Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
2 Pages12>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Zero2Cool  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, September 17, 2013 6:01:04 AM(UTC)
Click Chat to chat with other fans during the game!

UserPostedImage
Green Bay Packers ( 1 - 1 )
  • Total Offense = 1st
  • Passing Offense = 2nd
  • Rushing Offense = 16th

  • Total Defense = 29th
  • Passing Defense = 30th
  • Rushing Defense = 17th

  • Points For = 33.0 (2nd)
  • Points Against = 27.0 (24th)



UserPostedImage
Cincinnati Bengals ( 1 - 1 )
  • Total Offense = 12th
  • Passing Offense = 13th
  • Rushing Offense = 18th

  • Total Defense = 7th
  • Passing Defense = 14th
  • Rushing Defense = 7th

  • Points For = 20.5 (19th)
  • Points Against = 17.0 (8th)
Dulak  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, September 17, 2013 6:25:10 AM(UTC)
Dont know much about the bengals this year; lol dont even know whom the QB is - obviously not carson palmer ...

We got to be worried playing them in their house?

User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, September 17, 2013 8:13:50 AM(UTC)
The Bengals are a decent team - touted by some as among the best in the AFC.

What worries me is that for the first time this season we DON'T face a team with a big time RB. That probably means emphasis is taken off stopping the run. I've seen the past couple of seasons games like that where relative nobody RBs have big games against us. Also, they throw to their TEs a lot, which always seems to be a problem for the Packers.

Also, their D is a LOT tougher than Washington's - although maybe not quite up to San Fran's.

I see this as a trap game. We should win, but it probably won't be easy.

I'll guess 31 - 24 Packers.
nerdmann  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, September 17, 2013 11:07:25 AM(UTC)
We're not as bad as we looked in the Niners game. MAYBE not as good as we looked against the Skins.

Should be a good test game.
Wade  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, September 17, 2013 1:10:01 PM(UTC)
Close game, but Pack goes 2-1.

I'll say 24-16.

AR: 3 more TDs.
Running game returns to its sputtering form.
Defense gives up under 275 yards and just one TD.
Mucky Tundra  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, September 17, 2013 1:15:32 PM(UTC)
Thank God the Bengals don't have a real QB to take advantage of all the weapons the Bengals have on offense. Green, Sanu, Eifert, Gresham, Bernard and Green-Ellis. Gonna need good safety play to deal with their TEs.
hardrocker950  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, September 17, 2013 1:40:20 PM(UTC)
The Bengals have looked pretty good so far this year. Dalton is a pretty good QB, but I wouldn't put him in my top 5 or anything like that. I could see this game as a struggle, but the Pack is the better team overall from what I have seen.They did a pretty good job getting through the Pittsburgh front line, so I hope protecting our QB is high on the priorities for the game plan.

My prediction Packers win 34-27
User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, September 17, 2013 2:33:01 PM(UTC)
Mucky Tundra said: Go to Quoted Post
Thank God the Bengals don't have a real QB to take advantage of all the weapons the Bengals have on offense. Green, Sanu, Eifert, Gresham, Bernard and Green-Ellis. Gonna need good safety play to deal with their TEs.


The last time I underrated Dalton he kicked the Badgers ass in Pasadena. The guy is not great, but he is decent, and he has tall quality receivers - often a problem for the Packers.

steveishere  
#9 Posted : Tuesday, September 17, 2013 2:38:14 PM(UTC)
This is a "should win" game but not a team we will roll over. Should be a good competitive match up and should be fun to watch unless you are one of those fans that gets depressed when every win isn't easy.
Mucky Tundra  
#10 Posted : Tuesday, September 17, 2013 2:44:19 PM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
The last time I underrated Dalton he kicked the Badgers ass in Pasadena. The guy is not great, but he is decent, and he has tall quality receivers - often a problem for the Packers.



He's a great QB in a "leadership" sense. He has the command of the offense and knows it and he's certainly not just a game manager. But as far as his arm strength, mechanics, accuracy etc, the dude just doesn't have it. Watched the first half of the Steelers-Bengals and the dude was just constantly overthrowing receivers. Nearly got one of them killed going over the middle because he couldn't get the ball down with the velocity needed.

TBH, I'm more worried about TEs in this matchup.
Laser Gunns  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, September 17, 2013 2:49:57 PM(UTC)
that DL is scary stuff.

the OTs better bring their A-game.

I don't think we can afford another "lull" from the offense.
buckeyepackfan  
#12 Posted : Tuesday, September 17, 2013 3:47:41 PM(UTC)
Do not underestimate The Bengals this year.

Their defense is one of the best in the AFC, if not the best, they gave one away on opening day against DA Bears, and are coming off an emotional win over The Steelers Monday night.

Packers once again get the advantage of playing a team coming off a short week, I'll take any advantage that is given.

Seems to me the stronger defensive teams are in the NFC, but this isn't The Bengals of even 5 years ago.

Rookie RB and The "law firm" Ben Jarvis Green Ellis make a pretty good rb tandem, Dalton has some weapons on the inside and outside.

Don't use The Steelers game as an example of what their offense can do.

I compare The Bengal/Steeler rivalry to The Packer/Bears, when those 2 teams play each other it's never pretty and usually turns into a slobber knocker.

I hope The Packers can come out firing on all cylinders and can put up points early.

I'm betting on this turning into a shootout.

Packers 45 Bengals 31
DarkaneRules  
#13 Posted : Tuesday, September 17, 2013 4:48:22 PM(UTC)
I think we lose a close one here guys. I have a lot of respect for their D. The key to this game for me: Us getting turnovers
Yerko  
#14 Posted : Thursday, September 19, 2013 12:59:52 PM(UTC)
I haven't been thoroughly impressed with the Bengals this season. I know it is early and kinks could still be getting worked out for each team but for awhile now, they have been crowned the ones to beat in the AFC. So far we have two samples, a loss against the Bears and a 20-10 win over the Steelers (I agree with the comparison of Bengals/Steelers to Packers/Bears).

While they do have the threat of of two tight ends, the only option outside of that is AJ Green (who is a damn monster). The Steelers had shown that he can be taken out of the game with multiple coverages. Chicago gambled and decided they were going to stick Tillman on him and Green ate him alive. I am hoping that the Packers do not leave him with single coverage because he will absolutely destroy any of our corners....destroy.

I don't think the Bengals run game is as much of a threat as it is being touted to be. Green-Ellis will get the Bengals a few yards here and there but never break the big one and Bernard is still a rookie. Bernard can break a big run at any time but so long as someone gets contact on him, he will go down.

Bengals defense will surely be tough. Not as tough as the 49ers though. We have Aaron Rodgers and Co so aside from the Bengals front, this defense isn't that scary. If the Packers can muster up a run game early (and not force it), we are going to see Cincinnati cave. That is where this Cincy defense is weak. If a team gets up on them or is beating them consistently, they can be easy to break.

I expect just that. Its not going to be a pretty game because I don't think our defense has the tools to stop this offense.

Packers take it 34-28.
Tezzy  
#15 Posted : Sunday, September 22, 2013 6:47:00 AM(UTC)
I think the middle pressure by the Bengals defense will be countered well by Rodgers and the receivers playing the sidelines as well as any receiving group in the league. Not looking for much from the run game as usual. Defensively, keeping a lid on their tight ends and not letting Green have the big play is going to be where my blood pressure is elevated. I think we can maintain our good run defense and can bring more QB pressure without having to worry about the run threat like we have weeks one and two. I think this game comes down to the last minutes of the 4th quarter.

Packers 27
Bengals 23
nerdmann  
#16 Posted : Sunday, September 22, 2013 7:08:42 AM(UTC)
They're gonna get Franklin the ball in space today.
Mucky Tundra  
#17 Posted : Sunday, September 22, 2013 7:15:51 AM(UTC)
Tough but winnable game on the road vs a playoff caliber team.

30-23
DarkaneRules  
#18 Posted : Sunday, September 22, 2013 1:23:15 PM(UTC)
DarkaneRules said: Go to Quoted Post
I think we lose a close one here guys. I have a lot of respect for their D. The key to this game for me: Us getting turnovers


Well we were on a roll there. Sucks to be right again. Once we took the lead I thought we would keep it. I think there will be some changes from this game. Thank god we have a bye!
Zero2Cool  
#19 Posted : Sunday, September 22, 2013 1:26:25 PM(UTC)
Losing James Starks hurt. Johnathan Franklin did good, but would have been better if he could have been backed up by Starks.
Losing Jermichael Finley hurts the offense big time. I wonder if any Finley haters will acknowledge that yet.
Losing Clay Matthews III didn't help things either.

Bottom line, Packers were outplayed and are simply not a contender.

@jasonjwilde Bakhtiari misses cut block at the most critical time. Johnson deflects pass intended for Jones. #Packers will lose 34-30.
nerdmann  
#20 Posted : Sunday, September 22, 2013 1:26:37 PM(UTC)
DarkaneRules said: Go to Quoted Post
Well we were on a roll there. Sucks to be right again. Once we took the lead I thought we would keep it. I think there will be some changes from this game. Thank god we have a bye!


If there were only 5:00 remaining after that bad INT by Rodgers, we win. Instead there were 15:00.

There's plenty we can learn from in this game.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
uffda udfa (13h) : Packers re-sign Christine Michael
Smokey (14h) : Easier said than fixed .
Nonstopdrivel (15h) : The web version lists who started the thread; the mobile version lists who last updated it.
Nonstopdrivel (15h) : Also, there's a weird disparity between the web version and online version of this site.
Nonstopdrivel (15h) : ;-)
Zero2Cool (21-Mar) : Packers wanted D. Ware in 2005. Thank you Cowboys!
Zero2Cool (21-Mar) : lol Rourke
Nonstopdrivel (21-Mar) : I HATE HATE HATE the way all threads get marked as read after viewing a few of them in one session. It's obnoxious.
Smokey (21-Mar) : Check out this site, NFLdraftscout.com , a great resource site.
Smokey (20-Mar) : Jared Cook signs with Raiders .
Smokey (20-Mar) : I did watch SB 45 on YouTube the other night, very eye opening .
Smokey (20-Mar) : Watching Spring Training Baseball, Nationals vs Yankees, very interesting .
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : B1G making some noise in that bracket
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : The more join, the more talk, the better. including John
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : no forum should need one person, we have others, speak up!
gbguy20 (19-Mar) : slow forum needs more uffda
Smokey (19-Mar) : There's always next year .
Smokey (18-Mar) : Virginia is still in it !
Smokey (18-Mar) : On Wisconsin
Zero2Cool (18-Mar) : Down goes Villanova!! Badgers!!!
Zero2Cool (18-Mar) : Might have went into your SPAM or JUNK folder??
yooperfan (18-Mar) : Funny I never got the invite
wpr (17-Mar) : Ignoring the Signing Bonus, Jones' base is only $725K above the vet min
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Not many seem interested, but I did invite those from last year.
dhazer (16-Mar) : no bracket challenge Kevin?
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Blame twitter on the /home page here lol
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Datone Jones Vikings deal $3.75M, $1.6M signing bonus, $1.5M salary, $31,250 per game active, $150K workout bonus, $1.25M sacks-pt incentive
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Nope. I don't care to read up on Vikings players. :-)
Bnoble (15-Mar) : Anyone see any numbers on Jones deal?
uffda udfa (14-Mar) : Datone to Minnesota.
musccy (14-Mar) : A more $ than I'd prefer, but still glad Elliott is back
uffda udfa (14-Mar) : Jayrone back on a one year 1.6 deal.
Zero2Cool (13-Mar) : Martellus Bennett Contract Details: New Packers TE has just $3.85M cap hit in 2017
Zero2Cool (13-Mar) : Packers have $28 under cap yet
hardrocker950 (13-Mar) : Walden would be a nice pickup...
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
23m / Announcements / Zero2Cool

25m / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / blueleopard

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

11h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

17-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

17-Mar / Around The NFL / Smokey

17-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

17-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

Headlines