Zero2Cool
3 years ago
I started watching the Week 6 matchup last night. I made it through the first half. Some stuff I noticed.

[list]
  • Joe Buck and Troy Aikman were really annoying. Normally, I am good with Aikman, but that quarter he wouldn't shut up about changing stance in shotgun formation and repeatedly said he wouldn't talk about it until Brady was on the field.

  • The wind. Holy shit the wind was bad. You could see the hand towels flopping all over the place. The gamebook says the wind was NE 12mph. It seemed like more. Look at the angle of those trees. The ball fell off the tee on the kickoff. Temp: 88° F (31.1° C) Humidity: 48%, Wind: ENE 12 mph
  • Outdoor Weather: Cloudy, Wind Chill: 91
     image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content. image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content.

  • The Packers should not try any WR screens. Buccaneers sniff them out well.
  • The Packers cannot attempt a HB toss run. It does not work against this team.
  • Buccaneers played man coverage exclusively and Davante Adams was always getting open.
  • I think this was Davante Adams first game back from his hamstring injury.
  • Mike Evans was still recovering from ankle injury.
  • Kevin King did not play this game.
  • Buccaneers first three drives were stinkers.
  • Darius Shepard was in on offense.
  • The pick six was the most non-Aaron Rodgers throw I've seen in a long time. He just doesn't make those throws. He also starred Adams down from the moment the ball was snapped. Weird to see that kind of thing.
  • The offense just doesn't look the same as I've seen in the last month or two.
  • The 2nd Rodgers pick was tipped from Cartlon Davis who was covering Davante Adams. First time watching I thought Adams dropped it, but Davis tipped it.
  • Offense is basically responsible for the first 24 points scored in this game. They got them 10, and gave up 14.
  • The 2nd down pass to Marcedes Lewis -- if that is on target, it's 17 - 14 and probably a completely different game if Rodgers throws it on point. The next play was intentional grounding.
  • Packers can run between the tackles against Buccaneers with success. The toss runs are straight up failure.
  • Valdes-Scantling was open for a TD, but Rodgers over threw him. That would have put the score 17 - 21, but Rodgers takes sack on 3rd down and then Buccaneers walk down the field and make it 10 - 28 at half time.
  • Valdes-Scantling got open again for a TD, but Rodgers under threw him. That would have made the score going into halftime 17 - 28.

  • Starting OL for Packers
  • LT 69 D.Bakhtiari (Rick Wagner came in for Bakhtiari in 2nd half)
    LG 74 E.Jenkins
    C 63 C.Linsley
    RG 62 L.Patrick
    RT 77 B.Turner[/list]


    The Buccaneers offense didn't look threatening. If the Packers don't turn it over, the Buccaneers wouldn't have been able to run it so frequently.
    UserPostedImage
    wpr
    • wpr
    • Preferred Member
    3 years ago
    The Tampa game was very "unpacker-like". It was a perfect storm on things going wrong. Everywhere. Both sides of the ball. The weather. Everything. Adams and Clark finally returned after missing a few games. As you said no King. No Lazard.

    Just because GB played TB in week 6, this will not be the same two teams meeting again this week.
    UserPostedImage
    3 years ago
    Many "Packer" fans are worried about the game Sunday, because of what happened in Week 6. I've got a friend that knows the Packers football very well, but he is a huge "worry wart". He says, "they beat us 38-10, after a bye week". That's what has me a bit puzzled too, but up 10 zip, then get outscored 38 zip? What happened yesterday, happened yesterday.
    Zero2Cool
    3 years ago

    Many "Packer" fans are worried about the game Sunday, because of what happened in Week 6. I've got a friend that knows the Packers football very well, but he is a huge "worry wart". He says, "they beat us 38-10, after a bye week". That's what has me a bit puzzled too, but up 10 zip, then get outscored 38 zip? What happened yesterday, happened yesterday.

    Originally Posted by: packerfanoutwest 



    Watching the first half left me confident that the Packers can have a different outcome. I didn't notice much motion. I saw a lot of stretch runs and toss runs that (just my opinion) you shouldn't try against a fast LB crew. When the Packers ran North/South, they had success. Before the game was out of hand, Jamal Williams had a 20+ run.

    The team looked lethargic and with no energy. They punched themselves in the mouth and couldn't recover. I think the Buccaneers will be slower in the cold.
    UserPostedImage
    nerdmann
    3 years ago
    We dominated initially, but that's the game where I thought it deemed like they had a tell.

    They do have fast LBs, but we showed we can succeed. Whatever the tell was, stop doing that.

    These are games that Mike would have shit himself. We're with Matt now. Let's do this!
    “Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
    Zero2Cool
    3 years ago


    The Buccaneers played Man during week six. Do they commonly play man or commonly play zone? What is their strength? I NEEDS2NO!

     image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content.
    UserPostedImage
    Cheesey
    3 years ago
    This is a much different Packer team then it was in week six.
    I’m sure the Packers have watched the tape of that game, and figured out what went wrong.
    Plus, as was already stated by others, we have our WR crew healthy and rolling. That, and if Dillon is able to go, a three headed RB group that can make some big plays.
    I know some have said beating the Rams #1 defense wasn’t that big a deal because of who they played, but 16 games in the NFL, to have the #1 D is a pretty big deal. To do that for an entire season means you aren’t a slouch.
    UserPostedImage
    Mucky Tundra
    3 years ago
    Seems like once a year Green Bay craps the bed in a warm weather game down south. And to boot I think they were wearing their green jerseys. Tampas reminds me of the Packers last year. Very dependent on momentum shifts to get stops on D and can be feast or famine at times on offense.
    “Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”
    UserPostedImage
    "I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
    Fan Shout
    dfosterf (18h) : Maybe
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : Yes
    Zero2Cool (19h) : No.
    Mucky Tundra (21h) : End of a Degu-era
    dhazer (22h) : Steelers sign Patterson because of new kickoff rule interesting
    Zero2Cool (28-Mar) : Former #Packers TE Josiah Deguara is signing a 1-year deal with the Jaguars, per source.
    Zero2Cool (28-Mar) : They do not do it for "content sake".
    dfosterf (28-Mar) : For the record, I enjoy Beast and Mucky drafts
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Haha
    Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : No time for talking! Back to work beast!
    beast (27-Mar) : You saw only 4,201 of my mocks? 🥺 I think that means you missed more than half of them 😢
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : Does anyone know what Lambeau field improvements got put on hold? My guess would be for the 2025 draft
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : It's like listen, you made 4,201 mocks, no shit.
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Cuz during the draft "I had them mocked there!" as if it's amazing.
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : They're fun to do once in awhile. It's people who think they are "content" that annoy me.
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : Against tbd
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : Answer to your question is yes, it's a Thursday, will be the Chiefs aga
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : Luckily for all concerned, I don't post them. I did one, but that was like 25 mocks ago
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : NFL 2024 gonna start Sept 5th isn't it???
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Ugh... kids these days!
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : I'm gonna go do some more mock draft hell instead 🤪
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Did we do one of those prediction threads yet for 2024 season?
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : In my city, they are playing the nimby game, in order to keep some railroad tracks vs. 2 professional sports teams and a concert venue.
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : And/Or a city council, of which I haven't seen a good one in a very long time
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : That sounds like a Mayor, not a city.
    buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers halt scheduled 80mil upgrade of stadium until lease agreement talks are restarted
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : City of Green Bay puts Packers' Lambeau Field lease talks on hold
    buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers 1 of 3 teams to vote no on new kickoff rule.
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Packers sign another Kicker
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Lengthy explanation at PFF if you click the link
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Kickoff rules officially changed.ngthy explan
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : lol
    Cheesey (26-Mar) : 2009? No thanks! One open heart surgery is enough!
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Good for you!
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Yes. That's the one.
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Is that "Lady Dugan" per chance?
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Crystal?
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Please refresh my memory
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Alan posts. Crystal back in my life. It's 2009 all over again! Lol
    Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : BAH GAWD! THAT'S CHEESEYS MUSIC!
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Gutekunst said early stages of Jordan Love contract being discussed.
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Shouldn't be penalized cuz official screwed up
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Yeah, challenge until you are incorrect twice.
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Fining them is the goal, per the people who made the rule anyway.
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still waiting on the kickoff rule changes. Did hear yesterday that the touchback proposal will now be the 30 yard line, not the 35
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Probably speed of game issues with your proposal
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Hopefully the refs don't get in the habit of throwing flags on this
    beast (25-Mar) : I think when it comes to Challenges should get two strikes, so unlimited challenges as long as they keep winning them, but 2 wrong then done
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still subject to the fines etc
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Yes, I should have been more specific. Also, they are now saying it would be a 15 yard penalty. That makes more sense .
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2023 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Falcons
    Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
    SAINTS
    Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
    LIONS
    Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
    Raiders
    Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
    RAMS
    Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
    CHARGERS
    Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
    CHIEFS
    Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
    BUCCANEERS
    Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
    Panthers
    Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
    Cowboys
    Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
    49ers
    Recent Topics
    3h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

    18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

    28-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    28-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    27-Mar / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    22-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.