Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
5 Pages«<2345>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline uffda udfa  
#46 Posted : Sunday, August 10, 2014 4:44:13 PM(UTC)
uffda udfa

Rank: Member
Joined: 4/25/2014(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 151
Applause Received: 171
Originally Posted by: voiceofreason Go to Quoted Post
From Alshon Jeffery's nfl.com draft bio : Jeffery is an elite jump-ball prospect, but he does not stand out as fast on tape and is such a long strider that at times he looks to be moving in slow motion


And? That has what bearing on Boykin being slow? I'm not sure you're sure what you're trying to prove here. Boykin is slow. You can cite 500 guys who are also slow but that doesn't negate that Boykin is slow.

BTW, do you know what point you're trying to make?
UserPostedImage

It's one heckuva drug.
Offline voiceofreason  
#47 Posted : Sunday, August 10, 2014 4:46:31 PM(UTC)
voiceofreason

Rank: Registered
Joined: 4/4/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 16
Applause Received: 33
From Randall Cobb's nfl.com draft bio : Does not possesses great top-end speed and not overly elusive in the open field. Does not have the strength and power to carry the load or push the pile. Only possesses adequate overall ball skills as a receiver. Struggles to sustain his blocks.
blank
Offline voiceofreason  
#48 Posted : Sunday, August 10, 2014 4:56:27 PM(UTC)
voiceofreason

Rank: Registered
Joined: 4/4/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 16
Applause Received: 33
My point is that Boykin is not slow. He runs like everyone else is standing still!
blank
Offline uffda udfa  
#49 Posted : Sunday, August 10, 2014 7:18:48 PM(UTC)
uffda udfa

Rank: Member
Joined: 4/25/2014(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 151
Applause Received: 171
Originally Posted by: voiceofreason Go to Quoted Post
My point is that Boykin is not slow. He runs like everyone else is standing still!


By quoting bios from other players that equates to Boykin not being slow? I'm not following the logic.

Boykin is slow. There's no other way to describe his speed or lack of it.

Will be very fun to see what happens at WR. I can support that.
UserPostedImage

It's one heckuva drug.
Offline voiceofreason  
#50 Posted : Monday, August 11, 2014 8:37:16 AM(UTC)
voiceofreason

Rank: Registered
Joined: 4/4/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 16
Applause Received: 33
On that we can agree my friend. Should be a very solid top 4. Now we just need a TE to step up.
blank
Offline nerdmann  
#51 Posted : Monday, August 11, 2014 8:49:09 AM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,078
Applause Received: 756
Boykin has shown he's fast enough to get deep. I don't consider him a speed blazer though.

His main asset is his size. Hands too.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
thanks Post received 1 applause.
DoddPower on 8/15/2014(UTC)
Offline QCHuskerFan  
#52 Posted : Monday, August 11, 2014 9:18:34 AM(UTC)
QCHuskerFan

Rank: Member
Joined: 12/30/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 134
Applause Received: 183
Let's move on. Enough childishness.
Offline sschind  
#53 Posted : Monday, August 11, 2014 11:46:11 AM(UTC)
sschind

Rank: Member
United States
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN
Applause Given: 164
Applause Received: 515
I am not sure if all this arguing in Boykin's favor is meant to elevate him to a status he has yet to achieve or what. He was a decent #3 receiver last season and right now he is nothing more than that. The Packers have 2 receivers that are in the top 15 in the league for sure, you might even be able to argue for the top 10 (not sure I would but I would listen to your arguments) but that is really it. The thing is they may not need more than that. Maybe having two stud receivers and a bunch of average guys will be enough. I hope it is because for now, slow, fast or in between, that is what we have.
Every team has fans that fans of other teams point to and say "all their fans are assholes" Don't be one of those fans.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
wpr on 8/11/2014(UTC), nerdmann on 8/11/2014(UTC)
Offline wpr  
#54 Posted : Monday, August 11, 2014 12:52:07 PM(UTC)
wpr

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,284
Applause Received: 1,581
Originally Posted by: sschind Go to Quoted Post
I am not sure if all this arguing in Boykin's favor is meant to elevate him to a status he has yet to achieve or what. He was a decent #3 receiver last season and right now he is nothing more than that. The Packers have 2 receivers that are in the top 15 in the league for sure, you might even be able to argue for the top 10 (not sure I would but I would listen to your arguments) but that is really it. The thing is they may not need more than that. Maybe having two stud receivers and a bunch of average guys will be enough. I hope it is because for now, slow, fast or in between, that is what we have.


With 2 stud receivers that will give the "average" ones more opportunities. If they run their routes and catch the ball they will have solid numbers no matter it hey are #3,4 or 5 on the depth chart. There is plenty of Aaron to go around.
UserPostedImage
Offline Zero2Cool  
#55 Posted : Monday, August 11, 2014 12:57:17 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,038
Applause Received: 2,435
Originally Posted by: sschind Go to Quoted Post
I am not sure if all this arguing in Boykin's favor is meant to elevate him to a status he has yet to achieve or what. He was a decent #3 receiver last season and right now he is nothing more than that. The Packers have 2 receivers that are in the top 15 in the league for sure, you might even be able to argue for the top 10 (not sure I would but I would listen to your arguments) but that is really it. The thing is they may not need more than that. Maybe having two stud receivers and a bunch of average guys will be enough. I hope it is because for now, slow, fast or in between, that is what we have.


Two WR that are in the top 15? Did the Packers make a trade that I am not aware of??

Jordy Nelson and ... ???
"I do not think there is any thrill that can go through the human heart like that felt by the inventor as he sees some creation of the brain unfolding to success... such emotions make a man forget food, sleep, friends, love, everything." - Nikola Tesla
Offline wpr  
#56 Posted : Monday, August 11, 2014 1:25:40 PM(UTC)
wpr

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,284
Applause Received: 1,581
Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool Go to Quoted Post
Two WR that are in the top 15? Did the Packers make a trade that I am not aware of??

Jordy Nelson and ... ???


Cobb son. Cobb.

Walters #7 and 11

ESPN #7 & 10

FOX #10 & 9


These are the first 3 I looked at. I don't care what happened last year. I only care what people think this year will be like.
UserPostedImage
Offline musccy  
#57 Posted : Monday, August 11, 2014 2:51:56 PM(UTC)
musccy

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 5/7/2009(UTC)
Location: Pennsylvania
Applause Given: 359
Applause Received: 345
Originally Posted by: wpr Go to Quoted Post
Cobb son. Cobb.
FOX #10 & 9


These are the first 3 I looked at. I don't care what happened last year. I only care what people think this year will be like.


I find it interesting that Boykin is ranked above Jennings and James Jones in the Fox rankings. Obviously those are just guesstimated projections, but interesting that non-Packer fans don't anticipate Greg and James and their 9 and 3 million dollar contracts to outperform a UDFA making about 570k this year.
Offline wpr  
#58 Posted : Monday, August 11, 2014 4:04:00 PM(UTC)
wpr

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,284
Applause Received: 1,581
Originally Posted by: musccy Go to Quoted Post
I find it interesting that Boykin is ranked above Jennings and James Jones in the Fox rankings. Obviously those are just guesstimated projections, but interesting that non-Packer fans don't anticipate Greg and James and their 9 and 3 million dollar contracts to outperform a UDFA making about 570k this year.


I think it is more respect of Rodgers than anything else.
UserPostedImage
Offline voiceofreason  
#59 Posted : Monday, August 11, 2014 5:44:30 PM(UTC)
voiceofreason

Rank: Registered
Joined: 4/4/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 16
Applause Received: 33
I don't think Boykin should be ranked ahead of Jennings, or Jones. My only point was that Boykin is a lock to start the season as our number 3, barring injury or off field trouble. That was it.
blank
Offline wpr  
#60 Posted : Monday, August 11, 2014 5:50:49 PM(UTC)
wpr

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,284
Applause Received: 1,581
Originally Posted by: voiceofreason Go to Quoted Post
I don't think Boykin should be ranked ahead of Jennings, or Jones. My only point was that Boykin is a lock to start the season as our number 3, barring injury or off field trouble. That was it.


I don't think he should be rated above them either. That is why I said those that rank him ahead of Jennings or Jones are out of respect of Aaron.
UserPostedImage
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
5 Pages«<2345>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Bigbyfan

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

28-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

27-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

27-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Yerko

27-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

27-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

26-Feb / Announcements / Zero2Cool

26-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / warhawk

26-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / porky88

26-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan


Tweeter