dhazer
11 years ago

How about we ban guns except for the 3 weeks we get to hunt. That's the only time I take mine out. Can't ban cars or trucks because they are used daily. Catch the drift there Haze?

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



So all these people going on shooting sprees will wait for those 3 weeks? Do you not understand the only thing this gun ban is going to hurt is the law abiding citizen. Why is that so hard for you to understand. Look at the drug laws how good does that work? I can almost bet there are as many drug overdoses as there are gun killings a year. I just don't understand all this ban the guns thing. the drug dealers and gangsters and nuts are going to get guns one way or another but because of the laws you are telling us we can't defend ourselves.

The asshole running the country wants to be the dictator aka the next Hitler and this is another example.

look thru history at leaders that banned guns like Hitler, stalin, Mao, Kim, Castro and Qaddaffi, all wanted to run the world and now you can add Obama to the list. Think about this he bans assault rifles in the US but gives them to the drug Cartel in Mexico and must we forget he opened the borders to the illegals.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
11 years ago
If I believed in the death penalty, it would be for first degree murder ONLY. No exceptions.

I don't believe in it because there's not one government on the planet I'd trust enough to carry out a fair trial + an execution.

Conservatives claim they're for small government, yet believe a government can execute its citizens. That's yet another reason I'm proud to NOT call myself a conservative.

And for the record, my guns are not for killing animals. They're for killing people. People are a threat to me. Animals aren't. I'm not worried about a bunch of geese robbing my house to feed their meth habit. I'm not worried about some rabbits getting together and burning crosses on my lawn. I'm not worried about ducks blaming the recession on the wrong race/the wrong skin color/the wrong religion/the wrong sexual orientation/etc., and rounding up people and sending them to camps.

If you TRULY want to prevent genocide, keep guns in private hands. Anyone who says otherwise, I'd love to stick a history book up their ass.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
DakotaT
11 years ago

So all these people going on shooting sprees will wait for those 3 weeks? Do you not understand the only thing this gun ban is going to hurt is the law abiding citizen. Why is that so hard for you to understand. Look at the drug laws how good does that work? I can almost bet there are as many drug overdoses as there are gun killings a year. I just don't understand all this ban the guns thing. the drug dealers and gangsters and nuts are going to get guns one way or another but because of the laws you are telling us we can't defend ourselves.

The asshole running the country wants to be the dictator aka the next Hitler and this is another example.

look thru history at leaders that banned guns like Hitler, stalin, Mao, Kim, Castro and Qaddaffi, all wanted to run the world and now you can add Obama to the list. Think about this he bans assault rifles in the US but gives them to the drug Cartel in Mexico and must we forget he opened the borders to the illegals.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 



Haze, you're a perfect example of fright wing programming. I feel bad for you my friend. Obama has 4 years left as president - if you think he can accomplish what you just wrote, I'm sorry, but you are just a fool.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
11 years ago

If I believed in the death penalty, it would be for first degree murder ONLY. No exceptions.

I don't believe in it because there's not one government on the planet I'd trust enough to carry out a fair trial + an execution.

Conservatives claim they're for small government, yet believe a government can execute its citizens. That's yet another reason I'm proud to NOT call myself a conservative.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



My guess is, that most people today, that consider or call themselves conservatives are strictly talking Fiscal Conservatism, Not social conservatism.

Personally, I have no problem with the death penalty, provided the person has gone through the appeal process. There should be no life in prison. Life should be death. And that appeal process should not take 15 years.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Zero2Cool
11 years ago

Oh, let me boil it down for you: Your communication 'ability' (more like lack thereof) blow. You need to work on it. Also, while you are at it, try some people skills, too.

Originally Posted by: Formo 



Actually, you're the one who is lost. Did you even check into what I asked? Did you look into the most users date and find what happen on that date and correlate that to what I said about being FIRST on the internet with news REGARDLESS of accuracy? No sir, you did NOT! You just kept belittling my point because you lack the mental fortitude to grasp the psychological tactic that brainwashed you into thinking valid questions were posed from INACCURATE news sources/reports whom simply threw whatever online to get noticed FIRST!




I'm not convinced more Gun Control is the answer and I know having more guns is definitely not the answer. I mean, we have gun control already and it hasn't seemed to stop much. Then again, who's to say that with accuracy? Do we see many arrests spread country wide about an individual or members who have many assault weapons? Of course we don't because that's not what grabs peoples attention. Tragedy, now that's a different story. Tragedy gets most everyone's attention.
UserPostedImage
Formo
11 years ago

Actually, you're the one who is lost. Did you even check into what I asked? Did you look into the most users date and find what happen on that date and correlate that to what I said about being FIRST on the internet with news REGARDLESS of accuracy? No sir, you did NOT! You just kept belittling my point because you lack the mental fortitude to grasp the psychological tactic that brainwashed you into thinking valid questions were posed from INACCURATE news sources/reports whom simply threw whatever online to get noticed FIRST!

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Oh, forgot how you knew all the details. Glad you answered the questions.

Wait, you didn't because you can't. Either because you lack the comprehension of basic communication and/or tact to express it. Either way, you are the one looking like a jackass. 'Answering' my questions with obtuse, confusing, and plain incoherent responses won't get you far, bucko.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Zero2Cool
11 years ago

Oh, forgot how you knew all the details. Glad you answered the questions.

Wait, you didn't because you can't. Either because you lack the comprehension of basic communication and/or tact to express it. Either way, you are the one looking like a jackass. 'Answering' my questions with obtuse, confusing, and plain incoherent responses won't get you far, bucko.

Originally Posted by: Formo 



Continuing to put words in my mouth is only making you a jackass, buckwheat.

You want me to answer the questions he poses and I'm saying the questions arise from the multitude of inaccurate reports, because those reporting care not about accuracy but about being first on the 'breaking news'. Essentially, right back to my point of the author using the piss poor journalism in this country and leveraging brilliant wording to brainwash people thinking the many errant reports were FACTUAL reports, instead of being inaccurate shoot from the hip reports to get their article published first.

I really don't know how to make this more simple for you.

Shooting happens in school.
Reporters throw out anything they 'hear', claiming its from witnesses before verifying the information.
New reports come out after more information obtained.
Official report after confirmation of events while cross checking facts, etc...
Fella on the internet uses the multitude of flippant reports as facts that were retracted by Government and brainwashes weak minded folks who don't understand how to businesses try to monetize the internet.
Most people hate the Government, or at least dislike it strongly and don't trust it (no fault there) and that makes the aforementioned article more believable.


Does that make more sense? I ask because I care. I truly do not want people falling for this guy's manipulation. It really saddens me that people buy into that stuff. And I do not mean that in any negative connotation at all.
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
11 years ago
Does anyone have any specific proposed solutions that we might debate?

zombieslayer
11 years ago

Does anyone have any specific proposed solutions that we might debate?

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 



Sure. You want to fix things?

Work less hours. Spend more time with your family. Stop drugging up your kids. Get to know your neighbors.

Do those 4 things and violent crime will plummet. Guaranteed.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
dfosterf
11 years ago

Sure. You want to fix things?

Work less hours. Spend more time with your family. Stop drugging up your kids. Get to know your neighbors.

Do those 4 things and violent crime will plummet. Guaranteed.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



Will we get government compensation for that, or are you actually suggesting we do that for free?



Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Mucky Tundra (41m) : End of a Degu-era
    dhazer (1h) : Steelers sign Patterson because of new kickoff rule interesting
    Zero2Cool (4h) : Former #Packers TE Josiah Deguara is signing a 1-year deal with the Jaguars, per source.
    Zero2Cool (5h) : They do not do it for "content sake".
    dfosterf (15h) : For the record, I enjoy Beast and Mucky drafts
    Zero2Cool (22h) : Haha
    Mucky Tundra (23h) : No time for talking! Back to work beast!
    beast (23h) : You saw only 4,201 of my mocks? 🥺 I think that means you missed more than half of them 😢
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : Does anyone know what Lambeau field improvements got put on hold? My guess would be for the 2025 draft
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : It's like listen, you made 4,201 mocks, no shit.
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Cuz during the draft "I had them mocked there!" as if it's amazing.
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : They're fun to do once in awhile. It's people who think they are "content" that annoy me.
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : Against tbd
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : Answer to your question is yes, it's a Thursday, will be the Chiefs aga
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : Luckily for all concerned, I don't post them. I did one, but that was like 25 mocks ago
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : NFL 2024 gonna start Sept 5th isn't it???
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Ugh... kids these days!
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : I'm gonna go do some more mock draft hell instead 🤪
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Did we do one of those prediction threads yet for 2024 season?
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : In my city, they are playing the nimby game, in order to keep some railroad tracks vs. 2 professional sports teams and a concert venue.
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : And/Or a city council, of which I haven't seen a good one in a very long time
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : That sounds like a Mayor, not a city.
    buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers halt scheduled 80mil upgrade of stadium until lease agreement talks are restarted
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : City of Green Bay puts Packers' Lambeau Field lease talks on hold
    buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers 1 of 3 teams to vote no on new kickoff rule.
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Packers sign another Kicker
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Lengthy explanation at PFF if you click the link
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Kickoff rules officially changed.ngthy explan
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : lol
    Cheesey (26-Mar) : 2009? No thanks! One open heart surgery is enough!
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Good for you!
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Yes. That's the one.
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Is that "Lady Dugan" per chance?
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Crystal?
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Please refresh my memory
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Alan posts. Crystal back in my life. It's 2009 all over again! Lol
    Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : BAH GAWD! THAT'S CHEESEYS MUSIC!
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Gutekunst said early stages of Jordan Love contract being discussed.
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Shouldn't be penalized cuz official screwed up
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Yeah, challenge until you are incorrect twice.
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Fining them is the goal, per the people who made the rule anyway.
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still waiting on the kickoff rule changes. Did hear yesterday that the touchback proposal will now be the 30 yard line, not the 35
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Probably speed of game issues with your proposal
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Hopefully the refs don't get in the habit of throwing flags on this
    beast (25-Mar) : I think when it comes to Challenges should get two strikes, so unlimited challenges as long as they keep winning them, but 2 wrong then done
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still subject to the fines etc
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Yes, I should have been more specific. Also, they are now saying it would be a 15 yard penalty. That makes more sense .
    beast (25-Mar) : Simply fined in the week to follow
    beast (25-Mar) : I agree with one NFL official, it'll probably be like some of the helmets hits, not really called by the refs on the field but simply fined
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Hip drop is not. Super confusing. Referees job is harder
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2023 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Falcons
    Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
    SAINTS
    Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
    LIONS
    Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
    Raiders
    Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
    RAMS
    Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
    CHARGERS
    Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
    CHIEFS
    Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
    BUCCANEERS
    Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
    Panthers
    Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
    Cowboys
    Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
    49ers
    Recent Topics
    15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    27-Mar / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    24-Mar / Around The NFL / dhazer

    24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    22-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.