Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
musccy  
#21 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 2:53:57 PM(UTC)
Quote:
Jason Wilde ‏@jasonjwilde 21m
Nelson on Cobb, Jones injuries: "As far as I know, it’s possibly not as bad as it could have been." That's all I've got, folks.


I don't know if this refers to James (who I assumed was OK) both, or Dr. Nelson doesn't have any clue about the severity of the injuries.
play2win  
#22 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 2:55:52 PM(UTC)
Actually, millertime, we just had so many moving parts. I believe they are still trying to figure out where to run, etc. An all new OL. I think Aaron is learning what it is like to have a running game, and so is McCarthy.

Add to that we have played some of the NFL's top defenses, and BOTH Super Bowl teams through just the first 5 games.

If Aaron hadn't lost Jones or Cobb today, it might have been a blowout, and discussion moot. Crazy.
K_Buz  
#23 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 3:32:36 PM(UTC)
Why is Aaron so emotionless out there? I can understand staying calm, but sometimes you need to rally the troops.
wpr  
#24 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 3:58:20 PM(UTC)
Gaycandybacon said: Go to Quoted Post
Hopefully they didn't favor McMillian.... because he was plying like a man out there. House that is


not his thing. He has said many times he is laid back No Cal and CM3 is the wild and worked up So Cal.
musccy  
#25 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 4:05:54 PM(UTC)
Cobb/Jones not as bad as it looked???

I believe Jones won't be too bad, but nothing M.M. says here eases my concerns for Cobb.

Quote:
"We'll find out tomorrow," McCarthy said. "I'm hopeful for good information tomorrow once we get him back. James Jones, I'm hoping for good information there, too. We don't have a full diagnosis on either one of those guys."
sschind  
#26 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 5:18:35 PM(UTC)
millertime said: Go to Quoted Post
Anyone think that our new emphasis on the running game has prevented our passing game from getting into a rhythm?


Only Texaspackerbacker.

beast  
#27 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 5:52:17 PM(UTC)
millertime said: Go to Quoted Post
Anyone think that our new emphasis on the running game has prevented our passing game from getting into a rhythm?


I'd say yes, but also say they they're not emphasising it enough, which is also hurting the passing game. I'll try to explain what I mean.

Falcons WR Roddy White said one of the reasons the Falcons are struggling is because "This team doesn’t have an identity right now".


Right now, I don't think the Packers offense as a whole have a single identity which is hurtting the offense as a whole. On one hand you have Rodgers and the passing weapons, on the other you have the RBs and the blockers.

I think the focus on the OL's run blocking has hurt their pass blocking, which has hurt the passing attack because Rodgers doesn't seem to be as comfortible back there, as well as they no longer have Jennings, and may lose more WRs after this game, all which hurt the passing game.

But I also think the Packers playcallers (MM/Rodgers) wanting to pass it more often and ride the passing game has also hurt the Packers. As if they would give being a run first team a shot, it would often things up in the passing game as well as play action.

Though I did note that I could sometimes tell if it was a run or pass simple based on Lacy depth from Rodgers. I don't like tells and I'm sure the players and coaches are looking for tells a lot closer than I am.


TheKanataThrilla  
#28 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 6:00:21 PM(UTC)
I don't think there is issues with the passing game, I just find we are going for very low percentage throws way too often. 3rd and 2 and we try and connect a 20+ yard throw. I couple of times it looked that Aaron could have even ran for the first, but threw the low percentage pass instead. Also our pass plays still look like they are ran to the sidelines.

Lots of dropped passes today. Boykins looked lost for most of his time out there.

DoddPower  
#29 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 6:15:09 PM(UTC)
Losing two out of your three top targets is going to throw most teams out of whack for a while. I'm a little surprised they were able to do what they were able to do, really. Two crucial injuries like that can't be easy to adjust too. Add that to the poor pass protection and yeah, things probably aren't going to look that good. Other than the pass protection and a few drops, I thought things looked pretty good, all things considering.
User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#30 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 6:50:26 PM(UTC)
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
Only Texaspackerbacker.



A win is a win is a win but ........ did this look like the Packer passing game was in rhythm? Not to me. I'm as thankful as anybody for Lacy and the enhanced ability to run, and I'll blame good defense and bad O Line play for the lack of rhythm, but just the same, I'd rather see a Packer blowout - about 400 yards and 4 TDs passing, maybe about 45 - 17 - but I'm happy just the same hahahahaha.
DarkaneRules  
#31 Posted : Sunday, October 13, 2013 6:52:57 PM(UTC)
I think losing Joe as the OC was pretty big. Aaron is a great QB, but the insight, planning, and execution was better when Joe was here. That being said, we still are struggling in pass protection and when you rattle Aaron early, there will be times he plays too safe. Running the ball effectively probably caused the play of the game to Jordy with that beautiful play fake.
play2win  
#32 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 4:48:33 AM(UTC)
DoddPower said: Go to Quoted Post
Losing two out of your three top targets is going to throw most teams out of whack for a while. I'm a little surprised they were able to do what they were able to do, really. Two crucial injuries like that can't be easy to adjust too. Add that to the poor pass protection and yeah, things probably aren't going to look that good. Other than the pass protection and a few drops, I thought things looked pretty good, all things considering.


I thought they looked pretty good considering the circumstances as well.

Figure, we have faced 4 outstanding defensive front 7s in the 5 games we played. All with a completely revamped OL, and a nearly all new set of RBs.

It will take time for any QB to adjust under those conditions. Rodgers & Co. look like they will be fine. SF, CIN, DET and BAL are all known for wreaking havoc Up front. Of those 4 games we worked a split. Our OL is improving, especially the Left side. Wow. Couldn't understand why they were running Right side yesterday. If TJ Lang and Don Barclay can get it together as well as Bakhtiari and Sitton, look out.

We are just getting started.
play2win  
#33 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 4:57:10 AM(UTC)
Hey, anyone else here thinkng "Did that really happen yesterday?"

So cool than they ripped BAL on their home turf. My hat is off to AJ Hawk and the rest of our Packers Defense. Wow. They completely ruled the day. Lattimore. Hyde. Raji. Burnett. Neal. Datone. A lot of incredible contributions.
steveishere  
#34 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 5:36:38 AM(UTC)
DarkaneRules said: Go to Quoted Post
I think losing Joe as the OC was pretty big. Aaron is a great QB, but the insight, planning, and execution was better when Joe was here. That being said, we still are struggling in pass protection and when you rattle Aaron early, there will be times he plays too safe. Running the ball effectively probably caused the play of the game to Jordy with that beautiful play fake.


I don't know there was really only 1 year with Philbin that was better than either of the years so far without him. Ever year before 2011 was similar offensively to last year and this year.
Since69  
#35 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 6:47:50 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
A win is a win is a win but ... ...I'd rather see a Packer blowout - about 400 yards and 4 TDs passing, maybe about 45 - 17...


Me, too. I want to see the Packers' games well in hand by halftime. Save the hard-fought, suspenseful, back and forth "who's going to win this one?" games for teams I don't care about...
wpr  
#36 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 8:07:48 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
A win is a win is a win but ........ did this look like the Packer passing game was in rhythm? Not to me. I'm as thankful as anybody for Lacy and the enhanced ability to run, and I'll blame good defense and bad O Line play for the lack of rhythm, but just the same, I'd rather see a Packer blowout - about 400 yards and 4 TDs passing, maybe about 45 - 17 - but I'm happy just the same hahahahaha.


That will be this coming Sunday. Mark it down. Put it in the books.
sschind  
#37 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 9:17:26 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
A win is a win is a win but ........ did this look like the Packer passing game was in rhythm? Not to me. I'm as thankful as anybody for Lacy and the enhanced ability to run, and I'll blame good defense and bad O Line play for the lack of rhythm, but just the same, I'd rather see a Packer blowout - about 400 yards and 4 TDs passing, maybe about 45 - 17 - but I'm happy just the same hahahahaha.



Hey, I agree with you. If they could win every game without ever running I'd say go for it. The passing game was certainly out of rhythm, I just don't think its the running games fault. I agree on the good defense and bad pass blocking on the O-line.

Hey, would you look at that. TPB and I agreeing on something. That's either a sign of good things to come or we should all look to the skies with a little more diligence. Its all good though, we always agreed on the most important part. Packers winning.
sschind  
#38 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 9:22:08 AM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey, anyone else here thinkng "Did that really happen yesterday?"

So cool than they ripped BAL on their home turf. My hat is off to AJ Hawk and the rest of our Packers Defense. Wow. They completely ruled the day. Lattimore. Hyde. Raji. Burnett. Neal. Datone. A lot of incredible contributions.


that goal line stand was a thing of beauty and obviously one of the keys of the game.

Hyde looked good on the punt returns as well.

nerdmann  
#39 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 2:08:06 PM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey, anyone else here thinkng "Did that really happen yesterday?"

So cool than they ripped BAL on their home turf. My hat is off to AJ Hawk and the rest of our Packers Defense. Wow. They completely ruled the day. Lattimore. Hyde. Raji. Burnett. Neal. Datone. A lot of incredible contributions.


They did wear down late in the game though. Keep that in mind, the next time Aaron goes into no-huddle.
Dulak  
#40 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 2:10:13 PM(UTC)
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
that goal line stand was a thing of beauty and obviously one of the keys of the game.

Hyde looked good on the punt returns as well.



not sold on hyde for a punt returner - I mean he looked good in that one run - but to me he looks a bit skinny and can he hang onto the ball I Got to wonder
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : QB Mark Sanchez joining the Bears.
Zero2Cool (4h) : double it up
Zero2Cool (4h) : I'm kidding, relax....
Zero2Cool (4h) : and now he has been cut
uffda udfa (21h) : Per Schefter: Former Skins DT Ricky Jean Francois signed a one-year, $3M deal with Packers, per source.
uffda udfa (21h) : Per Schefter: FormerSkins DT Ricky Jean Francois signed a one-year, $3M deal with Packers, per source.
Zero2Cool (23-Mar) : lol by .01 not what i thought
Zero2Cool (23-Mar) : he's faster than Montgomery
uffda udfa (22-Mar) : Packers re-sign Christine Michael
Smokey (22-Mar) : Easier said than fixed .
Nonstopdrivel (22-Mar) : The web version lists who started the thread; the mobile version lists who last updated it.
Nonstopdrivel (22-Mar) : Also, there's a weird disparity between the web version and online version of this site.
Nonstopdrivel (22-Mar) : ;-)
Zero2Cool (21-Mar) : Packers wanted D. Ware in 2005. Thank you Cowboys!
Zero2Cool (21-Mar) : lol Rourke
Nonstopdrivel (21-Mar) : I HATE HATE HATE the way all threads get marked as read after viewing a few of them in one session. It's obnoxious.
Smokey (21-Mar) : Check out this site, NFLdraftscout.com , a great resource site.
Smokey (20-Mar) : Jared Cook signs with Raiders .
Smokey (20-Mar) : I did watch SB 45 on YouTube the other night, very eye opening .
Smokey (20-Mar) : Watching Spring Training Baseball, Nationals vs Yankees, very interesting .
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : B1G making some noise in that bracket
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : The more join, the more talk, the better. including John
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : no forum should need one person, we have others, speak up!
gbguy20 (19-Mar) : slow forum needs more uffda
Smokey (19-Mar) : There's always next year .
Smokey (18-Mar) : Virginia is still in it !
Smokey (18-Mar) : On Wisconsin
Zero2Cool (18-Mar) : Down goes Villanova!! Badgers!!!
Zero2Cool (18-Mar) : Might have went into your SPAM or JUNK folder??
yooperfan (18-Mar) : Funny I never got the invite
wpr (17-Mar) : Ignoring the Signing Bonus, Jones' base is only $725K above the vet min
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Not many seem interested, but I did invite those from last year.
dhazer (16-Mar) : no bracket challenge Kevin?
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Blame twitter on the /home page here lol
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Datone Jones Vikings deal $3.75M, $1.6M signing bonus, $1.5M salary, $31,250 per game active, $150K workout bonus, $1.25M sacks-pt incentive
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
11m / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

23-Mar / Announcements / Zero2Cool

23-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Mar / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

23-Mar / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

22-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

22-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

17-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

Headlines