Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#1 Posted : Monday, January 27, 2014 7:45:24 PM(UTC)
MintBaconDrivel

Rank: Administration
United States
Joined: 12/11/2012(UTC)
Applause Received: 102
A.J. Hawk didn't have a dramatically better year in 2013 than previous years. Fans merely gave him the credit he's deserved.


2013
Tackles: 118
Sacks: 5.0


2012
Tackles: 120
Sacks: 3.0
thanks Post received 1 applause.
FLORIDA PACKER88 on 1/28/2014(UTC)
Sponsor
Offline gbguy20  
#2 Posted : Monday, January 27, 2014 8:52:30 PM(UTC)
gbguy20

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 231
Applause Received: 316
solid numbers imo
thanks Post received 1 applause.
FLORIDA PACKER88 on 1/28/2014(UTC)
Offline DakotaT  
#3 Posted : Monday, January 27, 2014 8:54:37 PM(UTC)
DakotaT

Rank: Honored Member
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 751
Applause Received: 1,522
Haven't you guys riled up poor Buckeye enough?

I actually thought Hawk did have a pretty good year. I didn't see him getting burned by 5 yards deep down the seam. The balls completed on him were usually pretty well thrown. He was noticeably leaner, which kind of bit him in the ass on a few plays when he got run over - but for the most part, he played pretty well.
Offline wpr  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 5:52:35 AM(UTC)
wpr

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,303
Applause Received: 1,600
MintBaconDrivel said: Go to Quoted Post
A.J. Hawk didn't have a dramatically better year in 2013 than previous years. Fans merely gave him the credit he's deserved.


2013
Tackles: 118
Sacks: 5.0


2012
Tackles: 120
Sacks: 3.0


I guess that means he has reached the top and leveled off. Nothing wrong with that.
Offline play2win  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 6:03:56 AM(UTC)
play2win

Rank: Registered
United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 725
I thought there was no doubt that he improved. Came in lighter, which helped his speed and coverage, and that was noticeable.

He was coming off of two pretty poor seasons, so this was good to see. I would like to see what he would do with a legit ILB alongside of him. Oddly enough, we lost Bishop and his effectiveness plummeted. Bishop is another player Ted never really replaced.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 6:05:08 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,055
Applause Received: 2,531
Hawk has been the same player he has always been. Reliable and none risk taking. Even his position coach joked that he would like to see Hawk take a risk here and there, but then followed it up with that he's the most assignment sure player on defense.


I think those who say Hawk really came into his own or really had a great year ... haven't really paid much attention to Hawk in the first place.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
RaiderPride on 1/28/2014(UTC)
Offline nerdmann  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 6:09:17 AM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,168
Applause Received: 783
I thought he cut down on the number of yards lost per tackle. Maybe down to 3 instead of his customary 5-7.
Offline Laser Gunns  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 7:13:17 AM(UTC)
Laser Gunns

Rank: Member
United States
Joined: 9/30/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 45
Applause Received: 287
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
I thought he cut down on the number of yards lost per tackle. Maybe down to 3 instead of his customary 5-7.


Without looking at tape,

That could be more of a reflection in the DL for constantly getting blown off the LoS.
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#9 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 8:04:05 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2015

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 532
Applause Received: 373
If what we want is a marginal player in an important position, then he's our man. If he was the second best ILB, then no problem. But you look around at what most teams in the league have at ILB or MLB, and Hawk doesn't stack up very well - Jones even worse. Putting an athletic young ILB beside Hawk, then replacing Hawk with another quality young ILB in a year or so is pretty much what we need to do. Hopefully Thompson will get that done. Borland in the second or third round would help a lot. Just starting Lattimore over Jones would help some.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
DoddPower on 1/28/2014(UTC)
Offline Bigbyfan  
#10 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 12:20:43 PM(UTC)
Bigbyfan

Rank: Member
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 42
Applause Received: 91
He's the one guy on our team that we can depend on to show up every week. As long as he can stay healthy, the Packers are in no position to replace him with yet another injury prone player.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
wpr on 1/28/2014(UTC)
Offline nerdmann  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 1:03:15 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,168
Applause Received: 783
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
If what we want is a marginal player in an important position, then he's our man. If he was the second best ILB, then no problem. But you look around at what most teams in the league have at ILB or MLB, and Hawk doesn't stack up very well - Jones even worse. Putting an athletic young ILB beside Hawk, then replacing Hawk with another quality young ILB in a year or so is pretty much what we need to do. Hopefully Thompson will get that done. Borland in the second or third round would help a lot. Just starting Lattimore over Jones would help some.


Jones is fine when he's healthy. Can also swing to OLB in a pinch.
Offline DoddPower  
#12 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 1:29:53 PM(UTC)
DoddPower

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 2,367
Applause Received: 595
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Jones is fine when he's healthy. Can also swing to OLB in a pinch.


Sure, he's fine . . . as a back up.

thanks Post received 2 applause.
yooperfan on 1/28/2014(UTC), texaspackerbacker on 1/28/2014(UTC)
Offline luigis  
#13 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 3:52:49 PM(UTC)
luigis

Rank: Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 108
Applause Received: 113
AJ would be a fine player next to a playmaker.
He's not a playmaker and we need to find one.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
wpr on 1/28/2014(UTC), texaspackerbacker on 1/28/2014(UTC)
Offline cheeseheads123  
#14 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 8:39:39 PM(UTC)
cheeseheads123

Rank: Member
Joined: 9/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 78
Applause Received: 153
I agree with everyone saying he needs to be the second best ILB on the team.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
texaspackerbacker on 1/28/2014(UTC), luigis on 1/29/2014(UTC)
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#15 Posted : Wednesday, January 29, 2014 7:36:10 AM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 17
Applause Received: 556
Hawk for his career may not have made the most flashy plays, he just has done what is needed to allow others around him to make plays. Amazing how many times Hawk has been criticized for being dragged for a few yards on a tackle when it never should have been him making the tackle in the first place. Hawk is the backside LB on most plays and his main job is to not let the RB get a big run by cutting back and he does a pretty good job of that.

thanks Post received 1 applause.
FLORIDA PACKER88 on 1/29/2014(UTC)
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Wade

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey


Tweeter