Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Zero2Cool  
#1 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 9:05:12 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,055
Applause Received: 2,531
Shouldn't have surprised me but this did.

Zero2Cool attached the following image(s):
2013wr.png (28kb) downloaded 71 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Sponsor
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#2 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 9:11:25 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2015

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 531
Applause Received: 373
Yeah, we have very good WRs. So do a lot of other teams. I would say ours, when healthy, are in the top 8 or 10 teams in the league. Better than that? I doubt it.
Offline cheeseheads123  
#3 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 10:12:23 AM(UTC)
cheeseheads123

Rank: Member
Joined: 9/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 78
Applause Received: 153
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, we have very good WRs. So do a lot of other teams. I would say ours, when healthy, are in the top 8 or 10 teams in the league. Better than that? I doubt it.

What teams would you take over the Packers?

1. Denver
2. Atlanta? If healthy?

Offline texaspackerbacker  
#4 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 10:45:35 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2015

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 531
Applause Received: 373
cheeseheads123 said: Go to Quoted Post
What teams would you take over the Packers?

1. Denver
2. Atlanta? If healthy?



Lions, Cowboys, Bears, Bengals, maybe Saints, Cardinals, Texans, Niners, Ravens, Eagles
Offline cheeseheads123  
#5 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 10:58:46 AM(UTC)
cheeseheads123

Rank: Member
Joined: 9/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 78
Applause Received: 153
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
Lions, Cowboys, Bears, Bengals, maybe Saints, Cardinals, Texans, Niners, Ravens, Eagles


Little confused on how you evaluate receiving cores. I just don't see the argument for any of those teams being stronger than the Packers.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 11/25/2013(UTC)
Offline GermanGilbert  
#6 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 11:11:19 AM(UTC)
GermanGilbert

Rank: Member
Joined: 11/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 44
Applause Received: 95
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
Lions, Cowboys, Bears, Bengals, maybe Saints, Cardinals, Texans, Niners, Ravens, Eagles


Honestly I don't see any of those teams having a better #3 WR than James Jones is.

thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 11/25/2013(UTC)
Offline Zero2Cool  
#7 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 11:23:05 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,055
Applause Received: 2,531
GermanGilbert said: Go to Quoted Post
Honestly I don't see any of those teams having a better #3 WR than James Jones is.



or a better number four than Jarrett Boykin(hecatch)
Offline buckeyepackfan  
#8 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 2:59:08 PM(UTC)
buckeyepackfan

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2014

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Lima, Ohio
Applause Given: 443
Applause Received: 530
When Healthy I wouldn't put ANY ONE TEAMs wr corpse , over Nelson, Cobb, Jones, and now Boykin(hecactch).

Without Cobb, I'll drop them to 3 or 4.



Offline mi_keys  
#9 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 4:16:41 PM(UTC)
mi_keys

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 261
Applause Received: 398
cheeseheads123 said: Go to Quoted Post
Little confused on how you evaluate receiving cores. I just don't see the argument for any of those teams being stronger than the Packers.


That's where you are confusing yourself: the presumption that there is supposed to be any substance.
Offline steveishere  
#10 Posted : Tuesday, November 26, 2013 5:49:56 AM(UTC)
steveishere

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 53
Applause Received: 1,122
Jarrett Boykin has the 11th most WR yards in the league since he started getting significant snaps in week 6.
Offline hardrocker950  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, November 26, 2013 7:17:24 AM(UTC)
hardrocker950

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2014

Rank: Member
Joined: 11/10/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 92
Applause Received: 112
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
Jarrett Boykin has the 11th most WR yards in the league since he started getting significant snaps in week 6.


This says a lot. He was thrown into unknown territory, and has responded well - very well. I knew he could play, but I didn't expect this much production.
Offline steveishere  
#12 Posted : Tuesday, November 26, 2013 7:20:11 AM(UTC)
steveishere

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 53
Applause Received: 1,122
hardrocker950 said: Go to Quoted Post
This says a lot. He was thrown into unknown territory, and has responded well - very well. I knew he could play, but I didn't expect this much production.


With back up/3rd string/4th string QBs throwing to him too.
Offline Tezzy  
#13 Posted : Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:29:29 AM(UTC)
Tezzy

Rank: Member
United States
Joined: 8/21/2008(UTC)
Location: Wayne's Basement
Applause Given: 30
Applause Received: 96
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
With back up/3rd string/4th string QBs throwing to him too.


He has a 15.1 average. In the last 7 games he has 5+ catches in 5 of them. Production.
Offline sschind  
#14 Posted : Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:32:20 AM(UTC)
sschind

Rank: Member
United States
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN
Applause Given: 181
Applause Received: 535
buckeyepackfan said: Go to Quoted Post
When Healthy I wouldn't put ANY ONE TEAMs wr corpse , over Nelson, Cobb, Jones, and now Boykin(hecactch).

Without Cobb, I'll drop them to 3 or 4.





I wouldn't put a corpse over our guys even when they are hurt.[grin1] [grin1] [grin1] [grin1] [grin1]

Sorry, I couldn't resist. I know what you mean though and with the apparent emergence of Boykin it gives us some leeway with Jones. A 3 deep squad is nice but 4 is something few teams can even hope to have. It may be luxury we can't afford however.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Zero2Cool on 11/26/2013(UTC)
Offline mi_keys  
#15 Posted : Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:38:18 AM(UTC)
mi_keys

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 261
Applause Received: 398
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
I wouldn't put a corpse over our guys even when they are hurt.[grin1] [grin1] [grin1] [grin1] [grin1]

Sorry, I couldn't resist. I know what you mean though and with the apparent emergence of Boykin it gives us some leeway with Jones. A 3 deep squad is nice but 4 is something few teams can even hope to have. It may be luxury we can't afford however.


I hope we can. Jones has overcome his inconsistencies the last few seasons and he goes about his business the right way, as does the whole group. At a position dominated by divas and pricks, it's nice to have a group that across the board we can rely on and that is happy to contribute any way they can, whether that means they are blocking down field all game or reeling in 10 catches for 100+ and a few scores. I'd like to be able to keep them together, especially with what seems to be the likely end of Finley's career.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / texaspackerbacker

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower


Tweeter