Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
MintBaconDrivel  
#1 Posted : Saturday, February 8, 2014 11:16:05 AM(UTC)
Rob Demovsky said:

You’re referring to the fact they didn’t hire anyone as an outside linebackers coach to replace Kevin Greene. That’s possible, although they did say Winston Moss will coach inside linebackers and outside linebackers. And they promoted another coach, Scott McCurley, to help coach all linebackers. Also, defensive coordinator Dom Capers has run a 3-4 scheme for decades, and it’s unlikely he would overhaul his system in that regard. We’ll get a better idea on Monday, when the new assistant coaches are available for interviews.
Mucky Tundra  
#2 Posted : Saturday, February 8, 2014 11:27:18 AM(UTC)
LombardiAve said:
There has been some talk lately about the Packers making a move to a 4-3 defense from the 3-4. We take detailed look at what the Packers defense would look like if they switched to a 4-3 alignment. Yes, we all know the Green Bay Packers defense has struggled as of late. Last season, the
Zero2Cool  
#3 Posted : Saturday, February 8, 2014 2:02:02 PM(UTC)
no
nerdmann  
#4 Posted : Saturday, February 8, 2014 2:49:02 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
no


Agreed. They're stocked with 4-3 personnel, but they won't switch.
beast  
#5 Posted : Saturday, February 8, 2014 6:11:45 PM(UTC)


Packers aren't going to run 4-3 ... but don't be surprised if they run a lot of 4-2 formation (because it's their nickel package, which people call a 2-4 because the OLBers are lined up as 4-2 DEs.)
Mucky Tundra  
#6 Posted : Saturday, February 8, 2014 8:56:51 PM(UTC)
Hm but why not actually throw out a 4 man DL (with four hands in the dirt) with a 4-2 nickel or something?

Edit: Should have mentioned this before but what I meant was why not throw out the 4-2 nickel once in a while, not all the time.
Laser Gunns  
#7 Posted : Saturday, February 8, 2014 9:42:54 PM(UTC)
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
No
beast  
#8 Posted : Saturday, February 8, 2014 10:07:46 PM(UTC)
Mucky Tundra said: Go to Quoted Post
Hm but why not actually throw out a 4 man DL (with four hands in the dirt) with a 4-2 nickel or something?

Edit: Should have mentioned this before but what I meant was why not throw out the 4-2 nickel once in a while, not all the time.


I think their logic is that they train the OLB to be the edge guys and not the DL.

But I agree with you that they should train them for the 4-2 spot as well... I think the longer guys like Neal, Datone Jones and maybe another one or two others might be good in that 4-2 role.
Dulak  
#9 Posted : Sunday, February 9, 2014 7:53:43 AM(UTC)
hope not - I like our 3-4; just need to tweak it a bit IMO and keep our guys healthy.

Our best defensive player was out most of the time or playing 1/2 armed.
nerdmann  
#10 Posted : Sunday, February 9, 2014 9:39:41 AM(UTC)
Dulak said: Go to Quoted Post
hope not - I like our 3-4; just need to tweak it a bit IMO and keep our guys healthy.

Our best defensive player was out most of the time or playing 1/2 armed.


How old is Clay? Hope he's not breaking down.
User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#11 Posted : Sunday, February 9, 2014 11:17:04 AM(UTC)
There's too much obsession in here about 3-4 or 4-3. Defenses are about the sub-packages anyway. Our defense needs to identify the turds and rid ourselves of them, re-up Sam Shields, and get upgrades at safety and inside linebacker. Would love to see a top ten defense again!
Dulak  
#12 Posted : Sunday, February 9, 2014 2:26:23 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
There's too much obsession in here about 3-4 or 4-3. Defenses are about the sub-packages anyway. Our defense needs to identify the turds and rid ourselves of them, re-up Sam Shields, and get upgrades at safety and inside linebacker. Would love to see a top ten defense again!


ya but I think we all remember the sanders ara - ie before capers - our D could be read easily and we didnt do jack. IMO
play2win  
#13 Posted : Sunday, February 9, 2014 3:45:09 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
There's too much obsession in here about 3-4 or 4-3. Defenses are about the sub-packages anyway. Our defense needs to identify the turds and rid ourselves of them, re-up Sam Shields, and get upgrades at safety and inside linebacker. Would love to see a top ten defense again!


I wonder what this D would look like with 2 new LBs inside. Brad Jones has to be replaced. The guy sucks. Hawk has been durable, and almost always leads in tackles but I just wonder what it would be like having a better MLB there.

We need upgrades at so many positions. It boggles the mind:
NT
DE
OLB
MLB
ILB
SS (move Burnett back to FS)

I don't think we need to switch out of the 3-4, but we definitely need better players.
Dulak  
#14 Posted : Monday, February 10, 2014 3:13:39 AM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
I wonder what this D would look like with 2 new LBs inside. Brad Jones has to be replaced. The guy sucks. Hawk has been durable, and almost always leads in tackles but I just wonder what it would be like having a better MLB there.

We need upgrades at so many positions. It boggles the mind:
NT
DE
OLB
MLB
ILB
SS (move Burnett back to FS)

I don't think we need to switch out of the 3-4, but we definitely need better players.


I havnt liked brad jones since we drafted him ... you got some guys that looked tough or had alot of fire in em and they had some muscle ... then you had brad jones that didnt like look anything to do with the previous ... and still doesnt. Yet we paid him big $ last year with a contract (dont remember how long).

Supposedly he is our best pass def ILB ... Got to be better peeps out there then him.

Ive never really liked hawk either ... was only so so on the guy ... but I got to tell you this year ... especially with clay being out or hampered most of the time. I mostly saw hawk tearing it up. Prob first year I am glad we had hawk on our team and would want him again next year.

play2win  
#15 Posted : Monday, February 10, 2014 5:44:51 AM(UTC)
Dulak, Jones had 0 PDs and 0 INTs, for a guy who should be good in coverage with height and speed… I don't think he can cover. That is not part of his skill set. We can't have that in the middle of our D.

Figure with Raji going through the motions and not being effective, and Pickett always trying, but getting older and playing though injury all of last season, along with piss poor Safety play, our interior D left a lot to be desired. DL and LBs not getting home to the QB, not stopping the RB on run plays, and showing great difficulty in coverage over the middle.

I'm all for addressing the middle of our D this offseason. NT, DE, ILB, MLB and S. I hope they will bring in some good talent. We need it. My only question is, do they have the stones to cut loose the players, like Jones, who aren't producing?

At least Hawk made plays. 5 PDs and 1 INT, 1FF and 5 sacks to go with 118 tackles. If he had some real talent around him…. to think his numbers could have been even better… I like Hawk, because he is always there. He is reliable. I didn't care for his 2011-12 seasons - both play and his contract #s, but it was good to see him turn it completely around last season. I think we might be able to do better, but there are other positions listed that need far more attention.
nerdmann  
#16 Posted : Monday, February 10, 2014 9:57:41 AM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
Dulak, Jones had 0 PDs and 0 INTs, for a guy who should be good in coverage with height and speed… I don't think he can cover. That is not part of his skill set. We can't have that in the middle of our D.


Jones was battling injuries all year. He wasn't 100%.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Bigbyfan (14m) : Of course the Bears would be the ones to take my guy...
isocleas2 (36m) : Interesting
isocleas2 (36m) : Ward at #4
Zero2Cool (1h) : Bahahahhaha
Zero2Cool (1h) : In Madden.
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers made a trade!!
beast (2h) : Na, they're going to trade this year's 1st to the Patriots for two 1st round picks (one next year and one this year).
Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers might draft Saquon Barkley
beast (4h) : He's actions said, he's going to tease the #1 pick choice as long as he can
Zero2Cool (5h) : How so? What did he say?
beast (5h) : John Dorsey is just messing with people now... which QB he'll take... I partly love it, partly annoyed by it.
Zero2Cool (5h) : You can make your NFL Pick's (Fantasy > NFL Pick'em)
Smokey (5h) : bye week is not listed in this forum's posting.
Zero2Cool (5h) : You don't follow the Pacers, do you?
gbguy20 (6h) : i must be missing something with the bye week comment
Smokey (7h) : Order your Pizza, Now !
Smokey (7h) : Packers
Smokey (7h) : Yes there is a bye week in the Pacers 2018 Schedule.
Zero2Cool (7h) : no charges? so the bomb was a dud??
Zero2Cool (7h) : No charges for WR Davis over LAX bomb joke
Cheesey (7h) : THE WRATH OF KHAN!!
Zero2Cool (7h) : damn caps
Zero2Cool (7h) : yEEHAW!!
Smokey (7h) : "DRAFT CHAT" Baby !
packerfanoutwest (10h) : Packers first pick will be lining up on with the defense
beast (11h) : If Packers trade up, they're grabbing James (or an ILB or CB) ;-P
beast (11h) : Sounds like Khan is moving the team to London in time.
packerfanoutwest (11h) : Here's an idea. Start a thread on who can pick the Packers #1 pick. Just make the pick only. No other comments.
Zero2Cool (12h) : This is NOT good
Zero2Cool (12h) : Shad Khan: I’m buying Wembley to keep the Jaguars stable in both London and Jacksonville
Zero2Cool (12h) : @AndrewBrandt Yes. The best GMs will leverage desperate teams tonight.
Zero2Cool (12h) : Today's Birthdays: StoicFire (30)
Zero2Cool (13h) : The Parlor is better than The Room.
beast (26-Apr) : I believe the Packers seriously want to trade up (if they can find a price they like), I'm guessing for Fitzpatrick or James (though one guy said Ward). But could also be one of the ILBers (Smith or E
Smokey (25-Apr) : Rumors are not money in the bank deals.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2018 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 9 @ 7:20 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Sep 16 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Sep 23 @ 12:00 PM
Redskins
Sunday, Sep 30 @ 12:00 PM
BILLS
Sunday, Oct 7 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Monday, Oct 15 @ 7:15 PM
49ERS
Sunday, Oct 28 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Nov 4 @ 7:20 PM
Patriots
Sunday, Nov 11 @ 12:00 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Nov 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Sunday, Nov 25 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Dec 2 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Dec 9 @ 12:00 PM
FALCONS
Sunday, Dec 16 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Dec 23 @ 12:00 PM
Jets
Sunday, Dec 30 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
54m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5h / Random Babble / Cheesey

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Bigbyfan

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

26-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

24-Apr / Around The NFL / dhazer

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

24-Apr / Random Babble / Cheesey

Headlines