DoddPower
9 years ago

Thats what my thread is for. The offense,for the most part, is very average on the road. The defense did good but they played against a joke of an offense. Same as Buffalo.

Yea we won,but to not be concerned that our offense has stunk it up on the road 2 weeks in a row means you wearing them green and gold glasses. We can say Buffalo has a great defense so thats why we struggled. But whats the excuse for the Bucs game? That defense is horrid and yet our offense looked very out of sync and not lethal at all.

Originally Posted by: bboystyle 



Where exactly did I say I'm not concerned about the offense? I don't think I did. But if I didn't, I'll go ahead and say it now. I'm more concerned about the Packers defense in the playoffs than the Packers offense. I trust the best quarterback in the league, a very good running back, very good wide receivers, and an ascending offensive line over a defense that has repeatedly had its pants pulled down and spanked in the playoffs recently. Could the offense be better on the road? Absolutely. They always could. But I expect they will improve. They might not have to worry about that until the NFC Championship game anyway if they can beat the Lions. If the Packers can pull off a win against the Lions, the whole concern about the offense on the road isn't very important in the near future. The defense, however, will remain an issue, imo. Will they honestly be able to stop Tony Romo and Murray? The Falcons? The Lions? I think they can, but I don't trust them. They are very inconsistent, but I do think they are better than in recent years. But I'm not sure how much better.

I already stated the "excuse" for the Bucs game. I don't really think the Packers need any excuses. It was a nice win. But Rodgers recently had the flu and was playing with a hurt calf. Yet the Packers still moved the ball up and down the field and easily won. I really don't get the problem with that game. The Bills game was obviously a screw up. There are things to be concerned about, but will there ever be a time in which there are not? The Packers need to improve but all we can do is hope that they will. All of this is a moot point if they can't beat the Lions at home.
Zero2Cool
9 years ago

Unfortunately the Packers didn't match up all too well v. Seattle last time. With all this said, the team is playing for a 1st round bye on Sunday and this should be a MUCH higher priority than Seattle right now!

Originally Posted by: musccy 



Seahawks don't have Percy Harvin anymore. I equate that to playing the 49ers without Colin Kaepernick.
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
9 years ago

Seahawks don't have Percy Harvin anymore. I equate that to playing the 49ers without Colin Kaepernick.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Really? Harvin had 59 receiving yards and 41 rushing yards vs. us Week 1.

The main issue we have is their defense... that's playing as well as it ever has.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


DarkaneRules
9 years ago
That linebacker Bobby Wagner is holy shit worthy. He is definitely one of my favorite players in the league.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
nerdmann
9 years ago

Where exactly did I say I'm not concerned about the offense? I don't think I did. But if I didn't, I'll go ahead and say it now. I'm more concerned about the Packers defense in the playoffs than the Packers offense. I trust the best quarterback in the league, a very good running back, very good wide receivers, and an ascending offensive line over a defense that has repeatedly had its pants pulled down and spanked in the playoffs recently. Could the offense be better on the road? Absolutely. They always could. But I expect they will improve. They might not have to worry about that until the NFC Championship game anyway if they can beat the Lions. If the Packers can pull off a win against the Lions, the whole concern about the offense on the road isn't very important in the near future. The defense, however, will remain an issue, imo. Will they honestly be able to stop Tony Romo and Murray? The Falcons? The Lions? I think they can, but I don't trust them. They are very inconsistent, but I do think they are better than in recent years. But I'm not sure how much better.

I already stated the "excuse" for the Bucs game. I don't really think the Packers need any excuses. It was a nice win. But Rodgers recently had the flu and was playing with a hurt calf. Yet the Packers still moved the ball up and down the field and easily won. I really don't get the problem with that game. The Bills game was obviously a screw up. There are things to be concerned about, but will there ever be a time in which there are not? The Packers need to improve but all we can do is hope that they will. All of this is a moot point if they can't beat the Lions at home.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



Interesting post.

I think the defense is more consistent. When they're shitting themselves, they're shitting themselves. When they're playing decent football, they're playing decent football. When they're dominant, well they're never dominant. lol.

But the offense goes into lulls on a regular basis. Quarter by quarter, drive by drive, they can light it up one second like the greatest show, then they can completely shti themselves for 3 quarters in a row.

If this offense was consistent, we'd go FAR.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Rios39
9 years ago

Interesting post.

I think the defense is more consistent. When they're shitting themselves, they're shitting themselves. When they're playing decent football, they're playing decent football. When they're dominant, well they're never dominant. lol.

But the offense goes into lulls on a regular basis. Quarter by quarter, drive by drive, they can light it up one second like the greatest show, then they can completely shti themselves for 3 quarters in a row.

If this offense was consistent, we'd go FAR.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Defense has had a few dominant games actually. 2-3 at the very least


blank
bboystyle
9 years ago

Where exactly did I say I'm not concerned about the offense? I don't think I did. But if I didn't, I'll go ahead and say it now. I'm more concerned about the Packers defense in the playoffs than the Packers offense. I trust the best quarterback in the league, a very good running back, very good wide receivers, and an ascending offensive line over a defense that has repeatedly had its pants pulled down and spanked in the playoffs recently. Could the offense be better on the road? Absolutely. They always could. But I expect they will improve. They might not have to worry about that until the NFC Championship game anyway if they can beat the Lions. If the Packers can pull off a win against the Lions, the whole concern about the offense on the road isn't very important in the near future. The defense, however, will remain an issue, imo. Will they honestly be able to stop Tony Romo and Murray? The Falcons? The Lions? I think they can, but I don't trust them. They are very inconsistent, but I do think they are better than in recent years. But I'm not sure how much better.

I already stated the "excuse" for the Bucs game. I don't really think the Packers need any excuses. It was a nice win. But Rodgers recently had the flu and was playing with a hurt calf. Yet the Packers still moved the ball up and down the field and easily won. I really don't get the problem with that game. The Bills game was obviously a screw up. There are things to be concerned about, but will there ever be a time in which there are not? The Packers need to improve but all we can do is hope that they will. All of this is a moot point if they can't beat the Lions at home.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 





the offense is the reason why we loss to the Niners last year in the post season,not the defense. Our defense is poised to have a nice run this post season. Look at the offenses we have to face this post season. Aside from the cowboys,there isnt really any elite offenses they'll be facing. This playoff run will ride on our offense.
steveishere
9 years ago

the offense is the reason why we loss to the Niners last year in the post season,not the defense. Our defense is poised to have a nice run this post season. Look at the offenses we have to face this post season. Aside from the cowboys,there isnt really any elite offenses they'll be facing. This playoff run will ride on our offense.

Originally Posted by: bboystyle 



There was no "THE" reason we lost to the 49ers last year. The offense didn't have their best game but the defense also gave up the lead on the drive immediately after literally every scoring drive where our offense took the lead. The defense also gave up a 5 minute 65 yard drive to end the game. You cannot put that game all on the offense. The defenses numbers may have looked all right overall but they pretty much melted under every pressure situation throughout the game.
bboystyle
9 years ago

There was no "THE" reason we lost to the 49ers last year. The offense didn't have their best game but the defense also gave up the lead on the drive immediately after literally every scoring drive where our offense took the lead. The defense also gave up a 5 minute 65 yard drive to end the game. You cannot put that game all on the offense. The defenses numbers may have looked all right overall but they pretty much melted under every pressure situation throughout the game.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 





I'm sorry but our defense only let up 23 points to that niners offense which is impressive especially how badly they've been getting trounce in the playoffs. Our offense on the other hand only put up a pathetic 20 points at home filled with missed throws and dropped passes. I don't care for situation or stats. Only stat that matters is the score board in which our offense was garbage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (11h) : Chase Young to sign $13M contract with Saints
Zero2Cool (11h) : Yosh to Panthers what noooo. Wait he didn't do crap
wpr (18-Mar) : I say that he is technically HER BIL as he married her sister. I checked it out, he's considered my BIL as well. Sad.
Mucky Tundra (18-Mar) : wpr, I assume its your BIL via marriage to your wife? If so, I can figure out where the smarts in the family went ;)
wpr (18-Mar) : Mucky my B-I-L is Bare Stupid. I could write a book.
Mucky Tundra (18-Mar) : As a teenager in Rockford IL I would get heckled by adults in public for wearing GB gear
Mucky Tundra (18-Mar) : if you think the online ones are bad, try *living amongst* them
Mucky Tundra (18-Mar) : Never doubt wprs loyalty. Poor guy is surrounded by Bears fans in Northern IL
wpr (17-Mar) : pass Martha. Thanks for the invite though.
Martha Careful (17-Mar) : blog * as the same ugly Illinois colors were adopted by the Baer
Martha Careful (17-Mar) : WPR, perhaps you should be joining the Bears fans blog has the same ugly Illinois colors were adopted by the Bears
Mucky Tundra (17-Mar) : Ah a fellow U of Illinois hater. I can respect that though I imagine it's for different reasons
Zero2Cool (17-Mar) : BTW. I didn't catch the game. I just hate Illinois.
Mucky Tundra (17-Mar) : They're your Big Ten Chumps and you will like it!
Zero2Cool (17-Mar) : No, not for the record. Referee's handled that BS. Orange team was trash ass
Mucky Tundra (17-Mar) : *Your* Big Ten Chumps for the record
Zero2Cool (17-Mar) : No, not Big Ten Champs. IL is big ten CHUMPS
wpr (17-Mar) : Big Ten Champs
wpr (17-Mar) : !!!
wpr (17-Mar) : INI
wpr (17-Mar) : ILL
Martha Careful (17-Mar) : Wisconsin with an outstanding on in the men’s Big Ten basketball tournament. Let’s hope it continues in the NCAAs
Zero2Cool (17-Mar) : Almost like taking QB in 2020 even if you don't need one is good move.
Mucky Tundra (16-Mar) : 2021 QB Draft class looking like a real clunker
Mucky Tundra (16-Mar) : A conditional 6th rounder? I remember Bears fans arguing they'd get a day 2 pick at worst lol
dfosterf (16-Mar) : So I got the no extension part right and the have to wait on the CW physical wrong
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Bears are trading Justin Fields for a 2025 6th-round pick that goes to a 4th-round pick based on playtime, per sources.
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Former Packer Jarrett Bush opens Wisconsin’s first blow dry bar in Green Bay
dfosterf (16-Mar) : If the Bears are not doing a deal with Washington, they also cannot trade Fields until Williams physical with them. All hail Caleb Williams!
dfosterf (16-Mar) : The talent is undeniable, but the (advertised) haul is obscene.
dfosterf (16-Mar) : If the Bears are cutting a deal with the Commanders, in either scenario, cannot happen until williams passes a Commanders physical
dfosterf (16-Mar) : My guess is no to the Fields extension, but yes to the trade back with the Commanders.
dhazer (15-Mar) : I think the Bears do a Love extension and they will trade out of the 1st pick and take the haul
Martha Careful (15-Mar) : that might make sense
Zero2Cool (15-Mar) : Justin Fields to Steelers?
Zero2Cool (15-Mar) : Kenny Pickett. Eagles. Done.
Zero2Cool (15-Mar) : They can claim best two WR tandem.
Mucky Tundra (15-Mar) : Aaron Donald retiring
dhazer (15-Mar) : Campbell signing with 49ers
dhazer (15-Mar) : I love how the Bear Fans are now claiming they have the best skill players in the NFC North lol
Zero2Cool (15-Mar) : Vikings made a move to get a 2nd first round pick
Mucky Tundra (15-Mar) : That's a not a bad deal for the Bears
Zero2Cool (15-Mar) : Bears have traded for WR Keenan Allen sending Chargers a fourth rounder.
Martha Careful (15-Mar) : *signs
Martha Careful (14-Mar) : MLB Devon White science with the Eagles
Mucky Tundra (14-Mar) : But that was before FA started
Mucky Tundra (14-Mar) : Dhaze, I thought Kurls would be their #1 target when I read that he was an Amos comp (jack of all trades guy)
dhazer (14-Mar) : I would like to see the Packers target 2 more FA still available Kamren Curl Safety and Chase Young edge
Martha Careful (14-Mar) : wow...didn't see that coming
Zero2Cool (14-Mar) : AJ Dillon re-signing with Packers.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Mar / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

16-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

16-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

15-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

15-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

14-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

14-Mar / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

14-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Mar / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

13-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

13-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

13-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.