Welcome Guest! You can login or register.
Login or Register.
#21
Posted
:
Monday, September 23, 2013 5:58:35 PM(UTC)
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 83
Applause Received: 249
The Packers almost have to sign a WR to replace him. Like someone already said, I cannot see the Packers only keeping 4 receivers on the roster.
#22
Posted
:
Monday, September 23, 2013 6:07:07 PM(UTC)
Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 49
Applause Received: 1,127
Bigbyfan said: 
The Packers almost have to sign a WR to replace him. Like someone already said, I cannot see the Packers only keeping 4 receivers on the roster.
I don't know, unlike years past, they are not running empty nearly as often. And when they do, it is more TE involvement. Even if they don't get a WR, they still have 7 receiving options, not including RB.
#23
Posted
:
Monday, September 23, 2013 7:12:54 PM(UTC)
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,678
Applause Received: 1,464
PackFanWithTwins said: I don't know, unlike years past, they are not running empty nearly as often. And when they do, it is more TE involvement. Even if they don't get a WR, they still have 7 receiving options, not including RB.
Is Bostick that much of a drop off at WR compared to Ross?
#24
Posted
:
Monday, September 23, 2013 7:16:43 PM(UTC)
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1,069
Applause Received: 2,136
wpr said: so you are saying he is not Packer People? Pass. ;P
[-x
[mfing]
#25
Posted
:
Monday, September 23, 2013 7:42:57 PM(UTC)
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 4,186
Applause Received: 2,170
DakotaT said: [-x
[mfing]
love you man. at least you read my posts. [happy]
#26
Posted
:
Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:33:11 AM(UTC)
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 724
nerdmann said: Is Bostick that much of a drop off at WR compared to Ross?
I can't imagine how....
#27
Posted
:
Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:39:51 AM(UTC)
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,562
Applause Received: 4,229
Makes room for Josh Cribbs!!!
#28
Posted
:
Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:36:31 PM(UTC)
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 83
Applause Received: 249
PackFanWithTwins said: I don't know, unlike years past, they are not running empty nearly as often. And when they do, it is more TE involvement. Even if they don't get a WR, they still have 7 receiving options, not including RB.
What happens if 1 or 2 of our receivers get injured in a game? Do we just throw out any plays that require 3 receivers? You can't just throw a tightend over there and expect the same results. Tightends have enough to worry about memorizing their plays, doubt they know the routes of every receiver on every play. Also there's a difference between having a receiver run a certain route as planned, and having a tightend try to duplicate the same results. Going into a game with only four receivers is a bad move.
#29
Posted
:
Tuesday, September 24, 2013 3:00:03 PM(UTC)
Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 59
Applause Received: 1,813
Bigbyfan said: What happens if 1 or 2 of our receivers get injured in a game? Do we just throw out any plays that require 3 receivers? You can't just throw a tightend over there and expect the same results. Tightends have enough to worry about memorizing their plays, doubt they know the routes of every receiver on every play. Also there's a difference between having a receiver run a certain route as planned, and having a tightend try to duplicate the same results. Going into a game with only four receivers is a bad move.
If they lose 2 WRs they are going to do less 3+ WR stuff whether there's a Ross on the roster or not. They've been doing 95+% of their work with just 3 so far. Being shorthanded by 1 mostly useless WR for a single game won't make much difference.
#30
Posted
:
Monday, September 30, 2013 9:59:05 AM(UTC)
Joined: 9/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 85
Applause Received: 180
Any news yet on a replacement?
#31
Posted
:
Monday, September 30, 2013 10:25:55 AM(UTC)
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 4,186
Applause Received: 2,170
cheeseheads123 said: Any news yet on a replacement?
Since they have not signed any one yet. It will be a promotion from the PS.
Either Charles Johnson or Myles White. Although White was pretty good in preseason and Johnson was injured, I say Johnson.
#32
Posted
:
Monday, September 30, 2013 12:58:24 PM(UTC)
Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 59
Applause Received: 1,813
They signed RB Michael Hill
Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.