Green Bay Packers Forum
4 Pages123>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Online texaspackerbacker  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, November 6, 2013 10:52:59 AM(UTC)
Good to hear somebody beside me saying we shoulda kept Vince Young instead of Seneca Wallace. Bayliss even went on to include Coleman and Harrell as better choices.
Sponsor
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, November 6, 2013 10:55:34 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
Good to hear somebody beside me saying we shoulda kept Vince Young instead of Seneca Wallace. Bayliss even went on to include Coleman and Harrell as better choices.


Skip Bayless is known for being an idiot, still wanna be grouped with him?
thanks Post received 9 applause.
mi_keys on 11/6/2013(UTC), nerdmann on 11/6/2013(UTC), rabidgopher04 on 11/6/2013(UTC), Since69 on 11/6/2013(UTC), Mucky Tundra on 11/6/2013(UTC), DakotaT on 11/6/2013(UTC), DoddPower on 11/7/2013(UTC), wpr on 11/7/2013(UTC), gbguy20 on 11/7/2013(UTC)
Online texaspackerbacker  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, November 6, 2013 11:02:55 AM(UTC)
MintBaconDrivel said: Go to Quoted Post
Skip Bayless is known for being an idiot, still wanna be grouped with him?


Known by who? I occasionally watch him, and he is no less idiotic than most of the media talking heads - better than most.

Offline Yerko  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, November 6, 2013 11:24:25 AM(UTC)
Skip Bayless is a real piece of shit. The only reason he has a job is to get folks riled up and he does a good job of it.

Skip Bayless has always been anti-Rodgers. His opinion is worthless to me when it comes to anything Packers.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
DoddPower on 11/7/2013(UTC), wpr on 11/7/2013(UTC)
Offline Pack93z  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, November 6, 2013 11:35:53 AM(UTC)
Yerko said: Go to Quoted Post
Skip Bayless. The only reason he has a job is to get folks riled up and he does a good job of it.


This is pretty accurate... and it shocks me not that some of America enjoys his schpeel.

I wish at least ESPN would send him to a decent theatrical institution... it might make it less obvious the he just wants to spew hot air, hear himself do that spewing and an cause a faux controversy.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
DoddPower on 11/7/2013(UTC), Yerko on 11/7/2013(UTC)
Online mi_keys  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, November 6, 2013 11:36:07 AM(UTC)
Texas, I'm beginning to think you suffered a concussion during your spearing "tests." You should maybe go see a doctor. Citing these two to support your position [duh]

Skip is the same dipshit that tried to argue Rodgers is not a good leader because he does commercials; all while citing Brees, Brady and Manning as the best leaders at the position...

Steven A failed to call Bayliss out on this.

They're paid trolls.
thanks Post received 3 applause.
nerdmann on 11/6/2013(UTC), DoddPower on 11/7/2013(UTC), Yerko on 11/7/2013(UTC)
Offline steveishere  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, November 6, 2013 1:54:17 PM(UTC)
Skip Bayless said the decision to go with Aaron Rodgers would cost McCarthy and Ted Thompson their jobs and he also said the contract Ted Thompson gave Rodgers in 2008 was a big mistake (turned out to be the biggest contract steal in the league). I wouldn't trust him on anything that has to do with Packers QBs.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
nerdmann on 11/6/2013(UTC), DoddPower on 11/7/2013(UTC)
Online texaspackerbacker  
#8 Posted : Wednesday, November 6, 2013 2:20:04 PM(UTC)
I suppose I could be wrong - it's happened maybe 3 or 4 times now in my 66 years. I don't watch Bayliss very much. I was not aware of that anti-Rodgers stuff. Mostly he made good sense the times I watched him. Today, he didn't have anything negative to say about Rodgers, just about Wallace, and both he and Steven A seemed to take it as a given that we shoulda kept Vince Young over Wallace. THAT seems dead obvious.
Offline sschind  
#9 Posted : Wednesday, November 6, 2013 2:44:39 PM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
I suppose I could be wrong - it's happened maybe 3 or 4 times now in my 66 years. I don't watch Bayliss very much. I was not aware of that anti-Rodgers stuff. Mostly he made good sense the times I watched him. Today, he didn't have anything negative to say about Rodgers, just about Wallace, and both he and Steven A seemed to take it as a given that we shoulda kept Vince Young over Wallace. THAT seems dead obvious.


They all make good sense when they are saying things you agree with. As soon as they have a contrary opinion and they become idiots and buffoons.

What gets me is how you are so certain that Vince young would have been any better than Wallace. I mean its one thing to have a strong opinion but you are acting like it was a simple as deciding between a night with Emma Watson and a sharp stick in the eye and Ted Thompson chose the stick.

And I should know, I've had a sharp stick in the eye and I have had a night with... well I have had a sharp stick in the eye. I can only imagine the other choice would be infinitely better.
Offline nerdmann  
#10 Posted : Wednesday, November 6, 2013 3:01:50 PM(UTC)
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
They all make good sense when they are saying things you agree with. As soon as they have a contrary opinion and they become idiots and buffoons.

What gets me is how you are so certain that Vince young would have been any better than Wallace. I mean its one thing to have a strong opinion but you are acting like it was a simple as deciding between a night with Emma Watson and a sharp stick in the eye and Ted Thompson chose the stick.

And I should know, I've had a sharp stick in the eye and I have had a night with... well I have had a sharp stick in the eye. I can only imagine the other choice would be infinitely better.


Vince has the physical skills, but he's a head case.

Seneca is a pro's pro. He also has a decade of experience in similar offensive concepts and phraseaology to that which he will be utilizing here.
Offline steveishere  
#11 Posted : Wednesday, November 6, 2013 3:08:53 PM(UTC)
I actually think Skip said that trading Favre to the Jets was the worst move any GM has ever made in history.
Online cheeseheads123  
#12 Posted : Wednesday, November 6, 2013 4:58:21 PM(UTC)
Rodgers said it best. Skip is all shock value
Online texaspackerbacker  
#13 Posted : Wednesday, November 6, 2013 6:07:26 PM(UTC)
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
They all make good sense when they are saying things you agree with. As soon as they have a contrary opinion and they become idiots and buffoons.

What gets me is how you are so certain that Vince young would have been any better than Wallace. I mean its one thing to have a strong opinion but you are acting like it was a simple as deciding between a night with Emma Watson and a sharp stick in the eye and Ted Thompson chose the stick.

And I should know, I've had a sharp stick in the eye and I have had a night with... well I have had a sharp stick in the eye. I can only imagine the other choice would be infinitely better.


You'll have to excuse me for being old, but I don't even know who Emma Watson is hahahaha.

I assume you saw the same preseason games I saw, and for sure you watched last Monday night. I rest my case.

A decent backup QB should be able to come in the game and do like Josh McCown did when Cutler went out for the Bears ....... or a helluva lot of other backup QBs before that. Vince Young's ability to run combined with the game Lacy had would have been enough to beat the Bears, and if you don't think he would have been able to throw better than Wallace, well, you're beyond help.

BTW, my wife is 28, and she doesn't know who Emma Watson is either.
Offline steveishere  
#14 Posted : Wednesday, November 6, 2013 6:39:27 PM(UTC)
Vince Young has a lower career passer rating than Seneca Wallace. They both last saw action in 2011 and Vince Young played a bit worse than Wallace that year and was on a more talented team.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 11/6/2013(UTC)
Online texaspackerbacker  
#15 Posted : Wednesday, November 6, 2013 6:47:34 PM(UTC)
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
Vince Young has a lower career passer rating than Seneca Wallace. They both last saw action in 2011 and Vince Young played a bit worse than Wallace that year and was on a more talented team.


Vince Young is something like 31-13 as a starter (compared to 6-15 for Wallace), and the Titans weren't exactly a shining example of a good team.

Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages123>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
27m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

32m / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

49m / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Yerko

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884


Tweeter