Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
2 Pages12>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
shield4life  
#1 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 12:17:29 AM(UTC)
No running game
Zero2Cool  
#2 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 12:18:25 AM(UTC)
Our running game wasn't that bad. we couldn't stop their offense that was why we lost. we couldn't get them off the field
shield4life  
#3 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 12:20:23 AM(UTC)
props to woodson ... that's all i got to say
Scythe  
#4 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 12:22:33 AM(UTC)
Giving up over 200 yards on the ground didn't help much either.
Zero2Cool  
#5 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 12:24:37 AM(UTC)
We can't win when we let the other team run down our throats and make our defense stay on the field all game. No defense can handle that stuff.
shield4life  
#6 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 12:26:12 AM(UTC)
ya but if grant or jackson would of had like a td or something ... we'd be like 4 pts down right now ... anyways one loss no biggie it was bound to happen but running game hasn't been ticking last year don't know why tho ... there some big plays last 2 games but it's just not like year if you guys know what i mean ... ya sure defense line didn't do that much crazy too but you can't forget that o-line of dallas is very very very good
Ginco19  
#7 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 12:26:30 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
No running game


i think it was more of not sticking to our running game. We ran the ball well when we did but we abandoned it. Overall if we meet again, we can shut down T.O. and if we can keep consistant with our run game and get first downs our Defense can hold their Run game.
shield4life  
#8 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 12:27:54 AM(UTC)
hahhahaha even dallas winning you had to see that idiots face lmfaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
bozz_2006  
#9 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 12:31:36 AM(UTC)
isn't one and only, like, one? ....... and only?
shield4life  
#10 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 12:33:41 AM(UTC)
yup it is lol ... anyways um where's bigby lol ?
TengoJuego  
#11 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 12:36:47 AM(UTC)
There were a number of reasons. This one was just one of many.
bozz_2006  
#12 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 12:38:27 AM(UTC)
injured. so is nick collins. that's why we got see so much of Charlie Peprah tonight

and with harris out, we got some tramon williams too.
HoustonMatt  
#13 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 12:38:53 AM(UTC)
We couldn't stop their ground game and we gave up to many third down conversions. That's it.
Cheesey  
#14 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 12:40:29 AM(UTC)
We sucked on both sides of the ball.
Our D couldn't stop them, our O couldnt score
gotarace  
#15 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 12:43:42 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
We sucked on both sides of the ball.
Our D couldn't stop them, our O couldnt score

Add 14 flags and that completely summs it up.
evad04  
#16 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 12:45:12 AM(UTC)
Wow. Immediate evaluations are always so delicious -- especially when people say "one reason only."

C'mon krazy, there were a lot of undesirable things about tonight's game.

That isn't to say I've lost faith or anything. We played a very good team. It's impossible to load up the box to stop Barber/Jones when you have T.O. and Witten that require so much attention.

It's tough to rush only four and get pressure against a massive o-line.

It's tough NOT to give up a big pass here or there when the run game is already established and you have to account for T.O.

It was the culmination of ALL of these -- and ALSO that the run game wasn't quite there and the Packers couldn't put it in the endzone. Brandon Jackson looks impressive -- I think that should be noted.

Dallas is a VERY TOUGH team to defend, we made some mistakes, and we couldn't get the ball in the endzone.

We lost to a very good team. We'll be alright, and hopefully we'll get healthier and we'll learn a few things from the game.
Rockjock07  
#17 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 12:49:07 AM(UTC)
Either Ryan Grant is not healthy or the league is figuring him out because he's been very average this season. Jackson should get the majority of snaps next week. With that said, there should have been a commitment to the run tonight, ball control keeps the Cowboys offense off the field.

The 3 big plays also killed the packers. Also, the flags are starting to became more of a problem that continues to take away big plays for this team.
Zero2Cool  
#18 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 12:51:56 AM(UTC)
Grant only had 13 carries and he netted over 50 yards. He wasn't given the ball often enough with decent blocking.

This was not Grant's fault.
Pack93z  
#19 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 12:58:06 AM(UTC)
Easy answer... we got controlled at the line of scrimmage.. both sides.. we were suspect on our offensive line and their Oline just flat out wore our Dline down... that is one massive athletic front 5 the Cows have on offense.

Playcalling was limited because we couldn't pass protect well enough.. Rodgers was moving all night long.
Pack93z  
#20 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 1:00:38 AM(UTC)
Evad.. I agree.. nothing to get all excited about.. we had chances early.. we settled for FG's and their front wore us down.. I think it is clear on elite fronts our oline needs to step it up a little more.. the speed of the boys caused us struggles. Look familiar, it should same time of front (speed) that got us last January..
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
uffda udfa (1h) : Packers re-sign Christine Michael
Smokey (2h) : Easier said than fixed .
Nonstopdrivel (3h) : The web version lists who started the thread; the mobile version lists who last updated it.
Nonstopdrivel (3h) : Also, there's a weird disparity between the web version and online version of this site.
Nonstopdrivel (3h) : ;-)
Zero2Cool (21-Mar) : Packers wanted D. Ware in 2005. Thank you Cowboys!
Zero2Cool (21-Mar) : lol Rourke
Nonstopdrivel (21-Mar) : I HATE HATE HATE the way all threads get marked as read after viewing a few of them in one session. It's obnoxious.
Smokey (21-Mar) : Check out this site, NFLdraftscout.com , a great resource site.
Smokey (20-Mar) : Jared Cook signs with Raiders .
Smokey (20-Mar) : I did watch SB 45 on YouTube the other night, very eye opening .
Smokey (20-Mar) : Watching Spring Training Baseball, Nationals vs Yankees, very interesting .
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : B1G making some noise in that bracket
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : The more join, the more talk, the better. including John
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : no forum should need one person, we have others, speak up!
gbguy20 (19-Mar) : slow forum needs more uffda
Smokey (19-Mar) : There's always next year .
Smokey (18-Mar) : Virginia is still in it !
Smokey (18-Mar) : On Wisconsin
Zero2Cool (18-Mar) : Down goes Villanova!! Badgers!!!
Zero2Cool (18-Mar) : Might have went into your SPAM or JUNK folder??
yooperfan (18-Mar) : Funny I never got the invite
wpr (17-Mar) : Ignoring the Signing Bonus, Jones' base is only $725K above the vet min
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Not many seem interested, but I did invite those from last year.
dhazer (16-Mar) : no bracket challenge Kevin?
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Blame twitter on the /home page here lol
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Datone Jones Vikings deal $3.75M, $1.6M signing bonus, $1.5M salary, $31,250 per game active, $150K workout bonus, $1.25M sacks-pt incentive
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Nope. I don't care to read up on Vikings players. :-)
Bnoble (15-Mar) : Anyone see any numbers on Jones deal?
uffda udfa (14-Mar) : Datone to Minnesota.
musccy (14-Mar) : A more $ than I'd prefer, but still glad Elliott is back
uffda udfa (14-Mar) : Jayrone back on a one year 1.6 deal.
Zero2Cool (13-Mar) : Martellus Bennett Contract Details: New Packers TE has just $3.85M cap hit in 2017
Zero2Cool (13-Mar) : Packers have $28 under cap yet
hardrocker950 (13-Mar) : Walden would be a nice pickup...
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
19m / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

39m / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

2h / Announcements / Nonstopdrivel

2h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Nonstopdrivel

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

17-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

17-Mar / Around The NFL / Smokey

17-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

17-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

15-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

Headlines