Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
2 Pages12>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Zero2Cool  
#1 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 9:05:12 AM(UTC)
Shouldn't have surprised me but this did.

Zero2Cool attached the following image(s):
2013wr.png (28kb) downloaded 101 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#2 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 9:11:25 AM(UTC)
Yeah, we have very good WRs. So do a lot of other teams. I would say ours, when healthy, are in the top 8 or 10 teams in the league. Better than that? I doubt it.
cheeseheads123  
#3 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 10:12:23 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, we have very good WRs. So do a lot of other teams. I would say ours, when healthy, are in the top 8 or 10 teams in the league. Better than that? I doubt it.

What teams would you take over the Packers?

1. Denver
2. Atlanta? If healthy?

User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#4 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 10:45:35 AM(UTC)
cheeseheads123 said: Go to Quoted Post
What teams would you take over the Packers?

1. Denver
2. Atlanta? If healthy?



Lions, Cowboys, Bears, Bengals, maybe Saints, Cardinals, Texans, Niners, Ravens, Eagles
cheeseheads123  
#5 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 10:58:46 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
Lions, Cowboys, Bears, Bengals, maybe Saints, Cardinals, Texans, Niners, Ravens, Eagles


Little confused on how you evaluate receiving cores. I just don't see the argument for any of those teams being stronger than the Packers.
GermanGilbert  
#6 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 11:11:19 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
Lions, Cowboys, Bears, Bengals, maybe Saints, Cardinals, Texans, Niners, Ravens, Eagles


Honestly I don't see any of those teams having a better #3 WR than James Jones is.

Zero2Cool  
#7 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 11:23:05 AM(UTC)
GermanGilbert said: Go to Quoted Post
Honestly I don't see any of those teams having a better #3 WR than James Jones is.



or a better number four than Jarrett Boykin(hecatch)
buckeyepackfan  
#8 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 2:59:08 PM(UTC)
When Healthy I wouldn't put ANY ONE TEAMs wr corpse , over Nelson, Cobb, Jones, and now Boykin(hecactch).

Without Cobb, I'll drop them to 3 or 4.



mi_keys  
#9 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 4:16:41 PM(UTC)
cheeseheads123 said: Go to Quoted Post
Little confused on how you evaluate receiving cores. I just don't see the argument for any of those teams being stronger than the Packers.


That's where you are confusing yourself: the presumption that there is supposed to be any substance.
steveishere  
#10 Posted : Tuesday, November 26, 2013 5:49:56 AM(UTC)
Jarrett Boykin has the 11th most WR yards in the league since he started getting significant snaps in week 6.
hardrocker950  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, November 26, 2013 7:17:24 AM(UTC)
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
Jarrett Boykin has the 11th most WR yards in the league since he started getting significant snaps in week 6.


This says a lot. He was thrown into unknown territory, and has responded well - very well. I knew he could play, but I didn't expect this much production.
steveishere  
#12 Posted : Tuesday, November 26, 2013 7:20:11 AM(UTC)
hardrocker950 said: Go to Quoted Post
This says a lot. He was thrown into unknown territory, and has responded well - very well. I knew he could play, but I didn't expect this much production.


With back up/3rd string/4th string QBs throwing to him too.
Tezzy  
#13 Posted : Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:29:29 AM(UTC)
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
With back up/3rd string/4th string QBs throwing to him too.


He has a 15.1 average. In the last 7 games he has 5+ catches in 5 of them. Production.
sschind  
#14 Posted : Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:32:20 AM(UTC)
buckeyepackfan said: Go to Quoted Post
When Healthy I wouldn't put ANY ONE TEAMs wr corpse , over Nelson, Cobb, Jones, and now Boykin(hecactch).

Without Cobb, I'll drop them to 3 or 4.





I wouldn't put a corpse over our guys even when they are hurt.[grin1] [grin1] [grin1] [grin1] [grin1]

Sorry, I couldn't resist. I know what you mean though and with the apparent emergence of Boykin it gives us some leeway with Jones. A 3 deep squad is nice but 4 is something few teams can even hope to have. It may be luxury we can't afford however.
mi_keys  
#15 Posted : Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:38:18 AM(UTC)
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
I wouldn't put a corpse over our guys even when they are hurt.[grin1] [grin1] [grin1] [grin1] [grin1]

Sorry, I couldn't resist. I know what you mean though and with the apparent emergence of Boykin it gives us some leeway with Jones. A 3 deep squad is nice but 4 is something few teams can even hope to have. It may be luxury we can't afford however.


I hope we can. Jones has overcome his inconsistencies the last few seasons and he goes about his business the right way, as does the whole group. At a position dominated by divas and pricks, it's nice to have a group that across the board we can rely on and that is happy to contribute any way they can, whether that means they are blocking down field all game or reeling in 10 catches for 100+ and a few scores. I'd like to be able to keep them together, especially with what seems to be the likely end of Finley's career.
QCHuskerFan  
#16 Posted : Tuesday, November 26, 2013 10:50:01 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
Lions, Cowboys, Bears, Bengals, maybe Saints, Cardinals, Texans, Niners, Ravens, Eagles


The Niners are the 32nd passing offense. I don't care how many injuries. They have had a starting QB throwing the ball for 11 games. No way are they in the top 10. Certainly not ahead of the Packers.

Houston has 2 WR in the top 100 based on receptions. Hard to lobby for a top 10 rating with that poor level of production.

Bears have 2 WR in the Top 80.

Packers have 4 in the Top 68.

Packers have the #5 pass offense. It's not because of all the receptions our TE and RB are making. To not list them in anyone's top 5 is ridiculous.
steveishere  
#17 Posted : Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:28:57 AM(UTC)
Yeah the 49ers just released a guy who was their starting WR for a majority of the season because he sucked. Of course the guy cannot bother to explain why he thinks they are better (along with all those other teams) to back up his opinion. Instead of having intelligent conversation he's just spouting nonsense to try and make people mad.
luigis  
#18 Posted : Wednesday, November 27, 2013 8:14:02 AM(UTC)
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
I hope we can. Jones has overcome his inconsistencies the last few seasons and he goes about his business the right way, as does the whole group. At a position dominated by divas and pricks, it's nice to have a group that across the board we can rely on and that is happy to contribute any way they can, whether that means they are blocking down field all game or reeling in 10 catches for 100+ and a few scores. I'd like to be able to keep them together, especially with what seems to be the likely end of Finley's career.


I still see Jones as inconsistent. He has some fantastic games mixed with games where he just disappears. It's early but I think Boykin is a much better WR than Jones.
nerdmann  
#19 Posted : Wednesday, November 27, 2013 12:02:11 PM(UTC)
luigis said: Go to Quoted Post
I still see Jones as inconsistent. He has some fantastic games mixed with games where he just disappears. It's early but I think Boykin is a much better WR than Jones.


lol

dhazer  
#20 Posted : Wednesday, November 27, 2013 12:02:23 PM(UTC)
QCHuskerFan said: Go to Quoted Post
The Niners are the 32nd passing offense. I don't care how many injuries. They have had a starting QB throwing the ball for 11 games. No way are they in the top 10. Certainly not ahead of the Packers.

Houston has 2 WR in the top 100 based on receptions. Hard to lobby for a top 10 rating with that poor level of production.

Bears have 2 WR in the Top 80.

Packers have 4 in the Top 68.

Packers have the #5 pass offense. It's not because of all the receptions our TE and RB are making. To not list them in anyone's top 5 is ridiculous.


By your standards then we had the best wr depth in 2005 with the likes of Antonio Chapman, Donald Driver, Robert Ferguson,Andrea Thurmon, Terrance Murphy and even Javon Walker. Hell we had 3 TEs with atleast 25 catches and to top it off we had 4 rbs with atleast 10 catches. Damn we had to have the best passing team in the league or was it because of injuries sub par players had to play?

Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
gbguy20 (11h) : Martavis Bryant n whatnot
buckeyepackfan (24-Feb) : Smokey you can't lose something you never had.
buckeyepackfan (24-Feb) : Packers receive 4 comp picks for 2018. 4th, 2-5ths, 6th
Smokey (23-Feb) : Peters to the Rams
Smokey (23-Feb) : and another player is lost to another team. Deja Vu again !
Nonstopdrivel (22-Feb) : should have done*
Zero2Cool (21-Feb) : Hi 😊😉
TheKanataThrilla (21-Feb) : I guess I should have did a refresh when I walked away from the computer.
TheKanataThrilla (21-Feb) : Peters is 25 with one year left on his contract at just over $3M
Zero2Cool (21-Feb) : Mel Kiper sticks with Marcus Davenport to GB in 2nd mock
Zero2Cool (21-Feb) : As for Marcus Peters, how old is he an what's his contract years left?
Zero2Cool (21-Feb) : Packers got tired of Sitton's antics.
Zero2Cool (21-Feb) : Sitton was released not because of play or salary, but personality. He will not be re-signed.
TheKanataThrilla (21-Feb) : If we are planning on possibly cutting Cobb I can see the 2nd round pick. A second round pick for Peters is a pretty good deal.
Smokey (21-Feb) : I'd offer Cobb + a 3rd round pick + a 6th round pick in 2019 for the CB Peters from KC.
TheKanataThrilla (21-Feb) : I guess that is a highter round pick
TheKanataThrilla (21-Feb) : Suggestion was a 2nd round pick. I would want a lower round pick. I think that is too much. A 3rd or 4th seems about right.
Smokey (21-Feb) : Cobb and WHAT PICK ?
TheKanataThrilla (21-Feb) : A suggestion I saw was a trade of Cobb and a Pick for Peters. I think that would be a great move.
Smokey (21-Feb) : Sitton was drafted be GB in 2008, not a young man at this point, but still is a "bear" of a man.
Cheesey (21-Feb) : Sitton? Maybe if the price is right.
Cheesey (21-Feb) : I doubt the Packers would try to resign Sutton. But who knows? If the price is right?
Zero2Cool (20-Feb) : Bears declining option on Josh Sitton. He'll be Free Agent.
Zero2Cool (20-Feb) : Chiefs CB Marcus Peters trade rumors -- come to Packers!
Smokey (20-Feb) : Join us in Packershome and be part of the discussion today .
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Elizabeeth ... good bye
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Saturday, August 19, 2017
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : That's dedicated spammng!
Nonstopdrivel (19-Feb) : For some reason, I had to flush my DNS cache to access this site from my laptop today.
Nonstopdrivel (19-Feb) : I prefer toads to frogs, Smokey, thank you very much.
Rockmolder (19-Feb) : My girlfriends says thanks, Rourke.
Smokey (19-Feb) : Nonstopdrivel that you most likely say to all the frogs you meet .
Nonstopdrivel (19-Feb) : Rockmolder's avatar is so fucking sexy.
gbguy20 (19-Feb) : never seen the interview before. tough to listen to. can't believe it was 7 years ago
gbguy20 (19-Feb) : just watched a nick Collins tribute on yourube. the end featured an interview with nick reflecting on his injury
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

4h / Random Babble / Cheesey

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

23-Feb / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

23-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

23-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

23-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

22-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rockmolder

22-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

21-Feb / Random Babble / Smokey

Headlines