Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
4 Pages«<234

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Zero2Cool  
#61 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 4:56:19 PM(UTC)
Yerko said: Go to Quoted Post
BAD NEWS (for the) BEARS


Not really. James Jones has some fumbling issues with the Bears.
Zero2Cool  
#62 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 5:15:44 PM(UTC)
Green Bay Packers INACTIVES
10 WR Chris Harper
25 CB James Nixon
52 LB Clay Matthews
53 LB Nick Perry
88 TE Jermichael Finley
93 DE Josh Boyd
98 DE C.J. Wilson


96 Mike Neal will start at OLB in place of Perry; 55 Andy Mulumba will start at OLB in place of Matthews; 81 Andrew Quarless will start at TE in place of Finley.
IronMan  
#63 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 5:37:40 PM(UTC)
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool  
#64 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 7:18:00 PM(UTC)
nerdmann  
#65 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 9:45:37 PM(UTC)
Quite a disappointment.

In every way, shape and form.
rabidgopher04  
#66 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 9:59:58 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post


Look at that block by Kuhn. What a stud!
IronMan  
#67 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 10:29:19 PM(UTC)
The non challenge on the Quarless catch still bugs me. It wasn't a slam dunk, but definitely worth a shot.
porky88  
#68 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 10:42:39 PM(UTC)
^ I also thought Quarless caught the ball.

People are going to get on the offense, but the the Packers were 1-8 against Chicago since Jay Cutler and Dom Capers entered the rivalry.
In those nine games, the Bears have allowed 32 sacks and have turned the ball over 21 times. That’s an average of at least two turnovers and three sacks per game. On Monday night, with an improved offensive line, Chicago gave up just one sack and had no turnovers. The defense did not play up to standard and Josh McCown played well.
play2win  
#69 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 6:10:12 AM(UTC)
Eh, shake it off!

What else can we do? Losing Rodgers was going to be a blow, no matter who we were playing. I'm just hoping it is nothing serious and that Rodgers can return healthy sometime soon.

My hat is off to the Bears. They came in determined. They made plays on offense. Our defense had no answers. I thought there was an incredible amount of holding that went uncalled, but they apparently called the whole game pretty loose. This certainly was a division rivalry game, and being Bears/Packers, we all know just about anything can happen, and it did. There were a handful of game changing plays that could have gone the Packers' way or the Bears' way, and they tilted to the Bears. Balls heaved up while McCown was being hit, instead of being INTs went for receptions.

Packers defense has to look itself in the mirror. Good, midseason gut check.

I think Matt Flynn gets signed this week.
Zero2Cool  
#70 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 6:13:44 AM(UTC)
IronMan said: Go to Quoted Post
The non challenge on the Quarless catch still bugs me. It wasn't a slam dunk, but definitely worth a shot.


I don't think it had a chance of being overturned. Even with that said, we've seen referee's make worse overturns before. Without knowing when Rodgers was coming back, I understood why you'd want to make sure you have both challenges in your pocket in what was most likely to be a close game where a play or two could have decided it.

And with that said, you play not to lose, you end up doing just that.

Bears 4th an inches on the 33? and go for it. They played to win.

That's the difference.
play2win  
#71 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 6:28:25 AM(UTC)
Yeah, McCarthy does not have a good challenge record, and he knows it. But, you never know. I wanted him to challenge it, but could see why he did not. The play was that close. He didn't have anything to lose though, and I do believe he should have given it a go. Would have changed the game completely, had the play been overturned.

We played to not lose. Well said.

The officiating in this game sucked donkey dong.
Zero2Cool  
#72 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 6:37:45 AM(UTC)
sschind  
#73 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 6:37:49 AM(UTC)
IronMan said: Go to Quoted Post
The non challenge on the Quarless catch still bugs me. It wasn't a slam dunk, but definitely worth a shot.


Exactly what I said. In a close game you have to challenge that. It could be the difference maker or it could blow a close game wide open. The worst that happens you lose a TO. McCarthy doesn't seem to like to use them when it matters anyway.

Although I must admit when we downed the punt at the 1 I thought maybe it was a good idea after all.
sschind  
#74 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 6:39:22 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post


Great shot, even a second later when he just kind of turned and looked as if to say "where the hell is everybody"
sschind  
#75 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 6:43:40 AM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, McCarthy does not have a good challenge record, and he knows it. But, you never know. I wanted him to challenge it, but could see why he did not. The play was that close. He didn't have anything to lose though, and I do believe he should have given it a go. Would have changed the game completely, had the play been overturned.

We played to not lose. Well said.

The officiating in this game sucked donkey dong.


Yeah, I saw several holds that the Packers got away with.
Reignman  
#76 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 7:00:32 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
Bears have 14 days to prepare for the Packers.
Packers have 7 days to prepare for the Bears.


I know I'm a little late, and there's plenty more important things to talk about, but I was bored and wanted to add my own meaningless info as I read through the topic ...

Since 2008 (beginning of McCarthy/Rodgers era) here's how the Packers have done when their opponent has 2 weeks to prepare. (now 4-6)

2009 at TB L 28-38
2010 vs MIA L 20-23 ot
2010 at NYJ W 9-0
2010 at ATL W 48-21 (playoffs)
2011 vs STL W 24-3
2011 vs MIN W 45-7
2012 at IND L 27-30
2012 at NYG L 10-38
2012 at SF L 31-45 (playoffs)
2013 vs CHI L 20-27

Here's how they have done when the Packers get 2 weeks to prepare. (5-2)

2008 at TEN L 16-19 ot
2009 vs DET W 26-0
2010 at MIN W 31-3
2011 at SD W 45-38
2011 vs NYG L 20-37 (playoffs)
2012 at DET W 24-20
2013 vs DET W 22-9

Do you know how Frazier has done after a bye?

2011 at GB L 7-45
2012 at CHI L 10-28
2013 vs CAR L 10-35

He's 0-3 and gets outscored 108-27 with 2 weeks to prepare lol.
sschind  
#77 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 9:30:33 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post



Now that is one hole that I think I can honestly say even I could have run through. Not likely that I would have gotten a TD (I can barely see that far much less run) but I think I could have gotten a first down at least.

Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages«<234
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
buckeyepackfan (17-Feb) : Saints De'Vante Harris nothing but a POS!!!!! Look up his tweetes on Florida killings!!
Nonstopdrivel (17-Feb) : They're laying new gas line near my house. The trucks are all from a company in Madison.
Smokey (14-Feb) : 2018 Hall o Fame Game/Aug.2,2018/Ravens vs Bears
Zero2Cool (13-Feb) : Based off 2017 records, Packers have toughest schedule for 2018
Smokey (13-Feb) : Wow, tough new 2018 Packer Schedule !
Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : I don't know anything about him though. He good? Bad?
Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : Free Agent CB David Amerson ... bring him in!
Smokey (11-Feb) : Coffee time .
Smokey (11-Feb) : Watching girls olympic Hockey.
Rockmolder (10-Feb) : They'd have to give up half their draft. Cousins seems more likely.
Rockmolder (10-Feb) : I've read that somewhere. Wasn't anything more than speculation. Can't imagine it'll happen.
Smokey (10-Feb) : Might Denver trade with Cleveland for the #1 draft pick ?
Cheesey (10-Feb) : Zero is having fun yanking some chains!LOL!
Porforis (9-Feb) : KAPERNICK! jay kay
Zero2Cool (9-Feb) : Sign Case Keenum, trade Aaron Rodgers. Bring us a winner! (haha0
Zero2Cool (9-Feb) : in other words, it wasn't going against the salary cap, that's the point here.
Zero2Cool (9-Feb) : Favre wasn't offered $25 to stay retired! My lord, he was offered 10 year merchandising deal.
Zero2Cool (9-Feb) : Packers should be leaders, not followers. Set the trend, don't be the trend.
Zero2Cool (9-Feb) : Just because 49ers overpaid, doesn't mean other teams should be stupid.
gbguy20 (9-Feb) : wouldn't hurt the cap, just the bottom line. we offered favre 25 mill to stay retired.
gbguy20 (9-Feb) : or get him to take a team friendly number now while promising him a massive marketing contract in retirement to make up for it
gbguy20 (9-Feb) : jimmy g set the record after 7 starts. you really think Rodgers value goes down? sign him now and make it cap friendly for the next 2 years. get him for 28.5 per now instead of 34 per year a year or 2
Zero2Cool (9-Feb) : He has multiple years left, he can wait until final year, like the process goes
Zero2Cool (9-Feb) : he didn't play like a Superstar vs Panthers, he doesn't deserve new deal.
Porforis (9-Feb) : This assumes Rodgers continues to play like a superstar and doesn't miss additional seasons, lowering his value entering the mid to tail end of his career.
gbguy20 (9-Feb) : the longer we wait the worse it will get
gbguy20 (9-Feb) : the long
Zero2Cool (9-Feb) : Can't do that paying one player so much.
Zero2Cool (9-Feb) : Once he's paid, we're done. We can't draft AND develop. Need outside help.
gbguy20 (8-Feb) : extend Rodgers now
Zero2Cool (8-Feb) : PH is going into it's 11th season, or is it 12th? Either way, we lasted longer than Barry! haha
wpr (8-Feb) : Well said Porforis
Porforis (7-Feb) : PackersHome is the Barry Sanders of Packers forums
Smokey (7-Feb) : Yes, SB45 - GB 31 / Pitt 25
Zero2Cool (7-Feb) : Super Bowl
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rockmolder

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

15h / Random Babble / Smokey

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rockmolder

16-Feb / Around The NFL / Cheesey

15-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

13-Feb / Football Familiarity / Smokey

12-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

11-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

8-Feb / Random Babble / Smokey

8-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

8-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

Headlines