Zero2Cool
12 years ago

There is no truly logical opinion on how gay marriage should be disallowed. Only religious reasons exist, other reasons are purely idiotic. Refer to Rockmolder's post on page 1 for why.

Originally Posted by: Packers_Finland 



Refer to page kiss my ass.


But yea, there's apparently nothing further to debate on the subject. It's cut and dry and that's why it's a perfect world. :-"
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
12 years ago
Might as well allow marriages to trees. I mean, what's the argument against that?
Then, if your "wife" gets "dutch elms disease" and dies, you can collect life insurance......(AND have a winter's worth of firewood!)

I guess what it comes down to is, where do you draw the line? Seriously. What one person considers "normal", you may look at and say "WOW! That guys is CRAZY!"
(You know....like many of you feel about me.)
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
12 years ago
If someone wants to be enough of an idiot to call a tree his wife, I don't see why I should stand in his way. Why should marriage be a matter of allowed vs. disallowed? The only reason to disallow marriage is to preserve certain privileges and benefits of marriage, which I don't think should accrue to married people anyway.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
12 years ago

Might as well allow marriages to trees. I mean, what's the argument against that?
Then, if your "wife" gets "dutch elms disease" and dies, you can collect life insurance......(AND have a winter's worth of firewood!)

I guess what it comes down to is, where do you draw the line? Seriously. What one person considers "normal", you may look at and say "WOW! That guys is CRAZY!"
(You know....like many of you feel about me.)

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



I've always respected your religious view, but now you're comparing same sex marriage to a human being marrying a tree? That's awfully low Alan. I'm not sure if you're trying to be funny or not, hope you are.


You draw the line at HUMANS, it's not that complicated to understand this concept. If you are a HUMAN you should have the RIGHT to marry any other HUMAN. Very basic concept.


Besides, if you marry a tree, what's to say when one leaves?
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
12 years ago
Isn't the religious right's view on gay people kind of fucked up in the first place? There's actually scientific proof that the area of Soddom and Gomorrha being leveled by a small asteroid or comet and not some wrath of God as the old testament would have you believe. And even those scriptures were misconstrued. God wasn't condeming men lying down with men, he was condeming the wickedness of city life versus the more righteous life that Lot had previously led out in the rural area.

Anyway the stories of 2500 hundred years ago, should probably be to rest now as we venture forward into the 21st century. People can still believe what they want but our government was suppose to have separation from religion, but obviously we are not following what our founding fathers wanted.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
12 years ago



Besides, if you marry a tree, what's to say when one leaves?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 




Why don't you just make like a tree and get out of here.

UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
12 years ago



UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
12 years ago

If you are a HUMAN you should have the RIGHT to marry any other HUMAN. Very basic concept.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


Any other human who is capable of consent, anyway.

A tree is obviously not capable of consenting to marriage.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
12 years ago

Any other human who is capable of consent, anyway.

A tree is obviously not capable of consenting to marriage.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



I've never met a tree that said no ...
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
12 years ago

Any other human who is capable of consent, anyway.

A tree is obviously not capable of consenting to marriage.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Where do dryads fit into this? Can I marry a dryad?

(not that I'd want to, just asking)
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    dfosterf (9h) : For the record, I enjoy Beast and Mucky drafts
    Zero2Cool (16h) : Haha
    Mucky Tundra (17h) : No time for talking! Back to work beast!
    beast (18h) : You saw only 4,201 of my mocks? 🥺 I think that means you missed more than half of them 😢
    dfosterf (21h) : Does anyone know what Lambeau field improvements got put on hold? My guess would be for the 2025 draft
    Zero2Cool (23h) : It's like listen, you made 4,201 mocks, no shit.
    Zero2Cool (23h) : Cuz during the draft "I had them mocked there!" as if it's amazing.
    Zero2Cool (23h) : They're fun to do once in awhile. It's people who think they are "content" that annoy me.
    dfosterf (23h) : Against tbd
    dfosterf (23h) : Answer to your question is yes, it's a Thursday, will be the Chiefs aga
    dfosterf (23h) : Luckily for all concerned, I don't post them. I did one, but that was like 25 mocks ago
    Zero2Cool (23h) : NFL 2024 gonna start Sept 5th isn't it???
    Zero2Cool (23h) : Ugh... kids these days!
    dfosterf (23h) : I'm gonna go do some more mock draft hell instead 🤪
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Did we do one of those prediction threads yet for 2024 season?
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : In my city, they are playing the nimby game, in order to keep some railroad tracks vs. 2 professional sports teams and a concert venue.
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : And/Or a city council, of which I haven't seen a good one in a very long time
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : That sounds like a Mayor, not a city.
    buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers halt scheduled 80mil upgrade of stadium until lease agreement talks are restarted
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : City of Green Bay puts Packers' Lambeau Field lease talks on hold
    buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers 1 of 3 teams to vote no on new kickoff rule.
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Packers sign another Kicker
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Lengthy explanation at PFF if you click the link
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Kickoff rules officially changed.ngthy explan
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : lol
    Cheesey (26-Mar) : 2009? No thanks! One open heart surgery is enough!
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Good for you!
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Yes. That's the one.
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Is that "Lady Dugan" per chance?
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Crystal?
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Please refresh my memory
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Alan posts. Crystal back in my life. It's 2009 all over again! Lol
    Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : BAH GAWD! THAT'S CHEESEYS MUSIC!
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Gutekunst said early stages of Jordan Love contract being discussed.
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Shouldn't be penalized cuz official screwed up
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Yeah, challenge until you are incorrect twice.
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Fining them is the goal, per the people who made the rule anyway.
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still waiting on the kickoff rule changes. Did hear yesterday that the touchback proposal will now be the 30 yard line, not the 35
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Probably speed of game issues with your proposal
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Hopefully the refs don't get in the habit of throwing flags on this
    beast (25-Mar) : I think when it comes to Challenges should get two strikes, so unlimited challenges as long as they keep winning them, but 2 wrong then done
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still subject to the fines etc
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Yes, I should have been more specific. Also, they are now saying it would be a 15 yard penalty. That makes more sense .
    beast (25-Mar) : Simply fined in the week to follow
    beast (25-Mar) : I agree with one NFL official, it'll probably be like some of the helmets hits, not really called by the refs on the field but simply fined
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Hip drop is not. Super confusing. Referees job is harder
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Swivel hip drop is banned
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : The hip drop enforcement will be in the form of fines, etc. Not flags
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : A major foul will be enforced on the offense if there are offsetting penalties in a change of possession situation
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Teams will receive a 3rd challenge if 1 was successful. Previously, it took 2
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2023 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Falcons
    Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
    SAINTS
    Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
    LIONS
    Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
    Raiders
    Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
    RAMS
    Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
    CHARGERS
    Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
    CHIEFS
    Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
    BUCCANEERS
    Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
    Panthers
    Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
    Cowboys
    Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
    49ers
    Recent Topics
    9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    21h / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    24-Mar / Around The NFL / dhazer

    24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    22-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.