Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
4 Pages«<4

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Zero2Cool  
#101 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 4:56:19 PM(UTC)
Yerko said: Go to Quoted Post
BAD NEWS (for the) BEARS


Not really. James Jones has some fumbling issues with the Bears.
Zero2Cool  
#102 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 5:15:44 PM(UTC)
Green Bay Packers INACTIVES
10 WR Chris Harper
25 CB James Nixon
52 LB Clay Matthews
53 LB Nick Perry
88 TE Jermichael Finley
93 DE Josh Boyd
98 DE C.J. Wilson


96 Mike Neal will start at OLB in place of Perry; 55 Andy Mulumba will start at OLB in place of Matthews; 81 Andrew Quarless will start at TE in place of Finley.
IronMan  
#103 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 5:37:40 PM(UTC)
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool  
#104 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 7:18:00 PM(UTC)
nerdmann  
#105 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 9:45:37 PM(UTC)
Quite a disappointment.

In every way, shape and form.
rabidgopher04  
#106 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 9:59:58 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post


Look at that block by Kuhn. What a stud!
IronMan  
#107 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 10:29:19 PM(UTC)
The non challenge on the Quarless catch still bugs me. It wasn't a slam dunk, but definitely worth a shot.
porky88  
#108 Posted : Monday, November 4, 2013 10:42:39 PM(UTC)
^ I also thought Quarless caught the ball.

People are going to get on the offense, but the the Packers were 1-8 against Chicago since Jay Cutler and Dom Capers entered the rivalry.
In those nine games, the Bears have allowed 32 sacks and have turned the ball over 21 times. That’s an average of at least two turnovers and three sacks per game. On Monday night, with an improved offensive line, Chicago gave up just one sack and had no turnovers. The defense did not play up to standard and Josh McCown played well.
play2win  
#109 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 6:10:12 AM(UTC)
Eh, shake it off!

What else can we do? Losing Rodgers was going to be a blow, no matter who we were playing. I'm just hoping it is nothing serious and that Rodgers can return healthy sometime soon.

My hat is off to the Bears. They came in determined. They made plays on offense. Our defense had no answers. I thought there was an incredible amount of holding that went uncalled, but they apparently called the whole game pretty loose. This certainly was a division rivalry game, and being Bears/Packers, we all know just about anything can happen, and it did. There were a handful of game changing plays that could have gone the Packers' way or the Bears' way, and they tilted to the Bears. Balls heaved up while McCown was being hit, instead of being INTs went for receptions.

Packers defense has to look itself in the mirror. Good, midseason gut check.

I think Matt Flynn gets signed this week.
Zero2Cool  
#110 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 6:13:44 AM(UTC)
IronMan said: Go to Quoted Post
The non challenge on the Quarless catch still bugs me. It wasn't a slam dunk, but definitely worth a shot.


I don't think it had a chance of being overturned. Even with that said, we've seen referee's make worse overturns before. Without knowing when Rodgers was coming back, I understood why you'd want to make sure you have both challenges in your pocket in what was most likely to be a close game where a play or two could have decided it.

And with that said, you play not to lose, you end up doing just that.

Bears 4th an inches on the 33? and go for it. They played to win.

That's the difference.
play2win  
#111 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 6:28:25 AM(UTC)
Yeah, McCarthy does not have a good challenge record, and he knows it. But, you never know. I wanted him to challenge it, but could see why he did not. The play was that close. He didn't have anything to lose though, and I do believe he should have given it a go. Would have changed the game completely, had the play been overturned.

We played to not lose. Well said.

The officiating in this game sucked donkey dong.
Zero2Cool  
#112 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 6:37:45 AM(UTC)
sschind  
#113 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 6:37:49 AM(UTC)
IronMan said: Go to Quoted Post
The non challenge on the Quarless catch still bugs me. It wasn't a slam dunk, but definitely worth a shot.


Exactly what I said. In a close game you have to challenge that. It could be the difference maker or it could blow a close game wide open. The worst that happens you lose a TO. McCarthy doesn't seem to like to use them when it matters anyway.

Although I must admit when we downed the punt at the 1 I thought maybe it was a good idea after all.
sschind  
#114 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 6:39:22 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post


Great shot, even a second later when he just kind of turned and looked as if to say "where the hell is everybody"
sschind  
#115 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 6:43:40 AM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, McCarthy does not have a good challenge record, and he knows it. But, you never know. I wanted him to challenge it, but could see why he did not. The play was that close. He didn't have anything to lose though, and I do believe he should have given it a go. Would have changed the game completely, had the play been overturned.

We played to not lose. Well said.

The officiating in this game sucked donkey dong.


Yeah, I saw several holds that the Packers got away with.
Reignman  
#116 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 7:00:32 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
Bears have 14 days to prepare for the Packers.
Packers have 7 days to prepare for the Bears.


I know I'm a little late, and there's plenty more important things to talk about, but I was bored and wanted to add my own meaningless info as I read through the topic ...

Since 2008 (beginning of McCarthy/Rodgers era) here's how the Packers have done when their opponent has 2 weeks to prepare. (now 4-6)

2009 at TB L 28-38
2010 vs MIA L 20-23 ot
2010 at NYJ W 9-0
2010 at ATL W 48-21 (playoffs)
2011 vs STL W 24-3
2011 vs MIN W 45-7
2012 at IND L 27-30
2012 at NYG L 10-38
2012 at SF L 31-45 (playoffs)
2013 vs CHI L 20-27

Here's how they have done when the Packers get 2 weeks to prepare. (5-2)

2008 at TEN L 16-19 ot
2009 vs DET W 26-0
2010 at MIN W 31-3
2011 at SD W 45-38
2011 vs NYG L 20-37 (playoffs)
2012 at DET W 24-20
2013 vs DET W 22-9

Do you know how Frazier has done after a bye?

2011 at GB L 7-45
2012 at CHI L 10-28
2013 vs CAR L 10-35

He's 0-3 and gets outscored 108-27 with 2 weeks to prepare lol.
sschind  
#117 Posted : Tuesday, November 5, 2013 9:30:33 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post



Now that is one hole that I think I can honestly say even I could have run through. Not likely that I would have gotten a TD (I can barely see that far much less run) but I think I could have gotten a first down at least.

Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages«<4
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (15-Jun) : Today's Birthdays: Toddy (26)
Cheesey (11-Jun) : Thanks Kevin.
Cheesey (11-Jun) : Ok.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : Alan, it's an online stream.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : McCarthy speaks at 10am, so probably 11am for practice start.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : McCarthy speaks at 10am, so probably 11am for practice start.
Cheesey (11-Jun) : I don’t know if I can get that station.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : Listen to 107.5 the fan they'll tell you. I'm at airport.
Cheesey (11-Jun) : Thanks for trying WPR! I guess I’ll have to just wing it.
wpr (11-Jun) : Cheesey, The Packer's site says Nitschke Field. 12 am to 11:59 pm. I don't think they know
Cheesey (11-Jun) : Come on!! U smart guys can help me on this!
Cheesey (11-Jun) : Do any of you know what time the Packers mini camp practice is tomorrow?
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : Vince Lombardi would have been 105 today
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : If I were Owens, after reading what some of the voters have said. I'd say F YOU too. Shady process.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : Apparently it costs the inductees a LOT of money to attend.
beast (10-Jun) : Or if Owens is avoiding all HoF activity? Or if he's trying to figure a way to make money off this. Simply saying he's not going to be there doesn't tell me enough
beast (10-Jun) : I feel as if I need more details. Owens said he's not physical showing up, but he could still give a speech via video.
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Using 32 reporter votes is wrong.
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : They held grudges against him, and ignored his excellence on the field. Bogus shit. Political garbage.
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Owens has a point. Absolutely garbage how voters acted, and have responded.
buckeyepackfan (9-Jun) : The HOF needs to conveniently forget to include Owen's in the ceremonies, then fake apologize after.
gbguy20 (8-Jun) : Kevin, suggestion box. move the applaud button to the bottom of the post so i don't have to scroll back up after reading a good post. same goes for quote button i suppose
Cheesey (7-Jun) : Well...I wonder what HE is protesting. Maybe that he made WAY too much money?
Nonstopdrivel (7-Jun) : Wait, what? He bitches for years about not having been selected, and now he won't attend the ceremony?
Zero2Cool (7-Jun) : Hall of Fame announces that Terrell Owens has informed them he will NOT attend the enshrinement ceremony in August.
Nonstopdrivel (5-Jun) : Looking at some of the multiyear rookie UDFA contracts made me think of it. But now I see it's standard to sign them for three years.
packerfanoutwest (4-Jun) : Tavais or Tyrell,,,what's your question/point and why?
Nonstopdrivel (3-Jun) : Probably I was thinking about Tyrell Sutton (Northwestern -- went to the Panthers).
Nonstopdrivel (3-Jun) : Apparently, I'm full of shit. The amount of money teams are allowed to spend on UDFA signing bonuses is extremely small.
Nonstopdrivel (3-Jun) : He's not named in any list of 2012 Green Bay UDFA signings, I mean.
Nonstopdrivel (3-Jun) : I don't think that's the player. I don't recognize the name, and he's not listed on any news article from 2012.
Nonstopdrivel (3-Jun) : Huh, his brief stint with the Packers isn't even mentioned in the Wikipedia article.
packerfanoutwest (3-Jun) : Tavaris Cadet
Nonstopdrivel (2-Jun) : He ended up not making the final roster and was picked up (I believe) by New Orleans. Can anyone remember what his name was?
Nonstopdrivel (2-Jun) : Several years ago, prior to the draft, Green Bay offered a RB prospect (out of Appalachian State, I believe) a six-figure signing bonus if he'd agree to hold out for them.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2018 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 9 @ 7:20 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Sep 16 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Sep 23 @ 12:00 PM
Redskins
Sunday, Sep 30 @ 12:00 PM
BILLS
Sunday, Oct 7 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Monday, Oct 15 @ 7:15 PM
49ERS
Sunday, Oct 28 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Nov 4 @ 7:20 PM
Patriots
Sunday, Nov 11 @ 12:00 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Nov 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Sunday, Nov 25 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Dec 2 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Dec 9 @ 12:00 PM
FALCONS
Sunday, Dec 16 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Dec 23 @ 12:00 PM
Jets
Sunday, Dec 30 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Gilligan

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

16-Jun / Random Babble / Cheesey

15-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

15-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / blueleopard

15-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

14-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

13-Jun / Random Babble / wpr

13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

12-Jun / Random Babble / CFB Risk

12-Jun / Random Babble / Cheesey

11-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / KRK

11-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

8-Jun / Random Babble / wpr

Headlines