MintBaconDrivel
10 years ago

GREEN BAY — For most of last year and much of the offseason, they were grouped together. In fact, one opposing general manager, when asked about the Green Bay Packers being their typical uninvolved selves in unrestricted free agency this spring, replied simply, "They've got to sign 'The Big Three.'"

As it turned out, there were really only two priorities: Quarterback Aaron Rodgers, whose five-year, $110 million extension made him the NFL's highest-paid player in late April, and outside linebacker Clay Matthews, who received a five-year, $66 million extension about 10 days before Rodgers' payday.

The third amigo, of course, was supposed to be defensive lineman B.J. Raji. Not only does Raji have the same agent as Rodgers and Matthews — David Dunn of Athletes First — but like Matthews, he had one year left on his rookie contract. Unlike Matthews, Raji was reportedly told by the team that he wouldn't be getting an extension. Rather, according to NFL Network's Ian Rapoport , the Packers told Dunn that after some "early talks," they will let him play out the season.

Raji, the ninth overall pick in the 2009 NFL Draft, had expressed confidence just the week before at one of the team's open organized team activity practices, saying, "I'm not really going to talk contracts. Obviously, the Packers are a great organization and I'm sure they'll do right by me. I'll just leave it at that."Instead, despite having $16.3 million in salary-cap room after Rodgers' and Matthews' deals, the Packers instead signed safety Morgan Burnett to a four-year, $24.75 million extension that included an $8.25 million signing bonus and ties Burnett to the Packers through the 2017 season. Raji, meanwhile, will have to prove he's worth a big contract; he'd also be a candidate for the franchise tag, which for 2013 was $11.175 million for defensive ends and $8.45 million for defensive tackles.

Whatever the case, the Packers need Raji to tilt the field for them. The defense has been criticized for not being physical enough, and that starts up front. The question is whether the Packers will get a disgruntled Raji, who's upset at Burnett skipping him in the contract line, or a motivated Raji, intent on cashing in — with the Packers or elsewhere.

The way he sounded last month, Raji could be the latter.

"I'm just raring to go," he said during OTAs. "Anytime a season you win your division for the second straight year and you end up losing in the divisional round, especially with the expectations we have here, it's never a good feeling. I had some time to get off and come back with the mentality that I want to dominate like I have in the past. I'm going to help this defense play great defense every game."

Raji said defensive line coach Mike Trgovac and head coach Mike McCarthy both told him he played better in 2012 than he did in 2011, even though he was chosen for his first Pro Bowl team in 2011 and his statistics didn't indicate it (zero sacks, 45 tackles). He led the linemen in snaps (768) despite missing two games with an ankle injury. He did have 25 quarterback hurries, according to ProFootballFocus.com.

"I did not have a sack last year but according to Trgo and Coach McCarthy, they felt last year was probably one of my best pass-rushing years. So go figure," Raji said. "Obviously, I'd love to have the numbers to support that. But ultimately, I'm just about winning. Hopefully, I can help us win next year by having some more sacks."

Part of the Packers' plan to make Raji more productive, as has been the case in previous seasons, is to actually cut back on his snaps. That's been a talking point for three years running, though, and it hasn't happened with any consistency.

Now, though, the coaches feel that the addition of first-round pick Datone Jones and the emergence of Mike Neal will give them more options in their sub packages, and Raji could also get a breather on base downs, even with Jerel Worthy unlikely to be back until midseason after tearing the anterior cruciate ligament in his knee in the regular-season finale. Veterans C.J. Wilson and Ryan Pickett are early-down mainstays, with second-year man Mike Daniels, fourth-round pick Josh Boyd and a reinstated Johnny Jolly also factoring in.

"It's a little early to talk about depth charts, but those are guys that are going to fighting for those positions," Trgovac said.

At the same time, Raji isn't one to ask out of a game, and he'll have to balance his desire to play a lot to prove himself worthy of a big deal with the idea that he might be more productive on the downs he does play if he rests more. Either way, Trgovac made it clear to Raji the most glaring need for improvement.

"I actually sat down with Trgo at the end of the season and went down the list of things he felt we needed to improve on and one of the things he emphasized is I have to do a lot better job of shedding blocks, particularly in this league of guys who latch onto you," Raji said. "Obviously, as the season goes down for whatever reason, he thought I wasn't getting off blocks like I have in the past and that's one of the things I've emphasized this offseason is shedding blocks and making more plays."

If he does, the Packers will benefit, and so will Raji's wallet.

Jason Wilde  wrote:


OlHoss1884
10 years ago
This makes it sounds like he is aware of his inconsistency and I hope he picks it up a notch. With a deeper rotation on the line keeping everyone fresh I expect Raji, like the rest of the line, to play better.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits" --Albert Einstein
DarkaneRules
10 years ago
"Veterans C.J. Wilson and Ryan Pickett are early-down mainstays"

Why is CJ Wilson spoken of in this light in this article. I don't assume this for the upcoming season do yall? I assume open competition at CJs spot and for him to lose it.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
beast
10 years ago

"Veterans C.J. Wilson and Ryan Pickett are early-down mainstays"

Why is CJ Wilson spoken of in this light in this article. I don't assume this for the upcoming season do yall? I assume open competition at CJs spot and for him to lose it.

Originally Posted by: DarkaneRules 



I say it depends on scheme and play calls (and players).

Last year the Packers DL often opened up with all 3 DL playing two gap which is run clogging defense. Pickett, Raji and Wilson were clearly the best 3 at playing two gap of the DL last year. If Capers opens up like again then I think Wilson could potentially start like that again.

Personally I'm kind of hoping Capers goes away from that some because it seems to be a weakness for linemen not named Pickett and Wilson (yes that include Raji IMO)

Of course (young) Jolly was better at it than Wilson... and Capers might change it up and do something different. Also while I don't think Jones strength is two gap, if he's able to get through the gaps well that might make Capers want to change as well.

Long story short, I think it depends on scheme, and who's the best at that scheme. If it's two gap scheme then I think Wilson is in the running.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (1h) : Maybe
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yes
Zero2Cool (2h) : No.
Mucky Tundra (5h) : End of a Degu-era
dhazer (5h) : Steelers sign Patterson because of new kickoff rule interesting
Zero2Cool (8h) : Former #Packers TE Josiah Deguara is signing a 1-year deal with the Jaguars, per source.
Zero2Cool (9h) : They do not do it for "content sake".
dfosterf (19h) : For the record, I enjoy Beast and Mucky drafts
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Haha
Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : No time for talking! Back to work beast!
beast (27-Mar) : You saw only 4,201 of my mocks? 🥺 I think that means you missed more than half of them 😢
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Does anyone know what Lambeau field improvements got put on hold? My guess would be for the 2025 draft
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : It's like listen, you made 4,201 mocks, no shit.
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Cuz during the draft "I had them mocked there!" as if it's amazing.
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : They're fun to do once in awhile. It's people who think they are "content" that annoy me.
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Against tbd
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Answer to your question is yes, it's a Thursday, will be the Chiefs aga
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Luckily for all concerned, I don't post them. I did one, but that was like 25 mocks ago
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : NFL 2024 gonna start Sept 5th isn't it???
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Ugh... kids these days!
dfosterf (27-Mar) : I'm gonna go do some more mock draft hell instead 🤪
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Did we do one of those prediction threads yet for 2024 season?
dfosterf (27-Mar) : In my city, they are playing the nimby game, in order to keep some railroad tracks vs. 2 professional sports teams and a concert venue.
dfosterf (27-Mar) : And/Or a city council, of which I haven't seen a good one in a very long time
dfosterf (27-Mar) : That sounds like a Mayor, not a city.
buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers halt scheduled 80mil upgrade of stadium until lease agreement talks are restarted
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : City of Green Bay puts Packers' Lambeau Field lease talks on hold
buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers 1 of 3 teams to vote no on new kickoff rule.
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Packers sign another Kicker
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Lengthy explanation at PFF if you click the link
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Kickoff rules officially changed.ngthy explan
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : lol
Cheesey (26-Mar) : 2009? No thanks! One open heart surgery is enough!
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Good for you!
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Yes. That's the one.
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Is that "Lady Dugan" per chance?
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Crystal?
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Please refresh my memory
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Alan posts. Crystal back in my life. It's 2009 all over again! Lol
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : BAH GAWD! THAT'S CHEESEYS MUSIC!
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Gutekunst said early stages of Jordan Love contract being discussed.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Shouldn't be penalized cuz official screwed up
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Yeah, challenge until you are incorrect twice.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Fining them is the goal, per the people who made the rule anyway.
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still waiting on the kickoff rule changes. Did hear yesterday that the touchback proposal will now be the 30 yard line, not the 35
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Probably speed of game issues with your proposal
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Hopefully the refs don't get in the habit of throwing flags on this
beast (25-Mar) : I think when it comes to Challenges should get two strikes, so unlimited challenges as long as they keep winning them, but 2 wrong then done
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still subject to the fines etc
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Yes, I should have been more specific. Also, they are now saying it would be a 15 yard penalty. That makes more sense .
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

24-Mar / Around The NFL / dhazer

24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.