Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#1 Posted : Friday, July 18, 2014 12:38:46 PM(UTC)
MintBaconDrivel

Rank: Administration
United States
Joined: 12/11/2012(UTC)
Applause Received: 102
UserPostedImage
Younger, Better and even puts points on the board! Mike Daniels fills the gap left by Cullen Jenkins without breaking the bank and brings a nasty mean streak to the defensive!

According to ProFootballFocus, only Cameron Jordan (14), Kyle D. Williams (13), J.J. Watt (11), Calais Campbell (11), Muhammad Wilkerson (11), Antonio D. Smith (8) had more sacks than Mike Daniels (7) from the 3-4 DE position.

How satisfied are you with Daniels replacing the void of Cullen Jenkins on the Packers defensive line?
Sponsor
Offline yooperfan  
#2 Posted : Friday, July 18, 2014 1:57:25 PM(UTC)
yooperfan

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2014

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Ishpeming Michigan
Applause Given: 839
Applause Received: 402
I like!
I can hardly wait to see him rev up this defense this year.
As of right now he just may be my favorite defensive player.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
DarkaneRules on 7/19/2014(UTC)
Offline nerdmann  
#3 Posted : Friday, July 18, 2014 2:02:19 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,144
Applause Received: 772
Jenkins was better, when he was healthy. Not sure Daniels is gonna hold up against the run as Jenkins, but at least we're getting production from somebody.

Keep him fresh, and let him go after the QB.
Offline Dexter_Sinister  
#4 Posted : Friday, July 18, 2014 6:11:14 PM(UTC)
Dexter_Sinister

Rank: Registered
Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
MintBaconDrivel said: Go to Quoted Post
UserPostedImage
Younger, Better and even puts points on the board! Mike Daniels fills the gap left by Cullen Jenkins without breaking the bank and brings a nasty mean streak to the defensive!

According to ProFootballFocus, only Cameron Jordan (14), Kyle D. Williams (13), J.J. Watt (11), Calais Campbell (11), Muhammad Wilkerson (11), Antonio D. Smith (8) had more sacks than Mike Daniels (7) from the 3-4 DE position.

How satisfied are you with Daniels replacing the void of Cullen Jenkins on the Packers defensive line?


If it were not for Nick Collins getting hurt, people would have been saying Cullen who?
Offline Dexter_Sinister  
#5 Posted : Friday, July 18, 2014 6:16:56 PM(UTC)
Dexter_Sinister

Rank: Registered
Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Jenkins was better, when he was healthy. Not sure Daniels is gonna hold up against the run as Jenkins, but at least we're getting production from somebody.

Keep him fresh, and let him go after the QB.


Sacks are such a tiny percentage of the snaps a DL gets in a 3-4. They are just a few percent.

I don't really care if they get 2% or 4%. It really makes little difference. The other 495 snaps mean as much.

I would be just as happy to see 0 sacks, but the opposing QBs not have any room to step up in the pocket. So they are always throwing off their back foot and don't have any place to escape.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
AbbaGav on 7/19/2014(UTC)
Offline beast  
#6 Posted : Friday, July 18, 2014 7:12:54 PM(UTC)
beast

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 321
Applause Received: 368
Dexter_Sinister said: Go to Quoted Post
Sacks are such a tiny percentage of the snaps a DL gets in a 3-4. They are just a few percent.

I don't really care if they get 2% or 4%. It really makes little difference. The other 495 snaps mean as much.

I would be just as happy to see 0 sacks, but the opposing QBs not have any room to step up in the pocket. So they are always throwing off their back foot and don't have any place to escape.


Also when Jenkins was with the Packers, the base DEs were allowed to rush up field a lot more. In the last two years base defense has been asked to play more one gap... with rumors of the Packers going to more one gap systems, it'll be very interesting to see who earns the starting base DEs roles...

I think a lot depends on the new system and what they're asked to do in it... which is why I hate waiting to figure out the new system.


It might mean something or might mean nothing, but Packers.com changed the listings and have Daniels listed as a DT (with all the NTs)... where all the other guys under 315 pounds are listed at DE instead... does that mean they don't think Daniels has the length to play 3-4 DE? Or that he's mainly going to be playing inside and not DE role? If so that means he's not going to be playing the same position as Jenkins did... though I hope Daniels can battle for the position.
Offline Laser Gunns  
#7 Posted : Friday, July 18, 2014 8:39:44 PM(UTC)
Laser Gunns

Rank: Member
United States
Joined: 9/30/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 45
Applause Received: 283
sacks are a very overrated measuring stick for that particular position.

Offline DarkaneRules  
#8 Posted : Saturday, July 19, 2014 11:02:45 AM(UTC)
DarkaneRules

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 231
Applause Received: 391
Mike Daniels has the potential for greatness. What gives him this opportunity is his tenacity, leadership qualities, and endless self-motivation. He is my favorite player on this defense.
Offline Mucky Tundra  
#9 Posted : Saturday, July 19, 2014 11:07:48 AM(UTC)
Mucky Tundra

Rank: Senior Member
United States
Joined: 1/11/2013(UTC)
Location: Murray, Kentucky
Applause Given: 473
Applause Received: 589
MintBaconDrivel said: Go to Quoted Post
UserPostedImage



Odd, never seen that picture of Datone before. Here's one that's more well known.

UserPostedImage
Offline beast  
#10 Posted : Saturday, July 19, 2014 11:20:28 AM(UTC)
beast

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 321
Applause Received: 368
Mucky Tundra said: Go to Quoted Post
Odd, never seen that picture of Datone before. Here's one that's more well known.



If they let them all compete for one gap 3-4 DE, it'll be interesting to see who comes up the winner between Daniels, Neal, Datone, Boyd and others... of course there are two 3-4 DEs so that might make it even more interesting...
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
now / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22m / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Grabacr

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

29-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

29-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

29-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest


Tweeter