Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
2 Pages<12
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline DarkaneRules  
#11 Posted : Monday, October 7, 2013 9:55:26 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 334
Applause Received: 763
The Packers used the Lions aggressiveness against them. It was a good game plan.
Offline wpr  
#12 Posted : Monday, October 7, 2013 10:02:54 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 4,000
Applause Received: 2,049
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
Several times during this game I was reacquainted with a feeling I haven't had with a Packers RB since Ahman Green. Lacy looked so close to busting a huge gain on several occasions. With Green I got that impression a lot, with Lacy it's only a matter of time.

Side note, If McCarthy knew Lacy was 1 yard shy of 100 do you think he would have given him the ball rather than have Rodgers take a knee? I think he would have. I was kind of hoping he would after the Lions called the timeout after the knee but I understand why he punted.


no Mike does nothing to try and get personal accolades for players and he does nothing to that would rile up the other team generally speaking.
Offline sschind  
#13 Posted : Monday, October 7, 2013 8:08:47 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

United States
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN
Applause Given: 388
Applause Received: 812
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
no Mike does nothing to try and get personal accolades for players and he does nothing to that would rile up the other team generally speaking.


I disagree. First of all a run would not have riled up the the other team. It actually would have made more sense than taking the knee. If Lacy gains that yard we do not have to punt and Rodgers takes a knee on the next play.

Second, I think Mike McCarthy may have given Lacy the ball had he known he was only a yard short. McCarthy is big on having team support. You saw how bummed Lang was when he found out Lacy was a yard short. Had he gotten that yard the entire offense would have benefited. The OL knows what has been said about them not being able to run block. I know its only a yard but its a benchmark. 3 different 100 yard rushers in three weeks would have gone a long way to building up their confidence.

It's not like he would have been passing for a TD with 1 minute to go when you are up by 3 TDs already. That is out of Mike McCarthy character. Letting a RB have a chance at 100 yards by calling a play that 9 out of 10 coaches would have called anyway would make perfect sense and I think Mike McCarthy would have obliged.
Offline nerdmann  
#14 Posted : Tuesday, October 8, 2013 4:37:26 AM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,413
Applause Received: 1,424
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
I disagree. First of all a run would not have riled up the the other team. It actually would have made more sense than taking the knee. If Lacy gains that yard we do not have to punt and Rodgers takes a knee on the next play.

Second, I think Mike McCarthy may have given Lacy the ball had he known he was only a yard short. McCarthy is big on having team support. You saw how bummed Lang was when he found out Lacy was a yard short. Had he gotten that yard the entire offense would have benefited. The OL knows what has been said about them not being able to run block. I know its only a yard but its a benchmark. 3 different 100 yard rushers in three weeks would have gone a long way to building up their confidence.

It's not like he would have been passing for a TD with 1 minute to go when you are up by 3 TDs already. That is out of Mike McCarthy character. Letting a RB have a chance at 100 yards by calling a play that 9 out of 10 coaches would have called anyway would make perfect sense and I think Mike McCarthy would have obliged.


Mike and Aaron are big on statistics.
Offline wpr  
#15 Posted : Tuesday, October 8, 2013 5:27:01 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 4,000
Applause Received: 2,049
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
I disagree. First of all a run would not have riled up the the other team. It actually would have made more sense than taking the knee. If Lacy gains that yard we do not have to punt and Rodgers takes a knee on the next play.

Second, I think Mike McCarthy may have given Lacy the ball had he known he was only a yard short. McCarthy is big on having team support. You saw how bummed Lang was when he found out Lacy was a yard short. Had he gotten that yard the entire offense would have benefited. The OL knows what has been said about them not being able to run block. I know its only a yard but its a benchmark. 3 different 100 yard rushers in three weeks would have gone a long way to building up their confidence.

It's not like he would have been passing for a TD with 1 minute to go when you are up by 3 TDs already. That is out of Mike McCarthy character. Letting a RB have a chance at 100 yards by calling a play that 9 out of 10 coaches would have called anyway would make perfect sense and I think Mike McCarthy would have obliged.


Mike is all about the win period. If they lined up to run for 1 yard how would the Lions know that was their goal? Dirty Suh could have gone in and cut someone at the knees and ended up with a serious knee injury. With Aaron taking a knee that kept the Lions from hitting hard.
Offline wpr  
#16 Posted : Tuesday, October 8, 2013 5:33:28 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 4,000
Applause Received: 2,049
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Mike and Aaron are big on statistics.


if that is so why did they run the ball the last 4 times? BUSTED. Lets Box!
Offline steveishere  
#17 Posted : Tuesday, October 8, 2013 5:44:44 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 58
Applause Received: 1,763
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
if that is so why did they run the ball the last 4 times? BUSTED. Lets Box!


and sit Rodgers on the bench for a game when he had a shot at the TD record.
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#18 Posted : Tuesday, October 8, 2013 8:48:16 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 26
Applause Received: 962
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
I disagree. First of all a run would not have riled up the the other team. It actually would have made more sense than taking the knee. If Lacy gains that yard we do not have to punt and Rodgers takes a knee on the next play.


Not correct. It was 3rd & 7 when Rodgers took the knee. So Lacy would have needed to get at least 7 in order to not punt.
Offline sschind  
#19 Posted : Tuesday, October 8, 2013 10:54:41 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

United States
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN
Applause Given: 388
Applause Received: 812
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
Not correct. It was 3rd & 7 when Rodgers took the knee. So Lacy would have needed to get at least 7 in order to not punt.


Sorry, my mistake, I was thinking of the 1 yard needed for the 100 and got it mixed up with the distance needed.

Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
uffda udfa (now) : This is for NFL stuff. Not crock pots or crack pots.
uffda udfa (1m) : Shout is not back alley. Not your forum either.
Smokey (2m) : Cooking, or travel, or our favorite movie have every right in this forum.
Smokey (4m) : It is not, YOUR FORUM . Even politics is tolerated in the Back Ally .
uffda udfa (13m) : I love cooking but this is a Packers forum not Iron Chef.
Smokey (14m) : Anyone, man or woman, that can cook does not need to always depend upon others to cook their food for them.
Smokey (18m) : The greater majority of successful restaurants are owned/and run by Men.
Smokey (21m) : Making fun of the art of cooking only demonstrates a lack of sophistication.
Smokey (23m) : Most of the finest chefs in the world are men.
hardrocker950 (1h) : lol
uffda udfa (2h) : Best pressure cooker talk on the net!
hardrocker950 (3h) : Time to get the CB situation sorted out
Smokey (3h) : DON'T DELAY, JOIN TODAY !
musccy (5h) : Sorry, but no to shields. 9 mil better spent elsewhere.
uffda udfa (5h) : Sam Shields still having headaches but wants to continue playing.
uffda udfa (6h) : Not harsh. Another failure and playoff embarrassment.
uffda udfa (6h) : Aaron cried a little when asked about Jordy playing today.
GoPack1984 (6h) : Dismal season? I think that's too harsh.
uffda udfa (6h) : Packers should have never been 4-6. Dismal season.
GoPack1984 (6h) : ...with the current defense.
GoPack1984 (6h) : Good season. Great rebound from 4-6. Would have loved to have seen them go to the Super Bowl and win, but I don't know if that was realistic
uffda udfa (6h) : •thanks Shakespeare.
The_Green_Ninja (6h) : Mike at the end of the day is with the team every day and knows what is needed and not needed. Don't be surprised if Mike helps push the cha
Nonstopdrivel (6h) : Bated*
uffda udfa (6h) : It won't change until Ted is gone. I await that day with baited breath.
uffda udfa (6h) : Nobody has ever lost a championship game by as big of a margin as us. Title Town revolt.
uffda udfa (6h) : Did I hear wrong or was that the biggest beatdown in championship game history? Nice.
Nonstopdrivel (6h) : ndedly fill in all the holes on the roster.
Nonstopdrivel (7h) : I do get the same sort of complacent vibe from the Packers front office that cost Bill Polian his job. You can't rely on the QB to single-ha
The_Green_Ninja (7h) : Thomas Brady has been given tools his whole career. It's up to the Packers to start doing the same.
The_Green_Ninja (7h) : As much as I loved brett, Aaron is right. We need more tools and HE is the QB that deserves the tools
shield4life (7h) : & management
shield4life (7h) : Blame the coaching
The_Green_Ninja (7h) : This is near the same time Brett started saying the same stuff.
uffda udfa (7h) : That is exactly what Aaron is saying. We don't do what needs to be done to win. Same song over and over.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
7m / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

13m / Around The NFL / mojaveson

16m / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

49m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

5h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

6h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

8h / Announcements / wpr

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson


Packers Headlines