Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
2 Pages<12

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Bigbyfan  
#21 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 5:58:35 PM(UTC)
The Packers almost have to sign a WR to replace him. Like someone already said, I cannot see the Packers only keeping 4 receivers on the roster.
PackFanWithTwins  
#22 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 6:07:07 PM(UTC)
Bigbyfan said: Go to Quoted Post
The Packers almost have to sign a WR to replace him. Like someone already said, I cannot see the Packers only keeping 4 receivers on the roster.


I don't know, unlike years past, they are not running empty nearly as often. And when they do, it is more TE involvement. Even if they don't get a WR, they still have 7 receiving options, not including RB.
nerdmann  
#23 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 7:12:54 PM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't know, unlike years past, they are not running empty nearly as often. And when they do, it is more TE involvement. Even if they don't get a WR, they still have 7 receiving options, not including RB.


Is Bostick that much of a drop off at WR compared to Ross?
DakotaT  
#24 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 7:16:43 PM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
so you are saying he is not Packer People? Pass. ;P



[-x

[mfing]
wpr  
#25 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 7:42:57 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
[-x

[mfing]


love you man. at least you read my posts. [happy]
play2win  
#26 Posted : Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:33:11 AM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Is Bostick that much of a drop off at WR compared to Ross?


I can't imagine how....
Zero2Cool  
#27 Posted : Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:39:51 AM(UTC)
Makes room for Josh Cribbs!!!
Bigbyfan  
#28 Posted : Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:36:31 PM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't know, unlike years past, they are not running empty nearly as often. And when they do, it is more TE involvement. Even if they don't get a WR, they still have 7 receiving options, not including RB.


What happens if 1 or 2 of our receivers get injured in a game? Do we just throw out any plays that require 3 receivers? You can't just throw a tightend over there and expect the same results. Tightends have enough to worry about memorizing their plays, doubt they know the routes of every receiver on every play. Also there's a difference between having a receiver run a certain route as planned, and having a tightend try to duplicate the same results. Going into a game with only four receivers is a bad move.

steveishere  
#29 Posted : Tuesday, September 24, 2013 3:00:03 PM(UTC)
Bigbyfan said: Go to Quoted Post
What happens if 1 or 2 of our receivers get injured in a game? Do we just throw out any plays that require 3 receivers? You can't just throw a tightend over there and expect the same results. Tightends have enough to worry about memorizing their plays, doubt they know the routes of every receiver on every play. Also there's a difference between having a receiver run a certain route as planned, and having a tightend try to duplicate the same results. Going into a game with only four receivers is a bad move.



If they lose 2 WRs they are going to do less 3+ WR stuff whether there's a Ross on the roster or not. They've been doing 95+% of their work with just 3 so far. Being shorthanded by 1 mostly useless WR for a single game won't make much difference.
cheeseheads123  
#30 Posted : Monday, September 30, 2013 9:59:05 AM(UTC)
Any news yet on a replacement?
wpr  
#31 Posted : Monday, September 30, 2013 10:25:55 AM(UTC)
cheeseheads123 said: Go to Quoted Post
Any news yet on a replacement?


Since they have not signed any one yet. It will be a promotion from the PS.

Either Charles Johnson or Myles White. Although White was pretty good in preseason and Johnson was injured, I say Johnson.
steveishere  
#32 Posted : Monday, September 30, 2013 12:58:24 PM(UTC)
They signed RB Michael Hill
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (4h) : Click the Clear link to force new files to load for style.
Smokey (13h) : A little yellow for contrast maybe ?
Zero2Cool (20h) : Thanks. Took about 16-20 hours.
wpr (23h) : looks great.
Zero2Cool (25-Feb) : avatars aren't displaying
Zero2Cool (25-Feb) : plain look
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Bnoble

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

26-Feb / Announcements / dhazer

22-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / shield4life

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Feb / Community Welcome! / wpr

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

19-Feb / Around The NFL / uffda udfa

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

17-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

17-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / warhawk

Headlines