Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
5 Pages<12345>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline nyrpack  
#21 Posted : Wednesday, October 9, 2013 3:52:31 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Location: long island, ny
Applause Given: 8
Applause Received: 113
very few trades are made in the nfl, dont think anything looks promising !!
Online sschind  
#22 Posted : Wednesday, October 9, 2013 7:53:09 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

United States
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN
Applause Given: 388
Applause Received: 812
beast said: Go to Quoted Post
When talking about TEs, why does it all have to be about Finley? I didn't say a single thing about Finley and you're all defensive about him, for what ever reason. Got a crush on Finley or something?




So the reason of having two good TEs for a season isn't a good idea for the Packers?

Let's be honest, Mike McCarthy loves TEs, and now that the Packers have the running game and the WRs the weakness is over the middle. Why not have two good (maybe great) TEs?


Nelson, Cobb, Finley, Gonzo and Lacy all on the field at the same time with Jones, Starks and Franklin rotating in as needed.

Sounds like a pretty good group to me.


Because Finley is the Packers starting TE and that is why any talk of the Packers and a TE should involve Finley. Your group sounds good but I would prefer Nelson, Cobb, Jones, Finley and Lacy and that is who we have so we don't need Gonzo. If Mike McCarthy loves his TEs so much why don't we see more of them on the field or more of them getting involved. Quarless has 4 catches and Taylor has 2. I don't believe that the only reason our backup TEs don't have more catches is because they are not good enough. I don't see Mike McCarthy changing his game plan to get him involved TE so if they trade for Gonzo either he or Finley will be spending a lot of time on the bench or as a decoy.

If I have a crush on Finley I wonder what that says about your feelings towards Gonzo.
Online beast  
#23 Posted : Wednesday, October 9, 2013 8:18:56 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 570
Applause Received: 708
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
Because Finley is the Packers starting TE and that is why any talk of the Packers and a TE should involve Finley.


If that's true, then you would be a hypocrite because you talk had talk of the Packers and a WR and didn't involve the Packers starting WRs. But I think it's more likely you thought I was insulting Finley and went into defense mode.
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
I would absolutely love to see Gordon in Green Bay and if all it would take would be a second rounder it would be a steal.


sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
Your group sounds good but I would prefer Nelson, Cobb, Jones, Finley and Lacy and that is who we have so we don't need Gonzo.


Just because someone perfers something doesn't mean there is no need for something else. For example, I perfer a shut down CB, but that doesn't mean the Packers don't need an upgrade at Safety to go with Burnett.


sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
If Mike McCarthy loves his TEs so much why don't we see more of them on the field or more of them getting involved.


Because they're not talented enough when compared to the other players (WRs/RBs)

sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't believe that the only reason our backup TEs don't have more catches is because they are not good enough.

See you already had the answer and used it try to defend your point of veiw. But lets be honest the back-up TEs aren't that good other than maybe Quarless and he has a problem with catching the ball.

sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
If I have a crush on Finley I wonder what that says about your feelings towards Gonzo.


It says nothing, because I haven't gotten defensive and then attack someone idea over Gonzo. That's because there was no reason to, because no one has said anything bad about Gonzo here (just like no one has said anything bad about Finley here).

But even if people do say bad things about Gonzo, I can handle it because they'll probably be right, he's old, very well could be retiring after this season.
Offline steveishere  
#24 Posted : Thursday, October 10, 2013 6:15:37 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 58
Applause Received: 1,763
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
Because Finley is the Packers starting TE and that is why any talk of the Packers and a TE should involve Finley.


When we talked about the Packers bringing in Matthew Mulligan this offseason it had nothing to do with Finley. There are other players on the team than the "starters" and some of those players are even important. They don't just play 22 guys on Sundays.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
beast on 10/10/2013(UTC)
Online sschind  
#25 Posted : Thursday, October 10, 2013 7:32:27 AM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

United States
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN
Applause Given: 388
Applause Received: 812
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
When we talked about the Packers bringing in Matthew Mulligan this offseason it had nothing to do with Finley. There are other players on the team than the "starters" and some of those players are even important. They don't just play 22 guys on Sundays.


Yes but one must presume that they would not bring in Gonzo to fill the same role as Mulligan. The only reason you would bring in a player like Gonzales is to throw him the ball...a lot... and that would affect your starter.

Offline steveishere  
#26 Posted : Thursday, October 10, 2013 7:36:55 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 58
Applause Received: 1,763
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
Yes but one must presume that they would not bring in Gonzo to fill the same role as Mulligan. The only reason you would bring in a player like Gonzales is to throw him the ball...a lot... and that would affect your starter.



No different than bringing in a legit #4 WR which we had last year and everything seemed to work ok. Guys like DJ Williams and Andrew Quarless weren't drafted to be crappy back ups, reserve blockers, or ST players.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
beast on 10/10/2013(UTC)
Offline Yerko  
#27 Posted : Thursday, October 10, 2013 11:41:16 AM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 10/15/2008(UTC)
Location: Chicago, IL
Applause Given: 212
Applause Received: 381
nyrpack said: Go to Quoted Post
very few trades are made in the nfl, dont think anything looks promising !!


There have been a few big name trades already this season. A lot more action than we are used to. I was shocked when the Browns traded away Trent Richardson because when do we ever really see a team trade a star player in the middle of the season?

I think a thread like this just gets people thinking. While there is a slim chance to anything ever happening in season with the Packers, its still fun to talk about.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
DoddPower on 10/10/2013(UTC)
Online sschind  
#28 Posted : Thursday, October 10, 2013 2:35:59 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

United States
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN
Applause Given: 388
Applause Received: 812
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
No different than bringing in a legit #4 WR which we had last year and everything seemed to work ok. Guys like DJ Williams and Andrew Quarless weren't drafted to be crappy back ups, reserve blockers, or ST players.



No they weren't and they are not huge parts of the offense either which is my point. You don't trade for a guy like Gonzales unless you plan on using him as a pass catcher. Right now the Packers are not using their backup TEs as pass catchers.

This happens every time a big name hits the market, be it through free agency or trade possibility or whatever. Someone decides that just because they were a great player at one time or another that they would be a great benefit for our team. I just don't see it. Would it be a disaster? of course not, I just don't see much, if any upside to it.
Online beast  
#29 Posted : Thursday, October 10, 2013 3:09:48 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 570
Applause Received: 708
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
The only reason you would bring in a player like Gonzales is to throw him the ball...a lot..


You make that sound like a bad thing... if a player is making plays then they should be getting the ball. And you can have more than one TE on the field at a time.

sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
Right now the Packers are not using their backup TEs as pass catchers.


Because they can't catch the ball... and not making plays when they get their chances. Lets be honest, Gonzales and Finley both would.

Offline buckeyepackfan  
#30 Posted : Thursday, October 10, 2013 4:47:53 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2014

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Lima, Ohio
Applause Given: 793
Applause Received: 802
HELL NO!!!!

Paul Posluszny

Everyone is busy talking about the fire sale in Cleveland, but no one is talking about the fact they should be doing something similar in Jacksonville. I mean, look at what it did for the Browns who are now in a tie for first place in the AFC North. Posluszny has not been a star at the linebacker position, but he has been consistent, similar to A.J. Hawk. He would fit well in the Packers defense and provide some needed depth at the position without breaking the bank.

All three players could provide some help to a Packers team that is deep, but is fighting a bit of a losing battle with injuries.

THAT'S ALL WE NEED IS ANOTHER FRICKIN' A.J. HAWK!!!!!!!
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
5 Pages<12345>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : That's your opinion, facts prove it is not valid.
uffda udfa (2h) : Our guys talking too much about SB while ATL focused all on today.
uffda udfa (2h) : Matt Ryan has a great mindset for this game. Think he'll play well.
uffda udfa (2h) : Just like the playoff game from 2010 season.
uffda udfa (2h) : Atlanta couldn't find a bigger name for the anthem?
uffda udfa (2h) : Julio Jones anything but fine has 3 injuries in foot per Glazer.
uffda udfa (2h) : Looks like the club is off for Nick.
uffda udfa (2h) : Nick Perry has no future as a motivational speaker.
uffda udfa (3h) : Davante hasn't run in warm-ups just playing catch w/87 and talking 2 Erin Andrews.
GoPack1984 (3h) : All ACTIVE for #Packers: WR Jordy Nelson WR Davante Adams WR Geronimo Allison S Morgan Burnett RB Christine Michael CB Quinten Rollins
uffda udfa (3h) : All our guys are officially active. Go Pack Go
Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers inactives: Joe Callahan, Max McCaffrey, Herb Waters, Joe Kerridge, James Starks, Kyle Murphy, Christian Ringo
Zero2Cool (3h) : Christine Michael ... ACTIVE
Zero2Cool (3h) : Nelson, Adams, Geronimo. ACTIVE.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Rollins and Burnett are ACTIVE.
Zero2Cool (4h) : #Packers RB Christine Michael (back) just completed a workout in front of trainers by doing a backflip. Which seems like a good sign.
Zero2Cool (4h) : #Packers WR Jordy Nelson, Davonte Adams and Geronimo Allison, Randall Cobb, Travis Davis, Jeff Janis will all be active. One more than usual
mojaveson (4h) : Go Pack Go!
Mucky Tundra (5h) : speaking of Montgomery and 24, i think he'll have that many touches today :)
Zero2Cool (6h) : Ty Montgomery turns 24 today. Richard Rodgers turns 25 today.
Smokey (7h) : Ice down the Beer and get the food ready. I'm going Tex/Mex today !
Nonstopdrivel (7h) : Tom Brady has appeared in more conference championships than the Packers franchise has in its entire history.
Nonstopdrivel (8h) : Packers would be the first team in NFL history to make the Super Bowl after starting 4-6 or worse.
Nonstopdrivel (8h) : 5+ straight games.
Nonstopdrivel (8h) : The NFC Championship is the first game (regular season or playoffs) since the 1970 merger featuring two teams that have scored 30+ points in
Zero2Cool (8h) : Good news! @AtlantaFalcons scored more points than anyone this regular season. Bad news? Last 6 teams to do that haven't won Super Bowl
uffda udfa (10h) : Like a night before Christmas or opening Packers weekend...hard to sleep.
uffda udfa (12h) : Staying up late enough so that when U wake up it's game time.
buckeyepackfan (12h) : Exactly! Only a matter of time! GAMEDAY! GO! PACK! GO!
beast (14h) : BOOM!!!!
buckeyepackfan (14h) : TICK, TICK, TICK ????
GoPack1984 (15h) : It's NFC Championship day! Go Pack Go!!!!
uffda udfa (18h) : The Boss picks the Falcons: [TWITTER]788447079446130688[/TWITTER]
uffda udfa (18h) : Is there a prediction thread somewhere on the forum for the Falcons game?
uffda udfa (18h) : Lookout porous Falcons secondary!
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
52m / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / macbob

4h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson


Packers Headlines