Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
macbob  
#1 Posted : Thursday, June 16, 2011 7:04:18 PM(UTC)


Packers.com said:


Super Bowl XLV Rings

It’s more than a Super Bowl ring. It’s a ring for the ages.

The four Super Bowl titles, the 13 world championships, the 92 years of franchise history, and the path taken by the 2010 Packers to add this chapter – it’s all in there. It tells an entire tale that marries the storied tradition of the Packers with their singular achievement in 2010.

All in a ring? Sure, and it was done majestically and subtly at the same time.

The ring’s square crest is highlighted by the ‘G’ logo – gold on a green setting, of course – but the overwhelming sparkle of the diamond-dominant presentation shouldn’t distract from all it incorporates.

In each of the four corners of the crest, surrounding the ‘G,’ is a marquis-cut diamond, which is appropriately football-shaped, just like the one on top of the Vince Lombardi trophy. There are four of those for I, II, XXXI and XLV, the four trophies that will reside together forever in the team’s Hall of Fame.

The shape of the ‘G’ itself consists of 13 diamonds, one for each title dating back to 1929, and surrounding the entire crown are 92 diamonds, one for each year the Packers have been in existence.

That’s a lot cleverly depicted on the ring’s face, but that’s not the whole story. The sides, or flanks, of the ring continue the convergence of history with the present.

On the one side that’s personalized for each player with his last name, there’s both an impressively carved image of Lambeau Field – a tribute to the best venue and fans in the NFL – and the player’s jersey number. Each number is circled, just like those on the third jerseys introduced this past year that represent the attire of the first title team in ’29.

On the other side, underneath a logo-lettering of “PACKERS,” is a Lombardi Trophy, with the name of the iconic coach, the NFL shield, and an ‘XLV’ at the base, which captures both the specific game and a piece of its logo.

Together, the primary images on the two flanks can be interpreted as the Lombardi Trophy being brought back to its home, Lambeau Field, which was done two days after the Super Bowl victory in North Texas in front of more than 56,000 fans who braved sub-zero weather to share in the glory.

There’s additional context when the ring is seen next to the Packers’ previous three. It appears to fit with the collection, while simultaneously standing out as the one that represents more history than the others. Each ring builds on the previous one, with the latest edition the culmination, for now.

The saga wouldn’t be complete without the “inside story” to the 2010 season, which is, fittingly, on the inside of the ring.

The Packers became just the third team to win three road playoff games en route to a Super Bowl title, and the scores of all the postseason contests are engraved inside the ring.

Also engraved inside are the numeral “1” along with the words “Mind, Goal, Purpose and Heart” – the very number and terms veteran cornerback Charles Woodson employed with such fervor in his memorable postgame locker-room speech following the NFC Championship in Chicago.

The number and its accompanying characteristics also reflect the unity the Packers needed to overcome numerous obstacles in their path to the championship – countless injuries, back-to-back overtime losses, and a season on the brink with two weeks to go.

As for the basics, the Super Bowl XLV rings are made of platinum, with 18-karat yellow gold, and weigh a little over 4 ounces. The diamonds total 3.35 carats.

The boring basics, however, hardly matter when attempting to absorb a much larger picture, and this ring paints an exquisitely detailed and symbolic image.
wpr  
#2 Posted : Thursday, June 16, 2011 7:19:04 PM(UTC)
It is nice to see so much history worked into the the rings. I am disappointed. The 92 small diamonds don't spell "backed in".RollEyes
Kingkoopa  
#3 Posted : Thursday, June 16, 2011 7:24:36 PM(UTC)
Those rings are gorgeous!
Cheesey  
#4 Posted : Thursday, June 16, 2011 7:53:29 PM(UTC)
I dun do be wantin' me one of them there "bling blings!"
LOL!
(I'd even take a cubic zirconia one!!!)
nerdmann  
#5 Posted : Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:08:43 PM(UTC)
Cheesey said: Go to Quoted Post
I dun do be wantin' me one of them there "bling blings!"
LOL!
(I'd even take a cubic zirconia one!!!)




Ha ha, they should sell imitations! Hell, I'd buy one. LOL.
Wade  
#6 Posted : Friday, June 17, 2011 4:42:12 AM(UTC)
All in all, about what I expected. Sorry, but it's far too reminiscent of a bastard mating between a high school class ring and one of Mr T's pendants. And apart from the diamond solitaire (for a woman, obviously, a zillion diamonds just seems tacky and ostentatious to me.

A couple things I do like:
1. Platinum instead of gold.
2. The big G in the middle (even with the damn diamonds)
3. (and I really like this) The green highlighting the "G".That is major cool.
Wade  
#7 Posted : Friday, June 17, 2011 4:49:11 AM(UTC)
Odd. I just found this at CNNSI.com. It say's its a photo of Aaron Rodgers' ring.

Sure looks more like gold than platinum. And not as cool as the other pictures.


Rodgers' ring
macbob  
#8 Posted : Sunday, June 19, 2011 7:18:02 PM(UTC)
Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
Odd. I just found this at CNNSI.com. It say's its a photo of Aaron Rodgers' ring.

Sure looks more like gold than platinum. And not as cool as the other pictures.


Rodgers' ring


Think the photo you posted has poor lighting, etc. JSonline has a photo that looks like a similar/identical layout, but the colors, etc match the ones posted on Packers.com.

Here's the link to the JSonline photo.

http://www.jsonline.com/...s/packers/124050324.html
Cheesey  
#9 Posted : Monday, June 20, 2011 10:35:48 AM(UTC)
I like yellow gold better then platinum or white gold. The reason?
They look the same as if they were made out of plain silver.
Yerko  
#10 Posted : Monday, June 20, 2011 2:06:38 PM(UTC)
The rings are b-e-autiful and the fact that they hold that much story in them is amazing in itself. Wouldn't have know a small fact like "The shape of the ‘G’ itself consists of 13 diamonds, one for each title dating back to 1929, and surrounding the entire crown are 92 diamonds, one for each year the Packers have been in existence."

Awesome.
MassPackersFan  
#11 Posted : Saturday, June 25, 2011 3:05:04 PM(UTC)
One of my "sources" (heh) says that the rings cost $33,000 each.
istanbulpacker  
#12 Posted : Saturday, July 9, 2011 8:35:22 PM(UTC)
I guess it is a product of the times, but I think there are a few too many chip diamonds in the thing. Today, everything has to be "blinged" out. Sorry, not my style. I like the Super Bowl II ring I believe it is. Like the 3 diamonds with the green background. I do like the green that they put into the background of the G logo on the new one as well as what looks like a thin gold outline.

I do like all the symbolism too. Looks like someone took the time to make it meaningful. I respect that they included tradition into the design. I just don't like all the diamonds. Looks kinda tacky. It is big enough anyway so people will surely notice it. It's not like you need to go to extra effort to put all the flash on it too. Just one man's opinion, though. Since I didn't play for the team thus had no say in the ring design, who cares. If this is what they players like, it is their memento.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
uffda udfa (1h) : Some levity (1 NSFW word) https://twitter.com/PatMcAfeeShow/status/922208193819955200
Zero2Cool (5h) : @PGPackersNews Nelson, Adams and Cobb combined for five receptions. That's a formula for losing.
Zero2Cool (7h) : Do you see them not getting separation?
Cheesey (8h) : I'd like to see our WRs get some separation.
Zero2Cool (9h) : McCarthy protecting Hundley: "Our passing game, we can sit here and pick it apart all we want, but let's just blame it on head coach today."
Zero2Cool (9h) : Brett Hundley: "All I can say is don't write us off."
Zero2Cool (10h) : yinzer is als o 8 - 1 ...nice start dudes
Zero2Cool (10h) : dhazer is 8 - 1 this week so far in pick'em ...dayum
Zero2Cool (12h) : @Michael_Cohen13 Kevin King has been standing on the sideline for a few plays now. #Packers have been rolling with House and Hawkins. Not su
Zero2Cool (13h) : Justin McCray will start at LG today. What a ride for him the last two years. Arena Football League, free agent/unemployed, #Packers starter
yooperfan (13h) : Here we go gang!!!!
Zero2Cool (13h) : WR willie snead OUT
musccy (14h) : no worries...appreciate the pointers to find it.
Zero2Cool (14h) : i couldn't find another alternative so ... no more feed here
Zero2Cool (14h) : ya justin.tv flipped their vision on streaming
musccy (14h) : just did, thanks zero. Used to use Justin...not sure they work anymore
Zero2Cool (14h) : sure is gusty winds here i can hear the wind blowing an rain falling
Zero2Cool (14h) : check the top thread in packers forum section
musccy (14h) : Thanks zero!
Zero2Cool (14h) : http://goatdee.net/ <-- usually has good links
Zero2Cool (14h) : muscy, nerdmann usually has al ink in chat
Zero2Cool (14h) : and the tarp is back on the field
musccy (14h) : dumb question...ways to watch game online? Don't want to wait for game pass tonight
uffda udfa (15h) : Bakh and Bulaga active. Linsley, too. Lane Taylor, Out.
buckeyepackfan (15h) : Looks pretty clear after that
buckeyepackfan (15h) : Radar showing another band of showers probably within the hour.
Zero2Cool (15h) : and now its not raining at all
Zero2Cool (16h) : Right now it's just rain. Not light, not pouring.
buckeyepackfan (16h) : Light showers? Or heavy downpour?
Zero2Cool (16h) : It's raining in Green Bay.
uffda udfa (19h) : @RapSheet just said on NFL Morning the org does NOT expect 12 to return due to significant break.
uffda udfa (19h) : Schefter reporting doctors believe 12 can resume throwing in 6 weeks.
uffda udfa (20h) : Since 2008, Packers 3-7-1 without Aaron Rodgers
buckeyepackfan (20h) : The Brett Hundley era starts today! May it be a short successful run!
buckeyepackfan (20h) : GAMEDAY!
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / GoPack1984

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

22-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

22-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

21-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

21-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

21-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

21-Oct / Around The NFL / Dulak

21-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

21-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

Headlines