Green Bay Packers Forum
6 Pages123>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Zero2Cool  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, October 29, 2013 4:31:25 AM(UTC)
Chat with fans during the game!


Green Bay Packers ( 5 - 2 )
    Total Offense = 2nd
    Passing Offense = 5th
    Rushing Offense = 3rd

    Total Defense = 11th
    Passing Defense = 21st
    Rushing Defense = 4th

    Points For = 30.3 (3rd)
    Points Against = 22.6 (16th)

UserPostedImage



Chicago Bears ( 4 - 3 )
  • Total Offense = 10th
  • Passing Offense = 11th
  • Rushing Offense = 14th

  • Total Defense = 27th
  • Passing Defense = 27th
  • Rushing Defense = 25th

  • Points For = 30.4 (2nd)
  • Points Against = 29.4 (29th)

UserPostedImage
Sponsor
Offline play2win  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, October 29, 2013 4:47:58 AM(UTC)
Bear week. MNF. Ohhhhh, this is going to be good!
Offline Dulak  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, October 29, 2013 6:02:26 AM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
Bear week. MNF. Ohhhhh, this is going to be good!


still a bit worried about our lack or receivers - dont think Ive seen bostick out there much; say we give him a go.
Offline warhawk  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, October 29, 2013 10:20:22 AM(UTC)
I doubt any other team is ranked in the top five in 3 of four "Totals" categories. That's pretty impressive.

I would like to think the pass D would be ranked higher if it weren't for jumping out to leads and giving up a lot of yards in the 4th quarter to teams that are passing it every down.

Then again, I would like to see GB stop teams in the 4th quarter with a mentality that they will not let teams back in the game. A must attitude when it gets to playoff football.





thanks Post received 2 applause.
nerdmann on 10/29/2013(UTC), RaiderPride on 10/30/2013(UTC)
Offline GermanGilbert  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, October 29, 2013 4:12:32 PM(UTC)
One of the lucky charms is in town, anything else than a blowout win would be really surprising [grin1]
Offline OlHoss1884  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, October 29, 2013 4:55:25 PM(UTC)
The Bears injuries on defense have made it difficult for them to stop the run up the middle. I see this one going a lot like the Vikings game.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
play2win on 10/30/2013(UTC)
Offline DarkaneRules  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, October 29, 2013 6:24:03 PM(UTC)
No win is sweeter than a win against the Bears.
thanks Post received 4 applause.
Dulak on 10/30/2013(UTC), wpr on 10/30/2013(UTC), play2win on 10/30/2013(UTC), pokethebear on 10/30/2013(UTC)
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, October 29, 2013 7:11:31 PM(UTC)
I don't think the Bears woulda come close to the Packers in Green Bay under any circumstances. However, I see the loss of Cutler as more of a negative to them than maybe some people do. Cutler's downside is huge, but he had the ability to get hot - and I see McCown as "just a guy" who got inspired when he was thrown in last week, but who will come down to earth this week.

The injuries are giving the Packers an opportunity to develop some players who wouldn't have had a chance - Lattimore, Quarless, Boykin, the young OLBs, etc. This will only make the Packers stronger going forward.

45-17 Packers
Offline sschind  
#9 Posted : Tuesday, October 29, 2013 8:00:34 PM(UTC)
DarkaneRules said: Go to Quoted Post
No win is sweeter than a win against the Bears.


I disagree. Wins over the vikings or cowboys are 100 X sweeter than wins over the Bears

thanks Post received 2 applause.
DakotaT on 10/29/2013(UTC), nerdmann on 10/29/2013(UTC)
Offline DakotaT  
#10 Posted : Tuesday, October 29, 2013 8:09:36 PM(UTC)
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
I disagree. Wins over the vikings or cowboys are 100 X sweeter than wins over the Bears



Yeah, nothing is sweeter than a Packer beatdown of the Vikings.
Offline DarkaneRules  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, October 29, 2013 8:31:26 PM(UTC)
Eh not for me. Not this year. I prefer the Vikings being more formidable.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
pokethebear on 10/30/2013(UTC), Reignman on 11/5/2013(UTC)
Offline porky88  
#12 Posted : Tuesday, October 29, 2013 9:05:23 PM(UTC)
Cutler always did struggle against Dom Capers' defense, so his absence could be a blessing in disguise for the Bears. Nonetheless, Chicago's defense is not very good this year. They struggle to defend the pass. They struggle to defend the run. Green Bay is doing both well.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Zero2Cool on 10/30/2013(UTC)
Offline Gaycandybacon  
#13 Posted : Wednesday, October 30, 2013 5:20:38 AM(UTC)
Dulak said: Go to Quoted Post
still a bit worried about our lack or receivers - dont think Ive seen bostick out there much; say we give him a go.


Really? you're worried after the 2 performances with only 1 starting caliber receiver available? I actually think Boykin is starting caliber, albeit we've faced the Vikings and Browns, but the guy is coming into his own.

I don't look at it as the lack of receivers when you have 3 running backs that can play. Plus when you got a Jordy Nelson it makes it easier.

We have the 2nd most offensive yards in the league, plus we have surprisingly only given up 17 sacks through 8 games. Which I have to think it was way way higher at this time last year.

After seeing we can win with backup recievers, Jarrett Boykin, Myles White, Andrew Quarless just to name a few. I feel pretty damn good with anyone on the field as long as long as we have Arod.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
texaspackerbacker on 10/30/2013(UTC), pokethebear on 10/30/2013(UTC)
Offline Gaycandybacon  
#14 Posted : Wednesday, October 30, 2013 5:24:07 AM(UTC)
porky88 said: Go to Quoted Post
Cutler always did struggle against Dom Capers' defense, so his absence could be a blessing in disguise for the Bears. Nonetheless, Chicago's defense is not very good this year. They struggle to defend the pass. They struggle to defend the run. Green Bay is doing both well.


Only win Cutler has beaten us in his career was in Week 3 on MNF in 2010. Cutler sucks against the blitz imo. That's what kills him. He has a better offensive line though, Mcclown has a better offensive line. It's gonna be tough to get pressure on the Bears without Matthews. Hopefully we get back Nick Perry this week. Mike Neal has struggled the past 2 weeks. Gonna be a tough game. For the first time in severalllll years the Bears offense is better than their defense. Which isn't a bad thing.
Offline wpr  
#15 Posted : Wednesday, October 30, 2013 5:42:34 AM(UTC)
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
I disagree. Wins over the vikings or cowboys are 100 X sweeter than wins over the Bears

It all depends on your perspective. South of the cheeseland border beating to Bears even if they are hapless is much better than beating the vikies even if that win is for the division title.

The crap I get from Bears fans even from grandmas is ridiculous. A couple of wins a year keeps them quiet. I have not heard a whisper since the Bears began their annual hibernation.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Yerko on 10/30/2013(UTC)
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
6 Pages123>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / isocleas2

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann


Tweeter