Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline RaiderPride  
#1 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 1:38:56 AM(UTC)
RaiderPride

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 7/17/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 151
Applause Received: 231
See how great this kid is... Our Future Champion will excel this Januarry.....

Packers lose to Dallas Big Fricken Deal.

It was a learning experience for the team as a whole. It all comes down to January and being in the hunt in January.

Chico had a passer rating of 103.47 in this loss

ROMO had a passer rating of 82.63 in his win tonight.

The future is "Ours" The Packers will have a record of 3 wins and 1 loss next week and still be on top of the NFC North.

Great Loss... A loss that was needed to take the team to the next level.

I think the rest of the team had a check up from the neck up tonight as far as what it will take to put the ring on this year.

This is a good loss for the Packers as a team. It will result in a 7 game winning streak.

R.P.
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
Sponsor
Offline Rios39  
#2 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 1:41:55 AM(UTC)
Rios39

Rank: Member
Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 30
On Yahoo it said Rodgers was 80.1?
blank
Offline zombieslayer  
#3 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 1:52:25 AM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Yes. It was 80.1.
Aaron Rodgers didn't look good, but I'll put more of the blame on our OL. Our OL gets an F. Aaron Rodgers was not getting a full 3 seconds, whereas that overrated ass clown on the other side was getting 5 to 6 for too much of the game, and their RBs were getting holes big enough to fit a truck through.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. [tt] [mm] [ar]
Offline zombieslayer  
#4 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 1:52:54 AM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
And there's nothing good about losing to the Cows. Nothing.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. [tt] [mm] [ar]
Offline Rios39  
#5 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 1:59:20 AM(UTC)
Rios39

Rank: Member
Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 30
I can't really blame anything on Rodgers tonight. He'll be fine. But this O-Line needs to pick it up.
blank
Offline zombieslayer  
#6 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 2:06:25 AM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
I can't really blame anything on Rodgers tonight. He'll be fine. But this O-Line needs to pick it up.


That's what I was saying. I put the blame on the OL. It sucked. Aaron Rodgers didn't have any time, and had it been some immobile QB like P Manning, he would have been toast.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. [tt] [mm] [ar]
Offline Rockjock07  
#7 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 2:08:51 AM(UTC)
Rockjock07

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/13/2008(UTC)
Some things looked positive tonight but overall there were more negative things that came out of tonights game than positive.

With that said, the Packers wil not face a team with this much talent and as many weapons as they did tonight for the rest of the regular season.
Thank You 2005 White Sox!
Offline RaiderPride  
#8 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 2:28:37 AM(UTC)
RaiderPride

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 7/17/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 151
Applause Received: 231
Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
On Yahoo it said Rodgers was 80.1?


You may be right Rios39... The QB Rating Calculator I was using is coming up with different numbers every time I enter Chico's stats.

This web site I am using may be flawed....

http://www.primecomputing.com/

Thanks for the heads up Rios...

R.P.
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
Offline Rios39  
#9 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 2:30:38 AM(UTC)
Rios39

Rank: Member
Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 30
Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
On Yahoo it said Rodgers was 80.1?


You may be right Rios39... The QB Rating Calculator I was using is coming up with different numbers every time I enter Chico's stats.

This web site I am using may be flawed....

http://www.primecomputing.com/

Thanks for the heads up Rios...

R.P.


So that's probably season all around. In any case when you have an off game of 80.1, you'll be fine lol
blank
Offline all_about_da_packers  
#10 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 3:42:09 AM(UTC)
all_about_da_packers

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 12
Applause Received: 86
I don't understand how you can consider this a good loss RP.

Our o-line had trouble all night long with the rush, and historically we've struggled against the 3-4.

Our STs were bad. It seemed like anytime we got a decent kick/punt return, it was because the Packers held on the return. So any decent return was negated.

Our D got beat the f' up tonight. I mean that in the literal sense, so many of our starters got banged up at some point, they will be sore tomorrow.

The only good thing I take from this loss is knowing that the Packers room for improvement is a heck of a lot more than the Cowboys room for improvement. That's not saying much though, the Cowboys are loaded.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Offline TheEngineer  
#11 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 4:27:51 AM(UTC)
TheEngineer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
I can only go by the stats here, and unfortunately it didn't look too good.

Seems like:

1) Poor OL

2) Rodgers holding for too long

3) Defensive backs still need improvement

4) Haven't fixed poor TE coverage since last year

5) Injuries

6) Penalties


That about sums it up?

Anyway I expect a rebound next week against TB, and hopefully they can learn a thing or two from this game.
blank
Offline TheEngineer  
#12 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 4:35:09 AM(UTC)
TheEngineer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Also wanted to say, if an 80.1 QB rating, just shy of 300 yards and 1 rushing TD is part of Rodgers' 'growing pains' when the Pack loses, then I think the future is still pretty damn bright and I'm happy with who we have.
blank
Offline CaliforniaCheez  
#13 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 8:28:34 AM(UTC)
CaliforniaCheez

Rank: Registered
Joined: 9/15/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 5
Applause Received: 134
A better O-line was the difference in the game.

A healthy RB for the Packers would have helped.

Sitton and Wells will be healthy soon.

Grant may need a couple weeks off to get healthy.


The Packers look like a playoff team. They don't look good enough to be a championship team.
blank
Offline Greg C.  
#14 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 8:35:26 AM(UTC)
Greg C.

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)
Location: Marquette, Michigan
Applause Received: 48
This COULD turn out to be a good loss. Time will tell. But right now it's disappointing because it really wasn't a very close game. The Packers lost the physical battle on both sides of the line of scrimmage, and they also failed to come up with as many big plays as the Cowboys.

If I was a Cowboy fan, I would feel very good about this game. That makes it hard for me not to feel bad about it as a Packer fan. The only really good news is that there are still 13 games left in the season, so there is plenty of time for the Packers to improve. It's not a time to panic by any means.
blank
Offline IronMan  
#15 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 8:36:17 AM(UTC)
IronMan

ESPN NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2010

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 145
Applause Received: 117
Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
And there's nothing good about losing to the Cows. Nothing.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
6m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Laser Gunns

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rockmolder

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

2-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / warhawk

28-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

28-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

28-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

27-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

27-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Yerko

27-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

27-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra


Tweeter