Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
2 Pages12>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
wpr  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, December 25, 2012 8:06:39 PM(UTC)
JSOnline has a poll- Which team would you rather see miss the playoffs: Vikings or Bears?

After almost 3000 votes it is 51% vikings 49% bears. living in IL I had to chose the bears. With GB playing the vikings Sunday I figure that has something to do with the results. The fans for both teams are annoying. Around here viking fans are more annoying than bear fans.

Grudgingly my B-I-L had to admit that he wants GB to win Sunday. I laughed. I told him to tell his young son to cheer for GB as well. My nephew was not thrilled about it. He still is not so sure.
Pack93z  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, December 25, 2012 8:38:59 PM(UTC)
For me.. it is simply... I loathe the ground the Bears walk upon. I enjoy the banter of the Vikings.

Bears.
musccy  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, December 25, 2012 10:43:57 PM(UTC)
I've always hated the Vikes more, with their stupid Nordic call everytime they have a 1st down, their artificially piped in noise, jack-ass players like Randy Moss and the loveboat, and them stealing all of our ex-players (Longwell, Sharper, Burt)...so many more reasons to loathe them.
yooperfan  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, December 26, 2012 2:30:16 AM(UTC)
No question in my mind, Bears.
Packerchick  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, December 26, 2012 6:44:38 AM(UTC)
Rather see the Vikings miss, no doubt.
wpr  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, December 26, 2012 6:58:12 AM(UTC)
Porforis  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, December 26, 2012 7:32:12 AM(UTC)
Earlier in the year, Bears. With a chance to knock the vikings out of the playoffs and prevent APete from getting the record, AND getting the #2 seed all in one week, I'd have to say Vikings. Anyways, it's very unlikely but possible that neither the Bears nor Vikings will make the playoffs. Wouldn't that be sweet? :)
Gaycandybacon  
#8 Posted : Wednesday, December 26, 2012 7:45:38 AM(UTC)
Eh.... The Bears... must not be underestimated. The Vikings might have a little worse QB than da bears. [roflmao]

Looking at the Playoff race the Bears or Vikings would have to win 2 games and play us at Lambeau Field in the Championship again to even face us.. Who in the forseable future can predict they will?
Since69  
#9 Posted : Wednesday, December 26, 2012 8:23:27 AM(UTC)
Who would I rather face? The Bears.
Who would I rather beat? The Vikings.
mi_keys  
#10 Posted : Wednesday, December 26, 2012 9:12:28 AM(UTC)
I hate the Bears more. But I actually respect the Bears. I'd rather they make the playoffs over the Minnesota Little Swimmers any day.
User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#11 Posted : Wednesday, December 26, 2012 3:18:44 PM(UTC)
Well since the Bears really underachieved this year and the Vikings seriously overachieved - the Vikings deserve to be in the playoffs. With that said, I'm really going to enjoy watching our Packers steamroll the Vikings on Sunday, knocking them out of the playoffs.

If only Napoleon could get the Kitties riled up to knock off the Bears, we could still beat the Vikings and they would be able to go to the playoffs. But let's face it, Schwartz sucks, and the Kitties are back to being who we knew they were.
vikesrule  
#12 Posted : Wednesday, December 26, 2012 4:04:08 PM(UTC)
Although the Packers can't miss the playoffs, the best case scenario is....
Vikings win, San Francisco loses, and the Seahawks win.
This would make the Packers and Seahawks both 11-5 division winners, and the tie would be broken by....yes, you guessed it.ThumpUp

Wouldn't that just frost your cheesehead shorts.....[grin1]
Porforis  
#13 Posted : Wednesday, December 26, 2012 4:42:08 PM(UTC)
vikesrule said: Go to Quoted Post
Wouldn't that just frost your cheesehead shorts.....[grin1]


No, not really.
GermanGilbert  
#14 Posted : Wednesday, December 26, 2012 4:42:37 PM(UTC)
vikesrule said: Go to Quoted Post
Although the Packers can't miss the playoffs, the best case scenario is....
Vikings win, San Francisco loses, and the Seahawks win.
This would make the Packers and Seahawks both 11-5 division winners, and the tie would be broken by....yes, you guessed it.ThumpUp

Wouldn't that just frost your cheesehead shorts.....[grin1]


No it wouldn't. Your scenario would just lead to this:

First: Kick the shit out of your purple ass at wildcard weekend
Second: Take revenge and show the Seahawks who "won" both games in week 3 and in the divisional playoffs
Third: Get to SB XLVII, regardless wether home or away.

I can live with it. [grin1]

User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#15 Posted : Wednesday, December 26, 2012 5:14:41 PM(UTC)
vikesrule said: Go to Quoted Post
Although the Packers can't miss the playoffs, the best case scenario is....
Vikings win, San Francisco loses, and the Seahawks win.
This would make the Packers and Seahawks both 11-5 division winners, and the tie would be broken by....yes, you guessed it.ThumpUp

Wouldn't that just frost your cheesehead shorts.....[grin1]


You forget that this generation of Packer fans haven't been mind fucked to thinking the whole world is against like Viking fans that witnessed the first Hail Mary, when Drew Pearson was interfered with while hauling in a beautiful eephus pass from Roger Staubach.
Cheesey  
#16 Posted : Wednesday, December 26, 2012 6:21:35 PM(UTC)
I really don't care. I just want the Packers to win, period.
Beat the Queens sunday, and get the bye.
After that, who cares?
TheKanataThrilla  
#17 Posted : Wednesday, December 26, 2012 7:02:00 PM(UTC)
Don't really care if either of them miss. I just want to see the Giants gone.
mi_keys  
#18 Posted : Wednesday, December 26, 2012 8:07:45 PM(UTC)
TheKanataThrilla said: Go to Quoted Post
Don't really care if either of them miss. I just want to see the Giants gone.


Not that I'm afraid of/care who we play, but I'm fairly confident the Giants will not be making it to Green Bay this postseason. The only way the Giants can make the playoffs ends up with them as the 6th seed going to San Fran (if we lose New York is out and there is no way Arizona beats the Niners). The way they've played the last 7 games (2-5), I don't see them winning at both San Fran and Atlanta.
macbob  
#19 Posted : Wednesday, December 26, 2012 8:49:33 PM(UTC)
TheKanataThrilla said: Go to Quoted Post
Don't really care if either of them miss. I just want to see the Giants gone.


Personally, I wish the Bears, Vikes, and the Giants all made the playoffs and we had to play each of them to get to the Super Bowl. It would only make the journey so much sweeter to knock each one of them out of the playoffs on the way to New Orleans.

And I think it would only be fitting if we were to go on and win the Super Bowl 35-21 over the Patriots, since that's what we beat them by in Super Bowl XXXI (which was also in New Orleans). I think a recreation of that Super Bowl would be most pleasant.

PS: I'm not predicting, and I'm not being overconfident--this is just me dreaming...
Porforis  
#20 Posted : Wednesday, December 26, 2012 8:59:04 PM(UTC)
I really see no need to have to kill the Giants on our way to a super bowl. Yeah, they beat us earlier this year. Yeah, they knocked us out last year. But they're not division rivals and they don't have any major history with us this year like the Seachickens do.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
gbguy20 (20-Apr) : you're probably right
TheKanataThrilla (19-Apr) : I was thinking Dez gbguy20
gbguy20 (19-Apr) : Bmarsh cut. preparing for obj extension?
Zero2Cool (19-Apr) : Week 1: at Packers — Sept. 9 (SNF)
Cheesey (19-Apr) : I don't know. I don't have HBO. I only have regular BO.
Smokey (19-Apr) : Who is HBO's 2018 "Hard Knocks" team ?
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : Jimmy Graham on choosing Packers -- Why Green Bay instead of New Orleans? "#12 is hungry
DarkaneRules (17-Apr) : When he talked about missing guys he didn't mentioned Greg Jennings :)
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : it won't though. thus, off-season = hate season
gbguy20 (17-Apr) : these quotes from arod should shut people up
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : Jimmy Graham on whether he's still the same Jimmy Graham: "I'm still 6-foot-7 and still run a 4.55 (40)."
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : TE Jimmy Graham said he turned down a lot of money to sign with a team he said he feels can win it all. “12 is hungry,” he said.
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : Aaron Rodgers on potential extension with Packers: "There's interest on both sides in getting something done"
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : "You have to trust the process. And the process works." Aaron Rodgers
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : I think Barkley would be crazy good with Aaron Rodgers.
porky88 (15-Apr) : If the Packers trade into the top 10, I think it's for Saquan Barkley.
buckeyepackfan (15-Apr) : Lololol
buckeyepackfan (15-Apr) : Need to use this statement "The Packers have wasted enough years of AR's career"
TheKanataThrilla (14-Apr) : New GM with a new qb. History repeats.
TheKanataThrilla (14-Apr) : I had that fuck that idea about Rodgers..turns out I was wrong.
gbguy20 (14-Apr) : fuck that idea.
TheKanataThrilla (14-Apr) : Rosen?
Nonstopdrivel (14-Apr) : An unnamed source told Daniel Jeremiah the Packers will trade into the top ten to snag a quarterback.
Zero2Cool (13-Apr) : The #Cowboys have released WR Dez Bryant, source said. It’s done.
Zero2Cool (13-Apr) : Sources: Cowboys expected to release Bryant The Cowboys, who are meeting with Dez Bryant on Friday, plan on "moving on" and release the star receiver, sources told ESPN
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : Today's Birthdays: ThePrey (29)
Nonstopdrivel (11-Apr) : I'm easily offended.
Zero2Cool (11-Apr) : but, if you're easily offended, stay the hell out
Zero2Cool (11-Apr) : for some good laughs, read Let's Offend Everyone! in The Back Alley
gbguy20 (11-Apr) : give him a prove it deal here for that money. ridiculous
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : I think he wanted a prove it year, to cash in next season.
Nonstopdrivel (9-Apr) : Detail in Patriots' deal with WR Jordan Matthews shows the bargain: one-year, $1 million, plus $700K in incentives. Only $170K is guaranteed.
Porforis (9-Apr) : You're my favorite customer.
Nonstopdrivel (9-Apr) : Oh, hi, Mark.
TheKanataThrilla (8-Apr) : I like our current RBs. If we have an injury or 2 maybe sign Lacy on a cheap 1 year deal.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
9m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

20-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / warhawk

20-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

20-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

19-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

19-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / warhawk

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

15-Apr / Around The NFL / Cheesey

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

Headlines