Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Zero2Cool  
#1 Posted : Monday, May 14, 2018 7:16:19 AM(UTC)
Holy crap, this feels like pretty damn big news. What do you think about this?

KRK  
#2 Posted : Monday, May 14, 2018 10:48:40 AM(UTC)
Z, it is huge news. Some observations and thoughts follow.
First, when Sotomayor and Ginsberg are on the OTHER side of a decision, you know it’s the right decision.
Second, Vegas must be incredibly pissed off. They make huge money on sports book with no competition. For example, the first weekend of the NCAA men’s basketball tournament is the biggest weekend in Vegas. Now there will be other options.
Third, bookies will hate this because the cost of legitimately betting will go down. Whenever you inject competition in to a market, costs decrease.
Fourth, the feds will hate this decision also because with more and more people having a economic interest in the outcome of the game, the more parties there are that would have the economic motivation to fix a game. Remember, the corruption in a sport is generally not on who wins or who loses, but by how many points.
This is big.
isocleas2  
#3 Posted : Monday, May 14, 2018 1:19:08 PM(UTC)
Citizen's United was the worst decision in decades and Sotomayer and Ginsberg will certainly be seen in history as on the right side of that one. Although this decision won't be as detrimental to our country as a whole it will certainly devastate alot of people.

Gambling addiction is real and there will be thousands if not millions of new addicts born from this bill. I play alot of poker will be Vegas for the world series in a few weeks, and one of the saddest things about going into these places is seeing the zombies plugging away juniors college money into the slot machines. Atleast before you could get yourself banned from entering a casino, or you had to find a bookie which many couldn't/wouldn't do. Now it will be everywhere, and forgive me for having little faith in us providing credible treatment options. Considering how we deal with alcohol/drug addiction I feel for the families who will now have to deal with the fallout.

That's not even addressing how it will affect the integrity of sports....

KRK  
#4 Posted : Monday, May 14, 2018 2:22:53 PM(UTC)
The Citizens United decision was a GLORIOUS decision. It finally leveled the playing field restoring free speech. It was a sweeping victory against government censorship of free speech especially political speech. It allowed for a lifting of the blanket ban on advocacy groups which had been imposed by McCain Feingold.

It has brought about the defeat of incumbents as their ability to kept their offices through monopolizing the media and the power of incumbency was mitigated. It has leveled the playing field against unions who extort money from their members.

In short it has enabled associational free-speech. Advocacy groups whether conservative or liberal to advertise.

And please don’t hand me the “special interest money will decide elections” BS. Jeb Bush is super PAC raised $86 million, but DJT kicked his low energy ass. Hillary out raised Bernie 93mm to 4mm and she still needed debate questions in advance to win.

But I guess if one believes in the nanny state... that the government should supervise every freaking aspect of our lives...then one will think that both of these supreme court decisions are bad.
isocleas2  
#5 Posted : Monday, May 14, 2018 3:54:12 PM(UTC)
This seems to be going off track but you couldn't be more wrong about citizens united. The only people it has benefited are corporations and super rich who now can buy their politicians and dictate our politics (and often from the shadows). If you support your politicians being beholden to the voter you want money to have as little effect on them as possible. Its why most other modern countries have strict campaign finance laws and limit advertising, so it doesn't turn into the circus we now have with politicians spending 75% of their time fund raising.

Also every country has restrictions on what should be legal or not, its why we don't let people sell meth out of gas stations or scream fire in a crowded theatre. Sometimes you have to have common sense restrictions for the good of society. Reasonable people can understand that, some can't...

Edit: Check out this video/article and you get what i'm talking about, it shows how much influence we have on politicians making decisions. Unless you are donating money they really don't care...that should concern you.

http://www.upworthy.com/...esnt-care-what-you-think
KRK  
#6 Posted : Monday, May 14, 2018 6:28:07 PM(UTC)
My opinions on Citizens United are based upon the first Amendment and freedoms explicitly guaranteed by them, especially including freedom of speech and expression.
Let me explain to you why I disagree with your assertions
1. The only people who benefited from CU are the super rich
- even if true, so what? why should the super rich have their freedom impinged.
- you don't seem to have a problem taxing the shit out of them, so why can't they spend their money to convey their ideas in proportion with how much you tax them
- who are you to say what anyone can spend their money on, as long as it doesn't hurt anyone.
- who are you to say who is super rich or rich...you should get your nose out of other peoples' bank accounts or tax returns
- groups like Greenpeace, the Audubon society, and the NRA can organize and have a voice.
- Bill Proxmire had no problems winning elections without raising money, but that was his choice...it wasn't mandated.
- Prior to Citizens, anyone could get around these limits via Superpacs anyway. Now they can be more forthright.
2. We don't let people sell meth or yell fire in a crowded theater
- that argument sounds like its from someone on meth. How can someone compare either of these with voicing an opinion on a candidate or issue. If you can't see the difference between freedom of expression and causing direct harm to others, you need to take a step back and smell the coffee.
3. The survey cited is fraught is illogical. If politicians don't listen to voters, then the voters can vote them out. These voters would rather bitch than organize or vote. I have a bigger problem with the fact that over 50% of people don't pay any federal income tax, yet can vote to confiscate wealth from producers in society...the ones who create jobs.
4. I noticed you did not address the abuses and advantages labor union before CU...which have now been rightfully mitigated.
In conclusion....and to repeat....anyone against these decisions is for a big government nanny state.
gbguy20  
#7 Posted : Monday, May 14, 2018 7:11:46 PM(UTC)
I'd like to skip out on the federal income tax, how the heck do I pull that off?
isocleas2  
#8 Posted : Monday, May 14, 2018 9:14:09 PM(UTC)
KRK said: Go to Quoted Post
My opinions on Citizens United are based upon the first Amendment and freedoms explicitly guaranteed by them, especially including freedom of speech and expression.


Does the government’s legitimate interest to protecting our democracy justify infringement on the freedom of speech? Also should Corporations be given the same rights as actual citizens? These are the important questions to consider.

Hint: Yes our democracy does need to be protected against undue influence and no corporations should not be treated like people. So by allowing billions to be spent on lobbying legislators they are undermining democracy and defrauding voters out of their chance of legitimate representation. I'd say you probably would be concerned about democracy being undermined but telling from your rant about defending the super rich it seems you prefer a plutocracy (government run by the rich). You may want to read up on what a democracy looks like and who its supposed to work for (all of us, equally).

Quote:
- Bill Proxmire had no problems winning elections without raising money, but that was his choice...it wasn't mandated.


Candidates like Bill Proxmire (or DJT) are outliers, normally when you are outspent you lose the election. Money is the biggest decider in who wins.

94 percent of biggest House race spenders won
82 percent of biggest Senate race spenders won


Source: https://www.pbs.org/news...ictor-will-win-elections

Quote:
- Prior to Citizens, anyone could get around these limits via Superpacs anyway. Now they can be more forthright.


Nope, this is just flat out wrong. Check out the first chart from this article, compare spending pre-citizens united (2004 + 2006) to the elections after it. Its not even close to the same amount of money. If it was so easy to get around the limits why the change? https://www.washingtonpo...p;utm_term=.09faf9762d7e

Quote:
3. The survey cited is fraught is illogical.


Please specify how the survey is illogical and/or provide information to support that. Forgive me if I don't take you at your word.

Quote:
4. I noticed you did not address the abuses and adva
ntages labor union before CU...which have now been rightfully mitigated.


For someone who claims not to like illogical comparisons you sure seem to make alot of them.

Here's some facts: For every dollar spent on lobbying by labor unions and public-interest groups together, large corporations and their associations now spend $34. Of the 100 organizations that spend the most on lobbying, 95 consistently represent business. Source: https://www.theatlantic....erican-democracy/390822/

If I was to hand you a sandwich that was 95% bullshit and 5% ham, would you be prepared to call that a ham sandwich?

KRK  
#9 Posted : Tuesday, May 15, 2018 2:02:49 AM(UTC)
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”
Our freedoms are from God, not the government. We, the people, choose to convey certain of those rights, with limitations delineated in the Constitution to the government. Freedom of expression and freedom of speech are not conveyed to the Government. The government cannot over step those rights. Also,
1. We don't live in a democracy, we live in a constitutional republic.
2. Corporations are ultimately own by, for the economic benefit of people. Shouldn't the people who own those corporations have the same rights as people who own anything else? You can use your car to pass out fliers for candidate...should the government be able to say to you, Sorry your proportional use of that car is too highly skewed to politics. Why is a rich man'scash any different.
3. My points were mainly to protect individuals and associations who want to exercise their constitutional right of expression.
4. Most of the Founding Fathers were rich, and lost fortunes in the war to provide our freedoms. They exercised their God given right of expression.
5. People and 501c 3's generally give to politicians who agree with their views. The more people agree with their views, the more money they receive AND the more likely they are to get votes. You seem to think the politicians just stick their fingers up in the air and vote for whatever will get them the most money. Most politicians are not straight up whores who get economic benefit from foundations they form then sell out their country....although there are some.
6. Outlier or not, Proxmire and other candidates win, because they take centrist practical views which can be easily defended.
7. There is more spending....so what? Most people are ignorant of issues which affect our constitutional republic. For example, many ill-informed people they we live in a democracy and don't understand neither the foundational logic nor the genius behind the electoral college.
8. You seem great as asking questions and pointing to left wing articles (the Atlantic, Washington Compost and Socialist Public Radio). Go read National Review and get some balance. Perhaps, however, you can contemplate the core ideals behind these questions:
- why should the super rich have their freedoms impinged?
- you don't seem to have a problem taxing the shit out of them, so why can't they spend their money to convey their ideas in proportion with how much you tax them?
- who are you to say what anyone can spend their money on, as long as it doesn't hurt anyone?
- who are you to say who is super rich or rich...you should get your nose out of other peoples' bank accounts or tax returns...
- what if an individual feels so strongly on an issue, they want to take a second mortgage and take out ads for or against a candidate or issue....who are you to stop them? what right do you have to stop them?

And back to the point, why should the government prohibit gambling on sports events, especially when it has lotteries and allows casino gambling. Nanny state thinking....we, the government will tell you what you can and can't do with your money
DarkaneRules  
#10 Posted : Tuesday, May 15, 2018 5:24:19 AM(UTC)
I personally detest gambling, but whatever other people want to do with their money is up to them. I have more of an issue with state lotteries. At least be honest with the public, it's gambling.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Nonstopdrivel (3h) : Weird, I thought they had parted ways with him already. Apparently he was just on IR.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers expected to visit with veteran tight end Marcedes Lewis
DarkaneRules (6h) : And whether any improvement will be enough to make the team.
DarkaneRules (6h) : Goodson wasn't very good but it's been a while. He gets an opportunity to show how he's improved.
Zero2Cool (6h) : I still say Goodson is trash.
Zero2Cool (6h) : Aaron Rodgers brought up CB Demetri Goodson unprompted on Tuesday. "He's made some plays already during the two days (of OTAs)."
beast (19h) : Black 21.5" 5ms Widescreen LED Backlight‎
Zero2Cool (20h) : VA2246M-LED
beast (22h) : LB Mychal Kendricks anybody? ... good speed LB... and hoping he doesn't want to go play with his brother on the Vikings
Zero2Cool (22-May) : players picked from Nos. 1 to 21 in the first round receive fully guaranteed contracts.
beast (21-May) : Rumor is that Richie Incognito wants to retire, he just wanted to be released first so that he didn't have to play back any of his signing bonus.
Zero2Cool (21-May) : Bills have released G Richie Incognito -->>> ?? Packers?
Mucky Tundra (21-May) : or very shortly after being drafted
Mucky Tundra (21-May) : from reading about it, sounds like he went to rehab before even being drafted
Mucky Tundra (21-May) : didn't know about the other two stints
Zero2Cool (21-May) : favre went into rehab three times, ... i didn't know that and i thought i knew everything. WTF
Zero2Cool (21-May) : ass fuck? you sick bastid
Nonstopdrivel (20-May) : Not that I've . . . ASS! FUCK!
Nonstopdrivel (20-May) : Not that I've noticed. Noticed. Iced.
Cheesey (20-May) : Hey Nonstop.....do you know you have a history of repeating yourself?
Cheesey (20-May) : Hey Nonstop...do you know you have a history of repeating yourself?
Nonstopdrivel (19-May) : Reading Melt74's posting history is pretty funny. There aren't many members more laconic than he.
Nonstopdrivel (19-May) : Reading Melt74's posting history is pretty funny. There aren't many members more laconic than he.
wpr (19-May) : Wie gehts?
Porforis (18-May) : Guten tag.
Nonstopdrivel (18-May) : Gute . . . use your aggressive feelings, boy. Let the hate flow through you.
Porforis (18-May) : I am Gute.
Zero2Cool (18-May) : That is gute.
gbguy20 (15-May) : nvm just read about it. KT coffee is now the official coffee of the packers and will be served at Lambeau. taking over naming rights of the Verizon wireless gate and much more. sweet.
gbguy20 (15-May) : what's the details on the packers w/ kwik trip, Kevin?
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Packers & @KwikTrip expand & enhance their partnership
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Packers have signed first-round pick Jaire Alexander.
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Jason Witten, who also listed the Saints as a landing spot.
Zero2Cool (15-May) : “I think he’s going to end up going to the Green Bay Packers.” Jason Witten to @AdamSchefter about Dez Bryant.
Zero2Cool (14-May) : Marshall Newhouse ✔ @MNewhouse73 Hey, Legalize sports gambling all you want, but there’s no true gamble quite like whether to trust a fart or not.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2018 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 9 @ 7:20 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Sep 16 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Sep 23 @ 12:00 PM
Redskins
Sunday, Sep 30 @ 12:00 PM
BILLS
Sunday, Oct 7 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Monday, Oct 15 @ 7:15 PM
49ERS
Sunday, Oct 28 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Nov 4 @ 7:20 PM
Patriots
Sunday, Nov 11 @ 12:00 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Nov 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Sunday, Nov 25 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Dec 2 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Dec 9 @ 12:00 PM
FALCONS
Sunday, Dec 16 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Dec 23 @ 12:00 PM
Jets
Sunday, Dec 30 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
38m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

21-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

20-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / KRK

19-May / Random Babble / Nonstopdrivel

17-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

16-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

15-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

13-May / Random Babble / KRK

13-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / KRK

Headlines