Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, September 10, 2013 1:58:11 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2015

United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 670
Applause Received: 489
6 or 7 years ago or whatever it was, I was posting in a couple of other forums, and there was this big controversy. Should we use the highest first round pick we had in a long time before or since to take A.J. Hawk or Vernon Davis? As I recall, it was about 70/30 in favor of taking Hawk. I was in the minority, favoring Davis.

I'd like to know - as honestly as possible hahahaha - 1 where people in here stood in that debate back then, and 2 where they stand now in terms of taking Hawk over Davis.
Offline Dulak  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, September 10, 2013 2:24:24 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 1/19/2009(UTC)
Location: London, UK (from kenosha)
Applause Given: 296
Applause Received: 151
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
6 or 7 years ago or whatever it was, I was posting in a couple of other forums, and there was this big controversy. Should we use the highest first round pick we had in a long time before or since to take A.J. Hawk or Vernon Davis? As I recall, it was about 70/30 in favor of taking Hawk. I was in the minority, favoring Davis.

I'd like to know - as honestly as possible hahahaha - 1 where people in here stood in that debate back then, and 2 where they stand now in terms of taking Hawk over Davis.


IMO davis is the best WR out there and has been for awhile ... dude is a stud.

finley looks like he might make a comeback this year - wouldnt be surprised if he has some nice numbers also - I didnt follow the pack as closely back then so ...
Offline Zero2Cool  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, September 10, 2013 2:28:38 PM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,488
Applause Received: 4,008
I took my dog out of the fight because I was Al Davis'd with the freaky numbers VERNON Davis put up. I wasn't thrilled with A.J. Hawk, but he basically is what every said he was going to be. Everyone (sports brilliant folk that is) said that Hawk peaked already and was low risk. You knew what you'd get. Davis could be a star TE or a star athlete in underwear only.
Offline buckeyepackfan  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, September 10, 2013 2:37:14 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2014

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Lima, Ohio
Applause Given: 787
Applause Received: 802
Just another Ted Thompson F--k up!!!!
[duh] [duh] [duh] [duh] [duh] [duh]
another in a long length OF GM miscues, starting as far back as 1989..when.............................................................................................................................................................................................................
DAMNIT WE COULD HAVE HAD BARRY SANDERS!!!!!!!!!
Offline DoddPower  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, September 10, 2013 4:02:21 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2016FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2015

United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 3,413
Applause Received: 940
In hindsight, I would prefer V. Davis. Hawk is a solid player, but it's nice to get a rare athletic specimen when picking that high, imo. Decent to good linebackers can be found elsewhere. The truly elite athletes that are also good NFL players are rare and very tough to come by.
Offline nyrpack  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, September 10, 2013 4:15:50 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Location: long island, ny
Applause Given: 8
Applause Received: 113
coming out of school at ohio state, i was thrilled to land hawk, hes a good player that unfortunately didnt live up to the hype, but it could have been alot worse !!
Offline porky88  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, September 10, 2013 5:10:57 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2016Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2014PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2015

Joined: 4/26/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 253
Applause Received: 511
I would take Haloti Ngata over both.
thanks Post received 4 applause.
PackFanWithTwins on 9/10/2013(UTC), Bigbyfan on 9/10/2013(UTC), play2win on 9/11/2013(UTC), Wade on 9/11/2013(UTC)
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, September 10, 2013 8:00:07 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 26
Applause Received: 946
I've never taken sides on we should take this player or that. I would have been pleased with either.

Hawk has been exactly what he was seen as. The safest pick of the draft. Not the highest upside, but very little risk of being a failure. He was never expected to be Ray Lewis. He has been dependable, and he has been reasonably priced. He is not flashy, but the coaches say he is always where he is suppose to be. He is unselfish, he is like the FB of the defense. He takes on the lead blockers so others can make the play.

I am not sure how Davis would have fit into the offense. He definately had the talent, but that was a time when the offense was building the fab 5 WR group. TE was not a big part of the offense at that time, we were using them mostly for blocking with occasional routes.
Offline DoddPower  
#9 Posted : Tuesday, September 10, 2013 8:04:21 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2016FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2015

United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 3,413
Applause Received: 940
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
I've never taken sides on we should take this player or that. I would have been pleased with either.

Hawk has been exactly what he was seen as. The safest pick of the draft. Not the highest upside, but very little risk of being a failure. He was never expected to be Ray Lewis. He has been dependable, and he has been reasonably priced. He is not flashy, but the coaches say he is always where he is suppose to be. He is unselfish, he is like the FB of the defense. He takes on the lead blockers so others can make the play.

I am not sure how Davis would have fit into the offense. He definately had the talent, but that was a time when the offense was building the fab 5 WR group. TE was not a big part of the offense at that time, we were using them mostly for blocking with occasional routes.


A good coach would make someone as talented as Davis fit into their system. Also, drafting him would have probably changed some other moves as well, so it's hard to predict.
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#10 Posted : Tuesday, September 10, 2013 8:12:32 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 26
Applause Received: 946
DoddPower said: Go to Quoted Post
A good coach would make someone as talented as Davis fit into their system. Also, drafting him would have probably changed some other moves as well, so it's hard to predict.


True, but there is no telling what the team would look like today? If they took an offensive receiving threat, would they still have taken Jennings in the 2nd. Would they still have followed with Jones and Nelson the following years. The team would more than likely be completely different, and that could be better or worse. Nobody will ever know.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
uffda udfa (2h) : Hilarious reading below. I like Carter. Only guy who gets it.
uffda udfa (2h) : http://boards.dallascowboys.com/topic/71647-so-we-are-supposed-to-believe/#entry3978081
uffda udfa (3h) : Great news.
Zero2Cool (6h) : Jordy has "legitimate hope" to play, per @RobDemovsky.
Zero2Cool (7h) : Packers had one call on defense if called, no issue, wans't called. I didn't watch OL so dunno. I watched WR's
Zero2Cool (7h) : Dallas OL had some holds weren't called and 2 defensive holds, not called.
uffda udfa (7h) : I think the Pi vs just a holding call is a legit complaint. Terrible call.
GoPack1984 (7h) : Dallas can't complain about the officials. They got away with so many defensive holding calls.
uffda udfa (7h) : Dallas radio postgame: Dallas wins 7 out of 10 times.
uffda udfa (7h) : Brice led Pack w/ 6 tackles including the hardest of the game.
uffda udfa (7h) : Post game show said same thing. Everyone wondering how it didn't stay left.
Zero2Cool (8h) : Tornado warning forces players, fans to stay put at AT&T Stadium
Zero2Cool (8h) : Skip:More I see winning FG, more I see a very weird thing: It hooked hard left, then straightened out. Obviously no wind. Like meant to be
Zero2Cool (8h) : @RealSkipBayless: More I see winning FG, more I see a very weird thing: It hooked hard left, then straightened out. Obviously no wind. Like
uffda udfa (8h) : I don't believe Dallas is better than us. When Aaron is on we're the best.
beast (8h) : The huddle penalty was an odd one. Without Burnett and Nelson.
uffda udfa (8h) : Cowboys radio team initially called Crosby GW NO GOOD. Lol.
DarkaneRules (8h) : we beat an arguably better team at their place without morgan burnett. still can't believe it
uffda udfa (8h) : Re emphasized we aren't the better team. Sour grapes are sweet to me.
uffda udfa (8h) : Complaining of PI call and huddle penalty.
uffda udfa (8h) : Dallas play by play guy said we aren't best team.
uffda udfa (9h) : NBC is off the air down here. This is an OTA broadcast signal.
uffda udfa (9h) : Tornado warnings in Dallas area. Sign of aPACKalypse to Cowboys fans.
uffda udfa (9h) : I agree with a Homer. That's true. It was actually 35 per Erin Andrews post game int.
Zero2Cool (9h) : @espnhomer 4th and 26 is dead replaced by 36 on 3rd and 20.
uffda udfa (9h) : Garrett said he'd never seen or heard of the 15 yard penalty huddle rule.
uffda udfa (9h) : *toe
uffda udfa (9h) : Called Cook's catch best The tie drag in NFL history.
uffda udfa (9h) : Cowboys a much better team but Packers have best player. 105.3 The Fan.
uffda udfa (9h) : Dallas sports radio is some great comedy. Hysterical.
uffda udfa (9h) : Funnest Packers game since SB win ironically in same stadium.
DarkaneRules (9h) : you're amongst friends/family then
uffda udfa (9h) : I hate Dallas and love Green bay.
coltonja (9h) : In the most non-weird way possible I wish we could get a feed of the locker room- only for these first few minutes of celebration after the
yinzer (9h) : Pittsburgh!!
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
16m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

6h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann


Packers Headlines