Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
musccy  
#21 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 2:53:57 PM(UTC)
Quote:
Jason Wilde ‏@jasonjwilde 21m
Nelson on Cobb, Jones injuries: "As far as I know, it’s possibly not as bad as it could have been." That's all I've got, folks.


I don't know if this refers to James (who I assumed was OK) both, or Dr. Nelson doesn't have any clue about the severity of the injuries.
play2win  
#22 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 2:55:52 PM(UTC)
Actually, millertime, we just had so many moving parts. I believe they are still trying to figure out where to run, etc. An all new OL. I think Aaron is learning what it is like to have a running game, and so is McCarthy.

Add to that we have played some of the NFL's top defenses, and BOTH Super Bowl teams through just the first 5 games.

If Aaron hadn't lost Jones or Cobb today, it might have been a blowout, and discussion moot. Crazy.
K_Buz  
#23 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 3:32:36 PM(UTC)
Why is Aaron so emotionless out there? I can understand staying calm, but sometimes you need to rally the troops.
wpr  
#24 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 3:58:20 PM(UTC)
Gaycandybacon said: Go to Quoted Post
Hopefully they didn't favor McMillian.... because he was plying like a man out there. House that is


not his thing. He has said many times he is laid back No Cal and CM3 is the wild and worked up So Cal.
musccy  
#25 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 4:05:54 PM(UTC)
Cobb/Jones not as bad as it looked???

I believe Jones won't be too bad, but nothing M.M. says here eases my concerns for Cobb.

Quote:
"We'll find out tomorrow," McCarthy said. "I'm hopeful for good information tomorrow once we get him back. James Jones, I'm hoping for good information there, too. We don't have a full diagnosis on either one of those guys."
sschind  
#26 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 5:18:35 PM(UTC)
millertime said: Go to Quoted Post
Anyone think that our new emphasis on the running game has prevented our passing game from getting into a rhythm?


Only Texaspackerbacker.

beast  
#27 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 5:52:17 PM(UTC)
millertime said: Go to Quoted Post
Anyone think that our new emphasis on the running game has prevented our passing game from getting into a rhythm?


I'd say yes, but also say they they're not emphasising it enough, which is also hurting the passing game. I'll try to explain what I mean.

Falcons WR Roddy White said one of the reasons the Falcons are struggling is because "This team doesn’t have an identity right now".


Right now, I don't think the Packers offense as a whole have a single identity which is hurtting the offense as a whole. On one hand you have Rodgers and the passing weapons, on the other you have the RBs and the blockers.

I think the focus on the OL's run blocking has hurt their pass blocking, which has hurt the passing attack because Rodgers doesn't seem to be as comfortible back there, as well as they no longer have Jennings, and may lose more WRs after this game, all which hurt the passing game.

But I also think the Packers playcallers (MM/Rodgers) wanting to pass it more often and ride the passing game has also hurt the Packers. As if they would give being a run first team a shot, it would often things up in the passing game as well as play action.

Though I did note that I could sometimes tell if it was a run or pass simple based on Lacy depth from Rodgers. I don't like tells and I'm sure the players and coaches are looking for tells a lot closer than I am.


TheKanataThrilla  
#28 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 6:00:21 PM(UTC)
I don't think there is issues with the passing game, I just find we are going for very low percentage throws way too often. 3rd and 2 and we try and connect a 20+ yard throw. I couple of times it looked that Aaron could have even ran for the first, but threw the low percentage pass instead. Also our pass plays still look like they are ran to the sidelines.

Lots of dropped passes today. Boykins looked lost for most of his time out there.

DoddPower  
#29 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 6:15:09 PM(UTC)
Losing two out of your three top targets is going to throw most teams out of whack for a while. I'm a little surprised they were able to do what they were able to do, really. Two crucial injuries like that can't be easy to adjust too. Add that to the poor pass protection and yeah, things probably aren't going to look that good. Other than the pass protection and a few drops, I thought things looked pretty good, all things considering.
User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#30 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 6:50:26 PM(UTC)
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
Only Texaspackerbacker.



A win is a win is a win but ........ did this look like the Packer passing game was in rhythm? Not to me. I'm as thankful as anybody for Lacy and the enhanced ability to run, and I'll blame good defense and bad O Line play for the lack of rhythm, but just the same, I'd rather see a Packer blowout - about 400 yards and 4 TDs passing, maybe about 45 - 17 - but I'm happy just the same hahahahaha.
DarkaneRules  
#31 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 6:52:57 PM(UTC)
I think losing Joe as the OC was pretty big. Aaron is a great QB, but the insight, planning, and execution was better when Joe was here. That being said, we still are struggling in pass protection and when you rattle Aaron early, there will be times he plays too safe. Running the ball effectively probably caused the play of the game to Jordy with that beautiful play fake.
play2win  
#32 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 4:48:33 AM(UTC)
DoddPower said: Go to Quoted Post
Losing two out of your three top targets is going to throw most teams out of whack for a while. I'm a little surprised they were able to do what they were able to do, really. Two crucial injuries like that can't be easy to adjust too. Add that to the poor pass protection and yeah, things probably aren't going to look that good. Other than the pass protection and a few drops, I thought things looked pretty good, all things considering.


I thought they looked pretty good considering the circumstances as well.

Figure, we have faced 4 outstanding defensive front 7s in the 5 games we played. All with a completely revamped OL, and a nearly all new set of RBs.

It will take time for any QB to adjust under those conditions. Rodgers & Co. look like they will be fine. SF, CIN, DET and BAL are all known for wreaking havoc Up front. Of those 4 games we worked a split. Our OL is improving, especially the Left side. Wow. Couldn't understand why they were running Right side yesterday. If TJ Lang and Don Barclay can get it together as well as Bakhtiari and Sitton, look out.

We are just getting started.
play2win  
#33 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 4:57:10 AM(UTC)
Hey, anyone else here thinkng "Did that really happen yesterday?"

So cool than they ripped BAL on their home turf. My hat is off to AJ Hawk and the rest of our Packers Defense. Wow. They completely ruled the day. Lattimore. Hyde. Raji. Burnett. Neal. Datone. A lot of incredible contributions.
steveishere  
#34 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 5:36:38 AM(UTC)
DarkaneRules said: Go to Quoted Post
I think losing Joe as the OC was pretty big. Aaron is a great QB, but the insight, planning, and execution was better when Joe was here. That being said, we still are struggling in pass protection and when you rattle Aaron early, there will be times he plays too safe. Running the ball effectively probably caused the play of the game to Jordy with that beautiful play fake.


I don't know there was really only 1 year with Philbin that was better than either of the years so far without him. Ever year before 2011 was similar offensively to last year and this year.
Since69  
#35 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 6:47:50 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
A win is a win is a win but ... ...I'd rather see a Packer blowout - about 400 yards and 4 TDs passing, maybe about 45 - 17...


Me, too. I want to see the Packers' games well in hand by halftime. Save the hard-fought, suspenseful, back and forth "who's going to win this one?" games for teams I don't care about...
wpr  
#36 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 8:07:48 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
A win is a win is a win but ........ did this look like the Packer passing game was in rhythm? Not to me. I'm as thankful as anybody for Lacy and the enhanced ability to run, and I'll blame good defense and bad O Line play for the lack of rhythm, but just the same, I'd rather see a Packer blowout - about 400 yards and 4 TDs passing, maybe about 45 - 17 - but I'm happy just the same hahahahaha.


That will be this coming Sunday. Mark it down. Put it in the books.
sschind  
#37 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 9:17:26 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
A win is a win is a win but ........ did this look like the Packer passing game was in rhythm? Not to me. I'm as thankful as anybody for Lacy and the enhanced ability to run, and I'll blame good defense and bad O Line play for the lack of rhythm, but just the same, I'd rather see a Packer blowout - about 400 yards and 4 TDs passing, maybe about 45 - 17 - but I'm happy just the same hahahahaha.



Hey, I agree with you. If they could win every game without ever running I'd say go for it. The passing game was certainly out of rhythm, I just don't think its the running games fault. I agree on the good defense and bad pass blocking on the O-line.

Hey, would you look at that. TPB and I agreeing on something. That's either a sign of good things to come or we should all look to the skies with a little more diligence. Its all good though, we always agreed on the most important part. Packers winning.
sschind  
#38 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 9:22:08 AM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey, anyone else here thinkng "Did that really happen yesterday?"

So cool than they ripped BAL on their home turf. My hat is off to AJ Hawk and the rest of our Packers Defense. Wow. They completely ruled the day. Lattimore. Hyde. Raji. Burnett. Neal. Datone. A lot of incredible contributions.


that goal line stand was a thing of beauty and obviously one of the keys of the game.

Hyde looked good on the punt returns as well.

nerdmann  
#39 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 2:08:06 PM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey, anyone else here thinkng "Did that really happen yesterday?"

So cool than they ripped BAL on their home turf. My hat is off to AJ Hawk and the rest of our Packers Defense. Wow. They completely ruled the day. Lattimore. Hyde. Raji. Burnett. Neal. Datone. A lot of incredible contributions.


They did wear down late in the game though. Keep that in mind, the next time Aaron goes into no-huddle.
Dulak  
#40 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 2:10:13 PM(UTC)
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
that goal line stand was a thing of beauty and obviously one of the keys of the game.

Hyde looked good on the punt returns as well.



not sold on hyde for a punt returner - I mean he looked good in that one run - but to me he looks a bit skinny and can he hang onto the ball I Got to wonder
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
beast (20h) : Packers once again facing some former Packers this season, OLVan Roten, DE Peppers and CB Gunter
beast (23h) : Darn, and I was already worried about Spriggs possibly vs Peppers
Zero2Cool (14-Dec) : Jason Spriggs added to the injury report
Zero2Cool (14-Dec) : whoa
beast (14-Dec) : Packers are the only team to have less only 1 top 20 draft pick in the last decade... all other teams had more.
Zero2Cool (14-Dec) : McCarthy's last two conferences ... much more jovial than last two months, huge difference.
Zero2Cool (14-Dec) : If you picked Home for every NFL game, you'd have 115 correct picks. 55% success
Zero2Cool (14-Dec) : Cincinnati Bengals co-founder Pete Brown dies
Zero2Cool (13-Dec) : Rodgers says he doesn't expect to adjust way he plays: "I wouldn’t be playing if I didn’t feel confident playing the way that I played my en
Zero2Cool (13-Dec) : Panthers Trai Turner enters concussion protocol
Zero2Cool (13-Dec) : Great stat from Mike Zimmer just now at his presser. No team has beaten three above .500 teams on the road in a row since 1967.
Zero2Cool (13-Dec) : Brett Hundley or Blake Bortles if you're the Jaguars?
Zero2Cool (13-Dec) : @ESPNStatsInfo Last season, Aaron Rodgers threw 13 TD and 0 Int while going 5-0 in Dec./Jan. regular season games
FLORIDA PACKER88 (13-Dec) : 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
buckeyepackfan (13-Dec) : THAT BAAAAAAAAD MAN IS BACK!!!!!
cheeseheads123 (13-Dec) : 12 is back baby lets go!!!
Zero2Cool (12-Dec) : WR Davante Adams nominated for Clutch Performer of the Week
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : lol coach with jokes MM: "If i don't know tomorrow, they'll be putting Pat McKenzie on IR."
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : Rod of Airs here to fook you up!
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : Packers gonna play coy until Saturday night and go SURPRISE BITCHES
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : Mike McCarthy on Rodgers timetable: "This is in the hands of the experts. ... Let's just wait until the experts make their decision."
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : You can freaking localize ads too to region. This is NOT hard. Lazy asses.
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : I think so too, but it's time they get with it. You can have ads in streaming too.
Nonstopdrivel (11-Dec) : You've been able to stream postseason games for a few years now, I think.
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : last 4 games played, Packers have worst pass efficency, Browns 2nd worst
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : On @oath @YahooSports and @NFL Apps
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : Good news for NFL fans: starting with this season’s playoffs you can stream games on your phone. All phones. All carriers. For free. On
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : Verizon to pay NFL $500 million a year to stream games
beast (11-Dec) : Packers can't catch Eagles so it doesn't directly effect our playoff chances.
Nonstopdrivel (11-Dec) : yoffs?
Nonstopdrivel (11-Dec) : So . . . could in theory be a severe sprain. Which might still sideline him for the rest of the season, but perhaps he'd be back for the pla
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : That's regarding Carson Wentz
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : @AlbertBreer Doctors determined with manual test there was damage to ACL, extent unknown until MRI tomorrow.
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : Read reports that's what is feared and yes, you're right, usually if that's the fear = done
Nonstopdrivel (11-Dec) : MRI would me mostly a formality. He walked off on his own power, so possibly just a sprain? But I doubt it.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
7m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

35m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

36m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / musccy

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

14-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

14-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

14-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

13-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

13-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

13-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

13-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

Headlines