Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
3 Pages123>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
wpr  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 1:57:20 PM(UTC)
Rob Demovsky said:
In last year's draft, there were two safeties off the board when it came time for the Green Bay Packers to pick at No. 26 in the first round.

So instead of taking Florida safety Matt Elam, who would end up going six picks later to the Baltimore Ravens, Packers general manager Ted Thompson opted for UCLA defensive end Datone Jones.

Thompson's decision not to address the safety position at all in the draft or free agency turned out to be a mistake that would end up costing the 2013 team.

While Kiper expects Alabama’s Ha Ha Clinton-Dix to be selected before the Packers pick, he has them taking Louisville safety Calvin Pryor.



Quote:
He has a reputation as a physical, hard-hitting safety – something the Packers have lacked in recent years.
love this.


Quote:
Pryor sat out one game last season because he was suspended for an unspecified violation of team rules.
oh oh. He's not Packer People.
wpr  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 2:20:43 PM(UTC)
Kiper may be on to something. Walters has Pryor listed at the 4th best Safety. A 2-3 round pick.
Cbs has him listed at #1 even in front of Clinton-Dix. A 1st or 2nd round pick.
SI has him going to GB in the first.

Which of course means Ted will go another direction.
Rockmolder  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 2:25:42 PM(UTC)
Sounds quite early to draft Pryor to me, but if Kiper says so, I guess it will catch on with a lot of mock drafters soon enough, for no reason, really.

We'll see what he does at the combine. He has a real big chance to sneak into the 1st, but right now, the 21st pick seems like a bit of a reach.
wpr  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 2:29:15 PM(UTC)
Rockmolder said: Go to Quoted Post
Sounds quite early to draft Pryor to me, but if Kiper says so, I guess it will catch on with a lot of mock drafters soon enough, for no reason, really.

We'll see what he does at the combine. He has a real big chance to sneak into the 1st, but right now, the 21st pick seems like a bit of a reach.


Yeah I have a hard time accepting the fact that he will be the BPA. He may be the best S available but Ted almost never takes the player at a need position if someone considerably better is still on the board.
steveishere  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 2:31:05 PM(UTC)
Rockmolder said: Go to Quoted Post
Sounds quite early to draft Pryor to me, but if Kiper says so, I guess it will catch on with a lot of mock drafters soon enough, for no reason, really.

We'll see what he does at the combine. He has a real big chance to sneak into the 1st, but right now, the 21st pick seems like a bit of a reach.


A lot of the draft guys I follow on twitter seem to think he's 1st round quality and I've been seeing it before Kiper came out with his thing. There's really no reason at this point to think he's a reach in the first round. He's got the production and physical ability for it.
nerdmann  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 2:32:48 PM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
Kiper may be on to something. Walters has Pryor listed at the 4th best Safety. A 2-3 round pick.
Cbs has him listed at #1 even in front of Clinton-Dix. A 1st or 2nd round pick.
SI has him going to GB in the first.

Which of course means Ted will go another direction.


Ted can be quite predictable at times. BJ Raji, AJ Hawk, Datone Jones, these guys were all projected to go to us even before the draft.
wpr  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 3:04:29 PM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Ted can be quite predictable at times. BJ Raji, AJ Hawk, Datone Jones, these guys were all projected to go to us even before the draft.


Hawk yes but that was a weak draft and there were not many choices for GB at #5. I saw as many for other players other than Raji. Jones no way. If you look at 100 predictions he was on less than half of them. Of course someone will get it right but he was not that predicable. Many said he was not a fit for GB 3-4.

Even if these 3 were all predicable. Out of 9 drafts guessing the first pick 3 times is not a shocker. Especially when you factor in the 1000 "experts" making their guesses.
Bigbyfan  
#8 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 3:19:09 PM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
Hawk yes but that was a weak draft and there were not many choices for GB at #5. I saw as many for other players other than Raji. Jones no way. If you look at 100 predictions he was on less than half of them. Of course someone will get it right but he was not that predicable. Many said he was not a fit for GB 3-4.

Even if these 3 were all predicable. Out of 9 drafts guessing the first pick 3 times is not a shocker. Especially when you factor in the 1000 "experts" making their guesses.


Not sure what draft sites you follow, but the majority I read had the Packers either taking Datone Jones or Lacy in the 1st round (Luckily we got both). There were some saying Elam/Cyprien however.

DoddPower  
#9 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 3:21:32 PM(UTC)
I'm continually becoming more and more infatuated with Ra'shede Hageman. He's so big and has the long arms necessary to excel as a defensive end in a 3-4, or on the inside. I'm definitely going to be keeping my eye on him.
wpr  
#10 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 4:13:46 PM(UTC)
Bigbyfan said: Go to Quoted Post
Not sure what draft sites you follow, but the majority I read had the Packers either taking Datone Jones or Lacy in the 1st round (Luckily we got both). There were some saying Elam/Cyprien however.



fair question. Many of the links for last year are gone. I didn't say that I never saw anyone saying Jones would be with GB. Simply that there were a lot of other choices, including Lacy.

I did a quick google search. Went through 4 pages. I got 12 sites with 2013 mock drafts. Some of them had multiple people picking so I ended up with 22 first round selections for GB.

The picks were as follows:
Lacy 6 times.
Jones 3 times
TE- Eifert 3 times
FS Elam 2 times
1 time for the following:
OT- Watson; WR- Patterson, Hopkins, Woods; CB- Rhodes; DT- Williams; DE- Jordan and S- Vaccaro

You are correct when you add Lacy into the equation. But I am correct when I said Jones was not an overwhelming pick on his own.

The more common websites with a little credibility are:
Walter's- Jones
Draftek- Jones
Bleacher Report- Lacy (Ok some don't have that much credibility)
USA Today- Lacy
SI- Williams
Mayock- Lacy
TSN- Lacy
NY Daily News- Vaccaro

The other person to pick Jones was one of the 6 guys on NEPatriotsdraft.com.
FFToolbox.com had 6 picks also Lacy and Elam were tops.



User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#11 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 4:29:54 PM(UTC)
At this early stage, it's mostly only relevant to consider positions. I'm glad to read they are saying Safety. I'm thankful it ain't TE. As for Pryor, my question is , can he cover? There's a reason the Packers tend to avoid hard hitting Safeties. A lot of them can't cover - a higher priority.

The elephant in the draft room, of course, is what if anything do we pick up in free agency. Byrd would be nice, especially since I suspect there won't be much in that category of the draft when our turn comes.
beast  
#12 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 5:23:24 PM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah I have a hard time accepting the fact that he will be the BPA. He may be the best S available but Ted almost never takes the player at a need position if someone considerably better is still on the board.

Ted Thompson 2nd picks often seem like a position of need and/or position that has an important FA that year or the next year at the same position.
cheeseheads123  
#13 Posted : Wednesday, January 15, 2014 7:37:20 PM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
At this early stage, it's mostly only relevant to consider positions. I'm glad to read they are saying Safety. I'm thankful it ain't TE. As for Pryor, my question is , can he cover? There's a reason the Packers tend to avoid hard hitting Safeties. A lot of them can't cover - a higher priority.

The elephant in the draft room, of course, is what if anything do we pick up in free agency. Byrd would be nice, especially since I suspect there won't be much in that category of the draft when our turn comes.


The jury is still out on whether or not he can cover. That is why I view Pryor as someone to trade up for in the second as of now.
play2win  
#14 Posted : Thursday, January 16, 2014 6:37:50 AM(UTC)
DoddPower said: Go to Quoted Post
I'm continually becoming more and more infatuated with Ra'shede Hageman. He's so big and has the long arms necessary to excel as a defensive end in a 3-4, or on the inside. I'm definitely going to be keeping my eye on him.


Wow, DoddPower! Thanks for the headsup. This player looks phenomenal. I would love for Ted to pop on Jairus Byrd in FA, then draft this kid. Those two players added to our D could be a huge improvement.

We need Safety help so badly, but pounding the trenches early in the draft with top talent always makes sense.
cheeseheads123  
#15 Posted : Thursday, January 16, 2014 10:37:53 AM(UTC)
At this time last year Kiper had the Packers taking Barrett Jones G/C Alabama
PackFanWithTwins  
#16 Posted : Thursday, January 16, 2014 11:25:14 AM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah I have a hard time accepting the fact that he will be the BPA. He may be the best S available but Ted almost never takes the player at a need position if someone considerably better is still on the board.


I hate the BPA term. It is really BPAFP (Best player available for Packers). Need is always considered when ranking players. Players with more talent may be ranked lower than another if they play a position we don't need as bad. Ted's final board is a combination of so many factors.
Zero2Cool  
#17 Posted : Thursday, January 16, 2014 11:43:46 AM(UTC)
Packers should have selected Michael Crabtree and Vernon Davis. Stupid Ted Thompson. STUPID!! We all seen that Hawk would blow like Raji.
Rockmolder  
#18 Posted : Thursday, January 16, 2014 2:06:52 PM(UTC)
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
A lot of the draft guys I follow on twitter seem to think he's 1st round quality and I've been seeing it before Kiper came out with his thing. There's really no reason at this point to think he's a reach in the first round. He's got the production and physical ability for it.


Do you have any sources for that?

Not that I don't trust you. Your posts are always insightful and I fully believe you, but I must've been looking at the wrong Mocks then and I always like to find some more draftnicks to follow.
Rockmolder  
#19 Posted : Thursday, January 16, 2014 2:16:05 PM(UTC)
DoddPower said: Go to Quoted Post
I'm continually becoming more and more infatuated with Ra'shede Hageman. He's so big and has the long arms necessary to excel as a defensive end in a 3-4, or on the inside. I'm definitely going to be keeping my eye on him.


If he falls to 21, there's no doubt in my mind we should take him... At this point. Maybe if he does horribly at the Combine that'll change. Can't imagine that happening, though.

cheeseheads123 said: Go to Quoted Post
At this time last year Kiper had the Packers taking Barrett Jones G/C Alabama


Ah, yeah, I remember that hype. Didn't he go in the 4th?

PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
I hate the BPA term. It is really BPAFP (Best player available for Packers). Need is always considered when ranking players. Players with more talent may be ranked lower than another if they play a position we don't need as bad. Ted's final board is a combination of so many factors.


Maybe it is, but it shouldn't. I truly believe that, maybe except for STs and QB, you always go BPA, taking into consideration positional value.

That's how the Giants build that ridiculous DE nucleous, that's how the Lions built that D-line and that's how we build our WR to start with. Maybe it looks like overkill at some points, but I'd rather have 3 elite DEs that I can rotate, than 2 elite DEs and a good ILB.

But I agree with you, we draft BPAFP, as you coined it. That's how a guy like Cordarelle Patterson wasn't drafted last year. Or, at least, I think. I obviously can't look at the Packers bigboard.
PackFanWithTwins  
#20 Posted : Thursday, January 16, 2014 2:37:41 PM(UTC)
Rockmolder said: Go to Quoted Post
That's how a guy like Cordarelle Patterson wasn't drafted last year. Or, at least, I think. I obviously can't look at the Packers bigboard.


Our defense would be just as bad, and I can only imagine what people would be saying had we drafted a WR in the first round last year.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
beast (1h) : Packers can't catch Eagles so it doesn't directly effect our playoff chances.
Nonstopdrivel (1h) : yoffs?
Nonstopdrivel (1h) : So . . . could in theory be a severe sprain. Which might still sideline him for the rest of the season, but perhaps he'd be back for the pla
Zero2Cool (1h) : That's regarding Carson Wentz
Zero2Cool (1h) : @AlbertBreer Doctors determined with manual test there was damage to ACL, extent unknown until MRI tomorrow.
Zero2Cool (1h) : Read reports that's what is feared and yes, you're right, usually if that's the fear = done
Nonstopdrivel (1h) : MRI would me mostly a formality. He walked off on his own power, so possibly just a sprain? But I doubt it.
Nonstopdrivel (1h) : Provocative tests on scene are pretty sensitive. If they fear his ACL is torn, it probably is.
Zero2Cool (1h) : He has an ACL? I only heard there were running tests ... tomorrow.
Nonstopdrivel (1h) : Depends on which Nick Foles arises from the ashes. If it's the 2013 Foles, Eagles could still be a powerhouse.
gbguy20 (2h) : carson wentz torn acl. is that good or bad for our playoff chances?
nerdmann (5h) : It's definitive, Davante is BETTER than Janis.
Zero2Cool (6h) : can't believe some don't want Adams re-signed... what is wrong with you!!
Zero2Cool (6h) : @WesHod The #Packers turned to Davante Adams several times during the final series and he came through each time. The evolution of a playmak
buckeyepackfan (10h) : Packer Fans will take over Stadium today!
Zero2Cool (11h) : @AaronNagler Packers just took the field to cheers. No Browns fans here to boo yet.
buckeyepackfan (11h) : DILLY DILLY!
Zero2Cool (11h) : Williams though, to answer your question :D
Zero2Cool (11h) : First snap of the day don't mean didly
Zero2Cool (11h) : Starting? who cares?
Zero2Cool (11h) : Browns getting 1st win
dhazer (11h) : who is starting at rb today ?
buckeyepackfan (11h) : Perry innactive! Fackrell & Biegal step up today!
Zero2Cool (11h) : Both undrafted rookies, Lenzy Pipkins and Donatello Brown, are active for the #Packers. They join Randall, House and Hawkins as the active c
buckeyepackfan (13h) : GO! PACK! GO!
buckeyepackfan (13h) : GAMEDAY! #assesagainstthewall!
buckeyepackfan (13h) : GOOD MORNING PACKER FANS!
buckeyepackfan (13h) : Yes Packers will be done if they lose today.
beast (13h) : Packers might be done even if they go undefeated the rest of the way ,so any loss and they're out of playoff chase
dhazer (13h) : If GB loses today should mean end of TT and MM. The Browns are going for perfect season
gbguy20 (14h) : if we lose today are we done?
Zero2Cool (10-Dec) : Rodgers also lines up LB during practices. Fun they does have
buckeyepackfan (10-Dec) : Pipkin & Brown!!!! = Packer Win!!! BOOK IT!!!!
Cheesey (10-Dec) : GO Arvy, beat Namy! Lol!
wpr (9-Dec) : GO ARMY BEAT NAVY
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
now / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

9m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

32m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

13h / Fantasy Sports Talk / dhazer

10-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

9-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

Headlines