Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
6 Pages«<6

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
nerdmann  
#141 Posted : Wednesday, June 25, 2014 5:52:22 PM(UTC)
uffda udfa said: Go to Quoted Post
Brett Favre the best ever? [duh] There's no way in the world the "best ever" throws that many stupid interceptions in his career. Guy most fun to watch...maybe...but no way in the world is he the best ever or even the best ever in Green Bay. I would take Aaron Rodgers 10 times out of 10 over Brett Favre even if Aaron's career was already over today.



Brett was the best ever at being blackmailed to take a dive in the playoffs year after year.
Dexter_Sinister  
#142 Posted : Wednesday, June 25, 2014 6:37:08 PM(UTC)
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
And 7>5. Do you rate Otto Graham above all quarterbacks ever?


Tied for 2nd with Rodgers and Sammy Baugh.
Dexter_Sinister  
#143 Posted : Wednesday, June 25, 2014 6:40:19 PM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
Gosh, did I ignite this "RING" firestorm? And just by commenting that Aaron Rodgers is the greatest QB in this history of the world? Actually, I didn't even word it right; I shoulda said Rodgers WILL BE the greatest QB in history by the time he his done. Right now, that honor goes to BRETT FAVRE!

Jump Ball hahahaha.

I say again, Bart Starr was the hero of the team I loved growing up. However, who you have playing with you and coaching makes a huge difference in winning championships. It also makes a difference who is playing against you, including how many teams are even in the league.


Favre breaks the top 40 if he is lucky. He probably gets pushed out of that if Wilson can keep it up until he has the minimum number of passing attempts that qualifies for having a career.

Favre isn't even the 3rd best Packer QB.
Wade  
#144 Posted : Wednesday, June 25, 2014 7:02:50 PM(UTC)
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
And 7>5. Do you rate Otto Graham above all quarterbacks ever?


That's tough, for two reasons:

1. I never saw Graham play outside of occasional highlight reels.
2. The difference between 5 and 7 (40% bigger) and between 1 and 5 (400% bigger) is a lot smaller. An order of magnitude smaller, in fact.

So Graham v. Starr is a toughie.

Graham v. Rodgers? That's easy.

Graham.

mi_keys  
#145 Posted : Wednesday, June 25, 2014 7:48:24 PM(UTC)
Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
That's tough, for two reasons:

1. I never saw Graham play outside of occasional highlight reels.
2. The difference between 5 and 7 (40% bigger) and between 1 and 5 (400% bigger) is a lot smaller. An order of magnitude smaller, in fact.

So Graham v. Starr is a toughie.

Graham v. Rodgers? That's easy.

Graham.



From a percentage basis, 1 is immeasurably larger than 0, does that make Dilfer over Marino an easy decision?
nerdmann  
#146 Posted : Wednesday, June 25, 2014 8:21:28 PM(UTC)
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
From a percentage basis, 1 is immeasurably larger than 0, does that make Dilfer over Marino an easy decision?


Say what you want about Dilfer, but he wasn't out there trying to pad his stats to the detriment of the rest of the team.
mi_keys  
#147 Posted : Thursday, June 26, 2014 4:01:24 AM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Say what you want about Dilfer, but he wasn't out there trying to pad his stats to the detriment of the rest of the team.


[laughing] [laughing] [laughing] [laughing] [laughing] [laughing] [laughing] [laughing] [laughing] [laughing] [laughing] [laughing]

Right... he just skipped straight over the padding and right to the detriment part.
steveishere  
#148 Posted : Thursday, June 26, 2014 4:04:39 AM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Say what you want about Dilfer, but he wasn't out there trying to pad his stats to the detriment of the rest of the team.


If you were referring to Brees or Stafford or someone who throws the ball 40+ times a game no matter the situation I could see it but you are referring to Rodgers who doesn't pad his stats at all so you are just full of shit. Of course you won't have any proof or reasoning to offer up like you haven't for years you'll just keep on spouting the same bullshit that doesn't even make sense.
nerdmann  
#149 Posted : Thursday, June 26, 2014 5:12:03 AM(UTC)
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
If you were referring to Brees or Stafford or someone who throws the ball 40+ times a game no matter the situation I could see it but you are referring to Rodgers who doesn't pad his stats at all so you are just full of shit. Of course you won't have any proof or reasoning to offer up like you haven't for years you'll just keep on spouting the same bullshit that doesn't even make sense.


I actually watch the games.
sschind  
#150 Posted : Thursday, June 26, 2014 6:04:45 AM(UTC)
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
I've honestly never heard anyone claim Otto Graham as the greatest quarterback ever. He hardly ever gets mentioned in my experience, which is a shame because he deserves to be discussed as one of the greats. I just wouldn't rate him number 1.

I'm aware it will probably never go away, but it's not going to stop me from dispising it as an argument. It's, at best, intellectually dishonest, which is I suppose the point you're making about whatever works to your advantage.


You may be right. I sometimes get the old guys confused, and why not, I am an confused old guy myself. I think I was thinking of Sammy Baugh and not Otto Graham.

I don't like it as an argument either. It totally disregards the other players on the team not to mention coaching and all the other intangibles. You can take the best QB ever (we will find out who that is in the other thread) and put him on some of those Packers teams of the 70's and 80's and they still were not winning division much less the Super Bowl and guys like Dilfer prove it takes a village.
Wade  
#151 Posted : Thursday, June 26, 2014 10:03:38 AM(UTC)
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
From a percentage basis, 1 is immeasurably larger than 0, does that make Dilfer over Marino an easy decision?


The percentage function is not defined over the range [0,1], only over the range (0,1].





mi_keys  
#152 Posted : Thursday, June 26, 2014 11:27:59 AM(UTC)
Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
The percentage function is not defined over the range [0,1], only over the range (0,1].







That's why I said immeasurably and not infinitely... though maybe you still have me on a technicality?
Wade  
#153 Posted : Friday, June 27, 2014 6:42:13 AM(UTC)
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
That's why I said immeasurably and not infinitely... though maybe you still have me on a technicality?


Nah....Your point is valid, I was just being an asshole.

Again.

[grin1]
mi_keys  
#154 Posted : Friday, June 27, 2014 7:50:40 AM(UTC)
Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
Nah....Your point is valid, I was just being an asshole.

Again.

[grin1]


Cheers!

From one asshole to another.
Dexter_Sinister  
#155 Posted : Sunday, June 29, 2014 7:10:56 PM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
I actually watch the games.


Rodgers does what it takes to win games. High completion %, High TD%, High yards per attempt and Low INT% win games. But doing that also increases the stats.

Which is he doing. Winning games so the stats go up or increasing stats to win games?

Regardless, playing to win increases stats that coorelate to winning.

If Rodgers was just out to increase his stats, he would be throwing it more than Stafford and Brees.

Rodgers throws it better. Not more.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
6 Pages«<6
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
yinzer (17m) : what??
Zero2Cool (21m) : Today's Birthdays: mi_keys (29)
Zero2Cool (22m) : Steelers Will Remain In Locker Room During National Anthem
Zero2Cool (25m) : thanks
buckeyepackfan (5h) : Good Morning Packer Fans! Gameday! GO! PACK! GO!
buckeyepackfan (5h) : Happy Belated Birthday Z2C!
beast (10h) : Happy Birthday
wpr (16h) : Hope you had a great day Z.
uffda udfa (19h) : Happy Birthday, Z.
macbob (23-Sep) : Z2C-Hope you had a wonderful birthday! Thanks for providing us a great place to hang out.
Smokey (23-Sep) : Anyone watching the Utah vs Arizona tonight .
Cheesey (22-Sep) : No..."Fired FROM the forge!"LOL!
Smokey (21-Sep) : A "Forged in Fire" wash out ? LOL
Cheesey (21-Sep) : Zero got cut??? I TOLD him not to play with knives!
uffda udfa (21-Sep) : Spriggs to IR.
uffda udfa (21-Sep) : Nick Perry having surgery on finger likely out this week.
Zero2Cool (21-Sep) : Ravens add RB John Crockett from the practice squad to active.
Zero2Cool (21-Sep) : No Cobb this sunday??
buckeyepackfan (21-Sep) : Was a nice run Zero, always that chance they bring you back! :)
Zero2Cool (21-Sep) : I did.
gbguy20 (20-Sep) : francois is back. so who got cut?
Zero2Cool (20-Sep) : Football Sunday at 8:30AM CT ...nice
beast (20-Sep) : Would of had to give us a draft pick if they kept him. They just wanted him until someone else got off a suspension.
gbguy20 (20-Sep) : surprised they didn't keep him until they played us
Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : Cowboys have waived linebacker Jayrone Elliott, who was acquired in a trade from the Green Bay Packers
Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : ClayMatthews52 is awfully close to setting the #Packers all-time sack record.
uffda udfa (19-Sep) : Pelissero: Banged up on o-line, #Packers worked out 3 today, per source: Fahn Cooper, Givens Price and Brandon Thomas.
Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : Yup, PFT flips to whatever gets clickys
Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : Reuben Foster (ankle) sheds walking boot (and some wanted him as a Packers player!)
gbguy20 (19-Sep) : pft was raving abot gb last week
Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : Bash packers = ratings. nothing more. unreal how dumb some places are
Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : PFT is stupid
uffda udfa (19-Sep) : from pft.com rankings: 6. Packers (1-1; No. 1): Take away Rodgers, and the Packers wouldn’t win a game.
uffda udfa (19-Sep) : Yes. Sorry.
Zero2Cool (19-Sep) : "We are hypnotized by the talent of Aaron Rodgers" | @ColinCowherd
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
23-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

23-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

22-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

22-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

22-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

21-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

21-Sep / Around The NFL / Cheesey

21-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

20-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

20-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

20-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

19-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Poppa San

19-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

19-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

Headlines