uffda udfa
6 years ago

Not for those who know football.

I've really gotten sick of people who clearly don't know football. So many times AJ comes from backside makes a tackle 5-10 yards down field, and get criticized for it. he got dragged or was slow getting there. When if they would look at the play, they might realize that AJ never should have been making the tackle tackle in the first place. He had to because 2 or 3 others before him had already screwed up.

Bishop was OK at front side, but he wasn't assignment sure. Everybody remembers when he shot a gap to make a tackle for loss, but they don't remember all the times he tried and miss basically hanging the rest of the team out in the process.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



AJ Hawk was what he was because he couldn't run. I never understood how he posted the 40 he did. I'd like an investigation into that. I ain't kidding. Hawk ran like old Brewers catcher, Ted Simmons. I've been advocating putting impact players on the field. Guys with the most talent. AJ Hawk was one of those? If he was, well, no wonder... This guy was roided up at The Ohio State University and never ever came close to what he was supposed to be.

If I don't know football, then you surely can explain Hawk's lack of impact plays over his career? He made very very very few and he was a 5th overall. It was shocking how little impact he actually made. Late rounder, slower 40 time than Hawk by a mile, was infinitely more impactful. I want guys who can get on the field and change games. I'll live with some mistakes for the tradeoff of impact vs. a flatline guy. AJ Hawk is the poster child for our organization. He typifies exactly what I hate about our front office and our philosophy...these safe picks who don't really stand out...just flat line...




UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


PackFanWithTwins
6 years ago

AJ Hawk was what he was because he couldn't run. I never understood how he posted the 40 he did. I'd like an investigation into that. I ain't kidding. Hawk ran like old Brewers catcher, Ted Simmons. I've been advocating putting impact players on the field. Guys with the most talent. AJ Hawk was one of those? If he was, well, no wonder... This guy was roided up at The Ohio State University and never ever came close to what he was supposed to be.

If I don't know football, then you surely can explain Hawk's lack of impact plays over his career? He made very very very few and he was a 5th overall. It was shocking how little impact he actually made. Late rounder, slower 40 time than Hawk by a mile, was infinitely more impactful. I want guys who can get on the field and change games. I'll live with some mistakes for the tradeoff of impact vs. a flatline guy. AJ Hawk is the poster child for our organization. He typifies exactly what I hate about our front office and our philosophy...these safe picks who don't really stand out...just flat line...

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I don't think the switch to 3-4 was the best thing for him. But I think he gets far less credit then he deserves. Word is also that he spent to much time and bulked up a little to much in the weight room. I also don't think he was a slow as people try to make it seam. His build and running style doesn't look fast though. Jordy has sort of been that way also, when looking at him run he doesn't look fast, but then he is running by people. Looks can often be deceiving.

you keep saying Lack of Impact. What is impact? does it have to be on a highlight or stat line to be in impact? Taking on a C so Bishop can blitz unblocked and get a sack. Bishop gets credit for making an impact play, AJ who made it possible gets none.

There have been interviews with Kevin Greene, Woodson and other defensive players. They all say, if you listen to Dom and do what he says, you will have success. When things break down it is often because somebody didn't do what they were told, they made a mistake.

AJ was making great impact, just not highlights.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
beast
6 years ago

I don't think the switch to 3-4 was the best thing for him. But I think he gets far less credit then he deserves. Word is also that he spent to much time and bulked up a little to much in the weight room. I also don't think he was a slow as people try to make it seam. His build and running style doesn't look fast though. Jordy has sort of been that way also, when looking at him run he doesn't look fast, but then he is running by people. Looks can often be deceiving.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



What I think hurt Hawk most was the ultra-read and react system under DC Bob Sanders which asked OLB to help keep the ILB clean to make the tackle. But they took Hawk from a very aggressive college system and switch him over to the most reactive scheme I've seen in the NFL, which asked him to be a role player to help the ILB make the play. But the reactive role, and asking him to be a gap filler to keep someone else clean, was NOT in the best interested of Hawk out of college.

Same can be said about BJ and with the 3-4 scheme asking him to play two gap NT. Though the difference being, Raji's size limited him to interior DT, which in the 3-4 scheme had to play some two gap... but Raji sucked at it. Raji would of been best in an aggressive penetrate role.


But yes the Packers have grabbed some good college playmakers and tried to use them as role players, and it hasn't worked out as well, I'm not sure who you blame here.

UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
6 years ago

I don't think the switch to 3-4 was the best thing for him. But I think he gets far less credit then he deserves. Word is also that he spent to much time and bulked up a little to much in the weight room. I also don't think he was a slow as people try to make it seam. His build and running style doesn't look fast though. Jordy has sort of been that way also, when looking at him run he doesn't look fast, but then he is running by people. Looks can often be deceiving.

you keep saying Lack of Impact. What is impact? does it have to be on a highlight or stat line to be in impact? Taking on a C so Bishop can blitz unblocked and get a sack. Bishop gets credit for making an impact play, AJ who made it possible gets none.

There have been interviews with Kevin Greene, Woodson and other defensive players. They all say, if you listen to Dom and do what he says, you will have success. When things break down it is often because somebody didn't do what they were told, they made a mistake.

AJ was making great impact, just not highlights.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



I don't want to come across as a jerk, but it boggles my mind how often these kinds of things happen. Nobody has an ounce of trust in anything I say. Hawk was known for his lack of impact plays. That doesn't square with someone telling me I don't understand football. It squares with the opposite.

From profootballtalk.com

“His year was just quiet,” Moss said. “When he got in, there wasn’t a lot of tackle production and there weren’t interceptions so you look at his stat line and you say, ‘Well, what the hell did he do last year?’ A.J. is not a problem. A.J. is not an issue. A.J. didn’t play poorly last year. He just didn’t make those impact plays. I’m fine with what A.J. is doing. But on the flipside of that, you want your guys being impactful and making plays. He didn’t do it last year and I’m sure he’s not satisfied. He’s going to respond accordingly.”

The lack of impact plays was particularly noticeable in pass coverage, where Hawk declined from 10 passes defensed and three interceptions in 2010 to three passes defensed and zero interceptions in 2011. Hawk acknowledges that.

********************************************************************************

From PackerReport.com regarding his career post-mortem:

That Hawk went so high and failed to make the associated impact falls more on Thompson than it does on Hawk. One year after the surprise of drafting Aaron Rodgers in the first round – with Brett Favre still on the roster – Thompson nabbed what many billed as the safe pick in Hawk, which is just what the Packers got.

Hawk will never be remembered for making game-changing plays or tackles behind the line of scrimmage.

Because great plays like the one against the Saints were few and far between for Hawk, he probably falls outside the top 10 or even 15 best picks in the Thompson era. (He was the highest pick Ted had and falls outside the top 15 best picks of Ted, and we've had so few blue chippers? Indicting.)

Even AJ Hawk knows he failed to live up to expectations:

“There’s obviously a million plays you’d love to have back and a couple more Super Bowl rings that I feel like we could have had while I was there,” said Hawk. “So you never fully live up to any expectations anyone places on you or that you have on yourself, I feel like. But overall, spending nine years in Green Bay, it’s been an absolute blessing. I’m super fortunate.”

Here's one last one from one of his big fans on reddit. I just had to because this guy is a Hawk truther and typed this: His lack of “impact” plays (INT, FF or Sack) and his troubles in coverage has led to him having a rather average looking career.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


PackFanWithTwins
6 years ago

Nobody has an ounce of trust in anything I say. Hawk was known for his lack of impact plays.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



There is a very valid reason for that and I think you know what it is.

Nobody will deny that AJ didn't have a career full of highlights and sure it would have been nice if he had. But In my humble, always right opinion. that is result in where he was playing and what he was asked to do.

But as it pertains to this topic, BISHOP. You were wrong, Bishop was not sitting the bench because of Hawk he was sitting because he wasn't better than Barnett.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Cheesey
6 years ago
I think it's the coaching staff. They have some decent players, but don't seem to be able to build the defense around what they do best.
Maybe if they did, we could stop someone on 3rd and 10.
Capers should be shown the door. Get a new guy in and give it a try. What do we have to lose? Our defense is dead in the water, and won't change while Capers is still here.
Do we want the same crap defense next year????
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
6 years ago

There is a very valid reason for that and I think you know what it is.

Nobody will deny that AJ didn't have a career full of highlights and sure it would have been nice if he had. But In my humble, always right opinion. that is result in where he was playing and what he was asked to do.

But as it pertains to this topic, BISHOP. You were wrong, Bishop was not sitting the bench because of Hawk he was sitting because he wasn't better than Barnett.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



I don't. I understand allegations are hurled at me all the time but they stop when I ask for proof. What I was referring to was the information I post. My memory is very good and when I type something it isn't made up. Of course, I will err once in awhile, but it's pretty rare. Sometimes, I trust my memory too much.

Just one last thing on this Hawk didn't get replaced by Bishop. Thanks. This is no different than me bringing up Jeff Janis and wondering why Davante Adams was out there in Year 2 stinking it up. I couldn't care less if Janis was playing the X, Y or Z positions at WR or Davante. I want the best guys playing. It ain't position specific. I didn't say Bishop was on bench because of Hawk...I was saying we had to live through a pedestrian player while an actual impact one was on the bench.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Porforis
6 years ago
Again, let's try focusing more on the subject at hand than individual posters. If someone seriously bothers you that much that you can't resist making personal comments, ignore them or block them. The conversation itself is great - let's keep talking about it!
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (6m) : I hope they take a Punter at 9th overall. Be bold!
Mucky Tundra (47m) : I may end up eating those words but I think they need a lot more talent then their 4 picks can provide
Mucky Tundra (48m) : I really hope they stand pat and Draft a WR
Mucky Tundra (49m) : @DMRussini
Mucky Tundra (50m) : The Chicago Bears are very open for business at 9 and telling teams they are ready to move for the right price, per source
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend Penei Soul 4yrs - 112mil
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend St. Brown 4 years 120mil and
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : Now look, trading up to 13 to take a TE might not seem like a good idea later but it will be later!
dfosterf (24-Apr) : (Your trade up mock post)
dfosterf (24-Apr) : Mucky- The only thing fun to watch would be me flipping the f out if Gute goes up to 13 and grabs Brock Bowers, lol
beast (24-Apr) : DT Byron Murphy II, Texas... whom some believe is the next Aaron Donald (or the closest thing to Donald)
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : What? And who?
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : *sad Mucky noises*
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : @JoeJHoyt Murphy said he’s been told he won’t slide past pick No. 16.
wpr (23-Apr) : Just about time to watch Sonny Weaver stick it to the seahags. I never get tired of it.
Martha Careful (23-Apr) : *game plan
Martha Careful (23-Apr) : IMHO, not even close. He is not a guy you game play around.
Mucky Tundra (23-Apr) : is Aiyuk worth a 1st rounder?
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : 49ers are seeking a 1st round pick in exchange for WR Brandon Aiyuk
Mucky Tundra (22-Apr) : Based on Gutes comments, now I don't feel as silly having 13 picks in my mock the other day
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Zach Wilson to Broncos.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Gutekunst says he'd love to have 13 or 14 picks. He's trading back huh lol
beast (22-Apr) : Someday we'll have a draft betting scandal
beast (21-Apr) : Sometimes looking extremely amazing, sometimes looking extremely lost
beast (21-Apr) : I haven't looked into the QBs, but some have suggested Maye has some of the most extremely inconsistent tape they've seen
beast (21-Apr) : Well it also sounds like Patriots are listening to trade offers, not that seriously considering any, but listening means they aren't locked
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Maye needs to be AFC
Mucky Tundra (21-Apr) : Not liking the idea of the Vikings getting Maye
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Vikings HC joked that he may or may not have sent flowers to Bob Kraft. That's where rumor came from.
beast (21-Apr) : Can't tell if this is real or BS, but some rumors about a possible Patriots/Vikings trade for #3 overall
dfosterf (21-Apr) : One playbook to my knowledge. I was shooting for facetious.
beast (20-Apr) : I'm not sure they have different playbooks for different OL positions, and Dillard run blocking is supposedly worse than his pass blocking..
dfosterf (19-Apr) : The only problem with that is he isn't a guard either.
dfosterf (19-Apr) : Put him at right guard. That is where he will be coached. That is where he will compete. He is not even allowed to look at the LT playbook.
dfosterf (18-Apr) : Kidding aside, I hope the best for him.
dfosterf (18-Apr) : Went to a Titans board. One comment there. Not very long. I quote: "LOL" They don't sound overly upset about our aquisition.
beast (18-Apr) : OT Dillard has been absolutely horrible... like OG Newman levels
dfosterf (18-Apr) : Suit him up and have him stand in front of the big board as a draft day cautionary tale.
Zero2Cool (18-Apr) : Packers sign T Andre Dillard.
Mucky Tundra (18-Apr) : Adds most of the information this time of year comes from agents.
Mucky Tundra (18-Apr) : @RealAlexBarth Bill Belichick says accurate draft information doesn't leak from teams until about 12 hours before the draft. Adds most of th
Mucky Tundra (18-Apr) : I am very happy that for moment, Jordan Love seems like a normal human being
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : Belichick * whatever
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : "There's a lot of depth at Offensive Tackle and Wide Receiver." Bill Bellichick
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : Thanks! I can't believe it's over haha
Martha Careful (16-Apr) : Congratulations
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Boom. Student Loan. $0.00. Only took about 20 years.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : Packers DT Kenny Clark: New defensive coordinator Jeff Hafley will 'allow us to be way more disruptive'
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : Saints have agreed to terms on a contract with former Packers wide receiver Equanimeous St. Brown.
beast (12-Apr) : No, but of it's for legislation, then half of the country will find it evil, not good, whatever it says....
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

24-Apr / Random Babble / beast

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Apr / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

19-Apr / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Apr / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.