Zero2Cool
7 years ago

They showed that Janis end around to Seattle, Mike’ll be working some combos off of that play 'cause he knows they’ll scout it.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



How much do you want to bet that Jeff Janis is inactive and they activate Trevor Davis lol
UserPostedImage
luigis
7 years ago

How much do you want to bet that Jeff Janis is inactive and they activate Trevor Davis lol

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I think the Janis end-around is actually a very bad call from MM. It resulted in a big gain but I think the call was terrible. In the snow if the pitch fails or Janis slips or anything happens it can end in a defensive touchdown. Furthermore we didn't need to show that play in a game against a very bad team.


Luis
steveishere
7 years ago

I think the Janis end-around is actually a very bad call from MM. It resulted in a big gain but I think the call was terrible. In the snow if the pitch fails or Janis slips or anything happens it can end in a defensive touchdown. Furthermore we didn't need to show that play in a game against a very bad team.

Originally Posted by: luigis 



I don't think we should be complaining about the quality of the team we played when we scored a TD on that drive and only won by 8. It's not like it's some super secret special play on the tail end of a blowout, it's just getting our biggest/fastest player the ball in some space. Also he "pitched" it like 1 yard, it's not that risky. We even got to see Richard Rodgers throw an effective block. I loved that playcall and I hope we see some more stuff down the stretch that uses those skillsets of guys like Janis/Davis who may not be polished but can still add something to the offense.
Porforis
7 years ago

I think the Janis end-around is actually a very bad call from MM. It resulted in a big gain but I think the call was terrible. In the snow if the pitch fails or Janis slips or anything happens it can end in a defensive touchdown. Furthermore we didn't need to show that play in a game against a very bad team.

Originally Posted by: luigis 



I think one of the reasons it worked is because we were playing a very bad team.

But yes, I hate basically any run outside ever and this is only the second time in as long as I remember that we've had success on an endaround.
Cheesey
7 years ago
I thought Michael looked pretty good, for the short time he was out on the field.
UserPostedImage
beast
7 years ago

I thought Michael looked great and we haven’t had a speedster like this since Knile Davis😁 [or maybe i should say A. Green]. In non jumbo formations Christine had runs of 7, 5, 5, 1 and runs of 2, -1 with 2 FBs in backfield. Plus, 3 carries 0 yards on V-form drive. He’ll be fully ready next week in time to see his buddies. If he can bust a couple of long runs in last 4 games, he has a chance to lead 2 teams in rush yards for a season.

Ripkowski at 3:07 in 2nd he runs for 10 yards untouched; he had vision for the hole and hit it fast, faster than Lacy would have. He is Mike Alscott! He could play HB.

Monty was phenom. He played every snap of last 2 drives and it no coincidence that the O was unstoppable.

Michael doubled on Mercilus nicely at 7:24 3rd Q

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



Honestly I'm down right hating all the two FB formations this year... just too many guys in the backfield and defenses have been able to target the backfield and win most of the time. I want to set a one FB limit... of course maybe they'll surprise at some point with a two FB formation and hand it to Rip at FB and the LBers will wrongly target the RB and Rip will rip one off. But I rather get another pass catch on the field than another FB... and Cook has size, Cobb has quickness and Nelson and Adams come up big at times.

That's what I've been saying about Rip with the RBs injured, they should of given Rip a shot at full time RB (while the vet RBs were injured at least)... and I don't know why they didn't... though to be honest, I'm not sure about Rip having vision for the hole... to me it seems like he almost predetermines which hole he's going to hit, and hits it as hard as he can, weather it's open or not. And when it's open... great... when it's not... well he's going to push the pile as much as he can (or maybe bounce off).

Yeah I think they need to consider moving Monty to RB full time... or at least until they get a real good healthy RB that knows the systems. Think about this: Monty being able to flip between RB/WR and Rip between FB/RB on any given play... basically teams won't know if they want an extra LB or CB on the field depending on the set up. And then the Packers could show one look and then hit a motion and move them. Teams might not know if they're going to see a 4 WR / 1 RB package or a 3 WR / 2 RB package, as well as switching while going no huddle to keep what ever defense is on the field.

I've read one problem with Michael is that he gets mistake prone in pass protection, so I like reading that he at least doubled nicely once.... and I think this will continue with Michael as long as he feels he's the new guys and needs to impress to stick around. But I wonder what will happen once he stays getting comfortable... will he get complacent again?
UserPostedImage
luigis
7 years ago

I don't think we should be complaining about the quality of the team we played when we scored a TD on that drive and only won by 8. It's not like it's some super secret special play on the tail end of a blowout, it's just getting our biggest/fastest player the ball in some space. Also he "pitched" it like 1 yard, it's not that risky. We even got to see Richard Rodgers throw an effective block. I loved that playcall and I hope we see some more stuff down the stretch that uses those skillsets of guys like Janis/Davis who may not be polished but can still add something to the offense.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 



Watch the replay, Rodgers pitches the ball to Janis running behind. For a split second you see the ball in the air, the snow and Janis' hands approaching. Don't tell me your heart didn't skip a beat there.

Luis
Zero2Cool
7 years ago
What's this? Someone recognizes talent? What? Yeah, that's right you Clinton-Dix hater!!!!!



Bahahahhaha
UserPostedImage
steveishere
7 years ago
HHCD did put a couple good hits on some guys from what I saw.
Nonstopdrivel
7 years ago

. . . often standing around without even attempting to participate in the play.

Originally Posted by: luigis 


I wonder if he was the player I commented on during the game, the one who was actively jumping out of the way of contact instead of engaging the ball carrier. I hope this doesn't become a trend as the season wears on. I remember repeatedly mentioning this defense's seeming aversion to, even their occasional avoidance of, contact in a couple of articles I wrote a few seasons ago. I do not want to see a return of that trend.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (8h) : Maybe
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Yes
Zero2Cool (9h) : No.
Mucky Tundra (12h) : End of a Degu-era
dhazer (12h) : Steelers sign Patterson because of new kickoff rule interesting
Zero2Cool (15h) : Former #Packers TE Josiah Deguara is signing a 1-year deal with the Jaguars, per source.
Zero2Cool (16h) : They do not do it for "content sake".
dfosterf (28-Mar) : For the record, I enjoy Beast and Mucky drafts
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Haha
Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : No time for talking! Back to work beast!
beast (27-Mar) : You saw only 4,201 of my mocks? 🥺 I think that means you missed more than half of them 😢
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Does anyone know what Lambeau field improvements got put on hold? My guess would be for the 2025 draft
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : It's like listen, you made 4,201 mocks, no shit.
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Cuz during the draft "I had them mocked there!" as if it's amazing.
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : They're fun to do once in awhile. It's people who think they are "content" that annoy me.
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Against tbd
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Answer to your question is yes, it's a Thursday, will be the Chiefs aga
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Luckily for all concerned, I don't post them. I did one, but that was like 25 mocks ago
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : NFL 2024 gonna start Sept 5th isn't it???
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Ugh... kids these days!
dfosterf (27-Mar) : I'm gonna go do some more mock draft hell instead 🤪
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Did we do one of those prediction threads yet for 2024 season?
dfosterf (27-Mar) : In my city, they are playing the nimby game, in order to keep some railroad tracks vs. 2 professional sports teams and a concert venue.
dfosterf (27-Mar) : And/Or a city council, of which I haven't seen a good one in a very long time
dfosterf (27-Mar) : That sounds like a Mayor, not a city.
buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers halt scheduled 80mil upgrade of stadium until lease agreement talks are restarted
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : City of Green Bay puts Packers' Lambeau Field lease talks on hold
buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers 1 of 3 teams to vote no on new kickoff rule.
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Packers sign another Kicker
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Lengthy explanation at PFF if you click the link
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Kickoff rules officially changed.ngthy explan
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : lol
Cheesey (26-Mar) : 2009? No thanks! One open heart surgery is enough!
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Good for you!
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Yes. That's the one.
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Is that "Lady Dugan" per chance?
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Crystal?
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Please refresh my memory
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Alan posts. Crystal back in my life. It's 2009 all over again! Lol
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : BAH GAWD! THAT'S CHEESEYS MUSIC!
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Gutekunst said early stages of Jordan Love contract being discussed.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Shouldn't be penalized cuz official screwed up
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Yeah, challenge until you are incorrect twice.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Fining them is the goal, per the people who made the rule anyway.
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still waiting on the kickoff rule changes. Did hear yesterday that the touchback proposal will now be the 30 yard line, not the 35
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Probably speed of game issues with your proposal
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Hopefully the refs don't get in the habit of throwing flags on this
beast (25-Mar) : I think when it comes to Challenges should get two strikes, so unlimited challenges as long as they keep winning them, but 2 wrong then done
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still subject to the fines etc
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Yes, I should have been more specific. Also, they are now saying it would be a 15 yard penalty. That makes more sense .
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
3h / Around The NFL / beast

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

28-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

28-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.