Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
4 Pages<1234>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline macbob  
#11 Posted : Sunday, April 20, 2014 4:08:40 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2016PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2012FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2014

Joined: 10/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 374
Applause Received: 326
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
This proves what I have been saying for years. Trading up for a stud player is better than trading down to get 2-3 average quality players.


Actually, it depends on your situation. Trading away picks to move up helps your starting team at the expense of your depth.

Mike Sherman was a poster boy for the former (trading up), and Ted Thompson is a poster boy for the latter (trading down for additional picks).

Sherman left us depleted--as long as our starters were healthy, we were OK, but the minute somebody got injured there was a big drop off to their replacement. It also relied on him hitting a larger percentage of his picks, since he had fewer picks overall.

Thompson's approach was exactly what we needed after Sherman. The additional picks allowed us to regain depth quicker.

But once you have good depth again, you can afford some trading up to improve your starters. Which is where Thompson has impressed me the most--he adjusted his normal approach to trade up and take CM3 because of his player evaluation, and hit a home run.

Overall, I've been impressed with Thompson--he's kept us toward the top of the NFL, got us a Super Bowl championship, and had us surviving the loss of Aaron Rodgers to make the playoffs. He's had a few misses, but that's the nature of the beast--it's going to happen.
thanks Post received 5 applause.
DakotaT on 4/20/2014(UTC), Mucky Tundra on 4/20/2014(UTC), play2win on 4/21/2014(UTC), Yerko on 4/21/2014(UTC), mi_keys on 4/21/2014(UTC)
Offline nerdmann  
#12 Posted : Sunday, April 20, 2014 4:45:31 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,406
Applause Received: 1,419
Biggest problem facing this team is the injuries.
Offline TheKanataThrilla  
#13 Posted : Sunday, April 20, 2014 5:43:44 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Canada
Joined: 9/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 480
Applause Received: 505
It is hard for me to be pissed at Thompson for most of the picks because I was pretty happy with most of them as they were often BPA that filled a need. The one pick I wasn't happy with and I hope he proves me wrong is Nick Perry. Not that I thought he wasn't talented, I just thought we should have went with a Safety and Harrison Smith was my pick even though he had a second round ranking. I think Safety is now such a key position that if you lose your starter you need to draft a replacement in the early rounds. I find it a failure that Thompson has not found a replacement for Nick Collins.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Yerko on 4/21/2014(UTC)
Offline wpr  
#14 Posted : Sunday, April 20, 2014 6:10:33 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,993
Applause Received: 2,043
macbob said: Go to Quoted Post
Actually, it depends on your situation. Trading away picks to move up helps your starting team at the expense of your depth.

Mike Sherman was a poster boy for the former (trading up), and Ted Thompson is a poster boy for the latter (trading down for additional picks).

Sherman left us depleted--as long as our starters were healthy, we were OK, but the minute somebody got injured there was a big drop off to their replacement. It also relied on him hitting a larger percentage of his picks, since he had fewer picks overall.

Thompson's approach was exactly what we needed after Sherman. The additional picks allowed us to regain depth quicker.

But once you have good depth again, you can afford some trading up to improve your starters. Which is where Thompson has impressed me the most--he adjusted his normal approach to trade up and take CM3 because of his player evaluation, and hit a home run.

Overall, I've been impressed with Thompson--he's kept us toward the top of the NFL, got us a Super Bowl championship, and had us surviving the loss of Aaron Rodgers to make the playoffs. He's had a few misses, but that's the nature of the beast--it's going to happen.


I don't advocate always trading up at the expense of depth. Nor do I advocate always trading down and collect a lot of backups at the expense of quality game changing players. Like the FA vs draft debate, it takes a balanced approach to have a solid team.

Keep in mind of one the reasons Ted had to get extra draft picks is because GB was in cap hell and they had to get rid of a lot of over priced and under performing players. Accumulating 5th, 6th and 7th round picks is a quick way to do that.

When I say trade up (and I have said this many times in the past week) it has to be the right player and fit a need. I am not saying to trade up just because they can. Ted's team will have spent countless hours researching the prospective player. And let's face it, Ted & Co does a lot better job than 90% of the other GM's out there.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
yooperfan on 4/20/2014(UTC)
Offline wpr  
#15 Posted : Sunday, April 20, 2014 6:13:16 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,993
Applause Received: 2,043
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Wow man, so you know ahead of time that Clay was gonna pan out like he did.

Perhaps you'd care to name the top 5 pro bowlers in this years draft? I'm gonna be putting together my board soon, could use the insight.



RollEyes


Yep that is what I said wasn't it? I said I called Ted on his private line and told him CM3 was worth what he gave and and 5 times as much.

I got more than the next 5 pro bowlers but why would I want to give them to you?
Offline yooperfan  
#16 Posted : Sunday, April 20, 2014 6:25:13 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2014PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2016

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Ishpeming Michigan
Applause Given: 1,633
Applause Received: 648
[laughing] [laughing]
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
RollEyes


Yep that is what I said wasn't it? I said I called Ted on his private line and told him CM3 was worth what he gave and and 5 times as much.

I got more than the next 5 pro bowlers but why would I want to give them to you?
[laughing]

Offline nerdmann  
#17 Posted : Sunday, April 20, 2014 6:42:31 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,406
Applause Received: 1,419
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
RollEyes


Yep that is what I said wasn't it? I said I called Ted on his private line and told him CM3 was worth what he gave and and 5 times as much.

I got more than the next 5 pro bowlers but why would I want to give them to you?


In order to prove you know wtf you're talking about.
Offline wpr  
#18 Posted : Sunday, April 20, 2014 6:52:41 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,993
Applause Received: 2,043
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
In order to prove you know wtf you're talking about.


I don't have to prove squat to you.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
buckeyepackfan on 4/20/2014(UTC), DoddPower on 4/21/2014(UTC)
Online mi_keys  
#19 Posted : Sunday, April 20, 2014 7:26:23 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 352
Applause Received: 615
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
Ted's best pick was trading back into the first the pick up CM3. The players that were taken with GB's picks were Darius Butler, Derek Cox and Brandon Tate. Now if NE selected Jairus Byrd and Mike Wallace instead of Butler andTate maybe we would grade the deal differently. (Cox drafted by Jacksonville in a trade with NE.) This proves what I have been saying for years. Trading up for a stud player is better than trading down to get 2-3 average quality players.


I get what you are saying with a lot of your post but I disagree with this. One instance doesn't prove anything. It's all about the situation and who is available, and trading back doesn't always result in average players.

For example, in 2006 New England traded up with Green Bay in the second round. They took Chad Jackson, a receiver who ended up with 14 career receptions. With the picks we got from New England we ended up with Greg Jennings and Jason Spitz. Yes, Spitz was an average player. But Jennings was a multi-pro bowler and a key piece of our most recent Super Bowl team. He is decidedly well beyond average (except for his career choice decision making ability; that is subpar).

We also traded back for Jordy Nelson.

More good to elite players are found in the earlier rounds; but depending on what your scouting has dug up and what the board shows, your sometimes better off trading back, not just with regards to depth, but even finding top-end NFL players. It varies widely by situation.
Offline wpr  
#20 Posted : Sunday, April 20, 2014 7:46:46 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,993
Applause Received: 2,043
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
I get what you are saying with a lot of your post but I disagree with this. One instance doesn't prove anything. It's all about the situation and who is available, and trading back doesn't always result in average players.

For example, in 2006 New England traded up with Green Bay in the second round. They took Chad Jackson, a receiver who ended up with 14 career receptions. With the picks we got from New England we ended up with Greg Jennings and Jason Spitz. Yes, Spitz was an average player. But Jennings was a multi-pro bowler and a key piece of our most recent Super Bowl team. He is decidedly well beyond average (except for his career choice decision making ability; that is subpar).

We also traded back for Jordy Nelson.

More good to elite players are found in the earlier rounds; but depending on what your scouting has dug up and what the board shows, your sometimes better off trading back, not just with regards to depth, but even finding top-end NFL players. It varies widely by situation.


So I trust in Ted's crew more than other team's draft teams is that a crime? Naturally I am speaking in general terms. Even the great Ted can fail when he is working a trade. Thing is people don't get as excited if he were to trade down than to trade up and it not work out. You have more picks so if the 3rd round pick is a bust and the 5th round pick is great many people would tend to give him a pass. They would over look the fact that he could have still had the pick without the trade.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
uffda udfa (2h) : The Boss picks the Falcons: [TWITTER]788447079446130688[/TWITTER]
uffda udfa (2h) : Is there a prediction thread somewhere on the forum for the Falcons game?
uffda udfa (2h) : Lookout porous Falcons secondary!
Zero2Cool (3h) : uh oh'
uffda udfa (3h) : Jordy, Davante and GMO all playing tomorrow.
uffda udfa (7h) : MM is such a creature of habit that this is going to upset his apple cart.
uffda udfa (7h) : Waited 2 hours than bused 125 miles to Milwaukee.
uffda udfa (7h) : Fog forces Packers to alter flight to Atlanta.
uffda udfa (7h) : Hoping Max McCaffery is the next Adam Thielen and right soon.
uffda udfa (8h) : Everyone knew Tate got away with OPI and even he said so.
uffda udfa (8h) : http://www.packershome.com/forum/posts/m218900-UN-Fucking-Believable#post218900
uffda udfa (8h) : Golden Tate pushed off big time in Seattle. I said it then.
Zero2Cool (8h) : Max McCaffrey Added to Roster, J.C. Tretter Subtracted
Zero2Cool (8h) : Read what I said about Hail Mary plays and referees letting players play. Got it? Good.
Zero2Cool (8h) : I absolutely would not. Don't dare presume to speak for me. WTF.
uffda udfa (8h) : Had it been other way around I would've been screaming and so would u.
uffda udfa (9h) : It's just true. I try hard to see it and tell it like it is. Was OPI.
Zero2Cool (11h) : which is of course ok, i just personally see it as weird.
Zero2Cool (12h) : Just odd that a Packers fan points out when Packers perceived to get away with something, yet ignore opponent. Weird.
Zero2Cool (12h) : Packers added RB Christine Michael (back) to the injury report as questionable
uffda udfa (12h) : Not diminishing anything. He got away with OPI. Didn't notice before. Was in airport.
Zero2Cool (14h) : Bahahahahahahha GO PACK GO!!!!
Zero2Cool (14h) : when you're buying your Super Bowl LI Champion gear, be critical of that too!
Zero2Cool (14h) : keep trying to diminish what the Packers have done and ...
Zero2Cool (14h) : one... that's just how it goes. They let the players play. But go ahead
Zero2Cool (14h) : Everyone knows on the hail mary type passes, those little shoves won't be called. Think replacement refs 2012. So, no did not get away with
Dulak (14h) : ya I think they mentioned that U U ... but you see this alot - even in the dallas game they pushed off at least 1 time (they as in dallas)
uffda udfa (21h) : Just rewatched Cobbs hail mary catch in slo mo...he should've been flagged for OPI. Got away with one.
uffda udfa (23h) : Nope. I like Gus.
beast (21-Jan) : Did you want Anthony Lynn as HC? Cushion Bradley was going to follow Lynn where ever.
uffda udfa (21-Jan) : Gus Bradley is new DC in SD/LA. I would've loved to had him here in Green Bay.
uffda udfa (21-Jan) : It's just fine.
musccy (21-Jan) : 5 questionable Packers, none for Falcons. Not good.
uffda udfa (21-Jan) : Jordy not listed as OUT or DOUBTFUL. Questionable on injury report.
uffda udfa (21-Jan) : This is the 6th straight game we've faced someone for the 2nd time. We learn.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
11m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

13m / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

27m / Green Bay Packers Talk / rabidgopher04

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / The_Green_Ninja

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / flep

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / hardrocker950

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast


Packers Headlines