Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
12 Pages<1234>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline uffda udfa  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, June 17, 2014 8:56:58 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 4/25/2014(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 432
Applause Received: 469
Yeah, I meant he wouldn't make it to the PS because another team would pick him up on waivers before he cleared to get there.

I don't recall the Packers ever keeping more than 6 WR's. The injury thing probably ensures one of the top 6 or 7 hits PUP or IR. That is probably a good thing.

The Packers under Ted Thompson have kept some odd variations of roster makeup. I don't recall ever having 5 TE's on a roster prior to TT. 3 is the norm. I've been curious to see if we drop one TE to keep another WR. It'll be much easier to sneak a Perillo on the PS vs. a Janis. Also, I continue to wonder if Lyerla would be safe on the PS considering nobody would touch him post draft. Who knows...maybe, they keep 7 WR's if they really, really think those 7 are better than carrying a guy elsewhere.

Can't wait to see the final 53.

thanks Post received 1 applause.
Yerko on 6/18/2014(UTC)
Offline play2win  
#12 Posted : Wednesday, June 18, 2014 6:20:30 AM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 724
uffda udfa said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, I meant he wouldn't make it to the PS because another team would pick him up on waivers before he cleared to get there.

I don't recall the Packers ever keeping more than 6 WR's. The injury thing probably ensures one of the top 6 or 7 hits PUP or IR. That is probably a good thing.

The Packers under Ted Thompson have kept some odd variations of roster makeup. I don't recall ever having 5 TE's on a roster prior to TT. 3 is the norm. I've been curious to see if we drop one TE to keep another WR. It'll be much easier to sneak a Perillo on the PS vs. a Janis. Also, I continue to wonder if Lyerla would be safe on the PS considering nobody would touch him post draft. Who knows...maybe, they keep 7 WR's if they really, really think those 7 are better than carrying a guy elsewhere.

Can't wait to see the final 53.



It is going to be a weird 53. Huge talent at WR, TE, DL and LB.

I agree vultures are going to swoop in and nab any WR we try putting on the PS not named Gillette. Lyerla won't last there either.

If they are going to go back to keeping only 3 TEs, this might be the year to do so, with Quarless, Rodgers and Lyerla being the top 3 IMO. They could probably PUP Bostick. They normally keep only 5 WRs, but kept 6 in 2012. We have 7 that I would like us to keep, but that won't work. Hoping Ted can work a trade before roster cuts. We still have a full TC and preseason to work through too. We are definitely protected should we suffer an injury at WR in TC.

There are plenty of teams in need of top WR talent.
Offline steveishere  
#13 Posted : Wednesday, June 18, 2014 6:56:46 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 58
Applause Received: 1,760
I wouldn't be so sure Janis would get claimed on waivers. Everyone thought that about Charles Johnson too and he made it through. To claim him a team would have to put him onto their 53 for at least a couple weeks so you really have to be sure about a player to do that and he lasted until the late 7th round so obviously teams aren't all that sure about him. I think he'd be likely to get picked up a few weeks into the season though by a team that has some injuries at WR or some underperformers.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#14 Posted : Wednesday, June 18, 2014 7:03:27 AM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,501
Applause Received: 4,045
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
I wouldn't be so sure Janis would get claimed on waivers. Everyone thought that about Charles Johnson too and he made it through. To claim him a team would have to put him onto their 53 for at least a couple weeks so you really have to be sure about a player to do that and he lasted until the late 7th round so obviously teams aren't all that sure about him. I think he'd be likely to get picked up a few weeks into the season though by a team that has some injuries at WR or some underperformers.


I'll put money down that the Packers put a WR who is on the edge on IR for a pulled kneecap or something.
Offline uffda udfa  
#15 Posted : Wednesday, June 18, 2014 7:24:07 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 4/25/2014(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 432
Applause Received: 469
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
I wouldn't be so sure Janis would get claimed on waivers. Everyone thought that about Charles Johnson too and he made it through. To claim him a team would have to put him onto their 53 for at least a couple weeks so you really have to be sure about a player to do that and he lasted until the late 7th round so obviously teams aren't all that sure about him. I think he'd be likely to get picked up a few weeks into the season though by a team that has some injuries at WR or some underperformers.


Charles Johnson was injured, though. No one knew at the time just how injured he was but that played a role in him not getting scooped up right away. Packers had barely seen the guy due to his TC injury.

Janis is getting some positive press already and we're not to TC...that is something Charles Johnson never got. Those measurables of his are as good as Julio Jones and anyone else's in the entire league. I recall during the draft Charles Johnson tweeting that he thought the Cardinals would've been smarter to draft Jeff Janis in the 3rd round over the kid they took... John Brown from Pittsburgh State. https://twitter.com/Mrr_...tatus/464962341864747009
Offline steveishere  
#16 Posted : Wednesday, June 18, 2014 7:42:57 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 58
Applause Received: 1,760
uffda udfa said: Go to Quoted Post
Charles Johnson was injured, though. No one knew at the time just how injured he was but that played a role in him not getting scooped up right away. Packers had barely seen the guy due to his TC injury.

Janis is getting some positive press already and we're not to TC...that is something Charles Johnson never got. Those measurables of his are as good as Julio Jones and anyone else's in the entire league. I recall during the draft Charles Johnson tweeting that he thought the Cardinals would've been smarter to draft Jeff Janis in the 3rd round over the kid they took... John Brown from Pittsburgh State. https://twitter.com/Mrr_...tatus/464962341864747009


There's also the fact that nobody in the NFL thought he was a very good WR. I bet that played a role.
Offline nerdmann  
#17 Posted : Wednesday, June 18, 2014 9:34:48 AM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,406
Applause Received: 1,419
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
There's also the fact that nobody in the NFL thought he was a very good WR. I bet that played a role.


Charles Johnson? The rap on him was that he was a small school project. Hadn't competed on the big stage, so he was a bit raw, developmental guy.

Then when he showed up, he didn't show anything, because unbeknownst to our crack(ed) medical staff, he had knee ligament damage. These are the same "medical geniuses" who imo unnecessarily ended Nick Collins' career.
Offline uffda udfa  
#18 Posted : Wednesday, June 18, 2014 1:06:31 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 4/25/2014(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 432
Applause Received: 469
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
There's also the fact that nobody in the NFL thought he was a very good WR. I bet that played a role.


I'm puzzled by the above statement. How do you know this? He was scooped up by Cleveland. He may have been scooped up much earlier before PS had he been healthy enough to show teams what he could do, but he never got the chance. When he did play in that 4th pre-season game he was running on a bad wheel, and Cleveland still added him later in the year.

Johnson was another one of these great measurable guys from a small school. He was exactly the type we needed...a guy who could actually run and I hate this wording but take the top off a defense. It was disappointing we never got to see him. I'm very curious to see how he fares in Cleveland now that he's fully healthy.

Janis is our only true burner. I'd love us to have a Corey Bradford type again. It's been a long long time since we've had one that I can recall.
Offline steveishere  
#19 Posted : Wednesday, June 18, 2014 2:48:19 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 58
Applause Received: 1,760
uffda udfa said: Go to Quoted Post
I'm puzzled by the above statement. How do you know this? He was scooped up by Cleveland. He may have been scooped up much earlier before PS had he been healthy enough to show teams what he could do, but he never got the chance. When he did play in that 4th pre-season game he was running on a bad wheel, and Cleveland still added him later in the year.

Johnson was another one of these great measurable guys from a small school. He was exactly the type we needed...a guy who could actually run and I hate this wording but take the top off a defense. It was disappointing we never got to see him. I'm very curious to see how he fares in Cleveland now that he's fully healthy.

Janis is our only true burner. I'd love us to have a Corey Bradford type again. It's been a long long time since we've had one that I can recall.


Because if teams thought he was a good WR he wouldn't have dropped to the 7th round.
Offline uffda udfa  
#20 Posted : Wednesday, June 18, 2014 4:16:15 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 4/25/2014(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 432
Applause Received: 469
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
Because if teams thought he was a good WR he wouldn't have dropped to the 7th round.


He had a nice turnout for his pro day and had scouts buzzing with the time he turned in.

Donald Driver was also in the same category as a 7th round WR and he turned out okay. Did teams think he wasn't very good or were they just unsure because he went to Alcorn State? Same for Marques Colston from Hofstra. Shoot, Shannon Sharpe is one of the greatest TE's of all time... 7th round. Did the Broncos think he couldn't play? Same for a guy like Julius Thomas now? Did we think Brandon Bostick couldn't play because we didn't draft him?

You are implying that every 7th rounder and UDFA there has ever been teams didn't think they were good players? There is a reason a guy is in the league. Some team somewhere thought they were good. Janis had several teams call him (I believe you may have posted the video clip) and wanted him as a UDFA.

We must not think any of our UDFA or 7th round guys are any good. Year after year UDFA's and 7th rounders make impact for the Green Bay Packers. Sam Shields and Tramon Williams. We must not have thought they were any good...we just got lucky that they turned into our starting CB tandem.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
TheKanataThrilla on 6/18/2014(UTC)
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
12 Pages<1234>»
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (40m) : Boom! Davante Adams says last year's ankle injury "more difficult to deal with'
uffda udfa (3h) : Packers brass potentially leaving? Not worthy of discussing. Pressure Cooker? Never enough talk about them.
Zero2Cool (9h) : Put Quintorris in a pressure cooker.
uffda udfa (13h) : Back to football: Julio says he's going to play Sunday. Did NOT say he wouldn't be limited in the game.
uffda udfa (13h) : Anyone ever used their dishwasher to make their Thanksgiving turkey?
uffda udfa (13h) : Favorite Ronnie Milsap song? Smokey Mountain Rain or Any Day Now?
uffda udfa (17h) : Favorite GM candidate... Wolf or Gutekunst?
uffda udfa (17h) : I'd rather sit them than play them too compromised.
uffda udfa (17h) : Yeah, Z. More pressure cooker talk and smoked turkeys.
Zero2Cool (17h) : If this were a regular-season game, Nelson, Adams and Allison probably would not play, MM says.
Smokey (18h) : Mason Crosby is ill, hope it's not the Flu.
Smokey (18h) : Great, can we move past that story and get back to the Atlanta game ?
Zero2Cool (18h) : Packers exec Eliot Wolf has withdrawn his name for 49ers' GM job, as @TomPelissero reported. He didn't feel it was the right time.
TheKanataThrilla (19h) : We'll just have to score TDs then.
Zero2Cool (19h) : That's what we know.
Zero2Cool (19h) : Crosby, Mason K Illness
Smokey (20h) : Is He ill or not ?
Smokey (20h) : Raiderpride asked, "Anyone know what Crosby's illness is?"
Zero2Cool (20h) : Davante Adams expected to play- KFFL
Porforis (21h) : Alright, my opinion on Jordy has changed. If he's medically cleared to play, play him.
hardrocker950 (22h) : By Sunday we won't have any WRs
Zero2Cool (23h) : Geronimo hamstring, Janis quad. BEAUTIFUL.
Smokey (23h) : Mason Crosby, is his health OK ?
Smokey (23h) : Hello
FLORIDA PACKER88 (23h) : Davis, G-Mo, and Janis will need to step up, but all three did score last time we played ATL!
FLORIDA PACKER88 (23h) : Does Janis become a playoff hero second year in a row? Looks we're gonna have to find out either way regardless. Thank God for a healthy Cob
Smokey (23h) : Is Mason Crosby's health OK ?
Smokey (19-Jan) : What's in your Coffee ?
uffda udfa (18-Jan) : Sit Davante if he has a bad ankle. We remember 2015.
uffda udfa (18-Jan) : Davante is not going to practice until SAT at earliest.
uffda udfa (18-Jan) : Davante and Jordy may be inactive at ATL.
Smokey (18-Jan) : ROFL !!
Cheesey (18-Jan) : The Packers SMOKED the COWBOYS!!!LOL!
Smokey (18-Jan) : Ever Smoke a Turkey, it takes lots of rolling papers. LOL
Smokey (18-Jan) : Thanks Cheesey. LOL
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
31m / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

41m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rick12

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / The_Green_Ninja

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

16h / Around The NFL / wpr

16h / Around The NFL / wpr

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr


Packers Headlines