Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
6 Pages«<6

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
nerdmann  
#141 Posted : Wednesday, June 25, 2014 5:52:22 PM(UTC)
uffda udfa said: Go to Quoted Post
Brett Favre the best ever? [duh] There's no way in the world the "best ever" throws that many stupid interceptions in his career. Guy most fun to watch...maybe...but no way in the world is he the best ever or even the best ever in Green Bay. I would take Aaron Rodgers 10 times out of 10 over Brett Favre even if Aaron's career was already over today.



Brett was the best ever at being blackmailed to take a dive in the playoffs year after year.
Dexter_Sinister  
#142 Posted : Wednesday, June 25, 2014 6:37:08 PM(UTC)
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
And 7>5. Do you rate Otto Graham above all quarterbacks ever?


Tied for 2nd with Rodgers and Sammy Baugh.
Dexter_Sinister  
#143 Posted : Wednesday, June 25, 2014 6:40:19 PM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
Gosh, did I ignite this "RING" firestorm? And just by commenting that Aaron Rodgers is the greatest QB in this history of the world? Actually, I didn't even word it right; I shoulda said Rodgers WILL BE the greatest QB in history by the time he his done. Right now, that honor goes to BRETT FAVRE!

Jump Ball hahahaha.

I say again, Bart Starr was the hero of the team I loved growing up. However, who you have playing with you and coaching makes a huge difference in winning championships. It also makes a difference who is playing against you, including how many teams are even in the league.


Favre breaks the top 40 if he is lucky. He probably gets pushed out of that if Wilson can keep it up until he has the minimum number of passing attempts that qualifies for having a career.

Favre isn't even the 3rd best Packer QB.
Wade  
#144 Posted : Wednesday, June 25, 2014 7:02:50 PM(UTC)
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
And 7>5. Do you rate Otto Graham above all quarterbacks ever?


That's tough, for two reasons:

1. I never saw Graham play outside of occasional highlight reels.
2. The difference between 5 and 7 (40% bigger) and between 1 and 5 (400% bigger) is a lot smaller. An order of magnitude smaller, in fact.

So Graham v. Starr is a toughie.

Graham v. Rodgers? That's easy.

Graham.

mi_keys  
#145 Posted : Wednesday, June 25, 2014 7:48:24 PM(UTC)
Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
That's tough, for two reasons:

1. I never saw Graham play outside of occasional highlight reels.
2. The difference between 5 and 7 (40% bigger) and between 1 and 5 (400% bigger) is a lot smaller. An order of magnitude smaller, in fact.

So Graham v. Starr is a toughie.

Graham v. Rodgers? That's easy.

Graham.



From a percentage basis, 1 is immeasurably larger than 0, does that make Dilfer over Marino an easy decision?
nerdmann  
#146 Posted : Wednesday, June 25, 2014 8:21:28 PM(UTC)
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
From a percentage basis, 1 is immeasurably larger than 0, does that make Dilfer over Marino an easy decision?


Say what you want about Dilfer, but he wasn't out there trying to pad his stats to the detriment of the rest of the team.
mi_keys  
#147 Posted : Thursday, June 26, 2014 4:01:24 AM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Say what you want about Dilfer, but he wasn't out there trying to pad his stats to the detriment of the rest of the team.


[laughing] [laughing] [laughing] [laughing] [laughing] [laughing] [laughing] [laughing] [laughing] [laughing] [laughing] [laughing]

Right... he just skipped straight over the padding and right to the detriment part.
steveishere  
#148 Posted : Thursday, June 26, 2014 4:04:39 AM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Say what you want about Dilfer, but he wasn't out there trying to pad his stats to the detriment of the rest of the team.


If you were referring to Brees or Stafford or someone who throws the ball 40+ times a game no matter the situation I could see it but you are referring to Rodgers who doesn't pad his stats at all so you are just full of shit. Of course you won't have any proof or reasoning to offer up like you haven't for years you'll just keep on spouting the same bullshit that doesn't even make sense.
nerdmann  
#149 Posted : Thursday, June 26, 2014 5:12:03 AM(UTC)
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
If you were referring to Brees or Stafford or someone who throws the ball 40+ times a game no matter the situation I could see it but you are referring to Rodgers who doesn't pad his stats at all so you are just full of shit. Of course you won't have any proof or reasoning to offer up like you haven't for years you'll just keep on spouting the same bullshit that doesn't even make sense.


I actually watch the games.
sschind  
#150 Posted : Thursday, June 26, 2014 6:04:45 AM(UTC)
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
I've honestly never heard anyone claim Otto Graham as the greatest quarterback ever. He hardly ever gets mentioned in my experience, which is a shame because he deserves to be discussed as one of the greats. I just wouldn't rate him number 1.

I'm aware it will probably never go away, but it's not going to stop me from dispising it as an argument. It's, at best, intellectually dishonest, which is I suppose the point you're making about whatever works to your advantage.


You may be right. I sometimes get the old guys confused, and why not, I am an confused old guy myself. I think I was thinking of Sammy Baugh and not Otto Graham.

I don't like it as an argument either. It totally disregards the other players on the team not to mention coaching and all the other intangibles. You can take the best QB ever (we will find out who that is in the other thread) and put him on some of those Packers teams of the 70's and 80's and they still were not winning division much less the Super Bowl and guys like Dilfer prove it takes a village.
Wade  
#151 Posted : Thursday, June 26, 2014 10:03:38 AM(UTC)
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
From a percentage basis, 1 is immeasurably larger than 0, does that make Dilfer over Marino an easy decision?


The percentage function is not defined over the range [0,1], only over the range (0,1].





mi_keys  
#152 Posted : Thursday, June 26, 2014 11:27:59 AM(UTC)
Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
The percentage function is not defined over the range [0,1], only over the range (0,1].







That's why I said immeasurably and not infinitely... though maybe you still have me on a technicality?
Wade  
#153 Posted : Friday, June 27, 2014 6:42:13 AM(UTC)
mi_keys said: Go to Quoted Post
That's why I said immeasurably and not infinitely... though maybe you still have me on a technicality?


Nah....Your point is valid, I was just being an asshole.

Again.

[grin1]
mi_keys  
#154 Posted : Friday, June 27, 2014 7:50:40 AM(UTC)
Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
Nah....Your point is valid, I was just being an asshole.

Again.

[grin1]


Cheers!

From one asshole to another.
Dexter_Sinister  
#155 Posted : Sunday, June 29, 2014 7:10:56 PM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
I actually watch the games.


Rodgers does what it takes to win games. High completion %, High TD%, High yards per attempt and Low INT% win games. But doing that also increases the stats.

Which is he doing. Winning games so the stats go up or increasing stats to win games?

Regardless, playing to win increases stats that coorelate to winning.

If Rodgers was just out to increase his stats, he would be throwing it more than Stafford and Brees.

Rodgers throws it better. Not more.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
6 Pages«<6
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Nonstopdrivel (2h) : should have done*
Zero2Cool (18h) : Hi šŸ˜ŠšŸ˜‰
TheKanataThrilla (21-Feb) : I guess I should have did a refresh when I walked away from the computer.
TheKanataThrilla (21-Feb) : Peters is 25 with one year left on his contract at just over $3M
Zero2Cool (21-Feb) : Mel Kiper sticks with Marcus Davenport to GB in 2nd mock
Zero2Cool (21-Feb) : As for Marcus Peters, how old is he an what's his contract years left?
Zero2Cool (21-Feb) : Packers got tired of Sitton's antics.
Zero2Cool (21-Feb) : Sitton was released not because of play or salary, but personality. He will not be re-signed.
TheKanataThrilla (21-Feb) : If we are planning on possibly cutting Cobb I can see the 2nd round pick. A second round pick for Peters is a pretty good deal.
Smokey (21-Feb) : I'd offer Cobb + a 3rd round pick + a 6th round pick in 2019 for the CB Peters from KC.
TheKanataThrilla (21-Feb) : I guess that is a highter round pick
TheKanataThrilla (21-Feb) : Suggestion was a 2nd round pick. I would want a lower round pick. I think that is too much. A 3rd or 4th seems about right.
Smokey (21-Feb) : Cobb and WHAT PICK ?
TheKanataThrilla (21-Feb) : A suggestion I saw was a trade of Cobb and a Pick for Peters. I think that would be a great move.
Smokey (21-Feb) : Sitton was drafted be GB in 2008, not a young man at this point, but still is a "bear" of a man.
Cheesey (21-Feb) : Sitton? Maybe if the price is right.
Cheesey (21-Feb) : I doubt the Packers would try to resign Sutton. But who knows? If the price is right?
Zero2Cool (20-Feb) : Bears declining option on Josh Sitton. He'll be Free Agent.
Zero2Cool (20-Feb) : Chiefs CB Marcus Peters trade rumors -- come to Packers!
Smokey (20-Feb) : Join us in Packershome and be part of the discussion today .
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Elizabeeth ... good bye
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Saturday, August 19, 2017
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : That's dedicated spammng!
Nonstopdrivel (19-Feb) : For some reason, I had to flush my DNS cache to access this site from my laptop today.
Nonstopdrivel (19-Feb) : I prefer toads to frogs, Smokey, thank you very much.
Rockmolder (19-Feb) : My girlfriends says thanks, Rourke.
Smokey (19-Feb) : Nonstopdrivel that you most likely say to all the frogs you meet .
Nonstopdrivel (19-Feb) : Rockmolder's avatar is so fucking sexy.
gbguy20 (19-Feb) : never seen the interview before. tough to listen to. can't believe it was 7 years ago
gbguy20 (19-Feb) : just watched a nick Collins tribute on yourube. the end featured an interview with nick reflecting on his injury
buckeyepackfan (17-Feb) : Saints De'Vante Harris nothing but a POS!!!!! Look up his tweetes on Florida killings!!
Nonstopdrivel (17-Feb) : They're laying new gas line near my house. The trucks are all from a company in Madison.
Smokey (14-Feb) : 2018 Hall o Fame Game/Aug.2,2018/Ravens vs Bears
Zero2Cool (13-Feb) : Based off 2017 records, Packers have toughest schedule for 2018
Smokey (13-Feb) : Wow, tough new 2018 Packer Schedule !
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
26m / Random Babble / Smokey

26m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

23h / Random Babble / Smokey

21-Feb / Random Babble / Pack93z

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

17-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rockmolder

16-Feb / Around The NFL / Cheesey

15-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines