Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
4 Pages<1234>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Bigbyfan  
#21 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 5:58:35 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 81
Applause Received: 224
The Packers almost have to sign a WR to replace him. Like someone already said, I cannot see the Packers only keeping 4 receivers on the roster.
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#22 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 6:07:07 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 26
Applause Received: 962
Bigbyfan said: Go to Quoted Post
The Packers almost have to sign a WR to replace him. Like someone already said, I cannot see the Packers only keeping 4 receivers on the roster.


I don't know, unlike years past, they are not running empty nearly as often. And when they do, it is more TE involvement. Even if they don't get a WR, they still have 7 receiving options, not including RB.
Offline nerdmann  
#23 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 7:12:54 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,415
Applause Received: 1,424
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't know, unlike years past, they are not running empty nearly as often. And when they do, it is more TE involvement. Even if they don't get a WR, they still have 7 receiving options, not including RB.


Is Bostick that much of a drop off at WR compared to Ross?
Offline DakotaT  
#24 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 7:16:43 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

United States
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1,049
Applause Received: 2,116
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
so you are saying he is not Packer People? Pass. ;P



[-x

[mfing]
Offline wpr  
#25 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 7:42:57 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 4,001
Applause Received: 2,052
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
[-x

[mfing]


love you man. at least you read my posts. [happy]
Offline play2win  
#26 Posted : Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:33:11 AM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 724
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Is Bostick that much of a drop off at WR compared to Ross?


I can't imagine how....
Offline Zero2Cool  
#27 Posted : Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:39:51 AM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,505
Applause Received: 4,066
Makes room for Josh Cribbs!!!
Offline Bigbyfan  
#28 Posted : Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:36:31 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 81
Applause Received: 224
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't know, unlike years past, they are not running empty nearly as often. And when they do, it is more TE involvement. Even if they don't get a WR, they still have 7 receiving options, not including RB.


What happens if 1 or 2 of our receivers get injured in a game? Do we just throw out any plays that require 3 receivers? You can't just throw a tightend over there and expect the same results. Tightends have enough to worry about memorizing their plays, doubt they know the routes of every receiver on every play. Also there's a difference between having a receiver run a certain route as planned, and having a tightend try to duplicate the same results. Going into a game with only four receivers is a bad move.

Offline steveishere  
#29 Posted : Tuesday, September 24, 2013 3:00:03 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 58
Applause Received: 1,763
Bigbyfan said: Go to Quoted Post
What happens if 1 or 2 of our receivers get injured in a game? Do we just throw out any plays that require 3 receivers? You can't just throw a tightend over there and expect the same results. Tightends have enough to worry about memorizing their plays, doubt they know the routes of every receiver on every play. Also there's a difference between having a receiver run a certain route as planned, and having a tightend try to duplicate the same results. Going into a game with only four receivers is a bad move.



If they lose 2 WRs they are going to do less 3+ WR stuff whether there's a Ross on the roster or not. They've been doing 95+% of their work with just 3 so far. Being shorthanded by 1 mostly useless WR for a single game won't make much difference.
Offline cheeseheads123  
#30 Posted : Monday, September 30, 2013 9:59:05 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 9/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 85
Applause Received: 180
Any news yet on a replacement?
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
uffda udfa (5m) : Need some strong sharp passionate voices on D. Daniels gives great quotes.
uffda udfa (5m) : Nick Perry seems to be the team leader as he was giving pregame speeches that seemed very uninspiring.
uffda udfa (6m) : Morgan and his 14 wonderlic. Ever hear him talk? Man, not a bright guy at all.
uffda udfa (7m) : Burnett needs to be replaced. That's our leader? Or one of them? No, thanks.
beast (1h) : For the secondary, I think Burnett/Haha are the leaders.
Smokey (2h) : GB needs a new motto : DEFENSE RULES ! , is intended to change the direction of the Packers focus moving forward .
Smokey (2h) : Thank You Zero.
Zero2Cool (2h) : Great reading a thread and seeing "defense rules" spammed in them all. Great reading material.
Smokey (2h) : DEFENSE RULES !
Zero2Cool (2h) : Think you need to defensive leaders. Front Seven and Secondary. We seem to lack both. Daniels is closest.
beast (2h) : Packers players had a right to complain when they were being bullied by Mike Daniels... just talking about Packers ;-) jk
Zero2Cool (3h) : It was the 26th largest margin since 1940. Feels much worse
Zero2Cool (3h) : thought it was biggest margin of victory in Conf Championship, I was mistaken.
Smokey (5h) : Wow ! The Packers got disrespected too !
Smokey (5h) : Hello ?
uffda udfa (6h) : Can't. MM burned them all.
Smokey (6h) : go pack go ?
wpr (6h) : Smokey AND Uffda, you both ca be placed in a timeout. Stop it.
Smokey (7h) : go pack go :)
Zero2Cool (7h) : STOP! Talk Packers or STFU. K thanks. :-)
uffda udfa (7h) : Ranting about everyone to stop talking Wolf while talking cooking appliances.
uffda udfa (7h) : I told you the truth. It upset you. U were hypocritical.
Smokey (8h) : yes I was, but he just ...
Zero2Cool (8h) : We all have the same ability to ignore someone. Exercise that. GO PACK GO!!!
Smokey (8h) : NOT YOUR FIGHT NONSTOP
Nonstopdrivel (8h) : ving again.
Nonstopdrivel (8h) : Calling him a bully? Telling him to leave? Seriously? This is the kind of shit that drove me away last time and is making me contemplate lea
Smokey (9h) : Be a good fellow and go pester another forum.
Smokey (9h) : It amazes me that you've remained in this forum for as long as you have.
Smokey (9h) : This is not your schoolyard to bully others, in fact I was that kid who stood up to the bully and kicked his ass.
Smokey (9h) : In the end the bully ended up in prison as everyone else grew up and moved on with their lives.
Smokey (9h) : I rate you with the hated schoolyard bully that tried to terrorize others to feel himself big.
Smokey (9h) : U2, it is obvious that you don't care if people like you or not. Well people don't.
uffda udfa (11h) : It's the same day every day at 1265. They crave sameness.
uffda udfa (11h) : Didn't care u were talking cooking just that u tried censoring GM talk.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
30m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Pack93z

36m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Pack93z

39m / Football Familiarity / Smokey

46m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Pack93z

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Fantasy Sports Talk / rabidgopher04

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

12h / Around The NFL / mojaveson


Packers Headlines