Green Bay Packers Forum
3 Pages123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Zero2Cool  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, October 15, 2013 8:12:30 AM(UTC)
Chat with fans during the game!


Green Bay Packers ( 3 - 2 )
  • Total Offense = 5th
  • Passing Offense = 4th
  • Rushing Offense = 5th

  • Total Defense = 16th
  • Passing Defense = 18th
  • Rushing Defense = 3rd

  • Points For = 27.4 (5th)
  • Points Against = 22.8 (17th)

UserPostedImage




Cleveland Browns ( 3 - 3 )
  • Total Offense = 24th
  • Passing Offense = 17th
  • Rushing Offense = 22nd

  • Total Defense = 7th
  • Passing Defense = 8th
  • Rushing Defense = 7th

  • Points For = 19.7 (24th)
  • Points Against = 20.8 (11th)

UserPostedImage
Sponsor
Offline beast  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, October 15, 2013 11:02:19 AM(UTC)

Browns defense numbers look pretty good. I still say let the Packers TE Finley and Bostick work at WR some... especially since the main reason Bostick seems to not get on the field is because of his lack of blocking skills and WR don't need to be as good of blockers as TEs do.

Also something I think is note worthy.

3 of the 4 Browns CBs are listed under 5'10"
3 of the 4 Browns S are listed under 6'

Boykins 6' 2"
Nelson 6' 3"
Bostick 6' 3"
Finley 6' 5"

Might be able to throw some jump balls. Also just thought of this, I'm sure the Packers want to stick with their run game but those 4 spread out with Lacy back there would be interesting combo.

Or take one off and put Quarless in as a blocker.
thanks Post received 5 applause.
Zero2Cool on 10/15/2013(UTC), nerdmann on 10/15/2013(UTC), play2win on 10/16/2013(UTC), gbguy20 on 10/16/2013(UTC), Dulak on 10/17/2013(UTC)
Offline DarkaneRules  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, October 16, 2013 5:39:36 AM(UTC)
Well if we make the Browns one dimensional this could be fun. We need to get pressure though.
Offline go.pack.go.  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, October 16, 2013 8:01:23 PM(UTC)
At least we don't have to worry about Trent Richardson.
Offline Jakest3r  
#5 Posted : Thursday, October 17, 2013 12:31:17 AM(UTC)
My only worry is covering TE Cameron over the middle, that guy can play football.
Offline Dulak  
#6 Posted : Thursday, October 17, 2013 3:31:34 AM(UTC)
Jakest3r said: Go to Quoted Post
My only worry is covering TE Cameron over the middle, that guy can play football.


I dont know much about the browns these days - used to be a easy win ...

I agree with beast - be interesting if we can use your TEs more as WRs ... why not. Hope jones and #18 have a quick recovery.

Funny our D is only rated what #16; what I have seen this year is our D is the one saving our bacon in all these games (or attempting too) - Now not perfect; dont get me wrong (our corners and especially our safetys really need to watch some film) (I Still dont know why we got rid of woodson; at least he watched film and studied these QBs and maybe that would rub off on some of these younger guys).

... I digress ...

like to see bostick out there; he looked ' decent' in preaseason.

Offline nerdmann  
#7 Posted : Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:17:37 AM(UTC)
Dulak said: Go to Quoted Post
I dont know much about the browns these days - used to be a easy win ...

I agree with beast - be interesting if we can use your TEs more as WRs ... why not. Hope jones and #18 have a quick recovery.

Funny our D is only rated what #16; what I have seen this year is our D is the one saving our bacon in all these games (or attempting too) - Now not perfect; dont get me wrong (our corners and especially our safetys really need to watch some film) (I Still dont know why we got rid of woodson; at least he watched film and studied these QBs and maybe that would rub off on some of these younger guys).

... I digress ...

like to see bostick out there; he looked ' decent' in preaseason.



The D has held up. Unlike the O, they are not stat whores.

Alot of the stats against the D came in garbage time.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#8 Posted : Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:31:16 AM(UTC)
Packers' injuries so bad, game-day roster may come up short. Crazy.
Offline DarkaneRules  
#9 Posted : Thursday, October 17, 2013 6:00:47 AM(UTC)
Yeah it has been a huge shock to the team. It is really going to be a team by committee for a while.
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#10 Posted : Thursday, October 17, 2013 7:27:48 AM(UTC)
No Problem - an easy win at home. The Packers offense comes to life similar to the Redskins game, even against a better defense - Rodgers has some new toys to play with. The young LBs do the job.

Packers 45 Browns 17
Offline wpr  
#11 Posted : Thursday, October 17, 2013 8:34:54 AM(UTC)
Hoping for Aaron to get the team to overcome the injury bug that has landed on them. Better teams have lost to weaker teams when they have so many players out.
Offline Tezzy  
#12 Posted : Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:08:50 AM(UTC)
Seeing what Fauria did against the Browns defense last week, I would love to see a monster game from Finley. Dreaming I know.
Offline buckeyepackfan  
#13 Posted : Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:13:32 AM(UTC)
I'll say it again,

The Browns Defense will be the best defense The Packers have faced this year.

Anybody thinking this is going to be an easy win, is probably going to be dissapointed.

The Packers need to pressure Weeden into mistakes, like he always seems to do.

Shut down the run and make them one-dimensional.

That's the key to beating The Browns.

I hope Special teams have taken notice of The Browns returner, he is well above average.

Advice....DO NOT KCIK THE BALL TO HIM!!!!!

THIS COULD TURN INTO ONE OF THOSE UGLY GAMES THAT COULD TURN ON A PUNT OR KO RETURN.

Packers 23 - Browns 9
Offline Tezzy  
#14 Posted : Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:17:13 AM(UTC)
Regarding the theme of red zone efficiency. Now is as good a chance to change that up a bit. Last 3 weeks Browns are giving up a TD 71% of opponent red zone trips.
Offline buckeyepackfan  
#15 Posted : Thursday, October 17, 2013 11:01:18 AM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
The D has held up. Unlike the O, they are not stat whores.

Alot of the stats against the D came in garbage time.


The Packers offense has operated pretty much as you wanted the last few weeks.

AND STILL YOU THROW OUT YOUR STUPID ASS SAYINGS!!!!

I'm gonna tell you right now, The Packers easiest road to success this weekend is to come out throwing the ball all over the park and jumping on a Browns team who will fold up and go quietly away if they find themselves down 14-21 points on the road.

You want to call it stat-whoring fine, just shows you 'rea 2 trick pony.

All you ever comment about is stat-whoring and T.O.P.

Neither that is true(stat whoring) or very relevant(T.O.P) to a Packer win from week to week.

2 rookie OLBr's, 1 Rookie (OT), 1 rookie DB all starting this week, add in 1 Rookie DE in the rotation and 9 other rookies who will play a big part on Special teams and filling in at times,

you get to use your FAVORITE TERM OF ALL TIME!!!!

How Many Times nerdman will you post it??????

[laughing] [laughing] [laughing] [laughing]
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Yerko

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884


Tweeter