Green Bay Packers Forum
4 Pages123>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Zero2Cool  
#1 Posted : Monday, November 11, 2013 8:11:49 AM(UTC)
Chat with fans during the game!


Green Bay Packers ( 5 - 4 )
    Total Offense = 3rd
    Passing Offense = 5th
    Rushing Offense = 6th

    Total Defense = 18th
    Passing Defense = 21st
    Rushing Defense = 13th

    Points For = 27.2 (5th)
    Points Against = 23.6 (17th)

UserPostedImage



New York Giants ( 3 - 6 )
  • Total Offense = 23rd
  • Passing Offense = 14th
  • Rushing Offense = 29th

  • Total Defense = 12th
  • Passing Defense = 11th
  • Rushing Defense = 11th

  • Points For = 18.3 (30th)
  • Points Against = 27.0 (26th)

UserPostedImage
Sponsor
Offline Zero2Cool  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:45:11 AM(UTC)
Updated
Offline VinceLambeauStarr  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, November 12, 2013 9:50:47 AM(UTC)
It's hard to be hopeful, but I am. Just.
Offline cheeseheads123  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:01:09 AM(UTC)
I will be at the game. This is the second of the three games that ive been to where Rodgers didn't play.
thanks Post received 3 applause.
nerdmann on 11/12/2013(UTC), DoddPower on 11/12/2013(UTC), coltonja on 11/12/2013(UTC)
Offline Cheesey  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, November 12, 2013 5:40:08 PM(UTC)
It's hard for me to be positive about this game......or any upcoming games, until the Packers prove they can win one.
Of course I want them to win, but me wanting doesn't get it done.

The defense will have to GREATLY improve, and the red zone O will have to improve.

Eli Manning has to be licking his chops at the prospect of picking our D-backs apart.

Of course if we can pull off a win, it might just give the guys a shot in the arm that they need right now.
Offline nyrpack  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:04:58 PM(UTC)
cheeseheads123 said: Go to Quoted Post
I will be at the game. This is the second of the three games that ive been to where Rodgers didn't play.


i was planning on going but my daughters 7th birthday party is ealier in the day ,so im not going, kind of glad, without rodgers im hoping for a ball control low scoring game !!
Offline cheeseheads123  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:14:39 PM(UTC)
nyrpack said: Go to Quoted Post
i was planning on going but my daughters 7th birthday party is ealier in the day ,so im not going, kind of glad, without rodgers im hoping for a ball control low scoring game !!

Yeah its been a roller coaster ride in terms of my excitement level. First it got flexed, then rodgers got hurt, then seeing what Tolzien was capable of got me a little excited.
Offline Bigbyfan  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, November 12, 2013 8:13:12 PM(UTC)
cheeseheads123 said: Go to Quoted Post
I will be at the game. This is the second of the three games that ive been to where Rodgers didn't play.


So you're part of the problem! You just made it on my shit list... [boxing]

People to Blame

1. Dom Capers
2. Whoever wrote the article jinxing Rodgers
3. Cheeseheads123
4. McCarthy (for keeping Capers)
Offline cheeseheads123  
#9 Posted : Tuesday, November 12, 2013 8:15:32 PM(UTC)
Bigbyfan said: Go to Quoted Post
So you're part of the problem! You just made it on my sh!t list... [boxing]

People to Blame

1. Dom Capers
2. Whoever wrote the article jinxing Rodgers
3. Cheeseheads123
4. McCarthy (for keeping Capers)


If it makes you feel any better we won the super bowl that year [grin1]
Offline DarkaneRules  
#10 Posted : Tuesday, November 12, 2013 8:19:24 PM(UTC)
Their o line can still be exposed. It has not been playing well this year. The other side though is their defense has been consistently improving. This will be a tough one because I don't see our injured line winning against the Giants front. Hope I am wrong.
Offline nerdmann  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, November 12, 2013 9:39:39 PM(UTC)
DarkaneRules said: Go to Quoted Post
Their o line can still be exposed. It has not been playing well this year. The other side though is their defense has been consistently improving. This will be a tough one because I don't see our injured line winning against the Giants front. Hope I am wrong.


Lord forbid we'd run some screens and traps.
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#12 Posted : Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:19:58 PM(UTC)
I'm a little bit optimistic about this game.

First of all, Tolzien ain't Aaron Rodgers - no one is, but he at least gives us a chance.

Secondly, part of the problem last week was that the Eagles actually played pretty good. Foles is up and coming, and more athletic than Eli - maybe better all the way around at this point. And the Giants don't have anything like McCoy - who did a lot by himself where lesser runners probably woulda gotten stopped for losses or short gains. Besides, the Packers D is gonna be under some pressure to hold up their end of things.

It's a tough one to call score-wise, but I'll say first one to 27 wins for the 3rd week in a row. Packers 27 Giants 19 (bend don't break D - tough in the red zone for once - 4 Giant FGs)
Offline nerdmann  
#13 Posted : Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:33:24 PM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
I'm a little bit optimistic about this game.

First of all, Tolzien ain't Aaron Rodgers - no one is, but he at least gives us a chance.

Secondly, part of the problem last week was that the Eagles actually played pretty good. Foles is up and coming, and more athletic than Eli - maybe better all the way around at this point. And the Giants don't have anything like McCoy - who did a lot by himself where lesser runners probably woulda gotten stopped for losses or short gains. Besides, the Packers D is gonna be under some pressure to hold up their end of things.

It's a tough one to call score-wise, but I'll say first one to 27 wins for the 3rd week in a row. Packers 27 Giants 19 (bend don't break D - tough in the red zone for once - 4 Giant FGs)


Our safeties were repeatedly out of position and giving up big plays.

Also our run defense was never on the field.

Ain't worried about the QB. I'm worried about the D.
Offline Laser Gunns  
#14 Posted : Wednesday, November 13, 2013 3:14:28 AM(UTC)
It's so odd, I'm more worried about our D than starting what would be our 3rd string QB who wasn't even in camp.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 11/13/2013(UTC)
Offline Zero2Cool  
#15 Posted : Friday, November 15, 2013 11:51:50 AM(UTC)
No Rodgers?




Edit,

CB Casey Hayward (hamstring) has been ruled out.

LB Nick Perry (ankle, foot) is listed as doubtful.

OT Don Barclay (knee)
LB Andy Mulumba (ankle) are listed as questionable.

C Evan Dietrich-Smith (knee),
DE Mike Neal (abdomen),
DT Johnny Jolly (groin),
DT Ryan Pickett (knee),
LB Clay Matthews (thumb)
CB Sam Shields (hamstring) are listed as probable.

Matthews fully participated in practice Friday, Nov. 15. Jolly, Neal and Pickett were limited during practice while the other players did not participate in practice.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages123>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Poppa San

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Poppa San

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT


Tweeter