Green Bay Packers Forum

Join Our Green Bay Packers Interactive Community!

We have been providing fans with the best source of Packers information since 2006!
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
4 Pages<1234>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline DoddPower  
#31 Posted : Saturday, January 18, 2014 12:06:56 AM(UTC)
DoddPower

Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA

Applause Given: 2,232
Applause Received: 568

Originally Posted by: sschind Go to Quoted Post
I think they would have screamed bloody murder at the time but if we would have drafted Patterson I think they may be OK with it now.



How could anyone complain with a team adding another potentially elite player, regardless of position? Almost any average NFL caliber player could offer what Datone did this season. There are only a few players from every draft that have the talent of Patterson, if that. Obviously this could change, but at this point, Patterson is absolutely the better pick, even for the Packers.

Of course I truly believe in BPA. If a team adds elite talent almost every single year, chances are they will find a way to have a good team. Be it by draft and develop, trades, having the teams strengths being so strong that they outweigh the weaknesses, or whatever. There is always free agency to fill a couple of holes with average players, at least for some teams. I'll take elite talent every time, and find ways to fill any gaps that it creates. Just seems much easier and logical that way than the reverse.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
wpr on 1/18/2014(UTC)
Offline sschind  
#32 Posted : Saturday, January 18, 2014 8:54:20 AM(UTC)
sschind

Rank: Member

United States
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN

Applause Given: 151
Applause Received: 498

Originally Posted by: DoddPower Go to Quoted Post
How could anyone complain with a team adding another potentially elite player, regardless of position? Almost any average NFL caliber player could offer what Datone did this season. There are only a few players from every draft that have the talent of Patterson, if that. Obviously this could change, but at this point, Patterson is absolutely the better pick, even for the Packers.

Of course I truly believe in BPA. If a team adds elite talent almost every single year, chances are they will find a way to have a good team. Be it by draft and develop, trades, having the teams strengths being so strong that they outweigh the weaknesses, or whatever. There is always free agency to fill a couple of holes with average players, at least for some teams. I'll take elite talent every time, and find ways to fill any gaps that it creates. Just seems much easier and logical that way than the reverse.


Don't you think there would have been an uproar of negative responses last year it Ted Thompson would have drafted Patterson? At least more so than the uproar of negative responses that folowed the Jones pick. People didn't see a WR as as big of a need as a pass rusher so if Ted Thompson would have taken Patterson most people would have been upset. At this point yeah, I think almost everyone would be OK with it and I said so in my post.


Take this year for example. The majority of people seem to feel a safety or DL or OLB are our biggest needs. If the BPA is a TE and Ted Thompson takes him most of those people will be angry. If that TE turns out to be the next Graham or Gronk people will change their minds. That is what I meant.

As far as taking the BPA all the time that depends. It's also very subjective. I doubt any two GMs or any draft "experts" have the exact same board so what may be the BPA for half of them may not be the BPA to the other half. Non GMs can make their draft boards without factoring in need. If they think this CB is just a little better than that WR they will have him higher. A GM of a team that desperately needs a WR may have those two players reversed. When it comes time for that GM to make his pick he will probably take the WR. He thinks he is taking the BPA and the experts think he is drafting for need.

Obviously if we are talking about 1 or 2 spots its not a big deal. The problem comes in when the team right in front of your GM takes that WR and now your GM takes a WR he had rated 10 spots below the CB just to fill the need. That is not the right move to make.

The question is should GMs take their current roster into account when they make up their board or should they go simply on their opinions of the players in the draft. I guess ideally they would forget about their current players and simply make a list of the best players in the draft. That would eliminate the possibility of a current weakness on the team influencing their opinion of a particular player or position causing them to inflate their value.
Every team has fans that fans of other teams point to and say "all their fans are assholes" Don't be one of those fans.
Offline DoddPower  
#33 Posted : Saturday, January 18, 2014 5:40:32 PM(UTC)
DoddPower

Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA

Applause Given: 2,232
Applause Received: 568

Originally Posted by: sschind Go to Quoted Post
Don't you think there would have been an uproar of negative responses last year it Ted Thompson would have drafted Patterson? At least more so than the uproar of negative responses that folowed the Jones pick. People didn't see a WR as as big of a need as a pass rusher so if Ted Thompson would have taken Patterson most people would have been upset. At this point yeah, I think almost everyone would be OK with it and I said so in my post.


Take this year for example. The majority of people seem to feel a safety or DL or OLB are our biggest needs. If the BPA is a TE and Ted Thompson takes him most of those people will be angry. If that TE turns out to be the next Graham or Gronk people will change their minds. That is what I meant.

As far as taking the BPA all the time that depends. It's also very subjective. I doubt any two GMs or any draft "experts" have the exact same board so what may be the BPA for half of them may not be the BPA to the other half. Non GMs can make their draft boards without factoring in need. If they think this CB is just a little better than that WR they will have him higher. A GM of a team that desperately needs a WR may have those two players reversed. When it comes time for that GM to make his pick he will probably take the WR. He thinks he is taking the BPA and the experts think he is drafting for need.

Obviously if we are talking about 1 or 2 spots its not a big deal. The problem comes in when the team right in front of your GM takes that WR and now your GM takes a WR he had rated 10 spots below the CB just to fill the need. That is not the right move to make.

The question is should GMs take their current roster into account when they make up their board or should they go simply on their opinions of the players in the draft. I guess ideally they would forget about their current players and simply make a list of the best players in the draft. That would eliminate the possibility of a current weakness on the team influencing their opinion of a particular player or position causing them to inflate their value.


Well, I was completely speaking in hindsight. I understand it's not easy to truly identify whether one player is actually "better" than the other, regardless of position. But if a general manager feels that one player is truly the best player available, than I hope he would take them every time. I liked the Datone Jones pick, and still do. But based on this last season only, Patterson was the better pick. The Packers could have probably signed a dozen different free agents that gave them what Datone Jones did this season, and possibly more. I'm not sure that's the case with a guy like Patterson, unless the Packers traded for Percy Harvin or something . . . and that didn't work out either.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
wpr on 1/18/2014(UTC)
Offline play2win  
#34 Posted : Monday, January 20, 2014 11:40:48 AM(UTC)
play2win

Rank: Registered

United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee

Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 725

Originally Posted by: DoddPower Go to Quoted Post
How could anyone complain with a team adding another potentially elite player, regardless of position? Almost any average NFL caliber player could offer what Datone did this season. There are only a few players from every draft that have the talent of Patterson, if that. Obviously this could change, but at this point, Patterson is absolutely the better pick, even for the Packers.

Of course I truly believe in BPA. If a team adds elite talent almost every single year, chances are they will find a way to have a good team. Be it by draft and develop, trades, having the teams strengths being so strong that they outweigh the weaknesses, or whatever. There is always free agency to fill a couple of holes with average players, at least for some teams. I'll take elite talent every time, and find ways to fill any gaps that it creates. Just seems much easier and logical that way than the reverse.


Your point is well taken DoddPower. Imagine how differently this team may have fared this year had we taken Patterson instead of Jones...
Offline porky88  
#35 Posted : Monday, January 20, 2014 9:49:10 PM(UTC)
porky88

Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2014

Joined: 4/26/2007(UTC)

Applause Given: 216
Applause Received: 444

My first mock draft of the year.

Quote:
21. Green Bay Packers -- C.J. Mosley, LB, Alabama
Getting tougher upfront is a necessity if Green Bay is to compete with San Francisco and Seattle in the NFC. Mosley fits the bill. Many regard him as one of the elite prospects of this draft, but linebackers tend to fall on draft day, and the Alabama tag makes him a little overrated. Still, Mosley is an excellent two-down linebacker. He and long-time Green Bay linebacker A.J. Hawk would give the Packers a rugged look at the position.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
wpr on 1/21/2014(UTC), DoddPower on 1/21/2014(UTC)
Offline Rockmolder  
#36 Posted : Tuesday, January 21, 2014 3:14:03 AM(UTC)
Rockmolder

Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2010

Netherlands
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 179
Applause Received: 292

Originally Posted by: porky88 Go to Quoted Post
My first mock draft of the year.



May I ask why you see him as a two-down linebacker?
UserPostedImage
Offline steveishere  
#37 Posted : Tuesday, January 21, 2014 5:56:35 AM(UTC)
steveishere

Rank: Senior Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)

Applause Given: 50
Applause Received: 1,062

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder Go to Quoted Post
May I ask why you see him as a two-down linebacker?


Yeah, I was under the impression that his strength was pass coverage ability.
Offline cheeseheads123  
#38 Posted : Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:56:56 AM(UTC)
cheeseheads123

Rank: Member

Joined: 9/28/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 77
Applause Received: 146

Remember that time Kiper had Brohm #1?
UserPostedImage
Offline porky88  
#39 Posted : Tuesday, January 21, 2014 7:17:38 PM(UTC)
porky88

Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2014

Joined: 4/26/2007(UTC)

Applause Given: 216
Applause Received: 444

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder Go to Quoted Post
May I ask why you see him as a two-down linebacker?

I think he’s a good player who is being mistaken for a great player. I conclude this based on two things.

1. He doesn’t react quickly to a play. That doesn’t mean he won’t make the play, but it also means he may not make as many as he should.

2. Do his workout numbers translate into his on-field athleticism? I’ve seen some reports suggest he runs a 4.5 or 4.6 in the 40. I don’t see that on the field. In my opinion, he’ll cover the flats well enough, but he’s not going to turn and run stride for stride with quality NFL tight ends.
Offline wpr  
#40 Posted : Tuesday, January 21, 2014 7:35:56 PM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 3,284
Applause Received: 1,581

Originally Posted by: porky88 Go to Quoted Post
I think he’s a good player who is being mistaken for a great player. I conclude this based on two things.

1. He doesn’t react quickly to a play. That doesn’t mean he won’t make the play, but it also means he may not make as many as he should.

2. Do his workout numbers translate into his on-field athleticism? I’ve seen some reports suggest he runs a 4.5 or 4.6 in the 40. I don’t see that on the field. In my opinion, he’ll cover the flats well enough, but he’s not going to turn and run stride for stride with quality NFL tight ends.


Hawk 2.0
UserPostedImage
Offline nerdmann  
#41 Posted : Tuesday, January 21, 2014 9:55:31 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,989
Applause Received: 731

Originally Posted by: cheeseheads123 Go to Quoted Post
Remember that time Kiper had Brohm #1?


He also had Starks as the #2 RB in the country, before the shoulder injury the summer before his SR year. Behind only CJ Spiller, iirc.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Offline Zero2Cool  
#42 Posted : Wednesday, January 22, 2014 6:10:07 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 2,020
Applause Received: 2,378

Originally Posted by: cheeseheads123 Go to Quoted Post
Remember that time Kiper had Brohm #1?


No, I do not. Source?

Originally Posted by: nerdmann Go to Quoted Post
He also had Starks as the #2 RB in the country, before the shoulder injury the summer before his SR year. Behind only CJ Spiller, iirc.


Source?



"I do not think there is any thrill that can go through the human heart like that felt by the inventor as he sees some creation of the brain unfolding to success... such emotions make a man forget food, sleep, friends, love, everything." - Nikola Tesla
thanks Post received 1 applause.
wpr on 1/22/2014(UTC)
Offline nerdmann  
#43 Posted : Wednesday, January 22, 2014 9:54:39 AM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,989
Applause Received: 731

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool Go to Quoted Post
No, I do not. Source?



Source?





My memory.

Here's a link.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Offline nerdmann  
#44 Posted : Wednesday, January 22, 2014 9:57:01 AM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,989
Applause Received: 731

Listened to Kiper on Starks

Quote:
Kiper felt he was a second round value going into 2009 but will probably get drafted early on day 3 or top of the 4th round.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Offline DoddPower  
#45 Posted : Wednesday, January 22, 2014 1:20:04 PM(UTC)
DoddPower

Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA

Applause Given: 2,232
Applause Received: 568

Originally Posted by: porky88 Go to Quoted Post
2. Do his workout numbers translate into his on-field athleticism? I’ve seen some reports suggest he runs a 4.5 or 4.6 in the 40. I don’t see that on the field. In my opinion, he’ll cover the flats well enough, but he’s not going to turn and run stride for stride with quality NFL tight ends.


I can understand that sentiment. But really, how many middle line backers can? One of the few just shredded his knee (N. Bowman), and the other plays beside of him. Kuechly in Carolina. Maybe KJ Wright in Seattle. Possibly Danny Trevathan in Denver. I'm sure a few others, but there's not many linebackers period that can run with the likes of Jimmy Graham, a healthy Gronkoski, Vernon Davis, etc. Need a talented safety on those guys.

Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / texaspackerbacker

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / porky88

24-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

24-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / pacmaniac

23-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

23-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

23-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

22-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / RaiderPride

22-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

22-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan


Tweeter