Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
4 Pages<1234>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
beast  
#41 Posted : Friday, November 1, 2013 9:36:14 PM(UTC)
Tezzy said: Go to Quoted Post
Marshall and Jeffery can both go up and get jump balls. That right there is why I always cringe playing against Cutler, even though we have the record to say otherwise against him. He is willing to just chuck it up and let the WR make a play, and they can. I do think the Trestman offense is more tailored to be able to succeed with a backup like Josh, so I don't expect their offense to be neutered by much. Like our focus so many games this year, stuff the run and go from there.


True, but Cutler is also willing to just chuck it up there and lett he DB make a plays as well, if I'm reading the stats right, Cutler throw 1 TD and 4 INTs in his last two match-ups with the Packers. ThumpUp
I think Woodson loved to play against Cutler for that reason.

As for Josh McCown, he might not be as talented as Cutler but he might be a better overall fit for Trestman offense because he's safer with the ball.

Both Cutler and McCown started one game against the Packers in 2011

09/25/2011 Cutler was 21 of 37 (56.8%) for 302 yards, 2 TD, 2 INT, 3 sacks, 3 rushes for 11 yards.

12/25/2011 (Christmas game) McCown was 19 of 28 (67.9%) for 242 yards with 1 TD and 2 INT, 0 sacks, also 8 runs for 38 yards


Cutler had one more TD, but McCown had a better %, advoided sacks and could run better. I'd say McCown had the better game numbers wise and they scored a couple more points under him than with Cutler.

hardrocker950  
#42 Posted : Friday, November 1, 2013 10:15:55 PM(UTC)
It is a unique fan base in this area (NE Iowa.) Most of the people here are Packers, Vikings, and Bears fans - and the Chicago fan base has grown a lot in the past few years with many moving from Illinois to get away from inner city life.

That aside, I can't really expect the Bears to be a huge challenge given they don't seem to have the depth to overcome the injury situation. No team wants to play the Pack with their starting QB out - don't blame them.

I see us dominating on both sides of the ball with Lacy having a big game - 120 yards and 2 TDs. Nelson and Boykin both have a big game, each finding the end zone. Rodgers goes 29 of 34 throws 3 touchdowns with 290 yards. Defense plays strong through 3 quarters with 3 turnovers and gives up points with soft coverage in garbage time.

Packers win 41-20
beast  
#43 Posted : Saturday, November 2, 2013 6:29:10 PM(UTC)


Bears sign DT Jay Ratliff
OlHoss1884  
#44 Posted : Sunday, November 3, 2013 6:17:54 AM(UTC)
NFL Network reports Ratliffe won't be active this week.

Cutler has had bad games against us but mostly because he tries to force to much...something he has done for years in Chicago with no weapons and terrible OC's to go with his bad line. This year the line is better and he's got Marshall, Bennet and Jeffrey in addition to Forte. Cutler being out hurts them but they hve a smart, offensive-minded coach who can make due with backup, especially against a secondary that still has a lot of coverage lapses.

The issue for the Bears is that they injury plague has finally hit their defense and they have no beef up the middle, just when we have a running game going. I wouldn't be at all surprised to see us rack up 200 on the ground Monday night. In addition, their secondary hits hard and forces turnovers but they aren't especially good in coverage, something that will hurt them defensing in the red zone. ESPECIALLY if the pass rush is worn down from a 12 or 14 play drive like the ones last week.

I see the Packers getting 8 posessions and scoring like six times. If both teams were fully healthy I would say it would be close but I see this one going like 34-20
beast  
#45 Posted : Sunday, November 3, 2013 8:29:01 PM(UTC)
I wish there was some some of season scenarios generator where you could pick the games and see how it would effect the standings. They do have some for the playoffs, but they all seem to start in week 13 and not go the whole season.

So to figure out what would happen in playoff stuff you have to go figure out the hard way (reading the rules and researching how things would come out).



So if the Packers beat the Bears, then the Packers will have tie breakers (at least for now) over the whole NFC North and on top of having a two game lead on the Bears and one game lead on the Lions.


BUT if the Packers lose to the Bea... Bea... lose to... THEM... then there would be a 3 way tie for the NFC North. And going to the division tie breakers rules, they would be tied for the top 3 tie breakers. Going to the 4th one... where the Lions would then have the best record in the NFC (Packers currently have the best record of the 3 in the NFC but a lost Monday would give it to the Lions for now). And Bears would then have the head to head win over the Packers...


Long story short, Packers are playing for 1st or 3rd... Bears are playing for 2nd or 3rd and Lions are going to be 1st or 2nd.

NFL.com said:
1) Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games among the clubs).
2) Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.
3) Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games.
4) Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.
mi_keys  
#46 Posted : Sunday, November 3, 2013 8:49:36 PM(UTC)
Yerko said: Go to Quoted Post
Is it the grand one of them all, Wills Northwoods Inn? I have yet to go there but would like to one weekend. I've been spoiled by free Sunday Ticket this year so I don't have to trek out to a Packers bar but when I did, it was to a smaller one in Elmhurst, Il.


I live about a 5 minute walk from Wills. I'm there for most games. Love the place.

There was a stretch last year where I would be there 3 days out of the week between Badgers, Packers and a flag football sponsorship.
Zero2Cool  
#47 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 7:38:26 AM(UTC)
  1. 176 Sun November 16, 2008 W Green Bay Packers Chicago Bears 37 3
  2. 177 Mon December 22, 2008 L Green Bay Packers @ Chicago Bears 17 20
  3. 178 Sun September 13, 2009 W Green Bay Packers Chicago Bears 21 15
  4. 179 Sun December 13, 2009 W Green Bay Packers @ Chicago Bears 21 14
  5. 180 Mon September 27, 2010 L Green Bay Packers @ Chicago Bears 17 20
  6. 181 Sun January 2, 2011 W Green Bay Packers Chicago Bears 10 3
  7. 182 Sun January 23, 2011 W Green Bay Packers @ Chicago Bears 21 14
  8. 183 Sun September 25, 2011 W Green Bay Packers @ Chicago Bears 27 17
  9. 184 Sun December 25, 2011 W Green Bay Packers Chicago Bears 35 21
  10. 185 Thu September 13, 2012 W Green Bay Packers Chicago Bears 23 10
  11. 186 Sun December 16, 2012 W Green Bay Packers @ Chicago Bears 21 13



I heard on the radio that Aaron Rodgers is 9 - 2 against the Bears. The only two loses are from the only two Monday Night Football games against the Bears.
wpr  
#48 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 9:20:50 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
  1. 176 Sun November 16, 2008 W Green Bay Packers Chicago Bears 37 3
  2. 177 Mon December 22, 2008 L Green Bay Packers @ Chicago Bears 17 20
  3. 178 Sun September 13, 2009 W Green Bay Packers Chicago Bears 21 15
  4. 179 Sun December 13, 2009 W Green Bay Packers @ Chicago Bears 21 14
  5. 180 Mon September 27, 2010 L Green Bay Packers @ Chicago Bears 17 20
  6. 181 Sun January 2, 2011 W Green Bay Packers Chicago Bears 10 3
  7. 182 Sun January 23, 2011 W Green Bay Packers @ Chicago Bears 21 14
  8. 183 Sun September 25, 2011 W Green Bay Packers @ Chicago Bears 27 17
  9. 184 Sun December 25, 2011 W Green Bay Packers Chicago Bears 35 21
  10. 185 Thu September 13, 2012 W Green Bay Packers Chicago Bears 23 10
  11. 186 Sun December 16, 2012 W Green Bay Packers @ Chicago Bears 21 13



I heard on the radio that Aaron Rodgers is 9 - 2 against the Bears. The only two loses are from the only two Monday Night Football games against the Bears.


both were in Chicago so no worries here. ThumpUp
Tezzy  
#49 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 9:34:40 AM(UTC)
Yerko  
#50 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 10:00:09 AM(UTC)
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
I live about a 5 minute walk from Wills. I'm there for most games. Love the place.

There was a stretch last year where I would be there 3 days out of the week between Badgers, Packers and a flag football sponsorship.


It would be about a 20-30 minute ride for me down Diversey from Oak Park Ave. Maybe I'll catch a game (or more) out there next season! Heard the food is very good.
Zero2Cool  
#51 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 10:54:40 AM(UTC)
Packers enter this game 7th in rushing yards per game. If they get 235 or more, they'll be first. If they get 194 they'll be second. And so on.

  1. 235 rushing yards
  2. 194 rushing yards
  3. 193 rushing yards
  4. 187 rushing yards
  5. 181 rushing yards
  6. 178 rushing yards


There's your meaningless stat of the day.
wpr  
#52 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 11:30:43 AM(UTC)
Yerko said: Go to Quoted Post
Is it the grand one of them all, Wills Northwoods Inn? I have yet to go there but would like to one weekend. I've been spoiled by free Sunday Ticket this year so I don't have to trek out to a Packers bar but when I did, it was to a smaller one in Elmhurst, Il.


I just checked with my son. Northwoods is the one he goes to.
buckeyepackfan  
#53 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 11:39:01 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
Packers enter this game 7th in rushing yards per game. If they get 235 or more, they'll be first. If they get 194 they'll be second. And so on.

  1. 235 rushing yards
  2. 194 rushing yards
  3. 193 rushing yards
  4. 187 rushing yards
  5. 181 rushing yards
  6. 178 rushing yards


There's your meaningless stat of the day.


Packers will be the #1 rushing team in the NFL after tonights game.!!!!

BOOK IT!!!!!








Just think what Lacy , Starks and Co. could do if they had a real O-line to block for them!!!!!
[sarcasm] RollEyes RollEyes RollEyes
Zero2Cool  
#54 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 12:25:32 PM(UTC)
mi_keys  
#55 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 1:26:00 PM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
I just checked with my son. Northwoods is the one he goes to.


If he's ever complained about someone getting too worked up over referee incompetence or the Packers in general at that bar, it might have been me.
mi_keys  
#56 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 1:27:17 PM(UTC)
buckeyepackfan said: Go to Quoted Post
Packers will be the #1 rushing team in the NFL after tonights game.!!!!

BOOK IT!!!!!








Just think what Lacy , Starks and Co. could do if they had a real O-line to block for them!!!!!
[sarcasm] RollEyes RollEyes RollEyes


Or if we had a real linebacker on defense to get the other offense off the field and give our team more TOP.
SINCITYCHEEZE  
#57 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 2:30:57 PM(UTC)
It's been 2 seasons. I hope Slocum watches out for this play by Hester tonite.
Cheesey  
#58 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 3:53:49 PM(UTC)
I say Green Bay 42
"Duh Bares" 17
nyrpack  
#59 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 4:25:02 PM(UTC)
final score packers 34 bears 17 !!
Yerko  
#60 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 4:27:13 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post


BAD NEWS (for the) BEARS
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
beast (16h) : Packers once again facing some former Packers this season, OLVan Roten, DE Peppers and CB Gunter
beast (19h) : Darn, and I was already worried about Spriggs possibly vs Peppers
Zero2Cool (20h) : Jason Spriggs added to the injury report
Zero2Cool (20h) : whoa
beast (21h) : Packers are the only team to have less only 1 top 20 draft pick in the last decade... all other teams had more.
Zero2Cool (14-Dec) : McCarthy's last two conferences ... much more jovial than last two months, huge difference.
Zero2Cool (14-Dec) : If you picked Home for every NFL game, you'd have 115 correct picks. 55% success
Zero2Cool (14-Dec) : Cincinnati Bengals co-founder Pete Brown dies
Zero2Cool (13-Dec) : Rodgers says he doesn't expect to adjust way he plays: "I wouldn’t be playing if I didn’t feel confident playing the way that I played my en
Zero2Cool (13-Dec) : Panthers Trai Turner enters concussion protocol
Zero2Cool (13-Dec) : Great stat from Mike Zimmer just now at his presser. No team has beaten three above .500 teams on the road in a row since 1967.
Zero2Cool (13-Dec) : Brett Hundley or Blake Bortles if you're the Jaguars?
Zero2Cool (13-Dec) : @ESPNStatsInfo Last season, Aaron Rodgers threw 13 TD and 0 Int while going 5-0 in Dec./Jan. regular season games
FLORIDA PACKER88 (13-Dec) : 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
buckeyepackfan (13-Dec) : THAT BAAAAAAAAD MAN IS BACK!!!!!
cheeseheads123 (13-Dec) : 12 is back baby lets go!!!
Zero2Cool (12-Dec) : WR Davante Adams nominated for Clutch Performer of the Week
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : lol coach with jokes MM: "If i don't know tomorrow, they'll be putting Pat McKenzie on IR."
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : Rod of Airs here to fook you up!
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : Packers gonna play coy until Saturday night and go SURPRISE BITCHES
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : Mike McCarthy on Rodgers timetable: "This is in the hands of the experts. ... Let's just wait until the experts make their decision."
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : You can freaking localize ads too to region. This is NOT hard. Lazy asses.
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : I think so too, but it's time they get with it. You can have ads in streaming too.
Nonstopdrivel (11-Dec) : You've been able to stream postseason games for a few years now, I think.
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : last 4 games played, Packers have worst pass efficency, Browns 2nd worst
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : On @oath @YahooSports and @NFL Apps
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : Good news for NFL fans: starting with this season’s playoffs you can stream games on your phone. All phones. All carriers. For free. On
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : Verizon to pay NFL $500 million a year to stream games
beast (11-Dec) : Packers can't catch Eagles so it doesn't directly effect our playoff chances.
Nonstopdrivel (11-Dec) : yoffs?
Nonstopdrivel (11-Dec) : So . . . could in theory be a severe sprain. Which might still sideline him for the rest of the season, but perhaps he'd be back for the pla
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : That's regarding Carson Wentz
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : @AlbertBreer Doctors determined with manual test there was damage to ACL, extent unknown until MRI tomorrow.
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : Read reports that's what is feared and yes, you're right, usually if that's the fear = done
Nonstopdrivel (11-Dec) : MRI would me mostly a formality. He walked off on his own power, so possibly just a sprain? But I doubt it.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
1m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

3m / Green Bay Packers Talk / musccy

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

14-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

14-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

14-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

13-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

13-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

13-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

13-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

13-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

Headlines