Green Bay Packers Forum
4 Pages<1234>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline nerdmann  
#31 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 9:47:41 PM(UTC)
schroeder84 said: Go to Quoted Post
Just Ow. I hated to see this topic in the first place - I belong to the school of the unmentionable (it's a superstition). You never talk about a no-hitter until it's done. You never talk about a shutout until there are no goals scored. AND you sure as fark never talk about a possible injury situation that hasn't happened until it hasn't happened.

What a sad sinking feeling today. I am not sure Seneca Wallace is a long-term answer. Matt Flynn is available again, assuming losing his job 3 times in the last 14 months hasn't ruined his head. Just watching this year go down the crapper is painful.


Flynn's elbow injury is the reason he didn't beat out Russell last year in Seattle, and the reason he has washed out with the Raiders and now the Bills.
Offline nerdmann  
#32 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 9:48:42 PM(UTC)
go.pack.go. said: Go to Quoted Post
The writer of this article should be shot.


Hope he doesn't have a dog.
Offline SINCITYCHEEZE  
#33 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 10:04:52 PM(UTC)
I see all the Menards in Wisconsin just put pitchforks, torches, tar, feathers, and rails on sale. Boob McGinn, it may be time to head for the flatlands.
Offline mi_keys  
#34 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 10:19:45 PM(UTC)
Fuck McGinn. That is all.
Offline wpr  
#35 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 4:57:00 AM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Hope he doesn't have a dog.


hey nerdmann I hope you know I was just kidding when I said I hate you in the chat last night.
Offline wpr  
#36 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 5:01:45 AM(UTC)
schroeder84 said: Go to Quoted Post
Just Ow. I hated to see this topic in the first place - I belong to the school of the unmentionable (it's a superstition). You never talk about a no-hitter until it's done. You never talk about a shutout until there are no goals scored. AND you sure as fark never talk about a possible injury situation that hasn't happened until it hasn't happened.

What a sad sinking feeling today. I am not sure Seneca Wallace is a long-term answer. Matt Flynn is available again, assuming losing his job 3 times in the last 14 months hasn't ruined his head. Just watching this year go down the crapper is painful.


Yeah my bad for posting it here. When I saw the story I thought it was stupid to suggest Rodgers was replaceable.

In 2010 we have the thread to rank the players 1-10 we thought would hurt GB the most if they were inured.

I only listed Aaron. All 10 times. There is a reason he is paid so much. He is irreplaceable.
Offline play2win  
#37 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 6:33:35 AM(UTC)
Talk about the ultimate jinx. I like Bob McGinn, but why? Just because you can, doesn't mean you should. Because of that article, it was all over sports radio, and I have no doubts Rodgers had heard about it prior to the game. Did it possibly affect him? Unbelievable. Ouch.
Offline nerdmann  
#38 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 8:45:55 AM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
hey nerdmann I hope you know I was just kidding when I said I hate you in the chat last night.


lol I love you man.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
wpr on 11/5/2013(UTC)
Offline coltonja  
#39 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 8:53:35 AM(UTC)
Signing on to say- I hate you Bob McGinn, I hate you!
thanks Post received 2 applause.
Zero2Cool on 11/5/2013(UTC), wpr on 11/5/2013(UTC)
Offline steveishere  
#40 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 8:56:50 AM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
Talk about the ultimate jinx. I like Bob McGinn, but why? Just because you can, doesn't mean you should. Because of that article, it was all over sports radio, and I have no doubts Rodgers had heard about it prior to the game. Did it possibly affect him? Unbelievable. Ouch.


Hope you are joking lol that makes absolutely 0 sense.
Offline play2win  
#41 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 9:21:05 AM(UTC)
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
Hope you are joking lol that makes absolutely 0 sense.


Is there a problem? You seem to go well out of your way to throw your contradictory snipe comments into just about anything I say.

???
Offline steveishere  
#42 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 9:24:09 AM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
Is there a problem? You seem to go well out of your way to throw your contradictory snipe comments into just about anything I say.

???


I'm not going out of my way to think a Bob McGinn article possibly had something to do with Rodgers being hurt is ridiculous. I don't care who wrote it, that makes 0 sense. Don't worry about me. If you think what you said does indeed make sense then defend your statement, don't get personal.
Offline play2win  
#43 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 9:37:14 AM(UTC)
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
I'm not going out of my way to think a Bob McGinn article possibly had something to do with Rodgers being hurt is ridiculous. I don't care who wrote it, that makes 0 sense. Don't worry about me. If you think what you said does indeed make sense then defend your statement, don't get personal.


You made it personal bud. I'm entitled to my opinions. I merely posed the question. You don't like it? TFB. This is a forum to talk about football and the Packers. I respect that and other posters here and their questions and opinions, even when they differ from my own. You, clearly, do not.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#44 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 9:42:38 AM(UTC)
JSOnline Blog said:
Across the NFL, quarterbacks have gone down and teams have had to turn to their backups. The Bears won with theirs in Green Bay Monday night. The Packers' next opponent, the Philadelphia Eagles, have played with three quarterbacks this season.
Offline Yerko  
#45 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 9:43:55 AM(UTC)
I'm not superstitious at all but this is just damn creepy. He even writes in the article "if Rodgers were to go down early Monday night against the Bears."

Just a creepy coincidence. I finally read the article (why not? It came true) and I see what he is trying to say but to use this position as his centerpiece for the article was just dumb. That just goes to show that he doesn't realize how important Rodgers is to the success of this entire team.

Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Yerko

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884


Tweeter