Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
MintBaconDrivel  
#21 Posted : Monday, January 27, 2014 7:45:24 PM(UTC)
A.J. Hawk didn't have a dramatically better year in 2013 than previous years. Fans merely gave him the credit he's deserved.


2013
Tackles: 118
Sacks: 5.0


2012
Tackles: 120
Sacks: 3.0
gbguy20  
#22 Posted : Monday, January 27, 2014 8:52:30 PM(UTC)
solid numbers imo
User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#23 Posted : Monday, January 27, 2014 8:54:37 PM(UTC)
Haven't you guys riled up poor Buckeye enough?

I actually thought Hawk did have a pretty good year. I didn't see him getting burned by 5 yards deep down the seam. The balls completed on him were usually pretty well thrown. He was noticeably leaner, which kind of bit him in the ass on a few plays when he got run over - but for the most part, he played pretty well.
wpr  
#24 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 5:52:35 AM(UTC)
MintBaconDrivel said: Go to Quoted Post
A.J. Hawk didn't have a dramatically better year in 2013 than previous years. Fans merely gave him the credit he's deserved.


2013
Tackles: 118
Sacks: 5.0


2012
Tackles: 120
Sacks: 3.0


I guess that means he has reached the top and leveled off. Nothing wrong with that.
play2win  
#25 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 6:03:56 AM(UTC)
I thought there was no doubt that he improved. Came in lighter, which helped his speed and coverage, and that was noticeable.

He was coming off of two pretty poor seasons, so this was good to see. I would like to see what he would do with a legit ILB alongside of him. Oddly enough, we lost Bishop and his effectiveness plummeted. Bishop is another player Ted never really replaced.
Zero2Cool  
#26 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 6:05:08 AM(UTC)
Hawk has been the same player he has always been. Reliable and none risk taking. Even his position coach joked that he would like to see Hawk take a risk here and there, but then followed it up with that he's the most assignment sure player on defense.


I think those who say Hawk really came into his own or really had a great year ... haven't really paid much attention to Hawk in the first place.
nerdmann  
#27 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 6:09:17 AM(UTC)
I thought he cut down on the number of yards lost per tackle. Maybe down to 3 instead of his customary 5-7.
Laser Gunns  
#28 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 7:13:17 AM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
I thought he cut down on the number of yards lost per tackle. Maybe down to 3 instead of his customary 5-7.


Without looking at tape,

That could be more of a reflection in the DL for constantly getting blown off the LoS.
User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#29 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 8:04:05 AM(UTC)
If what we want is a marginal player in an important position, then he's our man. If he was the second best ILB, then no problem. But you look around at what most teams in the league have at ILB or MLB, and Hawk doesn't stack up very well - Jones even worse. Putting an athletic young ILB beside Hawk, then replacing Hawk with another quality young ILB in a year or so is pretty much what we need to do. Hopefully Thompson will get that done. Borland in the second or third round would help a lot. Just starting Lattimore over Jones would help some.
Bigbyfan  
#30 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 12:20:43 PM(UTC)
He's the one guy on our team that we can depend on to show up every week. As long as he can stay healthy, the Packers are in no position to replace him with yet another injury prone player.
nerdmann  
#31 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 1:03:15 PM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
If what we want is a marginal player in an important position, then he's our man. If he was the second best ILB, then no problem. But you look around at what most teams in the league have at ILB or MLB, and Hawk doesn't stack up very well - Jones even worse. Putting an athletic young ILB beside Hawk, then replacing Hawk with another quality young ILB in a year or so is pretty much what we need to do. Hopefully Thompson will get that done. Borland in the second or third round would help a lot. Just starting Lattimore over Jones would help some.


Jones is fine when he's healthy. Can also swing to OLB in a pinch.
DoddPower  
#32 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 1:29:53 PM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Jones is fine when he's healthy. Can also swing to OLB in a pinch.


Sure, he's fine . . . as a back up.

luigis  
#33 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 3:52:49 PM(UTC)
AJ would be a fine player next to a playmaker.
He's not a playmaker and we need to find one.
cheeseheads123  
#34 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 8:39:39 PM(UTC)
I agree with everyone saying he needs to be the second best ILB on the team.
PackFanWithTwins  
#35 Posted : Wednesday, January 29, 2014 7:36:10 AM(UTC)
Hawk for his career may not have made the most flashy plays, he just has done what is needed to allow others around him to make plays. Amazing how many times Hawk has been criticized for being dragged for a few yards on a tackle when it never should have been him making the tackle in the first place. Hawk is the backside LB on most plays and his main job is to not let the RB get a big run by cutting back and he does a pretty good job of that.

Zero2Cool  
#36 Posted : Wednesday, January 29, 2014 7:45:24 AM(UTC)
I don't think A.J. Hawk is the problem. I think Hawk being the best ILB is the problem.
luigis  
#37 Posted : Wednesday, January 29, 2014 8:27:22 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't think A.J. Hawk is the problem. I think Hawk being the best ILB is the problem.


Exactly.
buckeyepackfan  
#38 Posted : Wednesday, January 29, 2014 1:37:18 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't think A.J. Hawk is the problem. I think Hawk being the best ILB is the problem.


Just HEALTHY lbr's inside and out, would make a world of difference.

But hey that's JMO,

Hawk's replacement is already on the roster, he just needs a little seasoning!!!!!

Porforis  
#39 Posted : Wednesday, January 29, 2014 6:04:28 PM(UTC)
buckeyepackfan said: Go to Quoted Post
Just HEALTHY lbr's inside and out, would make a world of difference.

But hey that's JMO,

Hawk's replacement is already on the roster, he just needs a little seasoning!!!!!



As tasty as it is, I don't think Sriacha is going to help any of our ILBs.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
DarkaneRules (1h) : looking forward to the long week to recover after thursday. coming out with a win would be a bonus
beast (1h) : MM said those that aren't practicing today (I believe Bulaga/House) probably aren't gonna play against the Bears.
beast (1h) : Panky too... who is listed as a G/T, but I think he was 3rd string LT in the preseason
uffda udfa (2h) : Bakh is back at practice and is in line to play. Bulaga and John the only other T's. McCray?
Mucky Tundra (2h) : So uh, do we actually have any OTs left? Like, real ones and not practice squad fodder?
Zero2Cool (4h) : Vince Lombardi, on protesters, from 1970: ‘They have a right to say what they want, and it behooves us to listen.’
uffda udfa (4h) : Kyle Murphy to IR for Ulrick John
Zero2Cool (8h) : Bass Pro's $4 billion acquisition of Cabela's is complete, but it leaves a small western Nebraska town in suspense:
Zero2Cool (8h) : "Aaron Rodgers is keeping Mike McCarthy employed the same way AJ Green keeps Andy Dalton employed.” - @LeBatardShow
Zero2Cool (10h) : King, Kendricks and Bennett.
gbguy20 (10h) : which packers sat during the anthem?
Porforis (21h) : Noooo, not Goode!
Zero2Cool (25-Sep) : The #Packers place Brett Goode on IR and re-sign LS Taybor Pepper
Zero2Cool (25-Sep) : Packers signing Ulrick John to active roster off Cardinals practice squad today, according to a source
Porforis (25-Sep) : Agreed. HOW ABOUT THEM PACKERS?!
greengold (25-Sep) : i.e. keep politics out of football!
greengold (25-Sep) : Let the players who want to honor the flag along with the vast majority of fans do so. Don't celebrate those who don't.
greengold (25-Sep) : Rule, practice, suggestion? Whatever supposedly changed in 2009. Go back to the way it was. Let the players who want to honor the flag an
Zero2Cool (25-Sep) : Roethlisberger regrets Steelers' decision to skip anthem
Zero2Cool (25-Sep) : Chmura: "#Packers by 10-14. The Bears already played their good game. I have absolutely no fear for Thursday's game."
Zero2Cool (25-Sep) : The NFL Rulebook does not mention the anthem.
Zero2Cool (25-Sep) : There is no rule.
greengold (25-Sep) : The NFL needs to enforce the rule or get rid of the rule.
greengold (25-Sep) : Players stood for the National Anthem long before 2009. There just was no *rule* requiring them to stand.
steveishere (25-Sep) : How many fans are in the restroom taking a dump or in line for nachos during anthem. Same people probably mad at players
Porforis (25-Sep) : Yup.
Zero2Cool (25-Sep) : You know why
Porforis (25-Sep) : NFL players weren't even on the field for the anthem until 2009 - Why all of a sudden is not participating such a big deal?
Zero2Cool (25-Sep) : Former Seahawks/Packers HC Mike Holmgren on President Trump: “He’s uninformed”.
steveishere (25-Sep) : Funny how you were apparently fine with seeing guys who abuse women or do/sell drugs out there but god forbid they kneel lol
steveishere (25-Sep) : you had 1 foot out the door since Favre left anyways... bye
dhazer (25-Sep) : well so much for watching Packer games, I saw the 3 sitting on the bench and i turned the channel to the race, No more NFL games for me
beast (25-Sep) : Who are the longshots? Jags? Saints? Redskins? and who?
SINCITYCHEEZE (25-Sep) : Buckeye closing in on 4 Longshots in Pickem today....Son you need to hook me up we could make a killing on some parlays next weekend. Lol
beast (25-Sep) : Bears ran it 60% of the time...
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

2h / Around The NFL / PackFanWithTwins

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6h / Around The NFL / Smokey

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

Headlines