10 - 6 is dismal for Packers· Page 3

Porforis
Veteran Member

7 years ago

Do you take into account that Aaron Rodgers has a hurt calf on one leg and a bad hamstring on the other? OR does that not matter with your slanted perception against the Packers success?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Or our MASH unit at CB. But hey, only excuses for other teams right?

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#22

Do you take into account that Aaron Rodgers has a hurt calf on one leg and a bad hamstring on the other? OR does that not matter with your slanted perception against the Packers success?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Slanted? I think my perception is one of the only ones here that isn't. Success? If the organizational goal is to win SB championships and this year we don't win one what have we done? Failed. It is not successful to fall short of your goal. If your goal is to win divisional championships only then mission accomplished. Be proud. Order your gear, TODAY! Your own definition of success for this team is not in consort with the organizations. My definition is. It's right in line. Anything short of hoisting the Lombardi is not a successful. Exciting? Sure. Overcoming adversity. Sure. Not bad for being 4-6 sure. It's all those things but it's also short of the goal so it's...FAILURE...ta da. Do you think Pats fans think it's a successful season when they win the division and go down in the playoffs. I assure you they don't. They have expectation based on past success and having Tom Brady and it's justified. Our fans have the expectation of making the playoffs and calling it a win for the season. I see it bragged about all the time... the streak is x many years. Who cares? I'll take ONE SB victory vs. 50 straight playoff appearances without one. Ask Vikings fans how it feels not ever winning a SB. They better understand my point than most of you do.

I'm going to go try and hit my goal of 25 reps of 225. If I put up 24, I'm going to party like it's 1999 and call it a big success??? LOL. No. I'm going to be very upset I fell short of my goal and I couldn't quite pump that last rep. Again, there is no way to spin that falling short of your goal is a success. We try and win every game. When we lose we fell short of our goal and it wasn't a success. A season is no different. Can you imagine spinning losing a game into it being a big success? Why are you doing it with a season? Oh, right...because football is hard and not hitting your goal is acceptable.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#23

Or our MASH unit at CB. But hey, only excuses for other teams right?

Originally Posted by: Porforis

Seriously the guy is simply just a troll... he's unusual in that he trolls himself and his team, but still talks out of both sides of his mouth, say outlandish things one way, then when that's proven wrong... he's change his argument and say the outlandish thing the other way.

A few months ago, the Packers would be extremely lucky to get to 7-9... and only dreamer wearing rose colored glasses, who didn't live in reality could see the Packers with a winning season... which of course he was too big of a pussy to post on the form and so he only wrote it on Shout.

Now that once again he's proven wrong... he's saying winning record is horrible (after saying no way the Packers could do it). What bullshit. It's only horrible for those rooting against the Packers which clearly he has done... as he's been happy after Packers lost, and til this day, I've NEVER EVER seen a "Packers fan" bitch so much about a Bears loss (especially when it was the Packers beating the Bears... also I'm trying to remember... that game might of been for the division championship too). Hell, I know a number of Bears fans that bitched less, about how the Packers shouldn't of won the game, after that loss than he did.

At the end of the day, he's just here to say he's right... and since he takes both sides of an argument (no way the Packers will have a winning season / a winning season is a poor season for the Packers) he's going to say he's right... because he picks all options until it's the right one. And when you clearly catch him in a wrong argument, he changes subjects and the debate. Just like all the other trolls.

blueleopard
Member

7 years ago

#24

Soft schedule and we went against more playoff teams than any other team in the playoffs. Try again.

Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#25

Originally Posted by: beast

I stay out of forums in season...have been doing that for years. It's post season so I returned. I love how you say I was proven wrong as if you and the rest of this forum was certain we were making the playoffs at 4-6. I saw even the most hardened optimist lose hope then. I'm surprised Rodgers woke up. I'd like to know why? He slept walked for 18 months and all of a sudden started playing at 4-5? He did play well at Wash who is terrible on D, but he played well. Why all of a sudden? There is a reason. I was hoping 4-6 would continue for regime change purposes. It was a dream at 4-6 the way this D was playing to think we would reach 8-8. We over did it by 2. I thought 7-9, maybe. Yes, I was wrong but please don't act like I was alone in my thinking about this team back then. It was one of the few times what I thought actually meshed with the majority here.

I'm glad you spent a post telling me I'm a troll. Nothing makes me laugh more than the liberal use of that word. Do you know what it means or is it your safe word? I'm not a troll in any sense of the definition. I post what I truly believe. I am wrong just like all of you are. It's ironic that when I am wrong I'm just castigated but when I'm right it's ignored. It's further ignored in the very simple questions I ask that don't get answered. That is not a troll. You are just unable to answer and feel threatened so I must be a troll? Sure. Nothing I've typed since I returned from my season break has been outlandish or wrong. Talk around it all you'd like. Try taking it head on for once and see how you do.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

macbob
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#26

Regime change is easy to call for. What's harder is finding replacements that are improvements. Who are your replacements?

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

#27

Regime change is easy to call for. What's harder is finding replacements that are improvements. Who are your replacements?

Originally Posted by: macbob

Type is best I can do. Aggressive, smart, well spoken, hungry, respect commanding, tough.
Mike McCarthy has run his course here. Dom has run his course. Are you really more concerned with who is next vs. taking the risk on fresh ideas? I'm not. There is no guarantee any coach, DC, is going to work out here regardless of pedigree. The thing is to try. You have no idea what plays will work or moves during a game but you have to try things to find out. I want to find out what's behind door #2.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

macbob
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#28

So, you've got nobody, just a pipe dream.

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#29

I post what I truly believe.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

No shit... unless we're using sarcasm, we all post what we truly believe. You always repeat this stupid line, like you're the only one... which is just arrogant .

I love how you say I was proven wrong as if you and the rest of this forum was certain we were making the playoffs at 4-6.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

People were certain that the Packers were going to have a winning record you verbally attacked them, suggesting they'll never wake up to reality, that they're just dreamers who can't take off their rose color glasses and dismissed them. That has been your line year after year... so yes you have clearly been proven wrong year after year... as you're the one that's not in reality.

I get it, you're a perfectionist and always have try to improve things... but it fucking sucks that you're happy when the Packers lose and pissy&bitchy when the Packers win.... and feels like crap when you dump all over the team, and having your shout box hit and runs...

You are just unable to answer and feel threatened so I must be a troll?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Threatened? WTF are you taking about... no one feels threatened... this is on the internet... no one feels threatened about going on their computers. I'm not threatened about questions I can't answer... if fact the only people I know would be threaten about that is 1) People that are about to take a test 2) Perfectionist which feel the need and desire to know the correct answers.

And I'm not even close perfectionist. But you are... so you're probably just projecting your own feelings out on that one.

Also, that would completely explain why you feel the need to ask answers like "Why did Aaron Rodgers make no Guarantees for the Playoffs?" and why you feel the need to come up with a theory for everything... and why you response to each and and every post in the past.

So thanks for the insight on yourself, and maybe you need to work on not feeling threatened by others. Also feeling threatened and being a perfectionist combo would explain a lot of your behavior on here... Sorry, I never thought about that before.

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#30

So, you've got nobody, just a pipe dream.

Originally Posted by: macbob

Yup... with the current staff, you only have one option... them.

But if you fire them all... then you have an endless amount of options. And of course who ever is making this decision is clearly going to make the right choice... and they're going to find someone CLEARLY better than the Packers current staff, because they do it all the time... find coaches who help lead teams to playoffs 8 straight years in a row, it happens all the time.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Martha Careful (25m) : Flag?

Martha Careful (25m) : Sag?

Nonstopdrivel (53m) : It rhymes with "bag."

beast (16h) : Family? That's Deadpool's F word

Nonstopdrivel (16h) : Not THAT f-word.

Zero2Cool (17h) : fuck

beast (17h) : 49ers are Cap Tight

beast (17h) : Fuck

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Kanata, I will be when I'm on my lunch later

TheKanataThrilla (18h) : Love you NSD

Nonstopdrivel (18h) : Huh. I guess the F-word is censored in this fan shout.

Nonstopdrivel (18h) : Anyone who doesn't hang out in the chat probably smokes pole.

TheKanataThrilla (18h) : GoPackGo Thinking CB is the pick tonight

TheKanataThrilla (18h) : Anyone hanging out in the chat tonight?

Zero2Cool (19h) : whoa...49ers have had trade conversations about both Deebo Samuel and Brandon Aiyuk

Zero2Cool (19h) : I hope they take a Punter at 9th overall. Be bold!

Mucky Tundra (20h) : I may end up eating those words but I think they need a lot more talent then their 4 picks can provide

Mucky Tundra (20h) : I really hope they stand pat and Draft a WR

Mucky Tundra (20h) : @DMRussini

Mucky Tundra (20h) : The Chicago Bears are very open for business at 9 and telling teams they are ready to move for the right price, per source

buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend Penei Soul 4yrs - 112mil

buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend St. Brown 4 years 120mil and

Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : Now look, trading up to 13 to take a TE might not seem like a good idea later but it will be later!

dfosterf (24-Apr) : (Your trade up mock post)

dfosterf (24-Apr) : Mucky- The only thing fun to watch would be me flipping the f out if Gute goes up to 13 and grabs Brock Bowers, lol

beast (24-Apr) : DT Byron Murphy II, Texas... whom some believe is the next Aaron Donald (or the closest thing to Donald)

Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : What? And who?

Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : *sad Mucky noises*

Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : @JoeJHoyt Murphy said he’s been told he won’t slide past pick No. 16.

wpr (23-Apr) : Just about time to watch Sonny Weaver stick it to the seahags. I never get tired of it.

Martha Careful (23-Apr) : *game plan

Martha Careful (23-Apr) : IMHO, not even close. He is not a guy you game play around.

Mucky Tundra (23-Apr) : is Aiyuk worth a 1st rounder?

Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : 49ers are seeking a 1st round pick in exchange for WR Brandon Aiyuk

Mucky Tundra (22-Apr) : Based on Gutes comments, now I don't feel as silly having 13 picks in my mock the other day

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Zach Wilson to Broncos.

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Gutekunst says he'd love to have 13 or 14 picks. He's trading back huh lol

beast (22-Apr) : Someday we'll have a draft betting scandal

beast (21-Apr) : Sometimes looking extremely amazing, sometimes looking extremely lost

beast (21-Apr) : I haven't looked into the QBs, but some have suggested Maye has some of the most extremely inconsistent tape they've seen

beast (21-Apr) : Well it also sounds like Patriots are listening to trade offers, not that seriously considering any, but listening means they aren't locked

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Maye needs to be AFC

Mucky Tundra (21-Apr) : Not liking the idea of the Vikings getting Maye

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Vikings HC joked that he may or may not have sent flowers to Bob Kraft. That's where rumor came from.

beast (21-Apr) : Can't tell if this is real or BS, but some rumors about a possible Patriots/Vikings trade for #3 overall

dfosterf (21-Apr) : One playbook to my knowledge. I was shooting for facetious.

beast (20-Apr) : I'm not sure they have different playbooks for different OL positions, and Dillard run blocking is supposedly worse than his pass blocking..

dfosterf (19-Apr) : The only problem with that is he isn't a guard either.

dfosterf (19-Apr) : Put him at right guard. That is where he will be coached. That is where he will compete. He is not even allowed to look at the LT playbook.

dfosterf (18-Apr) : Kidding aside, I hope the best for him.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2023 Packers Schedule

Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM

Bears

38 - 20

Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM

Falcons

24 - 25

Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM

SAINTS

18 - 17

Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM

LIONS

20 - 34

Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM

Raiders

13 - 17

Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM

Broncos

17 - 19

Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

10 - 24

Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM

RAMS

20 - 3

Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM

Steelers

19 - 23

Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM

CHARGERS

23 - 20

Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM

Lions

29 - 22

Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM

CHIEFS

27 - 19

Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM

Giants

22 - 24

Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM

BUCCANEERS

20 - 34

Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM

Panthers

33 - 30

Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM

Vikings

33 - 10

Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM

BEARS

17 - 9

Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM

Cowboys

48 - 32

Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM

49ers

21 - 24