I don't know how they split the revenue for playing a London game but I do know that the stadium sells out pretty easily so it's possible I guess that a team that has trouble selling tickets here could make more money having a game there. I'm having trouble finding a lot of info on it though.

I kinda thought the same thing at first but when you consider that London and Wembley stadium ( I think that's where they play) is going to get their cut I can't see the "home" team netting as much as they would in their own stadium even if they don't sell out. Of course I don't know how much the tickets sell for over there as opposed to stadiums over here so maybe a smaller slice of a bigger pie really does net you more pie and we all know that's what it is all about...more pie. It does seem odd that a team like Jacksonville would be so willing to give up a home game if they were losing that much money on the venture.

The Packers should give up a game at Lambeau field for one at Wembley when England agrees to hold the next coronation at the Hutson center instead of Westminster Abbey.

---

Yeah I'll take a pass on that

---

When they put a Roof over Lambeau, that's when i would worry about saying no to London!!!

Never gonna happen, so FU NFL.

---

I'll bet anything it doesn't work both ways. Give up a home game you get to host a Super Bowl