Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline sschind  
#1 Posted : Sunday, November 24, 2013 3:57:52 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

United States
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN
Applause Given: 388
Applause Received: 812
I was at basketball games all afternoon so I didn't see the game but in looking at the scoring summary all I can think of is why do you go for 2 when an extra point puts you down by 9.

I get that if we make the 2 point we are down by only 8 but that means we have to make another 2 pointer for the tie.

1 score vs 2 I guess I can understand it but I still don't agree with it. There was still plenty of time left. Essentially you are saying "I have no confidence at all in our defense" which may be justified but you don't come out and admit it.

I know, I know, hindsight is 20/20 but I still don't agree with the call.
Offline Cheesey  
#2 Posted : Sunday, November 24, 2013 4:01:13 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

United States
Joined: 7/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 802
Applause Received: 937
I can see why they did it. At the time, our
offense wasn't moving the ball very well.
Flynn was a big shot in the arm.
Online nerdmann  
#3 Posted : Sunday, November 24, 2013 4:03:01 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,408
Applause Received: 1,420
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
I was at basketball games all afternoon so I didn't see the game but in looking at the scoring summary all I can think of is why do you go for 2 when an extra point puts you down by 9.

I get that if we make the 2 point we are down by only 8 but that means we have to make another 2 pointer for the tie.

1 score vs 2 I guess I can understand it but I still don't agree with it. There was still plenty of time left. Essentially you are saying "I have no confidence at all in our defense" which may be justified but you don't come out and admit it.

I know, I know, hindsight is 20/20 but I still don't agree with the call.


It's controversial, given that there was more than 8 minutes remaining, but I didn't have a problem with it at the time.

Queens were running wild on the ground with Peterson and Gerhart (11 fucking yards/carry) so they were gonna drain major clock. Similar situation as being under 8 minutes.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
Cheesey on 11/24/2013(UTC), wpr on 11/25/2013(UTC)
Offline gbguy20  
#4 Posted : Sunday, November 24, 2013 4:10:15 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 463
Applause Received: 497
Look, at the time, going for 2 was the right choice. In the end, it screwed us.

When we scored it looked like there would only be time for 1 more possession, so we had to make it a 1 possession game, which is why we went for 2.

Missing the 2 point conversion would put us in no worse position than had we just kicked the extra point to begin with. Kicking the extra point or missing the 2 point conversion would still make it a 2 possession game. So there was no harm in going for it and cutting it down to 1 possession.

As it turns out there was plenty of time and had we known that we would have kicked the extra point, scored another td and kicked another extra point, then the field goal would have been the game winner instead of game tying.

You cannot fault McCarthy for this, it was without question the right choice. With how our games had ended the last 2 weeks why would McCarthy ever even fathom that he would have time enough for 2 possessions. He did what he thought was his only choice to TIE the game. And he knew that going for it would not put him in any worse position. He made the right choice.
thanks Post received 3 applause.
cheeseheads123 on 11/24/2013(UTC), nerdmann on 11/24/2013(UTC), wpr on 11/25/2013(UTC)
Offline DarkaneRules  
#5 Posted : Sunday, November 24, 2013 4:35:19 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 334
Applause Received: 763
No regrets. Next game is all I care about now.
Offline K_Buz  
#6 Posted : Sunday, November 24, 2013 4:52:18 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 8/17/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6
Applause Received: 47
I like to find fault with any McCarthy decision, but I can't with the call to go for two. I think I would have ran Lacey up the middle given he was a beast, but that doesn't change what I thought of the call to go for 2.
Offline gbguy20  
#7 Posted : Sunday, November 24, 2013 5:06:39 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 463
Applause Received: 497
If you guys are going to question a decision today, don't question the call for 2. Question the decision to throw the ball on 3rd down at the goal line in overtime instead of handing it to lacy.
Offline DarkaneRules  
#8 Posted : Sunday, November 24, 2013 5:30:59 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 334
Applause Received: 763
Too many plays in that game to go over. I will leave that to the coaches and writers. I think we can all say that given the NFC North situation that a tie was better than a loss.
Online beast  
#9 Posted : Sunday, November 24, 2013 9:19:15 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 570
Applause Received: 708
Mike McCarthy went for it, because it would of been an 8 point game if they had got it. But I was against it and said so before the play.

My general rule for two point plays, is don't go for them unless they

1) Tie the game

2) Put you in a 3 or 7 point lead

3) Put you in a 3 or 7 point trail.

(maybe 4 if the game is over and the points don't matter)

Other wise they effect the 3 pointers, just like Mike McCarthy call did. Took the 3 points from being a winner ot making the just a tier.

gbguy20 said: Go to Quoted Post
Missing the 2 point conversion would put us in no worse position than had we just kicked the extra point to begin with..


ummm yes it did. It made getting 10 points, a tie instead of a win. That is a worse position.


gbguy20 said: Go to Quoted Post
You cannot fault McCarthy for this, it was without question the right choice. With how our games had ended the last 2 weeks why would McCarthy ever even fathom that he would have time enough for 2 possessions. He did what he thought was his only choice to TIE the game. And he knew that going for it would not put him in any worse position. He made the right choice.


without question? I questioned it very much at the time. I can't blame him for trying, but it without question was NOT the right choice.

And I promise you Mike McCarthy wasn't thinking his only option was a tie...
Offline Zero2Cool  
#10 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 6:12:00 AM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,503
Applause Received: 4,053
I liked the aggressiveness of going for two, but the Packers red zone offense is terrible this year. Even with Aaron Rodgers it was bad. So getting into the end zone twice on consecutive plays? I wanted the extra point. The only time I think you go for two is when you need it to tie the game and there's not much time left.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
uffda udfa (20m) : Our guys talking too much about SB while ATL focused all on today.
uffda udfa (21m) : Matt Ryan has a great mindset for this game. Think he'll play well.
uffda udfa (22m) : Just like the playoff game from 2010 season.
uffda udfa (23m) : Atlanta couldn't find a bigger name for the anthem?
uffda udfa (32m) : Julio Jones anything but fine has 3 injuries in foot per Glazer.
uffda udfa (42m) : Looks like the club is off for Nick.
uffda udfa (43m) : Nick Perry has no future as a motivational speaker.
uffda udfa (1h) : Davante hasn't run in warm-ups just playing catch w/87 and talking 2 Erin Andrews.
GoPack1984 (1h) : All ACTIVE for #Packers: WR Jordy Nelson WR Davante Adams WR Geronimo Allison S Morgan Burnett RB Christine Michael CB Quinten Rollins
uffda udfa (1h) : All our guys are officially active. Go Pack Go
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers inactives: Joe Callahan, Max McCaffrey, Herb Waters, Joe Kerridge, James Starks, Kyle Murphy, Christian Ringo
Zero2Cool (1h) : Christine Michael ... ACTIVE
Zero2Cool (1h) : Nelson, Adams, Geronimo. ACTIVE.
Zero2Cool (1h) : Rollins and Burnett are ACTIVE.
Zero2Cool (2h) : #Packers RB Christine Michael (back) just completed a workout in front of trainers by doing a backflip. Which seems like a good sign.
Zero2Cool (2h) : #Packers WR Jordy Nelson, Davonte Adams and Geronimo Allison, Randall Cobb, Travis Davis, Jeff Janis will all be active. One more than usual
mojaveson (2h) : Go Pack Go!
Mucky Tundra (3h) : speaking of Montgomery and 24, i think he'll have that many touches today :)
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ty Montgomery turns 24 today. Richard Rodgers turns 25 today.
Smokey (5h) : Ice down the Beer and get the food ready. I'm going Tex/Mex today !
Nonstopdrivel (5h) : Tom Brady has appeared in more conference championships than the Packers franchise has in its entire history.
Nonstopdrivel (5h) : Packers would be the first team in NFL history to make the Super Bowl after starting 4-6 or worse.
Nonstopdrivel (5h) : 5+ straight games.
Nonstopdrivel (5h) : The NFC Championship is the first game (regular season or playoffs) since the 1970 merger featuring two teams that have scored 30+ points in
Zero2Cool (5h) : Good news! @AtlantaFalcons scored more points than anyone this regular season. Bad news? Last 6 teams to do that haven't won Super Bowl
uffda udfa (8h) : Like a night before Christmas or opening Packers weekend...hard to sleep.
uffda udfa (10h) : Staying up late enough so that when U wake up it's game time.
buckeyepackfan (10h) : Exactly! Only a matter of time! GAMEDAY! GO! PACK! GO!
beast (12h) : BOOM!!!!
buckeyepackfan (12h) : TICK, TICK, TICK ????
GoPack1984 (13h) : It's NFC Championship day! Go Pack Go!!!!
uffda udfa (16h) : The Boss picks the Falcons: [TWITTER]788447079446130688[/TWITTER]
uffda udfa (16h) : Is there a prediction thread somewhere on the forum for the Falcons game?
uffda udfa (16h) : Lookout porous Falcons secondary!
Zero2Cool (17h) : uh oh'
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
17m / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

37m / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / macbob

2h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann


Packers Headlines