Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
11 years ago

First, I don't really know all the details to this, but it seems odd to me how this punishment was levied so harshly to Penn State. I agree with the 98-2011 wins being removed, the four year bowl ban, but the 60 million dollar fine doesn't make much sense to me.

WOW! I just looked this up to get more information to base an opinion on and came across this. "NCAA president Mark Emmert didn't punish former president Graham Spanier, former athletic director Tim Curley or former vice president Gary Schultz at all during Monday's dog-and-pony-show press conference in Indianapolis."


Sandusky, Paterno, Curley and Schultz are the ones who should be punished.


Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



1. The 60 million is there because the NCAA wants it to hurt where administrators and those who pay them are going to feel the pain, in pocketbook-decisions. Taking scholarships away, taking bowl games away, those aren't going to be felt by current administrators -- they'll just be able to blame the NCAA, after all. But a 60 million hit on the revenue side -- that means they are going to have to make a lot more visible decisions about a lot of funds. Whether it's in tuition increases, non-athletic-program cuts, or just uncomfortable questions from Pennsylvania legislators and their budget committees, the 60 million fine is going to be felt more personally by the successors to Spanier, Curley, Schultz, and Paterno. And that is what the NCAA/Big Ten wants.

(Now whether a mere 60 million is actually big enough to make things felt for the muckety-mucks at big-budget schools like PSU, that's another question. Part of the reason higher ed is in such straits today is that 60 million is actually relatively small potatoes for the bigger schools. It would bankrupt a school like mine, but the typical Big Ten university that annually spends well over a billion dollars? Belt-tightening, yes. Disaster? Maybe, maybe not.)

2. Didn't Emmert say something to the effect that the NCAA may still impose other sanctions after the criminal litigation runs its course re: Curley, Schultz, and, presumably, Spanier? As for Sandusky, I'm not sure, but he is being punsished about as severely short of a actual death penalty (does Pennsylvania have one for this sort of offense?) as he could be. I suppose the state of Pennsylvania could try some ex post facto confiscation of his wealth, but that would be, IMO, about as unconstitutional and unlawful as it gets: you don't get to change the rules of punishment for a crime for past crimes, no matter how heinous they are. And as for Paterno, he's beyond earthly punishment now and I'm not sure how much more can be done to trash his reputation than has already been done.


And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Zero2Cool
11 years ago
So the NCAA wants to punish those who succeed the last regime rather than that regime itself?

Who gets the $60 million? Does it get dispersed between the victims?
UserPostedImage
Porforis
11 years ago

First, I don't really know all the details to this, but it seems odd to me how this punishment was levied so harshly to Penn State. I agree with the 98-2011 wins being removed, the four year bowl ban, but the 60 million dollar fine doesn't make much sense to me.

WOW! I just looked this up to get more information to base an opinion on and came across this. "NCAA president Mark Emmert didn't punish former president Graham Spanier, former athletic director Tim Curley or former vice president Gary Schultz at all during Monday's dog-and-pony-show press conference in Indianapolis."


Sandusky, Paterno, Curley and Schultz are the ones who should be punished.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I'm pretty sure I heard on the radio (WTMJ) shortly after this broke that they would make a determination about sanctions against individual people now. When you think about it though, the NCAA really doesn't have power to punish individuals that aren't involved with athletic programs... This is 100% on the college to get rid of anybody that was involved with this crap.
Zero2Cool
11 years ago
Penn State has about $1 billion in debt.

Ya know what, just make an example of Penn State that if anything suspicious ever happening, report it to the authorities at the local police station. Shut Penn State down, permanently. Every Nitnany Lion has been tarnished, close it down. It's not worth trying to administer an adequate punishment, because there is none.

UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
11 years ago
Expect between 10 and 40% of current institutions of higher education to fail in the next 10 years or so. Expect another 40% or more to survive only in a form that is virtually unrecognizable compared to what they are today.

I don't know enough about Penn State to know where they are at, what they might offer that others might not, their academic strengths and weaknesses, etc.,, but if you're right that they are currently sitting on a billion of debt even before this PR/financial nightmare, they're going to have to guess right about a lot of things having absolutely nothing to do with football or sports.

There is going to be a *lot* of bloodletting in the next decade or so. (Regardless of whether the "great crash" happens to the economy as a whole or not.

Bank on it.


p.s. And many would consider me a flaming optimist.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Nonstopdrivel
11 years ago
It's threads like these that are one of the main reasons I don't come here much anymore. The vitriol spilled here is just wearing after a while. It makes me wonder what you guys say about me behind my back.

One thing being in Iraq did for me -- it really cured me of my holier-than-thou attitude. I tried as hard as I could not to be tainted by some of the stuff that was going on, and it ended up affecting even me in ways that just scared me. So I no longer have the idea that "I could never do that." Any human, anywhere, any time is capable of committing acts of unspeakable evil, sometimes almost without realizing it. Standing in judgement doesn't give you the moral high ground. It just makes your own pedestal that much more precarious.

Self-righteousness is just a form of pride, and they say pride was the original and worst sin.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
11 years ago

It's threads like these that are one of the main reasons I don't come here much anymore. The vitriol spilled here is just wearing after a while. It makes me wonder what you guys say about me behind my back.

One thing being in Iraq did for me -- it really cured me of my holier-than-thou attitude. I tried as hard as I could not to be tainted by some of the stuff that was going on, and it ended up affecting even me in ways that just scared me. So I no longer have the idea that "I could never do that." Any human, anywhere, any time is capable of committing acts of unspeakable evil, sometimes almost without realizing it. Standing in judgement doesn't give you the moral high ground. It just makes your own pedestal that much more precarious.

Self-righteousness is just a form of pride, and they say pride was the original and worst sin.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



You don't come around here anymore because everyone here has been cured in their grammatical ways. 🙂

And Rourke, you don't have to open these threads bud, lol.


I *think* I know what you're saying by "i could never do that". I remember people saying if they were married to Elin Nordegren they would never even consider the notion of cheating on her. How do they know that dating someone so voluptuous doesn't give them a big ego that they can do anyone without any consequences and thus feel superior to being caught?

We often don't know our limits until presented with situations of temptation.


UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
11 years ago
Well, certainly we judge too easily and too often. Rourke, you're correct on that. Though I'm not sure there's more judgmentalism here on PH than elsewhere in today's society, If anything, there's less than average.

That doesn't make what we do right. It's never a defense to say "others are worse" or "everyone does it."

I don't know if all of us are evil or capable of evil acts under the "right circumstances". I do believe we are all fallen, but that's not the same thing. And because we are fallen, we ought to claim righteousness we don't have.

But we can still condemn evil acts. What Sandusky did was evil. And, IMO, what Paterno, et al, did was even more evil.

Does that mean Sandusky is an evil man or that Paterno is a more evil man. No. Only God knows that. Only God has the ability to rank our evil characters.

Unfortunately, however, part of our being fallen is that we're always going to be susceptible to the sinful act of judgment when we encounter acts we consider especially evil. Should we get vitriolic toward Paterno, call him names, tell him to burn in hell? No. (Well, as a Christian, I shouldn't, anyway.) But part of being fallen means that not only will we be tempted to judge where we shouldn't, we will.

So, IMO, we should no more judge others judgmentalism than we should judge what they are judging. Point out, again that they are judging and taking God's task for their own? Yes. Refuse to associate with them, that, too, is within our power. But set ourselves above them? No.

There's Jesus. And there's the rest of us. And that's the only "relative degree of character" that should matter to us.

IMO.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Pack93z
11 years ago

Just when things start to quiet down just a bit for the university.. they make a bad decision and are going to be pounded yet again in the court of public opinion.

Why foot the bill for the two at the head of this story, but not for the one that out of the people in the know did the most to stop this?

No matter the answer.. they are going to be grilled over it.


While Penn State continues to pay the legal expenses of former university officials Gary Shultz and Tim Curley, it is not footing the bills for a key witness against Jerry Sandusky at his child sex abuse trial, Mike McQueary, NBC News has learned.

Schultz, a former senior vice president at Penn State, and Curley, the former athletic coordinator, are accused of lying to a grand jury about what they knew of sex abuse allegations against Sandusky. Their case faced its first test in court on Thursday, when defense lawyers argued that the charges should be dismissed.

McQueary, a former Penn State assistant coach, testified before a grand jury and at Sandusky’s trial that he saw Sandusky raping a boy as young as 10 in a locker room shower at Penn State in 2001. McQueary testified that he reported the incident to Joe Paterno, Penn State’s legendary former football coach, and later spoke to Tim Curley and Gary Schultz, a meeting that according to McQueary’s testimony took 15 minutes.

Read More... 


"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Formo
11 years ago

Just when things start to quiet down just a bit for the university.. they make a bad decision and are going to be pounded yet again in the court of public opinion.

Why foot the bill for the two at the head of this story, but not for the one that out of the people in the know did the most to stop this?

No matter the answer.. they are going to be grilled over it.


Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



I guess it's all relative.. but did the most?! Really?! So you walk in on one of your bosses close friends raping a 10 year old boy.. What do you do? You run straight to your boss? Or do you call 911? Or wait, even better.. You STOP THE FUCKING RAPE ASAP! I can't imagine being that poor kid. Getting sodomized or whatever happened to be the case and all of a sudden it gets interrupted by another coach who is significantly stronger than your assaulter. Hopes high that he'll stop this living Hell from continuing. What does McQueary do? Exchanges a few words and then WALKS AWAY. Of course, to make matters worse, he doesn't even call the PROPER authorities, he tells JoePa.

Yeah, JoePa and the idiots above him jacked up big time. I'm not saying they didn't. But McQueary.. He's got a special place in Hell right next to Sandirtbag.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Fan Shout
dfosterf (15h) : Maybe
Mucky Tundra (15h) : Yes
Zero2Cool (16h) : No.
Mucky Tundra (18h) : End of a Degu-era
dhazer (19h) : Steelers sign Patterson because of new kickoff rule interesting
Zero2Cool (22h) : Former #Packers TE Josiah Deguara is signing a 1-year deal with the Jaguars, per source.
Zero2Cool (23h) : They do not do it for "content sake".
dfosterf (28-Mar) : For the record, I enjoy Beast and Mucky drafts
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Haha
Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : No time for talking! Back to work beast!
beast (27-Mar) : You saw only 4,201 of my mocks? 🥺 I think that means you missed more than half of them 😢
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Does anyone know what Lambeau field improvements got put on hold? My guess would be for the 2025 draft
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : It's like listen, you made 4,201 mocks, no shit.
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Cuz during the draft "I had them mocked there!" as if it's amazing.
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : They're fun to do once in awhile. It's people who think they are "content" that annoy me.
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Against tbd
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Answer to your question is yes, it's a Thursday, will be the Chiefs aga
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Luckily for all concerned, I don't post them. I did one, but that was like 25 mocks ago
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : NFL 2024 gonna start Sept 5th isn't it???
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Ugh... kids these days!
dfosterf (27-Mar) : I'm gonna go do some more mock draft hell instead 🤪
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Did we do one of those prediction threads yet for 2024 season?
dfosterf (27-Mar) : In my city, they are playing the nimby game, in order to keep some railroad tracks vs. 2 professional sports teams and a concert venue.
dfosterf (27-Mar) : And/Or a city council, of which I haven't seen a good one in a very long time
dfosterf (27-Mar) : That sounds like a Mayor, not a city.
buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers halt scheduled 80mil upgrade of stadium until lease agreement talks are restarted
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : City of Green Bay puts Packers' Lambeau Field lease talks on hold
buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers 1 of 3 teams to vote no on new kickoff rule.
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Packers sign another Kicker
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Lengthy explanation at PFF if you click the link
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Kickoff rules officially changed.ngthy explan
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : lol
Cheesey (26-Mar) : 2009? No thanks! One open heart surgery is enough!
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Good for you!
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Yes. That's the one.
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Is that "Lady Dugan" per chance?
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Crystal?
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Please refresh my memory
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Alan posts. Crystal back in my life. It's 2009 all over again! Lol
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : BAH GAWD! THAT'S CHEESEYS MUSIC!
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Gutekunst said early stages of Jordan Love contract being discussed.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Shouldn't be penalized cuz official screwed up
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Yeah, challenge until you are incorrect twice.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Fining them is the goal, per the people who made the rule anyway.
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still waiting on the kickoff rule changes. Did hear yesterday that the touchback proposal will now be the 30 yard line, not the 35
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Probably speed of game issues with your proposal
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Hopefully the refs don't get in the habit of throwing flags on this
beast (25-Mar) : I think when it comes to Challenges should get two strikes, so unlimited challenges as long as they keep winning them, but 2 wrong then done
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still subject to the fines etc
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Yes, I should have been more specific. Also, they are now saying it would be a 15 yard penalty. That makes more sense .
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
19m / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

28-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

28-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.