Zero2Cool
9 years ago

Honestly, the Packers are going to let a 24 year old...a TWENTY FOUR YEAR OLD proven star just walk because of an extra mil or two average per season? Really? Draft, develop, depart?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


I think you're making up anger agenda's. I don't believe anyone is implying what you're claiming and when I said "increase Packers offer significantly", that wasn't implying by one or two million. Try $3 million at least per year more.


UserPostedImage
TheKanataThrilla
9 years ago

Comfortable with what they have? That is a very scary thought to me.

I saw enough from Adams to think you may be right but I have no idea what you saw in either Janis or Abbredaris, other than false logic "Ted drafted them so they will be good" to say they are not duds. They may not be duds but I have seen nothing that tells me one way or the other and I don't take Mike McCarthy comments about Janis as any sort of confirmation because he said the same thing about Boykin the year before.

We MAY draft a guy that is better than Jimmy Graham or we MAY sign a FA that turns out to be even better than Cobb or Adams and Janis and Abby MAY step up but I would be much more comfortable with our situation knowing we didn't have to count on one or more of those things happening. It may not be doom and gloom but without a doubt it weakens our WR group and I don't see how anyone can argue that it doesn't (not that you were but some people think it won't make any difference) The argument is is the amount it weakens our WR group offset by continuity we retain in the cap. IMO that will depend on the difference between what we offer that he turned down and what he gets. 3 million a year maybe, 1 million, NO WAY. If he signs somewhere else for 10 million a year I will think it was a big mistake to let him go. If he signs for more than that I'll be fine with the decision to let him go.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



I remember people were uncomfortable in letting Driver go to allow Cobb more reps. As a result we kept Driver 1 year too long in my opinion.

Many WRs can instantly play in this league. We have had the luxury of low expectations from our WRs to make any sort of impact year 1. No doubt losing Cobb would hurt, but I trust that Ted would have a back-up plan and must be given the non-bullshit updates on Janis and Abby. I think Adams is pretty darn good and more reps will help him. Boykin was pretty good at one point. I am not sure why he regressed.

Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
9 years ago
I have to admit that the thought of losing three starter-quality wide receivers in three years (and having had a fourth retire because of declining skills) scares me. Yes, Ted has been well above average at picking up good WRs in the draft. Yes, Adams has shown himself better than I thought he'd be when drafted.

Especially with an offense that is pass-dominant.

I'm not saying that they should pay Cobb whatever he asks. But I do think there's a major gamble here if they let him go.

Because Adams doesn't just have to take the next step. He has to become a threat that makes the 3rd and 4th and 5th options better by taking more of the defense's attention. Nelson, Jennings, Jones, Cobb -- each of these demonstrated abilities that meant DCs had to give them attention that did two things: first it meant that DCs couldn't just strive to shut down one guy; second, and more importantly, it opened up opportunities for those of lesser talent on the team (e.g. Boykin,Quarless) to become more frequent alternatives for the wily and uber-talented Rodgers. If Cobb leaves, though, only one of those four is left.

And that means Adams, and probably another WR/TE/RB must become a substantial threat greater than they have demonstrated to date.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
nerdmann
9 years ago

I am afraid Randall may be listening to his agent who is going for a big number contract that will be back loaded.
Signing bonus and guaranteed money are the only money's that count for the player.
The agent, on the other hand gets his percentage of the total contract!
Also known as "window dressing " money.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



Ted's MO is to back load contracts. They seem like bank busters when they're signed, but two years later the cap has expanded and now they look like bargain deals. That's how Ted rolls.

Still, he won't go above his number.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
uffda udfa
9 years ago
You lose Cobb and you have Jordy as your only proven guy and he's creeping up to the age where he's about to fall off. Why oh why they chose to give Jordy the money over Randall is the issue. I said it then and I'll resay it here. That was foolishness. The talent gap is negligible if not in Randall's favor but you gave the money to Jordy and are going to let a guy who is TWENTY FOUR nowhere near his prime walk because you gave the money to a near 30 year old WR? Tell me how that makes sense. You can't justify it.

Randall is plain and simple the definition of a CORE GUY. One of TT's favorite refrains...core guy. Keep your core together. He's potentially not going to do it and he's being defended? Amazed. Randall is class on the field and class off ... you reward those players. You don't let them walk at TWENTY FOUR. The excuse makers are going to have their own aversion to the truth meters challenged on this deal.



UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


lolleren
9 years ago

You lose Cobb and you have Jordy as your only proven guy and he's creeping up to the age where he's about to fall off. Why oh why they chose to give Jordy the money over Randall is the issue. I said it then and I'll resay it here. That was foolishness. The talent gap is negligible if not in Randall's favor but you gave the money to Jordy and are going to let a guy who is TWENTY FOUR nowhere near his prime walk because you gave the money to a near 30 year old WR? Tell me how that makes sense. You can't justify it.

Randall is plain and simple the definition of a CORE GUY. One of TT's favorite refrains...core guy. Keep your core together. He's potentially not going to do it and he's being defended? Amazed. Randall is class on the field and class off ... you reward those players. You don't let them walk at TWENTY FOUR. The excuse makers are going to have their own aversion to the truth meters challenged on this deal.


Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I have said it before, but the you don't pay WR1 money to a slot receiver. The reason Cobb didnt get paid over Nelson last season was for that precise reason.

If he wants 10m+ a year Ted needs to do what is best for the team in the long run and let him walk and pick up a cut Vet WR and utilize his extra 3rd round pick next year for the future.

blank
uffda udfa
9 years ago

I have said it before, but the you don't pay WR1 money to a slot receiver. The reason Cobb didnt get paid over Nelson last season was for that precise reason.

If he wants 10m+ a year Ted needs to do what is best for the team in the long run and let him walk and pick up a cut Vet WR and utilize his extra 3rd round pick next year for the future.

Originally Posted by: lolleren 



Oh, but Randall IS so much more than just a slot WR. Our WR's play all positions at various times. He's an integral part of what we do on O. To diminish him by simply saying he's nothing but a slot guy is dead wrong. If that is what is required to try justifying him walking then I get it, but it's still inaccurate.

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


lolleren
9 years ago

Oh, but Randall IS so much more than just a slot WR. Our WR's play all positions at various times. He's an integral part of what we do on O. To diminish him by simply saying he's nothing but a slot guy is dead wrong. If that is what is required to try justifying him walking then I get it, but it's still inaccurate.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



He is "just" a slot WR, he lines up in the slot 80-90% of the time, I believe I have seen those numbers somewhere.

http://www.acmepackingcompany.com/2015/3/4/8148311/examining-randall-cobbs-free-agent-value-and-the-slot-receiver-label 

"After his rookie year, though, take a look at his slot usage increasing. He jumped up to 84.4% in 2012, then 94.7%(!) and 87.3% each of the past two seasons."
blank
greengold
9 years ago
There is some distortion of the facts going on here when you imply they gave Jordy a HUGE contract and wont pay Cobb.
Yes, he is 29 this year. The last year or two of Jordy's contract are fake in my opinion.

In cap numbers, last year he cost you $5.9M.
This year it is $4.6M.
Next year when he is 30 it is $8.8M.

If he gets cut after 2016 it is a $4.6M writeoff. So his cost was $7.9M per year for 3 years, not the "$9.7M per year average" that gets advertised.

If you do keep him in 2017 when he is 31, (maybe the cap goes up significantly and he gets better with age?) the cap number is $11.5M with a $2.3M writeoff.

Even then his cost would be $8.3M over 4 years.

My guess is they have offered Cobb slightly more than that, but I could be wrong.

Ted is pretty damn good at managing the cap. If another team wants to be stupid and completely blow too much cap space on a slot receiver I think you have to let them.
DakotaT
9 years ago
I still want that 6'5" receiver that Aaron can throw some garbage up and the guy goes and makes the play. Cobb is good between the 20's, but he's no red zone threat. I still don't consider Cobb our top priority over Bulaga or retaining House. It seems to me, the Packers have been incredible at the "next guy up" in the receiving corps. Have no idea why so many of you get so worked up over this position. Look at what Belichek and Brady do with the scrap heap of receivers they have.

Sign Bulaga, and beef up our defense and we still have more than enough to win on offense, with or without Cobb.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (54m) : Packers looking to trade up
Martha Careful (3h) : Flag?
Martha Careful (3h) : Sag?
Nonstopdrivel (3h) : It rhymes with "bag."
beast (19h) : Family? That's Deadpool's F word
Nonstopdrivel (19h) : Not THAT f-word.
Zero2Cool (19h) : fuck
beast (20h) : 49ers are Cap Tight
beast (20h) : Fuck
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Kanata, I will be when I'm on my lunch later
TheKanataThrilla (21h) : Love you NSD
Nonstopdrivel (21h) : Huh. I guess the F-word is censored in this fan shout.
Nonstopdrivel (21h) : Anyone who doesn't hang out in the chat probably smokes pole.
TheKanataThrilla (21h) : GoPackGo Thinking CB is the pick tonight
TheKanataThrilla (21h) : Anyone hanging out in the chat tonight?
Zero2Cool (22h) : whoa...49ers have had trade conversations about both Deebo Samuel and Brandon Aiyuk
Zero2Cool (22h) : I hope they take a Punter at 9th overall. Be bold!
Mucky Tundra (23h) : I may end up eating those words but I think they need a lot more talent then their 4 picks can provide
Mucky Tundra (23h) : I really hope they stand pat and Draft a WR
Mucky Tundra (23h) : @DMRussini
Mucky Tundra (23h) : The Chicago Bears are very open for business at 9 and telling teams they are ready to move for the right price, per source
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend Penei Soul 4yrs - 112mil
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend St. Brown 4 years 120mil and
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : Now look, trading up to 13 to take a TE might not seem like a good idea later but it will be later!
dfosterf (24-Apr) : (Your trade up mock post)
dfosterf (24-Apr) : Mucky- The only thing fun to watch would be me flipping the f out if Gute goes up to 13 and grabs Brock Bowers, lol
beast (24-Apr) : DT Byron Murphy II, Texas... whom some believe is the next Aaron Donald (or the closest thing to Donald)
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : What? And who?
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : *sad Mucky noises*
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : @JoeJHoyt Murphy said he’s been told he won’t slide past pick No. 16.
wpr (23-Apr) : Just about time to watch Sonny Weaver stick it to the seahags. I never get tired of it.
Martha Careful (23-Apr) : *game plan
Martha Careful (23-Apr) : IMHO, not even close. He is not a guy you game play around.
Mucky Tundra (23-Apr) : is Aiyuk worth a 1st rounder?
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : 49ers are seeking a 1st round pick in exchange for WR Brandon Aiyuk
Mucky Tundra (22-Apr) : Based on Gutes comments, now I don't feel as silly having 13 picks in my mock the other day
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Zach Wilson to Broncos.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Gutekunst says he'd love to have 13 or 14 picks. He's trading back huh lol
beast (22-Apr) : Someday we'll have a draft betting scandal
beast (21-Apr) : Sometimes looking extremely amazing, sometimes looking extremely lost
beast (21-Apr) : I haven't looked into the QBs, but some have suggested Maye has some of the most extremely inconsistent tape they've seen
beast (21-Apr) : Well it also sounds like Patriots are listening to trade offers, not that seriously considering any, but listening means they aren't locked
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Maye needs to be AFC
Mucky Tundra (21-Apr) : Not liking the idea of the Vikings getting Maye
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Vikings HC joked that he may or may not have sent flowers to Bob Kraft. That's where rumor came from.
beast (21-Apr) : Can't tell if this is real or BS, but some rumors about a possible Patriots/Vikings trade for #3 overall
dfosterf (21-Apr) : One playbook to my knowledge. I was shooting for facetious.
beast (20-Apr) : I'm not sure they have different playbooks for different OL positions, and Dillard run blocking is supposedly worse than his pass blocking..
dfosterf (19-Apr) : The only problem with that is he isn't a guard either.
dfosterf (19-Apr) : Put him at right guard. That is where he will be coached. That is where he will compete. He is not even allowed to look at the LT playbook.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
21m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

52m / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

24-Apr / Random Babble / beast

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Apr / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

19-Apr / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Apr / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.