Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
musccy  
#21 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 2:53:57 PM(UTC)
Quote:
Jason Wilde ‏@jasonjwilde 21m
Nelson on Cobb, Jones injuries: "As far as I know, it’s possibly not as bad as it could have been." That's all I've got, folks.


I don't know if this refers to James (who I assumed was OK) both, or Dr. Nelson doesn't have any clue about the severity of the injuries.
play2win  
#22 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 2:55:52 PM(UTC)
Actually, millertime, we just had so many moving parts. I believe they are still trying to figure out where to run, etc. An all new OL. I think Aaron is learning what it is like to have a running game, and so is McCarthy.

Add to that we have played some of the NFL's top defenses, and BOTH Super Bowl teams through just the first 5 games.

If Aaron hadn't lost Jones or Cobb today, it might have been a blowout, and discussion moot. Crazy.
K_Buz  
#23 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 3:32:36 PM(UTC)
Why is Aaron so emotionless out there? I can understand staying calm, but sometimes you need to rally the troops.
wpr  
#24 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 3:58:20 PM(UTC)
Gaycandybacon said: Go to Quoted Post
Hopefully they didn't favor McMillian.... because he was plying like a man out there. House that is


not his thing. He has said many times he is laid back No Cal and CM3 is the wild and worked up So Cal.
musccy  
#25 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 4:05:54 PM(UTC)
Cobb/Jones not as bad as it looked???

I believe Jones won't be too bad, but nothing M.M. says here eases my concerns for Cobb.

Quote:
"We'll find out tomorrow," McCarthy said. "I'm hopeful for good information tomorrow once we get him back. James Jones, I'm hoping for good information there, too. We don't have a full diagnosis on either one of those guys."
sschind  
#26 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 5:18:35 PM(UTC)
millertime said: Go to Quoted Post
Anyone think that our new emphasis on the running game has prevented our passing game from getting into a rhythm?


Only Texaspackerbacker.

beast  
#27 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 5:52:17 PM(UTC)
millertime said: Go to Quoted Post
Anyone think that our new emphasis on the running game has prevented our passing game from getting into a rhythm?


I'd say yes, but also say they they're not emphasising it enough, which is also hurting the passing game. I'll try to explain what I mean.

Falcons WR Roddy White said one of the reasons the Falcons are struggling is because "This team doesn’t have an identity right now".


Right now, I don't think the Packers offense as a whole have a single identity which is hurtting the offense as a whole. On one hand you have Rodgers and the passing weapons, on the other you have the RBs and the blockers.

I think the focus on the OL's run blocking has hurt their pass blocking, which has hurt the passing attack because Rodgers doesn't seem to be as comfortible back there, as well as they no longer have Jennings, and may lose more WRs after this game, all which hurt the passing game.

But I also think the Packers playcallers (MM/Rodgers) wanting to pass it more often and ride the passing game has also hurt the Packers. As if they would give being a run first team a shot, it would often things up in the passing game as well as play action.

Though I did note that I could sometimes tell if it was a run or pass simple based on Lacy depth from Rodgers. I don't like tells and I'm sure the players and coaches are looking for tells a lot closer than I am.


TheKanataThrilla  
#28 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 6:00:21 PM(UTC)
I don't think there is issues with the passing game, I just find we are going for very low percentage throws way too often. 3rd and 2 and we try and connect a 20+ yard throw. I couple of times it looked that Aaron could have even ran for the first, but threw the low percentage pass instead. Also our pass plays still look like they are ran to the sidelines.

Lots of dropped passes today. Boykins looked lost for most of his time out there.

DoddPower  
#29 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 6:15:09 PM(UTC)
Losing two out of your three top targets is going to throw most teams out of whack for a while. I'm a little surprised they were able to do what they were able to do, really. Two crucial injuries like that can't be easy to adjust too. Add that to the poor pass protection and yeah, things probably aren't going to look that good. Other than the pass protection and a few drops, I thought things looked pretty good, all things considering.
User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#30 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 6:50:26 PM(UTC)
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
Only Texaspackerbacker.



A win is a win is a win but ........ did this look like the Packer passing game was in rhythm? Not to me. I'm as thankful as anybody for Lacy and the enhanced ability to run, and I'll blame good defense and bad O Line play for the lack of rhythm, but just the same, I'd rather see a Packer blowout - about 400 yards and 4 TDs passing, maybe about 45 - 17 - but I'm happy just the same hahahahaha.
DarkaneRules  
#31 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 6:52:57 PM(UTC)
I think losing Joe as the OC was pretty big. Aaron is a great QB, but the insight, planning, and execution was better when Joe was here. That being said, we still are struggling in pass protection and when you rattle Aaron early, there will be times he plays too safe. Running the ball effectively probably caused the play of the game to Jordy with that beautiful play fake.
play2win  
#32 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 4:48:33 AM(UTC)
DoddPower said: Go to Quoted Post
Losing two out of your three top targets is going to throw most teams out of whack for a while. I'm a little surprised they were able to do what they were able to do, really. Two crucial injuries like that can't be easy to adjust too. Add that to the poor pass protection and yeah, things probably aren't going to look that good. Other than the pass protection and a few drops, I thought things looked pretty good, all things considering.


I thought they looked pretty good considering the circumstances as well.

Figure, we have faced 4 outstanding defensive front 7s in the 5 games we played. All with a completely revamped OL, and a nearly all new set of RBs.

It will take time for any QB to adjust under those conditions. Rodgers & Co. look like they will be fine. SF, CIN, DET and BAL are all known for wreaking havoc Up front. Of those 4 games we worked a split. Our OL is improving, especially the Left side. Wow. Couldn't understand why they were running Right side yesterday. If TJ Lang and Don Barclay can get it together as well as Bakhtiari and Sitton, look out.

We are just getting started.
play2win  
#33 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 4:57:10 AM(UTC)
Hey, anyone else here thinkng "Did that really happen yesterday?"

So cool than they ripped BAL on their home turf. My hat is off to AJ Hawk and the rest of our Packers Defense. Wow. They completely ruled the day. Lattimore. Hyde. Raji. Burnett. Neal. Datone. A lot of incredible contributions.
steveishere  
#34 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 5:36:38 AM(UTC)
DarkaneRules said: Go to Quoted Post
I think losing Joe as the OC was pretty big. Aaron is a great QB, but the insight, planning, and execution was better when Joe was here. That being said, we still are struggling in pass protection and when you rattle Aaron early, there will be times he plays too safe. Running the ball effectively probably caused the play of the game to Jordy with that beautiful play fake.


I don't know there was really only 1 year with Philbin that was better than either of the years so far without him. Ever year before 2011 was similar offensively to last year and this year.
Since69  
#35 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 6:47:50 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
A win is a win is a win but ... ...I'd rather see a Packer blowout - about 400 yards and 4 TDs passing, maybe about 45 - 17...


Me, too. I want to see the Packers' games well in hand by halftime. Save the hard-fought, suspenseful, back and forth "who's going to win this one?" games for teams I don't care about...
wpr  
#36 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 8:07:48 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
A win is a win is a win but ........ did this look like the Packer passing game was in rhythm? Not to me. I'm as thankful as anybody for Lacy and the enhanced ability to run, and I'll blame good defense and bad O Line play for the lack of rhythm, but just the same, I'd rather see a Packer blowout - about 400 yards and 4 TDs passing, maybe about 45 - 17 - but I'm happy just the same hahahahaha.


That will be this coming Sunday. Mark it down. Put it in the books.
sschind  
#37 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 9:17:26 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
A win is a win is a win but ........ did this look like the Packer passing game was in rhythm? Not to me. I'm as thankful as anybody for Lacy and the enhanced ability to run, and I'll blame good defense and bad O Line play for the lack of rhythm, but just the same, I'd rather see a Packer blowout - about 400 yards and 4 TDs passing, maybe about 45 - 17 - but I'm happy just the same hahahahaha.



Hey, I agree with you. If they could win every game without ever running I'd say go for it. The passing game was certainly out of rhythm, I just don't think its the running games fault. I agree on the good defense and bad pass blocking on the O-line.

Hey, would you look at that. TPB and I agreeing on something. That's either a sign of good things to come or we should all look to the skies with a little more diligence. Its all good though, we always agreed on the most important part. Packers winning.
sschind  
#38 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 9:22:08 AM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey, anyone else here thinkng "Did that really happen yesterday?"

So cool than they ripped BAL on their home turf. My hat is off to AJ Hawk and the rest of our Packers Defense. Wow. They completely ruled the day. Lattimore. Hyde. Raji. Burnett. Neal. Datone. A lot of incredible contributions.


that goal line stand was a thing of beauty and obviously one of the keys of the game.

Hyde looked good on the punt returns as well.

nerdmann  
#39 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 2:08:06 PM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey, anyone else here thinkng "Did that really happen yesterday?"

So cool than they ripped BAL on their home turf. My hat is off to AJ Hawk and the rest of our Packers Defense. Wow. They completely ruled the day. Lattimore. Hyde. Raji. Burnett. Neal. Datone. A lot of incredible contributions.


They did wear down late in the game though. Keep that in mind, the next time Aaron goes into no-huddle.
Dulak  
#40 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 2:10:13 PM(UTC)
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
that goal line stand was a thing of beauty and obviously one of the keys of the game.

Hyde looked good on the punt returns as well.



not sold on hyde for a punt returner - I mean he looked good in that one run - but to me he looks a bit skinny and can he hang onto the ball I Got to wonder
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Porforis (7h) : Glad to have King back. And House. Packers need 'em.
Zero2Cool (10h) : Good! smack some posts in the forum right?!? :-) can't wait to read it
uffda udfa (13h) : No more clutter.
Cheesey (14h) : Go get him Uncle Ted!!
Zero2Cool (14h) : Former Packers pass-rusher Datone Jones is back on the market.
Zero2Cool (16h) : Good news for #Packers secondary: rookie CB Kevin King and vet CB Davon House (quad) both practiced. King has cleared concussion protocol.
Zero2Cool (16h) : Vince Biegel back on practice field!!
Zero2Cool (23h) : Maybe this little shout has no value if people gonna use it instead of the forum.
Zero2Cool (23h) : He's not writing. He's shouting, and its making the shout kind of without point with the clutter.
buckeyepackfan (18-Oct) : Just like last year at 4-6. The guy is just too funny!
buckeyepackfan (18-Oct) : GOOD news Uffda is already all but writing The Packers off for 2017!
uffda udfa (18-Oct) : Masturbation talk from Barfan? Nothing could make me COME back, quicker.
wpr (18-Oct) : Maybe the shout box needs to take a timeout. People keep using it. ;)
Zero2Cool (18-Oct) : Why do this is in shout? So frustrating. Post in forums. Thanks
Barfarn (18-Oct) : Masterbation will relieve some of that nervous tension!
uffda udfa (17-Oct) : Now, a guy they really liked and have groomed for 3 years is the guy. Tons of toys on O. Let's see how it runs with a great coach, now.
uffda udfa (17-Oct) : The Flynn Patriots game has been used to say that he is. Seneca and Scott showed otherwise.
uffda udfa (17-Oct) : Hundley is going to settle the debate once and for all in whether Mike McCarthy is a great coach, or not.
uffda udfa (17-Oct) : Doesn't speak well to the talent acquired by the org, does it? Easy to say talent is great until Rodgers is gone and you have to see it wit
Porforis (17-Oct) : Could Sam Bradford come into the Packers and post a winning record from here on out? Are there any non-starters in the NFL that could?
Zero2Cool (17-Oct) : Teddy is replaceable. Aaron is not. Vikings have a really good defense. We do not. Understand??
Zero2Cool (17-Oct) : You are wise enough to know the difference. Right?
uffda udfa (17-Oct) : Here's one for you, Z. Vikes lose Teddy B. and go out and aggressively get Bradford. Packers lose 12 and go out and get a UDFA.
uffda udfa (17-Oct) : :) Evans had a pre-draft visit with Packers.
Zero2Cool (17-Oct) : Put it in a topic. My lord why so difficult lol
uffda udfa (17-Oct) : http://www.nfl.com/draft/2017/profiles/jerod-evans?id=2558099
uffda udfa (17-Oct) : http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/former-virginia-tech-qb-jerod-evans-issues-warning-after-going-undrafted-043017
uffda udfa (17-Oct) : Oh, Jerod Evans formerly of Va Tech is our Hokie QB plan
uffda udfa (17-Oct) : Was previously on Eagles PS
uffda udfa (17-Oct) : Tweeted the below due to huge chip on his shoulder for going undrafted after leaving early.
uffda udfa (17-Oct) : Packers add Jerod Evans to PS. He went undrafted: https://twitter.com/rodfor6_/status/858382534274682884
Smokey (17-Oct) : NO a 6 point favorite to beat the Packers in GB .
Zero2Cool (17-Oct) : Yes!!!!!
Porforis (17-Oct) : "I said that too. Why don't you quote me?? I'm famous!" - Zero2Cool
Zero2Cool (16-Oct) : I said that too. Why don't you quote me?? I'm famous!
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / isocleas2

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / isocleas2

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Oct / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

17-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / gotarace

17-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

17-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / musccy

17-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

17-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

17-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

17-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

17-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

Headlines