nerdmann
8 years ago

The Packers have drafted nine receivers since Rodgers' ascension to starter in 2008, the seventh-highest total in the NFL, but never have they sought a dominant No. 1 receiver such as Dez Bryant. Instead, they have collected upper-end volume -- Nelson, Cobb and Adams were all second-round picks -- to build their scheme and financial structure around the idea that a high-level whole will prove better than any one part.

Rob Demovsky  wrote:



It's becoming a proven system.

Adams is gonna be elite.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
uffda udfa
8 years ago

It's becoming a proven system.

Adams is gonna be elite.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



The article just spoke to not drafting elite WR's and the first comment below is Adams who is the worst of the big 3 is going to be elite.

I really don't understand sometimes.

For me, I'll take a Dez Bryant type talent, not character, over what we have and fill in players around him. It makes no sense not to. We wouldn't go with a 2nd tier QB if we could...we're what we are because we have the best of the best at QB and that should be the idea at all positions.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


musccy
8 years ago

The article just spoke to not drafting elite WR's and the first comment below is Adams who is the worst of the big 3 is going to be elite.

I really don't understand sometimes.

For me, I'll take a Dez Bryant type talent, not character, over what we have and fill in players around him. It makes no sense not to. We wouldn't go with a 2nd tier QB if we could...we're what we are because we have the best of the best at QB and that should be the idea at all positions.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



You need an elite QB to win a SB much more than you need an elite wr. The last 2 SB champs illustrate that.

Of course Megatron would be nice, but I'd put an elite QB, LT, CB all above WR on a priorities list.
nerdmann
8 years ago

You need an elite QB to win a SB much more than you need an elite wr. The last 2 SB champs illustrate that.

Of course Megatron would be nice, but I'd put an elite QB, LT, CB all above WR on a priorities list.

Originally Posted by: musccy 



I'll take 2 or 3 very good guys over 1 "elite" guy every time.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
uffda udfa
8 years ago

I'll take 2 or 3 very good guys over 1 "elite" guy every time.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



...and I'll take one elite guy with 2 or 3 very good guys. What is this thinking that precludes doing better? "GOOD IS THE ENEMY OF GREAT"-Voltaire. That quote is proven here time and time again.

I'll take 3 or 4 elite WR's. Why shoot so low and accept it and wear it like some kind of badge of honor to shoot for less than the best? I simply don't get it.






UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Bigbyfan
8 years ago

...and I'll take one elite guy with 2 or 3 very good guys. What is this thinking that precludes doing better? "GOOD IS THE ENEMY OF GREAT"-Voltaire. That quote is proven here time and time again.

I'll take 3 or 4 elite WR's. Why shoot so low and accept it and wear it like some kind of badge of honor to shoot for less than the best? I simply don't get it.





Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



There's not a single person here that wouldn't take 3 or 4 elite receivers.... However there is only so much money to go around.

Would it be nice to have Dez Bryant and Calvin Johnson? Of course. The negative is that you would have to commit around $30 million of cap space to those two players. Add Rodgers' deal and that over $50 million committed to two receivers and a quarterback.

How do we pay for our linemen? Running backs? Corners? Safeties?

You can keep wishing for elite players at every position, but that wish is completely unrealistic. That's why people are happy/content with the three very good receivers we have.

I'd even argue that Jordy should be considered in the elite category. One of the top 7-10 in the league.
blank
musccy
8 years ago

...and I'll take one elite guy with 2 or 3 very good guys. What is this thinking that precludes doing better? "GOOD IS THE ENEMY OF GREAT"-Voltaire. That quote is proven here time and time again.

I'll take 3 or 4 elite WR's. Why shoot so low and accept it and wear it like some kind of badge of honor to shoot for less than the best? I simply don't get it.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



It's a capped league. There are other roster spots. You're not going to be elite at all 24 positions on the field. If you're pretty darn good at most positions, with some elite sprinkled in then you're doing well. If this was baseball, and you're the Dodgers, fine, shoot for a HoFer at each position.

An elite WR isn't necessarily bad, but it doesn't need to be a top priority on a roster, and having 3-4 very good WRs is arguably a better alternative.
nerdmann
8 years ago

There's not a single person here that wouldn't take 3 or 4 elite receivers.... However there is only so much money to go around.

Would it be nice to have Dez Bryant and Calvin Johnson? Of course. The negative is that you would have to commit around $30 million of cap space to those two players. Add Rodgers' deal and that over $50 million committed to two receivers and a quarterback.

How do we pay for our linemen? Running backs? Corners? Safeties?

You can keep wishing for elite players at every position, but that wish is completely unrealistic. That's why people are happy/content with the three very good receivers we have.

I'd even argue that Jordy should be considered in the elite category. One of the top 7-10 in the league.

Originally Posted by: Bigbyfan 



Keep in mind, Uffda's definition of "elite" includes Jeff Janis.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
musccy
8 years ago

Keep in mind, Uffda's definition of "elite" includes Jeff Janis.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



I don't often actually chuckle out loud - but this made me do just that. 👍
uffda udfa
8 years ago

There's not a single person here that wouldn't take 3 or 4 elite receivers.... However there is only so much money to go around.

Would it be nice to have Dez Bryant and Calvin Johnson? Of course. The negative is that you would have to commit around $30 million of cap space to those two players. Add Rodgers' deal and that over $50 million committed to two receivers and a quarterback.

How do we pay for our linemen? Running backs? Corners? Safeties?

You can keep wishing for elite players at every position, but that wish is completely unrealistic. That's why people are happy/content with the three very good receivers we have.

I'd even argue that Jordy should be considered in the elite category. One of the top 7-10 in the league.

Originally Posted by: Bigbyfan 



You make my case even stronger. What would we do if we committed that kind of space? Draft guys like Cobb and Nelson and not resign them and keep the pipeline full behind them. I still fail to see why you wouldn't want an elite WR? You want an elite QB, don't you? Oh, but that's different? It's hilarious how fiscally tight members here come when it comes to debating against our org's philosophy. It's mindboggling. You want the BEST possible player you can have. You want FOUR or FIVE elite WR's, if possible.

So, you guys are hoping Randall and Rollins are just good players not elite because it might cost too much to keep them if they're both phenomenal? The logic is stupefying. Honestly, I do think the Packers company line has done things to rational thinking people. I truly do.

I hope each and every draftee in this class and future class turns into a HOF player. I hope each one is so good that they command so much cap that we're getting comp picks like you wouldn't believe because we can't possibly keep them all.

James Jones. Ring a bell? He was merely a "good" WR from our group of non-elite WR's...did we keep him? Nope. We're going to have to let guys go whether they're stars, good, mediocre, or terrible. Give me ELITE.

Go back and read these posts and ask yourself if it makes any sense not to want as many elite players as you possibly can have at any position.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Fan Shout
wpr (1h) : Just about time to watch Sonny Weaver stick it to the seahags. I never get tired of it.
Martha Careful (1h) : *game plan
Martha Careful (2h) : IMHO, not even close. He is not a guy you game play around.
Mucky Tundra (5h) : is Aiyuk worth a 1st rounder?
Zero2Cool (5h) : 49ers are seeking a 1st round pick in exchange for WR Brandon Aiyuk
Mucky Tundra (22-Apr) : Based on Gutes comments, now I don't feel as silly having 13 picks in my mock the other day
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Zach Wilson to Broncos.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Gutekunst says he'd love to have 13 or 14 picks. He's trading back huh lol
beast (22-Apr) : Someday we'll have a draft betting scandal
beast (21-Apr) : Sometimes looking extremely amazing, sometimes looking extremely lost
beast (21-Apr) : I haven't looked into the QBs, but some have suggested Maye has some of the most extremely inconsistent tape they've seen
beast (21-Apr) : Well it also sounds like Patriots are listening to trade offers, not that seriously considering any, but listening means they aren't locked
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Maye needs to be AFC
Mucky Tundra (21-Apr) : Not liking the idea of the Vikings getting Maye
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Vikings HC joked that he may or may not have sent flowers to Bob Kraft. That's where rumor came from.
beast (21-Apr) : Can't tell if this is real or BS, but some rumors about a possible Patriots/Vikings trade for #3 overall
dfosterf (21-Apr) : One playbook to my knowledge. I was shooting for facetious.
beast (20-Apr) : I'm not sure they have different playbooks for different OL positions, and Dillard run blocking is supposedly worse than his pass blocking..
dfosterf (19-Apr) : The only problem with that is he isn't a guard either.
dfosterf (19-Apr) : Put him at right guard. That is where he will be coached. That is where he will compete. He is not even allowed to look at the LT playbook.
dfosterf (18-Apr) : Kidding aside, I hope the best for him.
dfosterf (18-Apr) : Went to a Titans board. One comment there. Not very long. I quote: "LOL" They don't sound overly upset about our aquisition.
beast (18-Apr) : OT Dillard has been absolutely horrible... like OG Newman levels
dfosterf (18-Apr) : Suit him up and have him stand in front of the big board as a draft day cautionary tale.
Zero2Cool (18-Apr) : Packers sign T Andre Dillard.
Mucky Tundra (18-Apr) : Adds most of the information this time of year comes from agents.
Mucky Tundra (18-Apr) : @RealAlexBarth Bill Belichick says accurate draft information doesn't leak from teams until about 12 hours before the draft. Adds most of th
Mucky Tundra (18-Apr) : I am very happy that for moment, Jordan Love seems like a normal human being
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : Belichick * whatever
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : "There's a lot of depth at Offensive Tackle and Wide Receiver." Bill Bellichick
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : Thanks! I can't believe it's over haha
Martha Careful (16-Apr) : Congratulations
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Boom. Student Loan. $0.00. Only took about 20 years.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : Packers DT Kenny Clark: New defensive coordinator Jeff Hafley will 'allow us to be way more disruptive'
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : Saints have agreed to terms on a contract with former Packers wide receiver Equanimeous St. Brown.
beast (12-Apr) : No, but of it's for legislation, then half of the country will find it evil, not good, whatever it says....
Mucky Tundra (12-Apr) : Draft is still 2 weeks away. UGH
dhazer (11-Apr) : Does anyone know of a good AI generator to create letters of Support for legislation?
Zero2Cool (11-Apr) : Gordon "Red" Batty retires as equipment manager
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Sounds like that's pretty certain now.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Packers "at" Eagles in Brazil. Week One
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Va' Fazer As Malas Va' !
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy tipping us off?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : “We’re either the first- or second-most popular team in Brazil.”
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Christian Watson got married. Wife better be careful with those hamstrings!! 😂😂
dfosterf (9-Apr) : Those poor bastards
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Falcons have signed former Packers CB Kevin King, who has been out of football since 2021.
dfosterf (8-Apr) : Collectively, we need to spend more time in what we have, when analyzing ostendible needs and historical proclivities
dfosterf (8-Apr) : I say he is better than so many of these draft picks
dfosterf (8-Apr) : Question of the week for me: Has anyone besides me done any deep dive into the potential of Alex McGough, our 3rd string qb?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Apr / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

21-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

19-Apr / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Apr / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.