Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
12 Pages«<56789>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline QCHuskerFan  
#61 Posted : Thursday, February 20, 2014 10:40:22 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 12/30/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 202
Applause Received: 271
Trading for more 2014 picks by using your 2015 picks is like spending your entire paycheck on the lottery. Yes, you might win and therefore have no needs in the future. But the reality is that you won't win, and you'll be bankrupt in the future.

When haven't the Packers (Or any team) headed into the offseason with some major needs? Remember 2012? No running game? Needed a back badly in the 1st round. Which became the 2nd. Who became the ROY. Imagine if in 2012 draft, in an effort to improve the OLB position, Ted Thompson traded 2013 2nd to move up and get ________. Then we enter 2013 with RB needs and no pick.

Yes, we need some new starters. I would expect the average NFL team is 'replacing' about 1 in 6 starters every offseason. Including Kickers, there are 24 starters. So we need 4 new ones. S, DL, TE, and ILB. Sounds about right.

Actually, it's probably higher than 1 in 6. On Offense, from 2013 playoff game, we may have a new starting RT, C, TE, WR, and FB in game 1 of 2014. And that's on a dang good offense. Nearly half of starters. Yes, some will be filled internally from young or recovered players, but replaced they will be.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
musccy on 2/20/2014(UTC)
Offline Zero2Cool  
#62 Posted : Thursday, February 20, 2014 11:49:26 AM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,503
Applause Received: 4,050
warhawk said: Go to Quoted Post
Well, if you can't come back from injury you don't belong in the NFL.
How many players DON'T get hurt? They all get hurt sometime or another.

Today's world of medicine allows full recovery from knee and other injuries and dozens of players come back every year that proves this.

The only players I wonder about coming back at full strength is Sherrod because THAT was a bad injury and Finley because neck/spine is where you can talk about careers being over.

The other guys? No. A foot? A thumb? A hammy? Please. If every team looked at the end of year injury report and said "well, don't count on any of those guys" they would all be in a major rebuilding project every year.


I believe every player plays HURT. Fingernail, twisted ankle, what have you.

Packers players are getting INJURED and it seem like a lot.


I believe the roster has a lot of talent, but just not enough UMPHF to stay on the field. Maybe its bad luck?
User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#63 Posted : Thursday, February 20, 2014 11:55:53 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2015

United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 670
Applause Received: 489
What a bunch of negativist CRAP! The Packers are FAR from being in/winning the Super Bowl? Come On!

First of all, if things fell right, it's entirely possible we could go all the way with pure crap on defense and with a shaky O-Line - Aaron Rodgers is that good.

Secondly, we will be infinitely better on defense just by getting rid of Raji and Pickett. In addition, however, all the negative crap notwithstanding, we will be greatly improved also by having back all those injured players for a full season - even minus an average amount of injuries next season.

We lost by 3 lousy points to arguably one of the top three teams in the NFL - having Rodgers back, yes, but still pretty crippled by injuries. I really don't see any reason we can't beat Seattle either.

And all of that is saying nothing about additions - hopefully a good draft, hopefully Thompson departing just a little bit from his ways and picking up a quality Safety and/or LB.

Hell No, we aren't far from Super Bowl quality. With just equal luck with injuries and in other areas, we are right there with the best right now.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
musccy on 2/20/2014(UTC)
Offline yooperfan  
#64 Posted : Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:12:44 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2014PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2016

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Ishpeming Michigan
Applause Given: 1,634
Applause Received: 648
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
What a bunch of negativist CRAP! The Packers are FAR from being in/winning the Super Bowl? Come On!

First of all, if things fell right, it's entirely possible we could go all the way with pure crap on defense and with a shaky O-Line - Aaron Rodgers is that good.

Secondly, we will be infinitely better on defense just by getting rid of Raji and Pickett. In addition, however, all the negative crap notwithstanding, we will be greatly improved also by having back all those injured players for a full season - even minus an average amount of injuries next season.

We lost by 3 lousy points to arguably one of the top three teams in the NFL - having Rodgers back, yes, but still pretty crippled by injuries. I really don't see any reason we can't beat Seattle either.

And all of that is saying nothing about additions - hopefully a good draft, hopefully Thompson departing just a little bit from his ways and picking up a quality Safety and/or LB.

Hell No, we aren't far from Super Bowl quality. With just equal luck with injuries and in other areas, we are right there with the best right now.


You know, you just may be right on this.
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

thanks Post received 2 applause.
buckeyepackfan on 2/20/2014(UTC), wpr on 2/20/2014(UTC)
Offline play2win  
#65 Posted : Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:08:53 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 724
That's dream world material. Google-eyed NFC North Division Champ illusions…. Our division sucked so bad that they are thinking of changing the rules for playoff seeding and whether or not division champs are automatic qualifiers.

Again, we did not beat one team with a winning record last year, and we ranked 31st in the NFL on defense. Until we get a defense other teams have to contend with, we will remain pretenders.

Who here did not see that defense wins championships this past season? The last two times we won the SB we had phenomenal defenses, loaded with playmakers. That just simply is not the case today.

What is more negative? Looking at our true standing in this league, or pretending everything is alright just because we have Aaron Rodgers?

We had a healthy Aaron Rodgers in both 2011 and in 2012, and we didn't finish the job because we had the very same issues affecting our play on defense. We are talking 3 years later about the exact same needs. SSALY. Three years running.

And, this horse shit about trading a future pick being akin to throwing salary on a lottery ticket. Puhleeeease! That is the kind of garbage that keeps people from taking any chances.

Did SEA not take any chances? WOW. Look what they just did.

Every draft choice includes a fair amount of risk. I'm simply open to Ted possibly trading away next year's R1 if he sees a player available that he deems worthy of such a move. That would have to be a pretty good player, right? That same player will still be on the roster next season, right? Well, what the hell's the problem? If we get 2 really good players into our system this year from R1 instead of 1, that extra player will have a full year of NFL experience under his belt by 2015.

Am I expecting him to do so? Hell no. But, if he did, I would welcome the move. I'd rather bolster a depleted defense with more top picks this year than wait. That's all.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
wpr on 2/20/2014(UTC)
Offline steveishere  
#66 Posted : Thursday, February 20, 2014 3:00:17 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 58
Applause Received: 1,763
How the crap are you expecting to get another 1st rounder this year with next years first round pick?
Offline QCHuskerFan  
#67 Posted : Thursday, February 20, 2014 3:14:35 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 12/30/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 202
Applause Received: 271
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post

Who here did not see that defense wins championships this past season?


And in 2013, the #17 Defense (ranked even lower than the feeble Packers, by the way) beat the #3 Defense for the Super Bowl title. So evidently, Defense doesn't always win. Sorry.

But you were right in 2012. The #27 D beat the #31 D for the title. Clearly, Defense wins championships based on this! What's that? You mean 2 teams ranked in the worst 6 defensive teams in the league played in the Super Bowl??? Heresy!

In 2011 Super Bowl, the Packers won with the #5 D!!! Of course the Steelers lost and their D was ranked... #2.

What's this mean? Absolutely nothing.

The 2013 Houston Texans had the #7 ranked defense! And won 2 games.

In 2013, the #6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, & 18 teams did not make the playoffs. The #19 team did and made it all the way to the Super Bowl.

Again? Nothing.

Seattle was the first team to win the Super Bowl in the last 10 years without a prototypical Franchise QB. Does that mean that the Patriots, Broncos, Saints, Steelers, Packers are all going to drop their studs and go with the new trend of young, short and average at QB? I doubt it, but I might be wrong.

Yes, the D needs to get better. But not at the cost of the future.

Offline QCHuskerFan  
#68 Posted : Thursday, February 20, 2014 3:21:34 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 12/30/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 202
Applause Received: 271
Let's not forget what it took the Redskins to move up in the 2012 draft. Just to move up. Not to add a pick. It took 2 1st and a 2nd, in addition to their 2012 1st.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
musccy on 2/20/2014(UTC)
Online musccy  
#69 Posted : Thursday, February 20, 2014 6:37:34 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 5/7/2009(UTC)
Location: Pennsylvania
Applause Given: 777
Applause Received: 759
warhawk said: Go to Quoted Post
Well, if you can't come back from injury you don't belong in the NFL.
How many players DON'T get hurt? They all get hurt sometime or another.

Today's world of medicine allows full recovery from knee and other injuries and dozens of players come back every year that proves this.

The only players I wonder about coming back at full strength is Sherrod because THAT was a bad injury and Finley because neck/spine is where you can talk about careers being over.

The other guys? No. A foot? A thumb? A hammy? Please. If every team looked at the end of year injury report and said "well, don't count on any of those guys" they would all be in a major rebuilding project every year.


I would have applauded you twice for this, but since I can't, I'll just quote you and say nice post!

It's conceivably possible that maybe 1 or 2 of the injured won't return to prior form, but to assume none will?

Online musccy  
#70 Posted : Thursday, February 20, 2014 6:46:18 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 5/7/2009(UTC)
Location: Pennsylvania
Applause Given: 777
Applause Received: 759
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post


Every draft choice includes a fair amount of risk. I'm simply open to Ted possibly trading away next year's R1 if he sees a player available that he deems worthy of such a move. That would have to be a pretty good player, right? That same player will still be on the roster next season, right? Well, what the hell's the problem? If we get 2 really good players into our system this year from R1 instead of 1, that extra player will have a full year of NFL experience under his belt by 2015.

Am I expecting him to do so? Hell no. But, if he did, I would welcome the move. I'd rather bolster a depleted defense with more top picks this year than wait. That's all.


From the Seahawks' depth chart online, here is their starting D's roster's draft position/year.

Bryant - #121 2008
McDaniel - undrafted FA 2006
Mebane - #85 2007
Clemons - undrafted FA 2003
Irvin - #15 2012
Wagner - #47 2012
Smith - #242 2012
Sherman - #154 2011
Maxwell - #173 2011
Chancellor - #133 2010
Thomas - #14 2010

Every starter behind their DL is from their last 4 draft classes, and only 2/11ths of their defense is from the 1st RD. So why must the Packers trade up into Rd 1 to get a top-notch defense?
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
12 Pages«<56789>»
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Smokey (10m) : Ice down the Beer and get the food ready. I'm going Tex/Mex today !
Nonstopdrivel (13m) : Tom Brady has appeared in more conference championships than the Packers franchise has in its entire history.
Nonstopdrivel (15m) : Packers would be the first team in NFL history to make the Super Bowl after starting 4-6 or worse.
Nonstopdrivel (15m) : 5+ straight games.
Nonstopdrivel (16m) : The NFC Championship is the first game (regular season or playoffs) since the 1970 merger featuring two teams that have scored 30+ points in
Zero2Cool (20m) : Good news! @AtlantaFalcons scored more points than anyone this regular season. Bad news? Last 6 teams to do that haven't won Super Bowl
uffda udfa (2h) : Like a night before Christmas or opening Packers weekend...hard to sleep.
uffda udfa (4h) : Staying up late enough so that when U wake up it's game time.
buckeyepackfan (5h) : Exactly! Only a matter of time! GAMEDAY! GO! PACK! GO!
beast (6h) : BOOM!!!!
buckeyepackfan (6h) : TICK, TICK, TICK ????
GoPack1984 (7h) : It's NFC Championship day! Go Pack Go!!!!
uffda udfa (10h) : The Boss picks the Falcons: [TWITTER]788447079446130688[/TWITTER]
uffda udfa (10h) : Is there a prediction thread somewhere on the forum for the Falcons game?
uffda udfa (10h) : Lookout porous Falcons secondary!
Zero2Cool (11h) : uh oh'
uffda udfa (11h) : Jordy, Davante and GMO all playing tomorrow.
uffda udfa (15h) : MM is such a creature of habit that this is going to upset his apple cart.
uffda udfa (15h) : Waited 2 hours than bused 125 miles to Milwaukee.
uffda udfa (15h) : Fog forces Packers to alter flight to Atlanta.
uffda udfa (15h) : Hoping Max McCaffery is the next Adam Thielen and right soon.
uffda udfa (16h) : Everyone knew Tate got away with OPI and even he said so.
uffda udfa (16h) : http://www.packershome.com/forum/posts/m218900-UN-Fucking-Believable#post218900
uffda udfa (16h) : Golden Tate pushed off big time in Seattle. I said it then.
Zero2Cool (16h) : Max McCaffrey Added to Roster, J.C. Tretter Subtracted
Zero2Cool (16h) : Read what I said about Hail Mary plays and referees letting players play. Got it? Good.
Zero2Cool (16h) : I absolutely would not. Don't dare presume to speak for me. WTF.
uffda udfa (16h) : Had it been other way around I would've been screaming and so would u.
uffda udfa (17h) : It's just true. I try hard to see it and tell it like it is. Was OPI.
Zero2Cool (19h) : which is of course ok, i just personally see it as weird.
Zero2Cool (20h) : Just odd that a Packers fan points out when Packers perceived to get away with something, yet ignore opponent. Weird.
Zero2Cool (20h) : Packers added RB Christine Michael (back) to the injury report as questionable
uffda udfa (20h) : Not diminishing anything. He got away with OPI. Didn't notice before. Was in airport.
Zero2Cool (22h) : Bahahahahahahha GO PACK GO!!!!
Zero2Cool (22h) : when you're buying your Super Bowl LI Champion gear, be critical of that too!
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
22m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

30m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

44m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / The_Green_Ninja

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / flep

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / hardrocker950

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast


Packers Headlines