Smokey
6 years ago


[horseow]

UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
6 years ago

The ruling on field was that Elliot's own momentum had him stopped at the 20 before being pushed or carried backward [IE 20="forward progress"]. To re-spot at the 19/overturn, "clear and obvious visual evidence" is required that demonstrates he got to the 19 on his own momentum [Agree that exists] AND that he was pushed or carried back by GB [Which does not exist].

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



The ruling on the field was that the play was over because his momentum stopped. That is all forward progress is. After that it is no different than any other play whether he had run out of bounds, was down by contact or forward progress stopped.

Player runs out of bounds, play is over, official spots the ball at the 20 because that is where runner went out. Replay shows the runner had extended the ball to the 19. replay result, ball spot changes to the 19.

Runner is tackled in a pile and down by contact. Offical spots the ball at the 20. spot gets challenged, and replay shows the ball was extened to the 19, replay result ball spot changes to the 19.

Why the play was blown dead doesn't matter on the challenge, they are only looking at the position of the ball at that point.


The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Barfarn
  • Barfarn
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
6 years ago



Originally Posted by: beast 



And Lastly 😂, the camera is clearly behind the 20 yard line [there's 5.5 yards toward goal and 3.5 yards backward in shot].

Here's the math of it: if the camera is above the 21, 8' feet above the ground and Elliot's reach is 4' off the ground the ball that appears to be above the 19 is in reality above the 20.

By this video shot NO ONE can tell you where the ball is at unless you know where the camera is!

Again no clear and convincing video evidence requires the call on field to stand.
6 years ago
Here's a question for you. If a player is running diagonally toward the sideline, and reaches the ball out for that extra yardage, then tucks it back in to his chest as he steps out of bounds, where is the ball marked? At the furthest point or where it was when he stepped out?
PackFanWithTwins
6 years ago

Here's a question for you. If a player is running diagonally toward the sideline, and reaches the ball out for that extra yardage, then tucks it back in to his chest as he steps out of bounds, where is the ball marked? At the furthest point or where it was when he stepped out?

Originally Posted by: TedThompsonsShades 



If not touched by a defender, the ball gets spotted where it was when the runner touches Out of Bounds. to get the extra yardage they would need to be holding the ball extended when their foot touches the white of the OOB.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
6 years ago
Well I've asked Pete Dougherty so we'll hopefully have our answer soon. 😂
beast
6 years ago

And Lastly

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 





Uncalled for post beast. The post in question was removed yesterday. No need to bring it up over and over again.

Edited post by wpr.
UserPostedImage
beast
6 years ago

Uncalled for post beast. The post in question was removed yesterday. No need to bring it up over and over again.

Edited post by wpr.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



You're right that was uncalled for. But it's also uncalled for him to continue to quote me on this issue after what the racist thing he was suggesting.

Zero asked us to walk away, I tried to until I saw him continuing to quote me and adding BS behind it. I'll try to walk away again, but I hope I don't see him talking to me again on this issue.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
6 years ago

You're right that was uncalled for. But it's also uncalled for him to continue to quote me on this issue after what the racist thing he was suggesting.

Zero asked us to walk away, I tried to until I saw him continuing to quote me and adding BS behind it. I'll try to walk away again, but I hope I don't see him talking to me again on this issue.

Originally Posted by: beast 



I don;t read every line in every post. There are certain people I hardly ever read. If you feel he crosses the line please report it.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (5h) : For the record, I enjoy Beast and Mucky drafts
Zero2Cool (12h) : Haha
Mucky Tundra (13h) : No time for talking! Back to work beast!
beast (13h) : You saw only 4,201 of my mocks? 🥺 I think that means you missed more than half of them 😢
dfosterf (17h) : Does anyone know what Lambeau field improvements got put on hold? My guess would be for the 2025 draft
Zero2Cool (19h) : It's like listen, you made 4,201 mocks, no shit.
Zero2Cool (19h) : Cuz during the draft "I had them mocked there!" as if it's amazing.
Zero2Cool (19h) : They're fun to do once in awhile. It's people who think they are "content" that annoy me.
dfosterf (19h) : Against tbd
dfosterf (19h) : Answer to your question is yes, it's a Thursday, will be the Chiefs aga
dfosterf (19h) : Luckily for all concerned, I don't post them. I did one, but that was like 25 mocks ago
Zero2Cool (19h) : NFL 2024 gonna start Sept 5th isn't it???
Zero2Cool (19h) : Ugh... kids these days!
dfosterf (19h) : I'm gonna go do some more mock draft hell instead 🤪
Zero2Cool (19h) : Did we do one of those prediction threads yet for 2024 season?
dfosterf (20h) : In my city, they are playing the nimby game, in order to keep some railroad tracks vs. 2 professional sports teams and a concert venue.
dfosterf (20h) : And/Or a city council, of which I haven't seen a good one in a very long time
dfosterf (20h) : That sounds like a Mayor, not a city.
buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers halt scheduled 80mil upgrade of stadium until lease agreement talks are restarted
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : City of Green Bay puts Packers' Lambeau Field lease talks on hold
buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers 1 of 3 teams to vote no on new kickoff rule.
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Packers sign another Kicker
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Lengthy explanation at PFF if you click the link
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Kickoff rules officially changed.ngthy explan
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : lol
Cheesey (26-Mar) : 2009? No thanks! One open heart surgery is enough!
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Good for you!
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Yes. That's the one.
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Is that "Lady Dugan" per chance?
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Crystal?
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Please refresh my memory
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Alan posts. Crystal back in my life. It's 2009 all over again! Lol
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : BAH GAWD! THAT'S CHEESEYS MUSIC!
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Gutekunst said early stages of Jordan Love contract being discussed.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Shouldn't be penalized cuz official screwed up
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Yeah, challenge until you are incorrect twice.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Fining them is the goal, per the people who made the rule anyway.
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still waiting on the kickoff rule changes. Did hear yesterday that the touchback proposal will now be the 30 yard line, not the 35
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Probably speed of game issues with your proposal
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Hopefully the refs don't get in the habit of throwing flags on this
beast (25-Mar) : I think when it comes to Challenges should get two strikes, so unlimited challenges as long as they keep winning them, but 2 wrong then done
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still subject to the fines etc
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Yes, I should have been more specific. Also, they are now saying it would be a 15 yard penalty. That makes more sense .
beast (25-Mar) : Simply fined in the week to follow
beast (25-Mar) : I agree with one NFL official, it'll probably be like some of the helmets hits, not really called by the refs on the field but simply fined
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Hip drop is not. Super confusing. Referees job is harder
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Swivel hip drop is banned
dfosterf (25-Mar) : The hip drop enforcement will be in the form of fines, etc. Not flags
dfosterf (25-Mar) : A major foul will be enforced on the offense if there are offsetting penalties in a change of possession situation
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Teams will receive a 3rd challenge if 1 was successful. Previously, it took 2
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17h / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

24-Mar / Around The NFL / dhazer

24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.