Raiders sign Richardson to offer sheet· Page 3

greengold
Member

9 years ago

#21

What a savant you are. Is that half a word?

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#22

Just read another article in news feed.

Details of the contract is putting me on the fence.

All but $200,000.00
Of the money is guaranteed.

Ted may balk at matching such a contract.

With Burnette and HHCD safely pencilled in as the starters and Hydes ability to move around, Richardson may very well be on his way out.

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

yooperfan
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#23

It seems to me that he is a big guy and a hard hitter but he has never developed.
IMO he is not an important piece to the puzzle and Ted should let him move on.

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#24

Sean Richardson is brutal in coverage (kind of important for a S). Is a guy blessed with all the measurables but isn't a true football player. He was with Casey Hayward at Vandy...I watched YouTube clips of him after we got him...it was said the guy had no instincts and the clips they showed of him sure proved that. He just looked lost and took some of the worst angles you possibly could on a football field. Not sure why the Raiders are interested. Good bye.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

gbguy20
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#25

I'll assume that your information is correct, even though you've not stated from where you got it. How many were with the practice squad ? How many will never make it to be a starter ?

Now I see the Packers loosing ILB's and CB's , and magically determine that those positions will need to be filled. :signduh:

Before Lacey, I saw that The Packers needed a Running Back, when ALL cried that the passing attack was all that was needed .

Last off-season , I foresaw the greatest need at the safety position. Then appears Ha Ha Clinton-Dix to the rescue. He will be more of a presence this season , following his rookie season.

I see the obvious and have the courage to speak the truth. That later I find articles penned by professionals that back up my case is just support for what I've been saying all along.

I say that the Packers Offense is in good shape for 2015, yet the Defense needs personal at the CB and ILB positions. In addition, faster/stronger Defensive non-starters will find Special Teams ready to welcome them to the squad.

Originally Posted by: Smokey

I'm almost ready to declare you more ridiculous than uffda. YOU saw that we needed a safety last offseason????!!! It's not as if the entire fan base knew that long before then. YOU saw we needed a running back 2 offseasons ago?! Again, the entire fan base was looking for a more balanced offensive attack. Let me get one thing straight for you, the experts are not waiting for you to tell them what the needs of the Packers are, before they write articles.

Also, while I am at it, the word is spelled offenSe and losing only has one o. As long as you are calling yourself knowledgeable, you might as well be spelling common words correctly.

Wherever you and Uffda came from, I am starting to think he wasn't the only troll hiding under that bridge.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

9 years ago

#26

Come on folks, we are all a little ridiculous, lets keep the poo flinging down a tad, mmmkay, thanks. 🙂

Focus more on the content, than the individual supplying the content.

I'll assume that your information is correct, even though you've not stated from where you got it

Originally Posted by: Smokey

www.Packers.com but who can trust them? :angel11:

Last off-season , I foresaw the greatest need at the safety position. Then appears Ha Ha Clinton-Dix to the rescue. He will be more of a presence this season , following his rookie season.

Originally Posted by: Smokey

You, Stevie Wonder and Ray Charles all saw the same thing.

I see the obvious and have the courage to speak the truth. That later I find articles penned by professionals that back up my case is just support for what I've been saying all along.

Originally Posted by: Smokey

I would encourage you to have the courage to ink up some exclusive articles for PackersHome and put them on the front page. I would truly appreciate the time and effort. I try to do this from time to time, but I think most are tired of my words. lol

sschind
Senior Member

9 years ago

#27

Come on folks, we are all a little ridiculous, lets keep the poo flinging down a tad, mmmkay, thanks. 🙂

Focus more on the content, than the individual supplying the content.

www.Packers.com but who can trust them? :angel11:

You, Stevie Wonder and Ray Charles all saw the same thing.

I would encourage you to have the courage to ink up some exclusive articles for PackersHome and put them on the front page. I would truly appreciate the time and effort. I try to do this from time to time, but I think most are tired of my words. lol

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Um... Ray is dead. Maybe Stevie but a dead guy? I'm willing to bet that even Smokey could see more than a dead guy. I wouldn't bet much but I would bet.

FLORIDA PACKER88
Member

9 years ago

#28

I like him on Special teams and as an occasional in box run support guy but I don't know that he has the coverage ability to be anything more than a part time backup. For that kind of money I think we should let him walk.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

9 years ago

#29

Packers gave him a $1.5 million restricted free agent qualifying offer.

Raiders signed him to a one year offer of a $1.35 million signing bonus, a fully guaranteed $1 million base salary and a $200,000 roster bonus payable at the start of training camp – meaning that essentially the deal is fully guaranteed, per Tom Silverstein and Jason Wilde.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

9 years ago

#30

With Shields and Hayward, why would Ted Thompson want to spend money retaining a player with experience at the position ?

Ok, be upset with me, but I read the off the wall post and just can't help myself sometimes. Do some of you actually read and believe what your post ?

On the other hand, some post are quite intelligent and show focused thought .

Every off-season that I've been in online forums (4 years) , I've been precisely correct about The Packers needs. Also the "experts" back me up in their articles.

As a result it is not easy to read post that sound as if they were written by High School Dropouts on Drugs . I don't expect people to always agree with me, but at least explain the logic behind some of the completely wrong ideas that get posted .

Originally Posted by: Smokey

I think the ADULT way to reply would be better then attacking someone. Just a thought.....maybe the person posting might not be as "intellegent" or "knowledgeable" as you (or as much as you THINK you are). So, do you think insulting their comments is the right thing to do? You did that to me when you first came here. It sure didn't start me off with a high opinion of you.
It would be better to think about what you are going to say, put yourself in the position of the person you are about to reply about, and then think of how it might hurt them.
You could post what you think in a much more thoughtful way, and still make some good points.
Try it some time. It may make what you post not make you look like a jack ass.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (8m) : I hope they take a Punter at 9th overall. Be bold!

Mucky Tundra (49m) : I may end up eating those words but I think they need a lot more talent then their 4 picks can provide

Mucky Tundra (50m) : I really hope they stand pat and Draft a WR

Mucky Tundra (51m) : @DMRussini

Mucky Tundra (51m) : The Chicago Bears are very open for business at 9 and telling teams they are ready to move for the right price, per source

buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend Penei Soul 4yrs - 112mil

buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend St. Brown 4 years 120mil and

Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : Now look, trading up to 13 to take a TE might not seem like a good idea later but it will be later!

dfosterf (24-Apr) : (Your trade up mock post)

dfosterf (24-Apr) : Mucky- The only thing fun to watch would be me flipping the f out if Gute goes up to 13 and grabs Brock Bowers, lol

beast (24-Apr) : DT Byron Murphy II, Texas... whom some believe is the next Aaron Donald (or the closest thing to Donald)

Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : What? And who?

Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : *sad Mucky noises*

Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : @JoeJHoyt Murphy said he’s been told he won’t slide past pick No. 16.

wpr (23-Apr) : Just about time to watch Sonny Weaver stick it to the seahags. I never get tired of it.

Martha Careful (23-Apr) : *game plan

Martha Careful (23-Apr) : IMHO, not even close. He is not a guy you game play around.

Mucky Tundra (23-Apr) : is Aiyuk worth a 1st rounder?

Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : 49ers are seeking a 1st round pick in exchange for WR Brandon Aiyuk

Mucky Tundra (22-Apr) : Based on Gutes comments, now I don't feel as silly having 13 picks in my mock the other day

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Zach Wilson to Broncos.

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Gutekunst says he'd love to have 13 or 14 picks. He's trading back huh lol

beast (22-Apr) : Someday we'll have a draft betting scandal

beast (21-Apr) : Sometimes looking extremely amazing, sometimes looking extremely lost

beast (21-Apr) : I haven't looked into the QBs, but some have suggested Maye has some of the most extremely inconsistent tape they've seen

beast (21-Apr) : Well it also sounds like Patriots are listening to trade offers, not that seriously considering any, but listening means they aren't locked

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Maye needs to be AFC

Mucky Tundra (21-Apr) : Not liking the idea of the Vikings getting Maye

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Vikings HC joked that he may or may not have sent flowers to Bob Kraft. That's where rumor came from.

beast (21-Apr) : Can't tell if this is real or BS, but some rumors about a possible Patriots/Vikings trade for #3 overall

dfosterf (21-Apr) : One playbook to my knowledge. I was shooting for facetious.

beast (20-Apr) : I'm not sure they have different playbooks for different OL positions, and Dillard run blocking is supposedly worse than his pass blocking..

dfosterf (19-Apr) : The only problem with that is he isn't a guard either.

dfosterf (19-Apr) : Put him at right guard. That is where he will be coached. That is where he will compete. He is not even allowed to look at the LT playbook.

dfosterf (18-Apr) : Kidding aside, I hope the best for him.

dfosterf (18-Apr) : Went to a Titans board. One comment there. Not very long. I quote: "LOL" They don't sound overly upset about our aquisition.

beast (18-Apr) : OT Dillard has been absolutely horrible... like OG Newman levels

dfosterf (18-Apr) : Suit him up and have him stand in front of the big board as a draft day cautionary tale.

Zero2Cool (18-Apr) : Packers sign T Andre Dillard.

Mucky Tundra (18-Apr) : Adds most of the information this time of year comes from agents.

Mucky Tundra (18-Apr) : @RealAlexBarth Bill Belichick says accurate draft information doesn't leak from teams until about 12 hours before the draft. Adds most of th

Mucky Tundra (18-Apr) : I am very happy that for moment, Jordan Love seems like a normal human being

Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : Belichick * whatever

Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : "There's a lot of depth at Offensive Tackle and Wide Receiver." Bill Bellichick

Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : Thanks! I can't believe it's over haha

Martha Careful (16-Apr) : Congratulations

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Boom. Student Loan. $0.00. Only took about 20 years.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : Packers DT Kenny Clark: New defensive coordinator Jeff Hafley will 'allow us to be way more disruptive'

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : Saints have agreed to terms on a contract with former Packers wide receiver Equanimeous St. Brown.

beast (12-Apr) : No, but of it's for legislation, then half of the country will find it evil, not good, whatever it says....

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2023 Packers Schedule

Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM

Bears

38 - 20

Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM

Falcons

24 - 25

Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM

SAINTS

18 - 17

Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM

LIONS

20 - 34

Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM

Raiders

13 - 17

Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM

Broncos

17 - 19

Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

10 - 24

Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM

RAMS

20 - 3

Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM

Steelers

19 - 23

Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM

CHARGERS

23 - 20

Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM

Lions

29 - 22

Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM

CHIEFS

27 - 19

Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM

Giants

22 - 24

Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM

BUCCANEERS

20 - 34

Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM

Panthers

33 - 30

Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM

Vikings

33 - 10

Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM

BEARS

17 - 9

Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM

Cowboys

48 - 32

Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM

49ers

21 - 24