Green Bay Packers Forum
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Zero2Cool  
#1 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 6:40:00 PM(UTC)
Any one want to take a stab at this one?
Sponsor
Offline eap33  
#2 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 6:54:16 PM(UTC)
I'd say it was a mixture of the two. The Boys are a great team (as much as I hate to say it). Of course it didn't help that WoodChuck is feeling worse than normal, Bigby's out, KGB isn't feeling up to par, Barnett got banged up early, Al Harris also. I'm not trying to make excuses, per se, but we aren't exactly firing on all cylinders at the moment. I say, more than the alternative, the Cowboys won the game yesterday.
Offline zombieslayer  
#3 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 6:57:44 PM(UTC)
The Cows won.

I don't think there's much of a valid argument for the Packers losing.
Offline gbpfan  
#4 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 7:01:43 PM(UTC)
we lost because we didn't produce offencivly d-line may be banged up but they got sacks an interception fumble yes they gave up too but they were getting to romo so pack lost
Offline agopackgo4  
#5 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 7:11:20 PM(UTC)
I think the Cowboys won. They had the clearly better team. And they showed it. It is that simple. They made the Packers look bad. They made ran all over us, and their defensive pressure was too good for our offensive line. Thats what it came down to. They are too good for us. At least right now. Hopefully that changes!
Offline Greg C.  
#6 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 7:45:37 PM(UTC)
I think it was mostly a case of the Cowboys winning. It's hard to stop a team that runs AND throws the ball as well as they do. There are very few teams in the league at any given time that have that kind of balance and explosiveness on offense. And their defense was much better than what it showed against Philly.

I was impressed by the Cowboys' athleticism pretty much across the board. Their only real weakness is at #2 receiver, as Crayton is not very good, but that no-name guy made two monster catches for them. It's like the Packers needed an extra player on both offense and defense to make it even.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann


Tweeter