Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
3 Pages123>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
nerdmann  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 3:35:59 PM(UTC)
I've often said that if Aaron went down, it would force this team to adhere to fundamentals.

This team is known for not showing up for a full 60 and continuously going into lulls. They don't seem to show up until "adversity" hits and their backs are against the wall.

I've always said this was a case in point, of what I am talking about. Look what happened in '10. The Packers were on the verge of elimination, they had to win 5 games in a row just to qualify for the playoffs, then they had to win all the way through.

And they did it.

We've been at that point this season too, forced to ADHERE TO FUNDAMENTALS in order to play consistently and win games. Well, fundamentals are the key to winning.

It's put up or shut up time. They WON'T be stat whoring from here on out. Let's see what this team can do.

Anybody with me? I think we can be successful.

play2win  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 4:01:53 PM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
I've often said that if Aaron went down, it would force this team to adhere to fundamentals.

This team is known for not showing up for a full 60 and continuously going into lulls. They don't seem to show up until "adversity" hits and their backs are against the wall.

I've always said this was a case in point, of what I am talking about. Look what happened in '10. The Packers were on the verge of elimination, they had to win 5 games in a row just to qualify for the playoffs, then they had to win all the way through.

And they did it.

We've been at that point this season too, forced to ADHERE TO FUNDAMENTALS in order to play consistently and win games. Well, fundamentals are the key to winning.

It's put up or shut up time. They WON'T be stat whoring from here on out. Let's see what this team can do.

Anybody with me? I think we can be successful.



I am. This team is going to rock this NFL season to another Lombardi Trophy. I know it. It is a better, deeper team than the one in 2010, as long as Aaron Rodgers makes a successful, healthy return from the clavicle injury. I believe he will, and I believe in our system. This team will respond to this incredible adversity to win it all.
nerdmann  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 4:05:40 PM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
I am. This team is going to rock this NFL season to another Lombardi Trophy. I know it. It is a better, deeper team than the one in 2010, as long as Aaron Rodgers makes a successful, healthy return from the clavicle injury. I believe he will, and I believe in our system. This team will respond to this incredible adversity to win it all.



Zero2Cool  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 4:08:33 PM(UTC)
mi_keys  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 4:33:21 PM(UTC)
You're already wrong: the 2010 Packers only won 2 games consecutively at the end of the regular season to make the playoffs, not 5.
coltonja  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 4:39:28 PM(UTC)
I have seen a lot of today that this is similar to 2010. Injuries- I agree. Depth and talent nowhere close, IMO. So many areas we were stronger in 2010. In fact' I only think we are better at running the football. Don't forget that year we had Collins, Woodson, Jenkins, Jennings, Driver- veterans and performers, among others, that kept our team together in times of adversity. Albeit, some of the previous listed were declining but the 10 team still held more depth and talent,
nerdmann  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 4:42:08 PM(UTC)
coltonja said: Go to Quoted Post
I have seen a lot of today that this is similar to 2010. Injuries- I agree. Depth and talent nowhere close, IMO. So many areas we were stronger in 2010. In fact' I only think we are better at running the football. Don't forget that year we had Collins, Woodson, Jenkins, Jennings, Driver- veterans and performers, among others, that kept our team together in times of adversity. Albeit, some of the previous listed were declining but the 10 team still held more depth and talent,


Clay Matthews, Nick Perry, Mike Neal, Datone Jones, Casey Hayward, Morgan Burnett, Eddie Lacy, Johnathan Franklin. Davon friggin House.

We got guys.
RaiderPride  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 4:49:05 PM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
I've often said that if Aaron went down, it would force this team to adhere to fundamentals.

This team is known for not showing up for a full 60 and continuously going into lulls. They don't seem to show up until "adversity" hits and their backs are against the wall.

I've always said this was a case in point, of what I am talking about. Look what happened in '10. The Packers were on the verge of elimination, they had to win 5 games in a row just to qualify for the playoffs, then they had to win all the way through.

And they did it.

We've been at that point this season too, forced to ADHERE TO FUNDAMENTALS in order to play consistently and win games. Well, fundamentals are the key to winning.

It's put up or shut up time. They WON'T be stat whoring from here on out. Let's see what this team can do.

Anybody with me? I think we can be successful.



Who wrote this? I demand an internal investigation!

It could not be negative Nerdman the most negative nelly on the planet earth?

Or.... Maybe he did... Perhaps he stole someone's anti depression meds?

nerdmann  
#9 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 5:03:12 PM(UTC)
RaiderPride said: Go to Quoted Post
Who wrote this? I demand an internal investigation!

It could not be negative Nerdman the most negative nelly on the planet earth?

Or.... Maybe he did... Perhaps he stole someone's anti depression meds?



You with me RP?
coltonja  
#10 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 5:04:49 PM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Clay Matthews, Nick Perry, Mike Neal, Datone Jones, Casey Hayward, Morgan Burnett, Eddie Lacy, Johnathan Franklin. Davon friggin House.

We got guys.


Haha this is exactly what I'm talking about matthews is a wash he was on 10, perry hasn't shown much but is on the way up. Same with neal, datone jones< Jenkins 2010 by a mile, Heyward has been hurt all year and < tramon 2010 our top cb then. Burnett is good but nowhere near Collins. Rbs are much better this year and Davon House had looked more like a stud than a dud.
DoddPower  
#11 Posted : Thursday, November 7, 2013 12:22:37 AM(UTC)
coltonja said: Go to Quoted Post
Haha this is exactly what I'm talking about matthews is a wash he was on 10, perry hasn't shown much but is on the way up. Same with neal, datone jones< Jenkins 2010 by a mile, Heyward has been hurt all year and < tramon 2010 our top cb then. Burnett is good but nowhere near Collins. Rbs are much better this year and Davon House had looked more like a stud than a dud.


Regardless, this team doesn't have to be "as good" as the 2010 team to win the Super Bowl again. They just have to be one point better than everyone else they play in the playoffs, if they make it.

When Rodgers is healthy and this running game, the Packers have a chance to be one point better than any team in the NFL, and a realistic chance at that.

wpr  
#12 Posted : Thursday, November 7, 2013 6:00:35 AM(UTC)
GB has zero chance without Aaron. He is the difference between 2010 ad this team.
The only chance they have is if Wallace doesn't screw up too much before Aaron comes back. I will make that 10%.
Zero2Cool  
#13 Posted : Thursday, November 7, 2013 6:18:11 AM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
GB has zero chance without Aaron. He is the difference between 2010 ad this team.
The only chance they have is if Wallace doesn't screw up too much before Aaron comes back. I will make that 10%.


Thought the difference was Cullen Jenkins?
wpr  
#14 Posted : Thursday, November 7, 2013 6:21:38 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
Thought the difference was Cullen Jenkins?


then you thought wrong.
buckeyepackfan  
#15 Posted : Thursday, November 7, 2013 6:42:07 AM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
I've often said that if Aaron went down, it would force this team to adhere to fundamentals.

This team is known for not showing up for a full 60 and continuously going into lulls. They don't seem to show up until "adversity" hits and their backs are against the wall.

I've always said this was a case in point, of what I am talking about. Look what happened in '10. The Packers were on the verge of elimination, they had to win 5 games in a row just to qualify for the playoffs, then they had to win all the way through.

And they did it.

We've been at that point this season too, forced to ADHERE TO FUNDAMENTALS in order to play consistently and win games. Well, fundamentals are the key to winning.

It's put up or shut up time. They WON'T be stat whoring from here on out. Let's see what this team can do.

Anybody with me? I think we can be successful.



You're such a fricken hypocrit.

You were the fisrt and most vocal of anyone as you threw player after player under the bus in Live chat during Monday's game.
Then you come up with your favorite "stat-whoring" comment, which has been proven wrong time and time again, yet you fail to see the ignorance in the statement.

Now it seems you have come up with a new "nerdman favorite" Fundamentals, as if The Packers have been playing out of control, not adhering to basics that they have learned from day 1.

Come Sunday if plays don't go exactly as you think they should, you will once again be the 1st to throw players under the bus, and start whining how this should be done and that should be done.

Now you want everyone to "be with you" like you are the only one who has any confidence in The Packers as a team to grind through this latest setback?

You like over/unders...here's a few for you.

How many time will you claim a packer has failed"?

How many time will you claim a Packer has "shit shemsives"?

How many time will "bad fundamentals" be the reason a player was beaten or the other team makes a successful play?

Heres my favorite...How many times will you be absolutley wrong when you give your nerdman play by play instant analysis with only a tv view of the game?
wpr  
#16 Posted : Thursday, November 7, 2013 7:45:05 AM(UTC)
Common buckeye tell us what you really think.
warhawk  
#17 Posted : Thursday, November 7, 2013 7:52:27 AM(UTC)
Well, all I can say is I hope the team is more united and has more resolve than this group here. That's for sure.

If not they are certainly screwed.

I expect Wallace to be better Sunday. The Bears smelled blood knowing the backup has had few reps and they were getting after him. This week will probably be the same but Seneca will be more prepared.

The D needs to pick it up. This is where the fundamentals and assignment sure part really kicks in. That and they need Mathews and Perry out there. They have to get pressure. I saw where Perry and Mathews practiced on a limited basis yesterday.
I don't want to hear about the "medical staff" and their crap or McCarthy say "we're being smart". Playing with a bad heel is not career threatening. Pad it, give him a shot, and get out there. The club can protect Mathews.

We need these guys. I don't want to see a QB "almost" go down and then throw a miracle TD. We can't have a Matt Forte slip through the line and see them 20 yards from anybody because somebody got suckered out of position. The "A" team needs to be on the field.

Now.



Yerko  
#18 Posted : Thursday, November 7, 2013 9:17:57 AM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
They WON'T be stat whoring from here on out. Let's see what this team can do.

Anybody with me? I think we can be successful.





Other than that...yes, I am with you. Don't confuse stat whoring and being one of the greatest quarterbacks in the league.
User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#19 Posted : Thursday, November 7, 2013 11:30:53 AM(UTC)
warhawk said: Go to Quoted Post
Well, all I can say is I hope the team is more united and has more resolve than this group here. That's for sure.

If not they are certainly screwed.

I expect Wallace to be better Sunday. The Bears smelled blood knowing the backup has had few reps and they were getting after him. This week will probably be the same but Seneca will be more prepared.

The D needs to pick it up. This is where the fundamentals and assignment sure part really kicks in. That and they need Mathews and Perry out there. They have to get pressure. I saw where Perry and Mathews practiced on a limited basis yesterday.
I don't want to hear about the "medical staff" and their crap or McCarthy say "we're being smart". Playing with a bad heel is not career threatening. Pad it, give him a shot, and get out there. The club can protect Mathews.

We need these guys. I don't want to see a QB "almost" go down and then throw a miracle TD. We can't have a Matt Forte slip through the line and see them 20 yards from anybody because somebody got suckered out of position. The "A" team needs to be on the field.

Now.



Uh No. The Bears were so stupid that they played the same kind of D - those two safeties 20 or so yards deep - against Wallace that they did against Rodgers for most of the game. When their dumbass D coordinator finally got the message, our running game was shut down.

I hate to say it, but for the first time since before the Favre Era, I will be EXPECTING the Packers to lose - I hope I'm wrong, but if McCarthy stubbornly sticks with that lemon, Wallace, it is just about assured that we will lose. The Eagles will play cautious enough that our D can't win it for us. Knowing Wallace is worthless, they will stack the box and shut down Lacy and Starks. Sorry, but barring a miracle return by Aaron Rodgers or McCarthy going to Tolzien, I just don't see the Packers having a chance.
warhawk  
#20 Posted : Thursday, November 7, 2013 12:49:17 PM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
Uh No. The Bears were so stupid that they played the same kind of D - those two safeties 20 or so yards deep - against Wallace that they did against Rodgers for most of the game. When their dumbass D coordinator finally got the message, our running game was shut down.

I hate to say it, but for the first time since before the Favre Era, I will be EXPECTING the Packers to lose - I hope I'm wrong, but if McCarthy stubbornly sticks with that lemon, Wallace, it is just about assured that we will lose. The Eagles will play cautious enough that our D can't win it for us. Knowing Wallace is worthless, they will stack the box and shut down Lacy and Starks. Sorry, but barring a miracle return by Aaron Rodgers or McCarthy going to Tolzien, I just don't see the Packers having a chance.


Not so sure about that. Philly has the worst Pass D in the league. I'm not going to rate Wallace as so pathetic with more time to prepare that he couldn't hurt the Eagles if they did as you suggest.
ALL teams will try to slow the run game down. It's a lot harder to do when you can't defend the pass. With no prep time McCarthy wasn't about to go downfield with the ball but you can bet he will pull the trigger against this D if they are up in the box as you say.

Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Smokey (9h) : Coffee anyone ?
Smokey (21-Jun) : good show
Cheesey (21-Jun) : APPLE with ice cream!
Smokey (20-Jun) : Cherry with Vanilla Ice Cream !!
Cheesey (20-Jun) : APPLE!
Smokey (20-Jun) : Apple or Cherry Pie ?
TheKanataThrilla (18-Jun) : The only have 2 preseason games. I like that as the fans get to see more of the starters.
TheKanataThrilla (18-Jun) : Next week I believe the CFL season starts. Go Redblacks!!!
Smokey (18-Jun) : Been researching CFL , Edmonton Eskimos have the best colors/uniforms .
Smokey (18-Jun) : When does the CFL Season start anyway ?
Smokey (18-Jun) : Saw Flute CFL highlights in the day, full CFL game was /is rare .
TheKanataThrilla (18-Jun) : I wish many of you would have seen Doug Flutie in the CFL. Absolute beauty.
TheKanataThrilla (18-Jun) : Vince Young cut from Sask. Roughriders. Good for him to consider the CFL, but only a select few NFL QB castoffs are a good CFL fit.
Smokey (17-Jun) : R 2
Zero2Cool (17-Jun) : Not all hackers are bad
Smokey (16-Jun) : Public Hangings for Hackers .
Cheesey (16-Jun) : No, he said HACKERS!
Smokey (16-Jun) : Did you say Crackers ?
Zero2Cool (16-Jun) : PACKERS PACKERS PACKERS
Cheesey (16-Jun) : "That is true, my dear Smokey!"LOL!
Smokey (15-Jun) : dat ? Brer Cheesey ?
Cheesey (15-Jun) : True dat, Smokey. MUCH better!
Smokey (15-Jun) : I like the fillets/tenders, they usually are a better deal.
Cheesey (15-Jun) : Good one, Porforis! Made me laugh!
Porforis (15-Jun) : Shoulda gone with Kentucky Fried Chickadee
Cheesey (15-Jun) : Last time I had KFC, the pieces were so small it should be renamed "Kentucky Fried Sparrow"
Cheesey (15-Jun) : POPEYES! (Or Churches chicken)
Smokey (15-Jun) : KFC or Popeyes Chicken ?
Smokey (15-Jun) : It's grocery shopping day !
Smokey (15-Jun) : Why did they shelter ?
buckeyepackfan (14-Jun) : Everybody safe in Green Bay? NFL Network babe said they had to take shelter in a theater for awhile.
Zero2Cool (14-Jun) : Today??
wpr (14-Jun) : Happy birthday Zero.
Smokey (14-Jun) : LOL !!!!
Cheesey (13-Jun) : The NBA season just ended....doesn't it start up again in another week?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Saturday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
14m / Around The NFL / wpr

17m / Around The NFL / Smokey

45m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

9h / Around The NFL / Smokey

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

22h / Around The NFL / Smokey

21-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

21-Jun / Football Familiarity / Smokey

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

20-Jun / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

19-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

18-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

17-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

Headlines